aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSanjoy Das <sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com>2016-06-08 17:48:31 +0000
committerSanjoy Das <sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com>2016-06-08 17:48:31 +0000
commita19edc4d15b0dae0210b90615775edd76f021008 (patch)
tree0957e2cc19b04b966ac15ff4291feb8641ee02d5 /llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
parent86be3748a6f0e288d24054f402f0b9afb0912dc3 (diff)
downloadllvm-a19edc4d15b0dae0210b90615775edd76f021008.zip
llvm-a19edc4d15b0dae0210b90615775edd76f021008.tar.gz
llvm-a19edc4d15b0dae0210b90615775edd76f021008.tar.bz2
Fix a bug in SCEV's poison value propagation
The worklist algorithm introduced in rL271151 didn't check to see if the direct users of the post-inc add recurrence propagates poison. This change fixes the problem and makes the code structure more obvious. Note for release managers: correctness wise, this bug wasn't a regression introduced by rL271151 -- the behavior of SCEV around post-inc add recurrences was strictly improved (in terms of correctness) in rL271151. llvm-svn: 272179
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp25
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
index d76b0f3..111b9b6 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp
@@ -4880,22 +4880,23 @@ bool ScalarEvolution::isAddRecNeverPoison(const Instruction *I, const Loop *L) {
return false;
SmallPtrSet<const Instruction *, 16> Pushed;
- SmallVector<const Instruction *, 8> Stack;
+ SmallVector<const Instruction *, 8> PoisonStack;
+ // We start by assuming \c I, the post-inc add recurrence, is poison. Only
+ // things that are known to be fully poison under that assumption go on the
+ // PoisonStack.
Pushed.insert(I);
- for (auto *U : I->users())
- if (Pushed.insert(cast<Instruction>(U)).second)
- Stack.push_back(cast<Instruction>(U));
+ PoisonStack.push_back(I);
bool LatchControlDependentOnPoison = false;
- while (!Stack.empty()) {
- const Instruction *I = Stack.pop_back_val();
-
- for (auto *U : I->users()) {
- if (propagatesFullPoison(cast<Instruction>(U))) {
- if (Pushed.insert(cast<Instruction>(U)).second)
- Stack.push_back(cast<Instruction>(U));
- } else if (auto *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(U)) {
+ while (!PoisonStack.empty()) {
+ const Instruction *Poison = PoisonStack.pop_back_val();
+
+ for (auto *PoisonUser : Poison->users()) {
+ if (propagatesFullPoison(cast<Instruction>(PoisonUser))) {
+ if (Pushed.insert(cast<Instruction>(PoisonUser)).second)
+ PoisonStack.push_back(cast<Instruction>(PoisonUser));
+ } else if (auto *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(PoisonUser)) {
assert(BI->isConditional() && "Only possibility!");
if (BI->getParent() == LatchBB) {
LatchControlDependentOnPoison = true;