aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/clang/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com>2012-10-17 19:35:37 +0000
committerJordan Rose <jordan_rose@apple.com>2012-10-17 19:35:37 +0000
commit29fc261cd7062f5015918193c6ad0e1de3ba0732 (patch)
treebb455273d5d97ac641abc9b9767618df71cd85f8 /clang/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp
parent13ac0e253d0955248e66a2fa34064ed70e3daca1 (diff)
downloadllvm-29fc261cd7062f5015918193c6ad0e1de3ba0732.zip
llvm-29fc261cd7062f5015918193c6ad0e1de3ba0732.tar.gz
llvm-29fc261cd7062f5015918193c6ad0e1de3ba0732.tar.bz2
[analyzer] Create a temporary region when accessing a struct rvalue.
In C++, rvalues that need to have their address taken (for example, to be passed to a function by const reference) will be wrapped in a MaterializeTemporaryExpr, which lets CodeGen know to create a temporary region to store this value. However, MaterializeTemporaryExprs are /not/ created when a method is called on an rvalue struct, even though the 'this' pointer needs a valid value. CodeGen works around this by creating a temporary region anyway; now, so does the analyzer. The analyzer also does this when accessing a field of a struct rvalue. This is a little unfortunate, since the rest of the struct will soon be thrown away, but it does make things consistent with the rest of the analyzer. This allows us to bring back the assumption that all known 'this' values are Locs. This is a revised version of r164828-9, reverted in r164876-7. <rdar://problem/12137950> llvm-svn: 166120
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp')
-rw-r--r--clang/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp73
1 files changed, 73 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/clang/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp b/clang/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp
index 3581566..cffa64d 100644
--- a/clang/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/Analysis/array-struct-region.cpp
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core,debug.ExprInspection -verify -x c %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core,debug.ExprInspection -verify -x c++ -analyzer-config c++-inlining=constructors %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core,debug.ExprInspection -DINLINE -verify -x c %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=core,alpha.core,debug.ExprInspection -DINLINE -verify -x c++ -analyzer-config c++-inlining=constructors %s
void clang_analyzer_eval(int);
@@ -8,10 +10,29 @@ struct S {
#if __cplusplus
const struct S *getThis() const { return this; }
+ const struct S *operator +() const { return this; }
+
+ bool check() const { return this == this; }
+ bool operator !() const { return this != this; }
+
+ int operator *() const { return field; }
#endif
};
+#if __cplusplus
+const struct S *operator -(const struct S &s) { return &s; }
+bool operator ~(const struct S &s) { return &s != &s; }
+#endif
+
+
+#ifdef INLINE
+struct S getS() {
+ struct S s = { 42 };
+ return s;
+}
+#else
struct S getS();
+#endif
void testAssignment() {
@@ -25,6 +46,14 @@ void testAssignment() {
#if __cplusplus
clang_analyzer_eval(s.getThis() == &s); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(+s == &s); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(-s == &s); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+
+ clang_analyzer_eval(s.check()); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(!s); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(~s); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
+
+ clang_analyzer_eval(*s == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
#endif
}
@@ -37,6 +66,12 @@ void testImmediateUse() {
#if __cplusplus
clang_analyzer_eval((void *)getS().getThis() == (void *)&x); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval((void *)+getS() == (void *)&x); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval((void *)-getS() == (void *)&x); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
+
+ clang_analyzer_eval(getS().check()); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(!getS()); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(~getS()); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
#endif
}
@@ -68,6 +103,13 @@ void testReferenceAssignment() {
clang_analyzer_eval(s.field == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(s.getThis() == &s); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(+s == &s); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+
+ clang_analyzer_eval(s.check()); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(!s); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(~s); // expected-warning{{FALSE}}
+
+ clang_analyzer_eval(*s == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
}
@@ -80,8 +122,39 @@ bool checkThis(const S &s) {
return s.getThis() == &s;
}
+bool checkThisOp(const S &s) {
+ return +s == &s;
+}
+
+bool checkThisStaticOp(const S &s) {
+ return -s == &s;
+}
+
void testReferenceArgument() {
clang_analyzer_eval(getConstrainedFieldRef(getS()) == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(checkThis(getS())); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(checkThisOp(getS())); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(checkThisStaticOp(getS())); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+}
+
+
+int getConstrainedFieldOp(S s) {
+ if (*s != 42) return 42;
+ return *s;
+}
+
+int getConstrainedFieldRefOp(const S &s) {
+ if (*s != 42) return 42;
+ return *s;
}
+
+void testImmediateUseOp() {
+ int x = *getS();
+ if (x != 42) return;
+ clang_analyzer_eval(x == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+
+ clang_analyzer_eval(getConstrainedFieldOp(getS()) == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(getConstrainedFieldRefOp(getS()) == 42); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+}
+
#endif