aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMax Kazantsev <mkazantsev@azul.com>2023-02-20 18:38:07 +0700
committerMax Kazantsev <mkazantsev@azul.com>2023-02-20 18:38:07 +0700
commit0cbb8ec030e23c0e13331b5d54155def8c901b36 (patch)
tree0597fc68b3703110cd721de2a3cbb048fccdc1a2 /llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp
parent3e84fc857f28479cd9574f72efcba7eb8f60d602 (diff)
downloadllvm-0cbb8ec030e23c0e13331b5d54155def8c901b36.zip
llvm-0cbb8ec030e23c0e13331b5d54155def8c901b36.tar.gz
llvm-0cbb8ec030e23c0e13331b5d54155def8c901b36.tar.bz2
Revert "[AssumptionCache] caches @llvm.experimental.guard's"
This reverts commit f9599bbc7a3f831e1793a549d8a7a19265f3e504. For some reason it caused us a huge compile time regression in downstream workloads. Not sure whether the source of it is in upstream code ir not. Temporarily reverting until investigated. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D142330
Diffstat (limited to 'llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp')
-rw-r--r--llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp22
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp
index 2d648cc..11796ef 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/AssumptionCache.cpp
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
-// This file contains a pass that keeps track of @llvm.assume and
-// @llvm.experimental.guard intrinsics in the functions of a module.
+// This file contains a pass that keeps track of @llvm.assume intrinsics in
+// the functions of a module.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ findAffectedValues(CallBase *CI, TargetTransformInfo *TTI,
}
}
-void AssumptionCache::updateAffectedValues(CondGuardInst *CI) {
+void AssumptionCache::updateAffectedValues(AssumeInst *CI) {
SmallVector<AssumptionCache::ResultElem, 16> Affected;
findAffectedValues(CI, TTI, Affected);
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ void AssumptionCache::updateAffectedValues(CondGuardInst *CI) {
}
}
-void AssumptionCache::unregisterAssumption(CondGuardInst *CI) {
+void AssumptionCache::unregisterAssumption(AssumeInst *CI) {
SmallVector<AssumptionCache::ResultElem, 16> Affected;
findAffectedValues(CI, TTI, Affected);
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ void AssumptionCache::scanFunction() {
// to this cache.
for (BasicBlock &B : F)
for (Instruction &I : B)
- if (isa<CondGuardInst>(&I))
+ if (isa<AssumeInst>(&I))
AssumeHandles.push_back({&I, ExprResultIdx});
// Mark the scan as complete.
@@ -225,10 +225,10 @@ void AssumptionCache::scanFunction() {
// Update affected values.
for (auto &A : AssumeHandles)
- updateAffectedValues(cast<CondGuardInst>(A));
+ updateAffectedValues(cast<AssumeInst>(A));
}
-void AssumptionCache::registerAssumption(CondGuardInst *CI) {
+void AssumptionCache::registerAssumption(AssumeInst *CI) {
// If we haven't scanned the function yet, just drop this assumption. It will
// be found when we scan later.
if (!Scanned)
@@ -238,9 +238,9 @@ void AssumptionCache::registerAssumption(CondGuardInst *CI) {
#ifndef NDEBUG
assert(CI->getParent() &&
- "Cannot a register CondGuardInst not in a basic block");
+ "Cannot register @llvm.assume call not in a basic block");
assert(&F == CI->getParent()->getParent() &&
- "Cannot a register CondGuardInst not in this function");
+ "Cannot register @llvm.assume call not in this function");
// We expect the number of assumptions to be small, so in an asserts build
// check that we don't accumulate duplicates and that all assumptions point
@@ -252,8 +252,8 @@ void AssumptionCache::registerAssumption(CondGuardInst *CI) {
assert(&F == cast<Instruction>(VH)->getParent()->getParent() &&
"Cached assumption not inside this function!");
- assert(isa<CondGuardInst>(VH) &&
- "Cached something other than CondGuardInst!");
+ assert(match(cast<CallInst>(VH), m_Intrinsic<Intrinsic::assume>()) &&
+ "Cached something other than a call to @llvm.assume!");
assert(AssumptionSet.insert(VH).second &&
"Cache contains multiple copies of a call!");
}