aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/configuration.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlex Bradbury <asb@igalia.com>2023-10-03 17:54:29 +0100
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2023-10-03 17:54:29 +0100
commit18c3c46858c3a40f60f0f7cd74eff5e282c8813b (patch)
treefb86cae0a68c21a2c262e86f7857c93245c46f2a /lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/configuration.py
parent169c20584d75bf4a49cd85782eca0259ccb26dd1 (diff)
downloadllvm-18c3c46858c3a40f60f0f7cd74eff5e282c8813b.zip
llvm-18c3c46858c3a40f60f0f7cd74eff5e282c8813b.tar.gz
llvm-18c3c46858c3a40f60f0f7cd74eff5e282c8813b.tar.bz2
[RISCV] Update Zfa extension version to 1.0 (#67964)
The Zfa specification was recently ratified <https://wiki.riscv.org/display/HOME/Recently+Ratified+Extensions>. This commit bumps the version to 1.0, but leaves it as an experimental extension (to be done in a follow-on patch), so reviews can focus on confirming there haven't been spec changes we have missed (which as noted below, is more difficult than usual). Because the development of the Zfa spec overlapped with the transition of riscv-isa-manual from LaTeX to AsciiDoc, it's more difficult than usual to confirm version changes. The linked PDF in RISCVUsage is for some reason a 404. Key commit histories to review are: * Changes to zfa.adoc on the main branch <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/commits/main/src/zfa.adoc> * Changes to zfa.tex on the now defunct latex branch <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/commits/latex/src/zfa.tex> From reviewing these, I believe there have been no changes to the spec since version 0.1/0.2 (sadly the AsciiDoc and LaTeX versions of the spec are inconsistent about version numbering).
Diffstat (limited to 'lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/configuration.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions