aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-03-24[gdb/symtab] Fix line number of static const class memberTom de Vries1-1/+3
Since commit 6d263fe46e0 ("Avoid bad breakpoints with --gc-sections"), there was a silent regression on openSUSE Leap 15.4 for test-case gdb.cp/m-static.exp, from: ... (gdb) info variable everywhere^M All variables matching regular expression "everywhere":^M ^M File /home/vries/tmp.local-remote-host-native/m-static.h:^M 8: const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M (gdb) ... to: ... (gdb) info variable everywhere^M All variables matching regular expression "everywhere":^M ^M File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:^M 8: const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M ^M File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static1.cc:^M 8: const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M (gdb) ... Another regression was found due to that commit, and it was fixed in commit 99d679e7b30 ("[gdb/symtab] Fix "file index out of range" complaint") by limiting the scope of the fix in the original commit. Fix this regression by yet further limiting the scope of that fix, making sure that this bit in dwarf_decode_lines is executed again for m-static1.cc: ... /* Make sure a symtab is created for every file, even files which contain only variables (i.e. no code with associated line numbers). */ ... Tested on x86_64-linux. PR symtab/30265 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30265
2023-03-24[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/m-static.exp regression on Ubuntu 20.04Tom de Vries1-2/+1
In commit 722c4596034 ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/*.exp for remote host"), I needed to change ".*/" into "(.*/)?" in: ... gdb_test "info variable everywhere" \ "File .*/m-static\[.\]h.*const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;" ... However, due to the fact that I got this output: ... (gdb) info variable everywhere^M All variables matching regular expression "everywhere":^M ^M File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:^M 8: const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M ^M File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static1.cc:^M 8: const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M ... I decided to make the matching somewhat stricter, to make sure that the two matched lines were subsequent. The commit turned out to be more strict than intended, and caused a regression on Ubuntu 20.04, where the output was instead: ... (gdb) info variable everywhere^M All variables matching regular expression "everywhere":^M ^M File /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/m-static.h:^M 8: const int gnu_obj_4::everywhere;^M ... At that point I realized I'm looking at a bug (filed as PR symtab/30265), which manifests on openSUSE Leap 15.4 for native and readnow, and on Ubuntu 20.04 for readnow, but not for native. Before my commit, the test-case passed whether the bug manifested or not. After my commit, the test-case only passed when the bug manifested. Fix the test-case regression by reverting to the situation before the commit: pass whether the bug manifests or not. We could add an xfail for the PR, but I'm expecting a fix soon, so that doesn't look worth the effort. Tested on x86_64-linux, both on openSUSE Leap 15.4 and Ubuntu 20.04, both with native and readnow. Reported-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-03-22[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/cp-relocate.exp for remote hostTom de Vries1-1/+3
Fix test-case gdb.cp/cp-relocate.exp for remote host using gdb_remote_download. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-03-22[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/annota{2,3}.exp for native-extended-gdbserverTom de Vries2-10/+30
When running test-cases gdb.cp/annota{2,3}.exp with target board native-extended-gdbserver, we run into a few FAILs, due to the test-cases trying to match inferior output together with gdb output. Fix this by ignoring the inferior output in this case. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-03-22[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/*.exp for remote hostTom de Vries12-1/+29
Fix a few test-cases in gdb.cp/*.exp for remote host using new proc include_file. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-03-20gdb: fix crash during command completionAndrew Burgess2-0/+25
In some cases GDB will fail when attempting to complete a command that involves a rust symbol, the failure can manifest as a crash. The problem is caused by the completion_match_for_lcd object being left containing invalid data during calls to cp_symbol_name_matches_1. The first question to address is why we are calling a C++ support function when handling a rust symbol. That's due to GDB's auto language detection for msymbols, in some cases GDB can't tell if a symbol is a rust symbol, or a C++ symbol. The test application contains symbols for functions which are statically linked in from various rust support libraries. There's no DWARF for these symbols, so all GDB has is the msymbols built from the ELF symbol table. Here's the problematic symbol that leads to our crash: mangled: _ZN4core3str21_$LT$impl$u20$str$GT$5parse17h5111d2d6a50d22bdE demangled: core::str::<impl str>::parse As an msymbol this is initially created with language auto, then GDB eventually calls symbol_find_demangled_name, which loops over all languages calling language_defn::sniff_from_mangled_name, the first language that can demangle the symbol gets assigned as the language for that symbol. Unfortunately, there's overlap in the mangled symbol names, some (legacy) rust symbols can be demangled as both rust and C++, see cplus_demangle in libiberty/cplus-dem.c where this is mentioned. And so, because we check the C++ language before we check for rust, then the msymbol is (incorrectly) given the C++ language. Now it's true that is some cases we might be able to figure out that a demangled symbol is not actually a valid C++ symbol, for example, in our case, the construct '::<impl str>::' is not, I believe, valid in a C++ symbol, we could look for ':<' and '>:' and refuse to accept this as a C++ symbol. However, I'm not sure it is always possible to tell that a demangled symbol is rust or C++, so, I think, we have to accept that some times we will get this language detection wrong. If we accept that we can't fix the symbol language detection 100% of the time, then we should make sure that GDB doesn't crash when it gets the language wrong, that is what this commit addresses. In our test case the user tries to complete a symbol name like this: (gdb) complete break pars This results in GDB trying to find all symbols that match 'pars', eventually we consider our problematic symbol, and we end up with a call stack that looks like this: #0 0x0000000000f3c6bd in strncmp_iw_with_mode #1 0x0000000000706d8d in cp_symbol_name_matches_1 #2 0x0000000000706fa4 in cp_symbol_name_matches #3 0x0000000000df3c45 in compare_symbol_name #4 0x0000000000df3c91 in completion_list_add_name #5 0x0000000000df3f1d in completion_list_add_msymbol #6 0x0000000000df4c94 in default_collect_symbol_completion_matches_break_on #7 0x0000000000658c08 in language_defn::collect_symbol_completion_matches #8 0x0000000000df54c9 in collect_symbol_completion_matches #9 0x00000000009d98fb in linespec_complete_function #10 0x00000000009d99f0 in complete_linespec_component #11 0x00000000009da200 in linespec_complete #12 0x00000000006e4132 in complete_address_and_linespec_locations #13 0x00000000006e4ac3 in location_completer In cp_symbol_name_matches_1 we enter a loop, this loop repeatedly tries to match the demangled problematic symbol name against the user supplied text ('pars'). Each time around the loop another component of the symbol name is stripped off, thus, we check 'pars' against these options: core::str::<impl str>::parse str::<impl str>::parse <impl str>::parse parse As soon as we get a match the cp_symbol_name_matches_1 exits its loop and returns. In our case, when we're looking for 'pars', the match occurs on the last iteration of the loop, when we are comparing to 'parse'. Now the problem here is that cp_symbol_name_matches_1 uses the strncmp_iw_with_mode, and inside strncmp_iw_with_mode we allow for skipping over template parameters. This allows GDB to match the symbol name 'foo<int>(int,int)' if the user supplies 'foo(int,'. Inside strncmp_iw_with_mode GDB will record any template arguments that it has skipped over inside the completion_match_for_lcd object that is passed in as an argument. And so, when GDB tries to match against '<impl str>::parse', the first thing it sees is '<impl str>', GDB assumes this is a template argument and records this as a skipped region within the completion_match_for_lcd object. After '<impl str>' GDB sees a ':' character, which doesn't match with the 'pars' the user supplied, so strncmp_iw_with_mode returns a value indicating a non-match. GDB then removes the '<impl str>' component from the symbol name and tries again, this time comparing to 'parse', which does match. Having found a match, then in cp_symbol_name_matches_1 we record the match string, and the full symbol name within the completion_match_result object, and return. The problem here is that the skipped region, the '<impl str>' that we recorded in the penultimate loop iteration was never discarded, its still there in our returned result. If we look at what the pointers held in the completion_match_result that cp_symbol_name_matches_1 returns, this is what we see: core::str::<impl str>::parse | \________/ | | | '--- completion match string | '---skip range '--- full symbol name When GDB calls completion_match_for_lcd::finish, GDB tries to create a string using the completion match string (parse), but excluding the skip range, as the stored skip range is before the start of the completion match string, then GDB tries to do some weird string creation, which will cause GDB to crash. The reason we don't often see this problem in C++ is that for C++ symbols there is always some non-template text before the template argument. This non-template text means GDB is likely to either match the symbol, or reject the symbol without storing a skip range. However, notice, I did say, we don't often see this problem. Once I understood the issue, I was able to reproduce the crash using a pure C++ example: template<typename S> struct foo { template<typename T> foo (int p1, T a) { s = 0; } S s; }; int main () { foo<int> obj (2.3, 0); return 0; } Then in GDB: (gdb) complete break foo(int The problem here is that the C++ symbol for the constructor looks like this: foo<int>::foo<double>(int, double) When GDB enters cp_symbol_name_matches_1 the symbols it examines are: foo<int>::foo<double>(int, double) foo<double>(int, double) The first iteration of the loop will match the 'foo', then add the '<int>' template argument will be added as a skip range. When GDB find the ':' after the '<int>' the first iteration of the loop fails to match, GDB removes the 'foo<int>::' component, and starts the second iteration of the loop. Again, GDB matches the 'foo', and now adds '<double>' as a skip region. After that the '(int' successfully matches, and so the second iteration of the loop succeeds, but, once again we left the '<int>' in place as a skip region, even though this occurs before the start of our match string, and this will cause GDB to crash. This problem was reported to the mailing list, and a solution discussed in this thread: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2023-January/195166.html The solution proposed here is similar to one proposed by the original bug reported, but implemented in a different location within GDB. Instead of placing the fix in strncmp_iw_with_mode, I place the fix in cp_symbol_name_matches_1. I believe this is a better location as it is this function that implements the loop, and it is this loop, which repeatedly calls strncmp_iw_with_mode, that should be resetting the result object state (I believe). What I have done is add an assert to strncmp_iw_with_mode that the incoming result object is empty. I've also added some other asserts in related code, in completion_match_for_lcd::mark_ignored_range, I make some basic assertions about the incoming range pointers, and in completion_match_for_lcd::finish I also make some assertions about how the skip ranges relate to the match pointer. There's two new tests. The original rust example that was used in the initial bug report, and a C++ test. The rust example depends on which symbols are pulled in from the rust libraries, so it is possible that, at some future date, the problematic symbol will disappear from this test program. The C++ test should be more reliable, as this only depends on symbols from within the C++ source code. Since I originally posted this patch to the mailing list, the following patch has been merged: commit 6e7eef72164c00d6a5a7b0bce9fa01f5481f33cb Date: Sun Mar 19 09:13:10 2023 -0600 Use rust_demangle to fix a crash This solves the problem of a rust symbol ending up in the C++ specific code by changing the order languages are sorted. However, this new commit doesn't address the issue in the C++ code which was fixed with this commit. Given that the C++ issue is real, and has a reproducer, I'm still going to merge this fix. I've left the discussion of rust in this commit message as I originally wrote it, but it should be read within the context of GDB prior to commit 6e7eef72164c00d6a5a7. Co-Authored-By: Zheng Zhan <zzlossdev@163.com>
2023-03-18[gdb/testsuite] Handle attributes.h for remote hostTom de Vries2-3/+8
Handle $srcdir/lib/attributes.h using lappend_include_dir. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-03-10Use require with target_infoTom Tromey1-8/+2
This changes many tests to use 'require' when checking target_info. In a few spots, the require is hoisted to the top of the file, to avoid doing any extra work when the test is going to be skipped anyway.
