diff options
author | Sanjoy Das <sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> | 2016-06-08 17:48:31 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sanjoy Das <sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com> | 2016-06-08 17:48:31 +0000 |
commit | a19edc4d15b0dae0210b90615775edd76f021008 (patch) | |
tree | 0957e2cc19b04b966ac15ff4291feb8641ee02d5 /llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp | |
parent | 86be3748a6f0e288d24054f402f0b9afb0912dc3 (diff) | |
download | llvm-a19edc4d15b0dae0210b90615775edd76f021008.zip llvm-a19edc4d15b0dae0210b90615775edd76f021008.tar.gz llvm-a19edc4d15b0dae0210b90615775edd76f021008.tar.bz2 |
Fix a bug in SCEV's poison value propagation
The worklist algorithm introduced in rL271151 didn't check to see if the
direct users of the post-inc add recurrence propagates poison. This
change fixes the problem and makes the code structure more obvious.
Note for release managers: correctness wise, this bug wasn't a
regression introduced by rL271151 -- the behavior of SCEV around
post-inc add recurrences was strictly improved (in terms of correctness)
in rL271151.
llvm-svn: 272179
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp')
-rw-r--r-- | llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp | 25 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp index d76b0f3..111b9b6 100644 --- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp +++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp @@ -4880,22 +4880,23 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isAddRecNeverPoison(const Instruction *I, const Loop *L) { return false; SmallPtrSet<const Instruction *, 16> Pushed; - SmallVector<const Instruction *, 8> Stack; + SmallVector<const Instruction *, 8> PoisonStack; + // We start by assuming \c I, the post-inc add recurrence, is poison. Only + // things that are known to be fully poison under that assumption go on the + // PoisonStack. Pushed.insert(I); - for (auto *U : I->users()) - if (Pushed.insert(cast<Instruction>(U)).second) - Stack.push_back(cast<Instruction>(U)); + PoisonStack.push_back(I); bool LatchControlDependentOnPoison = false; - while (!Stack.empty()) { - const Instruction *I = Stack.pop_back_val(); - - for (auto *U : I->users()) { - if (propagatesFullPoison(cast<Instruction>(U))) { - if (Pushed.insert(cast<Instruction>(U)).second) - Stack.push_back(cast<Instruction>(U)); - } else if (auto *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(U)) { + while (!PoisonStack.empty()) { + const Instruction *Poison = PoisonStack.pop_back_val(); + + for (auto *PoisonUser : Poison->users()) { + if (propagatesFullPoison(cast<Instruction>(PoisonUser))) { + if (Pushed.insert(cast<Instruction>(PoisonUser)).second) + PoisonStack.push_back(cast<Instruction>(PoisonUser)); + } else if (auto *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(PoisonUser)) { assert(BI->isConditional() && "Only possibility!"); if (BI->getParent() == LatchBB) { LatchControlDependentOnPoison = true; |