aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectCommands.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBangtian Liu <bangtian@cs.toronto.edu>2020-12-17 15:58:45 +0000
committerWhitney Tsang <whitneyt@ca.ibm.com>2020-12-17 16:00:15 +0000
commitd20e0c3444ad9ada550d9d6d1d56fd72948ae444 (patch)
tree27f549bb991f7d0552abe32d3387cc6388cd2204 /lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectCommands.cpp
parent7e13694ac745f6cd4008dd354f2fcfc417b1e1e9 (diff)
downloadllvm-d20e0c3444ad9ada550d9d6d1d56fd72948ae444.zip
llvm-d20e0c3444ad9ada550d9d6d1d56fd72948ae444.tar.gz
llvm-d20e0c3444ad9ada550d9d6d1d56fd72948ae444.tar.bz2
Ensure SplitEdge to return the new block between the two given blocks
This PR implements the function splitBasicBlockBefore to address an issue that occurred during SplitEdge(BB, Succ, ...), inside splitBlockBefore. The issue occurs in SplitEdge when the Succ has a single predecessor and the edge between the BB and Succ is not critical. This produces the result ‘BB->Succ->New’. The new function splitBasicBlockBefore was added to splitBlockBefore to handle the issue and now produces the correct result ‘BB->New->Succ’. Below is an example of splitting the block bb1 at its first instruction. /// Original IR bb0: br bb1 bb1: %0 = mul i32 1, 2 br bb2 bb2: /// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlock bb0: br bb1 bb1: br bb1.split bb1.split: %0 = mul i32 1, 2 br bb2 bb2: /// IR after splitEdge(bb0, bb1) using splitBasicBlockBefore bb0: br bb1.split bb1.split br bb1 bb1: %0 = mul i32 1, 2 br bb2 bb2: Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92200
Diffstat (limited to 'lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectCommands.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions