diff options
| author | Sarthak Gupta <sarthakgpt95@gmail.com> | 2023-10-23 14:15:03 +0530 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2023-10-23 09:45:03 +0100 |
| commit | 3651f377f632d9152f2bd8fc2f9302ec9f9bdd5e (patch) | |
| tree | e61b04fa63ed1118ef7d4a5680cded445b606e88 /clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp | |
| parent | 5b189d6f5606b051667b363f7430a7b990afab34 (diff) | |
| download | llvm-3651f377f632d9152f2bd8fc2f9302ec9f9bdd5e.zip llvm-3651f377f632d9152f2bd8fc2f9302ec9f9bdd5e.tar.gz llvm-3651f377f632d9152f2bd8fc2f9302ec9f9bdd5e.tar.bz2 | |
[mlir][tosa] Check for unranked tensors during validation (#68509)
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/67760
`levelCheckRank` ensures that the tensors for tosa operations are not
unranked
During tosa validation in `levelCheckRank`, we were trying to get the
rank of a tensor without checking if it is ranked or unranked, which
leads to an `assert` error. I see two ways to fix this:
- Only check `type.getRank() > tosa_level.MAX_RANK` if the tensor is
ranked, and then proceed as usual.
(like `if (type.hasRank() && type.getRank() > tosa_level.MAX_RANK)` , OR
- Throw an error for unranked tensors as result.
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/Basic/SourceManager.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions