diff options
| author | Vlad Serebrennikov <serebrennikov.vladislav@gmail.com> | 2023-05-30 12:03:01 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Vlad Serebrennikov <serebrennikov.vladislav@gmail.com> | 2023-05-30 12:09:02 +0300 |
| commit | 9c561e8f3c2e8292bce9d7b36657144ba26a1c91 (patch) | |
| tree | 6340c7243ffdc011222b32ae2be15ca20280b589 /lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/ScriptInterpreterPython.h | |
| parent | 898b880308f1ce31520c939ab19366dc3b82c930 (diff) | |
| download | llvm-9c561e8f3c2e8292bce9d7b36657144ba26a1c91.zip llvm-9c561e8f3c2e8292bce9d7b36657144ba26a1c91.tar.gz llvm-9c561e8f3c2e8292bce9d7b36657144ba26a1c91.tar.bz2 | |
[clang] Add test for CWG1397
Resolution of this CWG breaks potential dependency loop between complete-class context of non-static data member initializer (NSDMI), and defaulted default constructor, which is `noexcept` depending on NSDMIs among other things.
For whatever reason in C++11 mode we issue an additional note and a different line number for the primary error. But I find the message itself even worse than aforementioned issues. It describes what's going on, but doesn't say what's bad about it. I find the previous version of this message more clear: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8dbc6b26171167b8ddf66a5f4b6d6fb9baf28336 . Created an issue for that: #62823
Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D151034
Diffstat (limited to 'lldb/source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/ScriptInterpreterPython.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions