[AST] Dont invalide VarDecl even the default initializaiton is failed.

Summary:
This patch would cause clang emit more diagnostics, but it is much better than https://reviews.llvm.org/D76831

```cpp
struct A {
  A(int);
  ~A() = delete;
};
void k() {
  A a;
}

```

before the patch:

/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'A'
  A a;
    ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:20:3: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
  A(int);
  ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:19:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
struct A {

After the patch:

/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'A'
  A a;
    ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:20:3: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
  A(int);
  ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:19:8: note: candidate constructor (the implicit copy constructor) not viable: requires 1 argument, but 0 were provided
struct A {
       ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:24:5: error: attempt to use a deleted function
  A a;
    ^
/tmp/t3.cpp:21:3: note: '~A' has been explicitly marked deleted here
  ~A() = delete;

Reviewers: sammccall

Reviewed By: sammccall

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77395

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions