aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNikita Popov <npopov@redhat.com>2024-09-02 12:11:03 +0200
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2024-09-02 12:11:03 +0200
commitb9bba6ca9fc62c5ae3ee402196b11a523a500fdc (patch)
tree34906e9f152a39daeaf89b5fa579718ea571ab73 /llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
parentd7100111f41ca314c094987d880d1648b78256af (diff)
downloadllvm-b9bba6ca9fc62c5ae3ee402196b11a523a500fdc.zip
llvm-b9bba6ca9fc62c5ae3ee402196b11a523a500fdc.tar.gz
llvm-b9bba6ca9fc62c5ae3ee402196b11a523a500fdc.tar.bz2
[BasicAA] Track nuw through decomposed expressions (#106512)
When we decompose the GEP offset expression, and the arithmetic is not performed using nuw operations, we cannot retain the nuw flag on the decomposed GEP. For example, if we have `gep nuw p, (a-1)`, this is not at all the same as `gep nuw (gep nuw p, a), -1`. Fix this by tracking NUW through linear expression decomposition, similarly to what we already do for the NSW flag. This fixes the miscompilation reported in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105496#issuecomment-2315322220.
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp31
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
index 72db289..a00ed75 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
@@ -375,24 +375,28 @@ struct LinearExpression {
APInt Scale;
APInt Offset;
+ /// True if all operations in this expression are NUW.
+ bool IsNUW;
/// True if all operations in this expression are NSW.
bool IsNSW;
LinearExpression(const CastedValue &Val, const APInt &Scale,
- const APInt &Offset, bool IsNSW)
- : Val(Val), Scale(Scale), Offset(Offset), IsNSW(IsNSW) {}
+ const APInt &Offset, bool IsNUW, bool IsNSW)
+ : Val(Val), Scale(Scale), Offset(Offset), IsNUW(IsNUW), IsNSW(IsNSW) {}
- LinearExpression(const CastedValue &Val) : Val(Val), IsNSW(true) {
+ LinearExpression(const CastedValue &Val)
+ : Val(Val), IsNUW(true), IsNSW(true) {
unsigned BitWidth = Val.getBitWidth();
Scale = APInt(BitWidth, 1);
Offset = APInt(BitWidth, 0);
}
- LinearExpression mul(const APInt &Other, bool MulIsNSW) const {
+ LinearExpression mul(const APInt &Other, bool MulIsNUW, bool MulIsNSW) const {
// The check for zero offset is necessary, because generally
// (X +nsw Y) *nsw Z does not imply (X *nsw Z) +nsw (Y *nsw Z).
bool NSW = IsNSW && (Other.isOne() || (MulIsNSW && Offset.isZero()));
- return LinearExpression(Val, Scale * Other, Offset * Other, NSW);
+ bool NUW = IsNUW && (Other.isOne() || MulIsNUW);
+ return LinearExpression(Val, Scale * Other, Offset * Other, NUW, NSW);
}
};
}
@@ -408,7 +412,7 @@ static LinearExpression GetLinearExpression(
if (const ConstantInt *Const = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Val.V))
return LinearExpression(Val, APInt(Val.getBitWidth(), 0),
- Val.evaluateWith(Const->getValue()), true);
+ Val.evaluateWith(Const->getValue()), true, true);
if (const BinaryOperator *BOp = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Val.V)) {
if (ConstantInt *RHSC = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BOp->getOperand(1))) {
@@ -444,6 +448,7 @@ static LinearExpression GetLinearExpression(
E = GetLinearExpression(Val.withValue(BOp->getOperand(0), false), DL,
Depth + 1, AC, DT);
E.Offset += RHS;
+ E.IsNUW &= NUW;
E.IsNSW &= NSW;
break;
}
@@ -451,13 +456,14 @@ static LinearExpression GetLinearExpression(
E = GetLinearExpression(Val.withValue(BOp->getOperand(0), false), DL,
Depth + 1, AC, DT);
E.Offset -= RHS;
+ E.IsNUW = false; // sub nuw x, y is not add nuw x, -y.
E.IsNSW &= NSW;
break;
}
case Instruction::Mul:
E = GetLinearExpression(Val.withValue(BOp->getOperand(0), false), DL,
Depth + 1, AC, DT)
- .mul(RHS, NSW);
+ .mul(RHS, NUW, NSW);
break;
case Instruction::Shl:
// We're trying to linearize an expression of the kind:
@@ -472,6 +478,7 @@ static LinearExpression GetLinearExpression(
Depth + 1, AC, DT);
E.Offset <<= RHS.getLimitedValue();
E.Scale <<= RHS.getLimitedValue();
+ E.IsNUW &= NUW;
E.IsNSW &= NSW;
break;
}
@@ -697,7 +704,8 @@ BasicAAResult::DecomposeGEPExpression(const Value *V, const DataLayout &DL,
// If the integer type is smaller than the index size, it is implicitly
// sign extended or truncated to index size.
bool NUSW = GEPOp->hasNoUnsignedSignedWrap();
- bool NonNeg = NUSW && GEPOp->hasNoUnsignedWrap();
+ bool NUW = GEPOp->hasNoUnsignedWrap();
+ bool NonNeg = NUSW && NUW;
unsigned Width = Index->getType()->getIntegerBitWidth();
unsigned SExtBits = IndexSize > Width ? IndexSize - Width : 0;
unsigned TruncBits = IndexSize < Width ? Width - IndexSize : 0;
@@ -706,9 +714,11 @@ BasicAAResult::DecomposeGEPExpression(const Value *V, const DataLayout &DL,
// Scale by the type size.
unsigned TypeSize = AllocTypeSize.getFixedValue();
- LE = LE.mul(APInt(IndexSize, TypeSize), NUSW);
+ LE = LE.mul(APInt(IndexSize, TypeSize), NUW, NUSW);
Decomposed.Offset += LE.Offset.sext(MaxIndexSize);
APInt Scale = LE.Scale.sext(MaxIndexSize);
+ if (!LE.IsNUW)
+ Decomposed.NWFlags = Decomposed.NWFlags.withoutNoUnsignedWrap();
// If we already had an occurrence of this index variable, merge this
// scale into it. For example, we want to handle:
@@ -719,7 +729,8 @@ BasicAAResult::DecomposeGEPExpression(const Value *V, const DataLayout &DL,
areBothVScale(Decomposed.VarIndices[i].Val.V, LE.Val.V)) &&
Decomposed.VarIndices[i].Val.hasSameCastsAs(LE.Val)) {
Scale += Decomposed.VarIndices[i].Scale;
- LE.IsNSW = false; // We cannot guarantee nsw for the merge.
+ // We cannot guarantee no-wrap for the merge.
+ LE.IsNSW = LE.IsNUW = false;
Decomposed.VarIndices.erase(Decomposed.VarIndices.begin() + i);
break;
}