2023-03-07[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/breakpoint-shlib-func.exp with ↵Tom de Vries1-0/+2
remote-gdbserver-on-localhost Test-case gdb.cp/breakpoint-shlib-func.exp fails with target board remote-gdbserver-on-localhost. Fix this by adding the missing gdb_load_shlib. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-02-27gdb: don't treat empty enums as flag enumsAndrew Burgess2-0/+79
In C++ it is possible to use an empty enum as a strong typedef. For example, a user could write: enum class my_type : unsigned char {}; Now my_type can be used like 'unsigned char' except the compiler will not allow implicit conversion too and from the native 'unsigned char' type. This is used in the standard library for things like std::byte. Currently, when GDB prints a value of type my_type, it looks like this: (gdb) print my_var $1 = (unknown: 0x4) Which isn't great. This gets worse when we consider something like: std::vector<my_type> vec; When using a pretty-printer, this could look like this: std::vector of length 2, capacity 2 = {(unknown: 0x2), (unknown: 0x4)} Clearly not great. This is described in PR gdb/30148. The problem here is in dwarf2/read.c, we assume all enums are flag enums unless we find an enumerator with a non-flag like value. Clearly an empty enum contains no non-flag values, so we assume the enum is a flag enum. I propose adding an extra check here; that is, an empty enum should never be a flag enum. With this the above cases look more like: (gdb) print my_var $1 = 4 and: std::vector of length 2, capacity 2 = {2, 4} Which look much better. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30148 Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-02-12gdb/c++: fix handling of breakpoints on @plt symbolsAndrew Burgess3-0/+124
This commit should fix PR gdb/20091, PR gdb/17201, and PR gdb/17071. Additionally, PR gdb/17199 relates to this area of code, but is more of a request to refactor some parts of GDB, this commit does not address that request, but it is probably worth reading that PR when looking at this commit. When the current language is C++, and the user places a breakpoint on a function in a shared library, GDB will currently find two locations for the breakpoint, one location will be within the function itself as we would expect, but the other location will be within the PLT table for the call to the named function. Consider this session: $ gdb -q /tmp/breakpoint-shlib-func Reading symbols from /tmp/breakpoint-shlib-func... (gdb) start Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x40112e: file /tmp/breakpoint-shlib-func.cc, line 20. Starting program: /tmp/breakpoint-shlib-func Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at /tmp/breakpoint-shlib-func.cc:20 20 int answer = foo (); (gdb) break foo Breakpoint 2 at 0x401030 (2 locations) (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 2 breakpoint keep y <MULTIPLE> 2.1 y 0x0000000000401030 <foo()@plt> 2.2 y 0x00007ffff7fc50fd in foo() at /tmp/breakpoint-shlib-func-lib.cc:20 This is not the expected behaviour. If we compile the same test using a C compiler then we see this: (gdb) break foo Breakpoint 2 at 0x7ffff7fc50fd: file /tmp/breakpoint-shlib-func-c-lib.c, line 20. (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 2 breakpoint keep y 0x00007ffff7fc50fd in foo at /tmp/breakpoint-shlib-func-c-lib.c:20 Here's what's happening. When GDB parses the symbols in the main executable and the shared library we see a number of different symbols for foo, and use these to create entries in GDB's msymbol table: - In the main executable we see a symbol 'foo@plt' that points at the plt entry for foo, from this we add two entries into GDB's msymbol table, one called 'foo@plt' which points at the plt entry and has type mst_text, then we create a second symbol, this time called 'foo' with type mst_solib_trampoline which also points at the plt entry, - Then, when the shared library is loaded we see another symbol called 'foo', this one points at the actual implementation in the shared library. This time GDB creates a msymbol called 'foo' with type mst_text that points at the implementation. This means that GDB creates 3 msymbols to represent the 2 symbols found in the executable and shared library. When the user creates a breakpoint on 'foo' GDB eventually ends up in search_minsyms_for_name (linespec.c), this function then calls iterate_over_minimal_symbols passing in the name we are looking for wrapped in a lookup_name_info object. In iterate_over_minimal_symbols we iterate over two hash tables (using the name we're looking for as the hash key), first we walk the hash table of symbol linkage names, then we walk the hash table of demangled symbol names. When the language is C++ the symbols for 'foo' will all have been mangled, as a result, in this case, the iteration of the linkage name hash table will find no matching results. However, when we walk the demangled hash table we do find some results. In order to match symbol names, GDB obtains a symbol name matching function by calling the get_symbol_name_matcher method on the language_defn class. For C++, in this case, the matching function we use is cp_fq_symbol_name_matches, which delegates the work to strncmp_iw_with_mode with mode strncmp_iw_mode::MATCH_PARAMS and language set to language_cplus. The strncmp_iw_mode::MATCH_PARAMS mode means that strncmp_iw_mode will skip any parameters in the demangled symbol name when checking for a match, e.g. 'foo' will match the demangled name 'foo()'. The way this is done is that the strings are matched character by character, but, once the string we are looking for ('foo' here) is exhausted, if we are looking at '(' then we consider the match a success. Lets consider the 3 symbols GDB created. If the function declaration is 'void foo ()' then from the main executable we added symbols '_Z3foov@plt' and '_Z3foov', while from the shared library we added another symbol call '_Z3foov'. When these are demangled they become 'foo()@plt', 'foo()', and 'foo()' respectively. Now, the '_Z3foov' symbol from the main executable has the type mst_solib_trampoline, and in search_minsyms_for_name, we search for any symbols of type mst_solib_trampoline and filter these out of the results. However, the '_Z3foov@plt' symbol (from the main executable), and the '_Z3foov' symbol (from the shared library) both have type mst_text. During the demangled name matching, due to the use of MATCH_PARAMS mode, we stop the comparison as soon as we hit a '(' in the demangled name. And so, '_Z3foov@plt', which demangles to 'foo()@plt' matches 'foo', and '_Z3foov', which demangles to 'foo()' also matches 'foo'. By contrast, for C, there are no demangled hash table entries to be iterated over (in iterate_over_minimal_symbols), we only consider the linkage name symbols which are 'foo@plt' and 'foo'. The plain 'foo' symbol obviously matches when we are looking for 'foo', but in this case the 'foo@plt' will not match due to the '@plt' suffix. And so, when the user asks for a breakpoint in 'foo', and the language is C, search_minsyms_for_name, returns a single msymbol, the mst_text symbol for foo in the shared library, while, when the language is C++, we get two results, '_Z3foov' for the shared library function, and '_Z3foov@plt' for the plt entry in the main executable. I propose to fix this in strncmp_iw_with_mode. When the mode is MATCH_PARAMS, instead of stopping at a '(' and assuming the match is a success, GDB will instead search forward for the matching, closing, ')', effectively skipping the parameter list, and then resume matching. Thus, when comparing 'foo' to 'foo()@plt' GDB will effectively compare against 'foo@plt' (skipping the parameter list), and the match will fail, just as it does when the language is C. There is one slight complication, which is revealed by the test gdb.linespec/cpcompletion.exp, when searching for the symbol of a const member function, the demangled symbol will have 'const' at the end of its name, e.g.: struct_with_const_overload::const_overload_fn() const Previously, the matching would stop at the '(' character, but after my change the whole '()' is skipped, and the match resumes. As a result, the 'const' modifier results in a failure to match, when previously GDB would have found a match. To work around this issue, in strncmp_iw_with_mode, when mode is MATCH_PARAMS, after skipping the parameter list, if the next character is '@' then we assume we are looking at something like '@plt' and return a value indicating the match failed, otherwise, we return a value indicating the match succeeded, this allows things like 'const' to be skipped. With these changes in place I now see GDB correctly setting a breakpoint only at the implementation of 'foo' in the shared library. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20091 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17201 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17071 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17199 Tested-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-01-26Use clean_restart in gdb.cpTom Tromey2-8/+2
Change gdb.cp to use clean_restart more consistently.
2023-01-26Eliminate spurious returns from the test suiteTom Tromey19-23/+0
A number of tests end with "return". However, this is unnecessary. This patch removes all of these.
2023-01-26gdb/testsuite: initialize "correct" variable in gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp.tclSimon Marchi1-0/+2
Due to a GDB bug (visible when building with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG), GDB crashes somewhere in the middle of gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp, and thus fails to read the string, at gdb.cp/cpexprs.exp.tcl:725. The "correct" variable doesn't get set, and I then see this TCL error: ERROR: can't read "correct": no such variable Avoid the TCL error by initializing the "correct" variable to a dummy value. Change-Id: I828968d9b2d105ef47f8da2ef598aa16a518c059
2023-01-26[gdb/testsuite] Add and use is_x86_64_m64_targetTom de Vries1-3/+1
Add new proc is_x86_64_m64_target and use it where appropriate. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2023-01-25gdb/testsuite: rename test source file to match test scriptAndrew Burgess2-1/+1
The previous commit touched the source file for the test script gdb.cp/cpcompletion.exp. This source file is called pr9594.cc. The source file is only used by the one test script. This commit renames the source file to cpcompletion.cc to match the test script, this is more inline with how we name source files these days.
2023-01-25gdb/testsuite: use test_gdb_complete_unique more in C++ testsAndrew Burgess1-4/+4
Spotted in gdb.cp/cpcompletion.exp that we could replace some uses of gdb_test with test_gdb_complete_unique, this will extend the completion testing to check tab-completion as well as completion using the 'complete' command in some additional cases.
2023-01-19Use "maint ignore-probes" in no-libstdcxx-probe.expTom Tromey1-5/+4
While looking at some test output, I saw that no-libstdcxx-probe.exp was not being run. However, it occurred to me that Tom de Vries' new "maint ignore-probes" command could be used to enable this test unconditionally. Reviewed-by: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2023-01-17Use require in paramless.expTom Tromey1-1/+1
The new paramless.exp test was not converted to the new "require" approach. This patch fixes the problem.
2023-01-17Fix parameter-less template regression in new DWARF readerTom Tromey2-0/+87
PR c++/29896 points out a regression in the new DWARF reader. It does not properly handle a case like "break fn", where "fn" is a template function. This happens because the new index uses strncasecmp to compare. However, to make this work correctly, we need a custom function that ignores template parameters. This patch adds a custom comparison function and fixes the bug. A new test case is included. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29896
2023-01-13Rename to allow_shlib_testsTom Tromey4-4/+4
This changes skip_shlib_tests to invert the sense, and renames it to allow_shlib_tests.
2023-01-13Rename to allow_hw_watchpoint_testsTom Tromey1-1/+1
This changes skip_hw_watchpoint_tests to invert the sense, and renames it to allow_hw_watchpoint_tests.
2023-01-13Rename to allow_cplus_tests and allow_stl_testsTom Tromey126-126/+126
This changes skip_cplus_tests to invert the sense, and renames it to allow_cplus_tests. This one also converts skip_stl_tests to allow_stl_tests, as that was convenient to do at the same time.
2023-01-13Use require target_can_use_run_cmdTom Tromey2-6/+2
This changes some tests to use "require target_can_use_run_cmd".
2023-01-13Use require !skip_stl_testsTom Tromey5-5/+5
This changes some tests to use "require !skip_stl_tests".
2023-01-13Use require !skip_shlib_testsTom Tromey2-6/+2
This changes some tests to use "require !skip_shlib_tests".
2023-01-13Use require !skip_cplus_testsTom Tromey119-151/+119
This changes some tests to use "require !skip_cplus_tests".
2023-01-13Use require dwarf2_supportTom Tromey3-7/+3
This changes some tests to use "require dwarf2_support".
2023-01-09Fix crash with C++ qualified namesTom Tromey1-0/+1
PR c++/29503 points out that something like "b->Base::member" will crash when 'b' does not have pointer type. This seems to be a simple oversight in eval_op_member. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29503 Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>
2023-01-06gdb/c++: Detect ambiguous variables in imported namespacesBruno Larsen1-2/+11
When running gdb.cp/nsusing.cc and stopping at line 17, we can ask GDB to print x and get a compiler-dependent answer. Using gcc 12.2.1, GDB will print M::x, and using clang 16.0.0 prints N::x. Not only is this behavior confusing to users, it is also not consistent with compiler behaviors, which would warn that using x is ambiguous at this point. This commit makes GDB behavior consistent with compilers. it achieves this by making it so instead of exiting early when finding any symbol with the correct name, GDB continues searching through all include directives, storing all matching symbols in a relational map betwen the mangled name and the found symbols. If the resulting map has more than one entry, GDB says that the reference is ambiguous and lists all possibilities. Otherwise it returns the block_symbol structure for the desired symbol, or an empty struct if nothing was found. The commit also changes gdb.cp/nsusing.exp to test the ambiguous detection.
2023-01-01Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBJoel Brobecker315-315/+315
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script, which automated the update of the copyright year range for all source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include year 2023.
2022-12-30[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp with -fcf-protectionTom de Vries1-1/+10
On Ubuntu 22.04.1 x86_64, I run into: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp: no_header: not in inline 1 next^M 51 if (t != NULL^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp: no_header: next step 1 ... This is due to -fcf-protection, which adds the endbr64 at the start of get_alias_set: ... 0000000000001180 <_Z13get_alias_setP4tree>: 1180: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 1184: 48 85 ff test %rdi,%rdi ... so the extra insn gets an is-stmt line number entry: ... INDEX LINE ADDRESS IS-STMT PROLOGUE-END ... 11 50 0x0000000000001180 Y 12 50 0x0000000000001180 13 51 0x0000000000001184 Y 14 54 0x0000000000001184 ... and when stepping into get_alias_set we step to line 50: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp: no_header: in main step^M get_alias_set (t=t@entry=0x555555558018 <xx>) at step-and-next-inline.cc:50^M 50 {^M ... In contrast, with -fcf-protection=none, we get: ... 0000000000001170 <_Z13get_alias_setP4tree>: 1170: 48 85 ff test %rdi,%rdi ... and: ... INDEX LINE ADDRESS IS-STMT PROLOGUE-END ... 11 50 0x0000000000001170 Y 12 51 0x0000000000001170 Y 13 54 0x0000000000001170 ... so when stepping into get_alias_set we step to line 51: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/step-and-next-inline.exp: no_header: in main step^M get_alias_set (t=t@entry=0x555555558018 <xx>) at step-and-next-inline.cc:51^M 51 if (t != NULL^M ... Fix this by rewriting the gdb_test issuing the step command to check which line the step lands on, and issuing an extra next if needed. Tested on x86_64-linux, both with and without -fcf-protection=none. PR testsuite/29920 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29920
2022-12-21gdb/c++: validate 'using' directives based on the current lineBruno Larsen2-4/+15
When asking GDB to print a variable from an imported namespace, we only want to see variables imported in lines that the inferior has already gone through, as is being tested last in gdb.cp/nsusing.exp. However with the proposed change to gdb.cp/nsusing.exp, we get the following failures: (gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/nsusing.exp: continue to breakpoint: marker10 stop print x $9 = 911 (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/nsusing.exp: print x, before using statement next 15 y += x; (gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/nsusing.exp: using namespace M print x $10 = 911 (gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/nsusing.exp: print x, only using M Showing that the feature wasn't functioning properly, it just so happened that gcc ordered the namespaces in a convenient way. This happens because GDB doesn't take into account the line where the "using namespace" directive is written. So long as it shows up in the current scope, we assume it is valid. To fix this, add a new member to struct using_direct, that stores the line where the directive was written, and a new function that informs if the using directive is valid already. Unfortunately, due to a GCC bug, the failure still shows up. Compilers that set the declaration line of the using directive correctly (such as Clang) do not show such a bug, so the test includes an XFAIL for gcc code. Finally, because the final test of gdb.cp/nsusing.exp has turned into multiple that all would need XFAILs for older GCCs (<= 4.3), and that GCC is very old, if it is detected, the test just exits early. Approved-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-12-05gdb/testsuite: remove perror calls when failing to runSimon Marchi71-84/+0
I noticed that when running these two tests in sequence: Running /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/arrayptr.exp ... ERROR: GDB process no longer exists ERROR: Couldn't run foo-all Running /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/assign_1.exp ... The results in gdb.sum are: Running /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/arrayptr.exp ... PASS: gdb.ada/arrayptr.exp: scenario=all: compilation foo.adb ERROR: GDB process no longer exists UNRESOLVED: gdb.ada/arrayptr.exp: scenario=all: gdb_breakpoint: set breakpoint at foo.adb:40 (eof) ERROR: Couldn't run foo-all Running /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/assign_1.exp ... UNRESOLVED: gdb.ada/assign_1.exp: changing the language to ada PASS: gdb.ada/assign_1.exp: set convenience variable $xxx to 1 The UNRESOLVED for arrayptr.exp is fine, as GDB crashes in that test, while trying to run to main. However, the UNRESOLVED in assign_1.exp doesn't make sense, GDB behaves as expected in that test: (gdb) set lang ada^M (gdb) UNRESOLVED: gdb.ada/assign_1.exp: changing the language to ada print $xxx := 1^M $1 = 1^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/assign_1.exp: set convenience variable $xxx to 1 The problem is that arrayptr.exp calls perror when failing to run to main, then returns. perror makes it so that the next test (as in pass/fail) will be recorded as UNRESOLVED. However, here, the next test (as in pass/fail) is in the next test (as in .exp). Hence the spurious UNRESOLVED in assign_1.exp. These perror when failing to run to X are not really useful, especially since runto records a FAIL on error, by default. Remove all the perrors on runto failure I could find. When there wasn't one already, add a return statement when failing to run, to avoid running the test of the test unnecessarily. I thought of adding a check ran between test (in gdb_finish probably) where we would emit a warning if errcnt > 0, meaning a test quit and left a perror "active". However, reading that variable would poke into the DejaGNU internals, not sure it's a good idea. Change-Id: I2203df6d06e199540b36f56470d1c5f1dc988f7b
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.cp/*.expAndrew Burgess66-79/+79
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.cp/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-19Show locno for 'multi location' breakpoint hit msg+conv var $_hit_bbnum ↵Philippe Waroquiers3-8/+8
$_hit_locno PR breakpoints/12464 This implements the request given in PR breakpoints/12464. Before this patch, when a breakpoint that has multiple locations is reached, GDB printed: Thread 1 "zeoes" hit Breakpoint 1, some_func () at somefunc1.c:5 This patch changes the message so that bkpt_print_id prints the precise encountered breakpoint: Thread 1 "zeoes" hit Breakpoint 1.2, some_func () at somefunc1.c:5 In mi mode, bkpt_print_id also (optionally) prints a new table field "locno": locno is printed when the breakpoint hit has more than one location. Note that according to the GDB user manual node 'GDB/MI Development and Front Ends', it is ok to add new fields without changing the MI version. Also, when a breakpoint is reached, the convenience variables $_hit_bpnum and $_hit_locno are set to the encountered breakpoint number and location number. $_hit_bpnum and $_hit_locno can a.o. be used in the command list of a breakpoint, to disable the specific encountered breakpoint, e.g. disable $_hit_bpnum.$_hit_locno In case the breakpoint has only one location, $_hit_locno is set to the value 1, so as to allow a command such as: disable $_hit_bpnum.$_hit_locno to disable the breakpoint even when the breakpoint has only one location. This also fixes a strange behaviour: when a breakpoint X has only one location, enable|disable X.1 is accepted but transforms the breakpoint in a multiple locations breakpoint having only one location. The changes in RFA v4 handle the comments of Tom Tromey: - Changed convenience var names from $bkptno/$locno to $_hit_bpnum/$_hit_locno. - updated the tests and user manual accordingly. User manual also explictly describes that $_hit_locno is set to 1 for a breakpoint with a single location. - The variable values are now set in bpstat_do_actions_1 so that they are set for silent breakpoints, and when several breakpoints are hit at the same time, that the variables are set to the printed breakpoint. The changes in RFA v3 handle the additional comments of Eli: GDB/NEW: - Use max 80-column - Use 'code location' instead of 'location'. - Fix typo $bkpno - Ensure that disable $bkptno and disable $bkptno.$locno have each their explanation inthe example - Reworded the 'breakpoint-hit' paragraph. gdb.texinfo: - Use 'code location' instead of 'location'. - Add a note to clarify the distinction between $bkptno and $bpnum. - Use @kbd instead of examples with only one command. Compared to RFA v1, the changes in v2 handle the comments given by Keith Seitz and Eli Zaretskii: - Use %s for the result of paddress - Use bkptno_numopt_re instead of 2 different -re cases - use C@t{++} - Add index entries for $bkptno and $locno - Added an example for "locno" in the mi interface - Added examples in the Break command manual.
2022-11-18gdb/testsuite: rewrite gdb.cp/call-method-register.exp with dwarf assemblerAndrew Burgess2-76/+80
Convert the gdb.cp/call-method-register.exp test to make use of the DWARF assembler. The existing gdb.cp/call-method-register.exp test relies on a GCC extension - forcing a local variable into a particular named register. This means that the test will only work with Clang, and, as we have to name the register into which the variable will be placed, will only work for those targets where we've selected a suitable register, currently this is x86-64, i386, and ppc64. By switching to the DWARF assembler, the test will work with gcc and clang, and should work on most, if not all, architectures. The test creates a small structure, something that can fit within a register, and then tries to call a method on the structure from within GDB. This should fail because GDB can't take the address of the in register structure (for the `this` pointer). As the test is for a failure case, then we don't really care _which_ register the structure is in, and I take advantage of this for the DWARF assembler test, I just declare that the variable is in DW_OP_reg0, whatever that might be. I've tested the new test on x86-64, ppc, aarch64, and risc-v, and the test runs, and passes on all these architectures, which is already more than we used to cover. Additionally, on x86-64, I've tested with Clang and gcc, and the test runs and passed with both compilers. Reviewed-By: Lancelot SIX <lancelot.six@amd.com>
2022-11-18gdb/testsuite: don't avoid DWARF assembler tests with ClangAndrew Burgess1-5/+0
Two tests make the claim that the DWARF assembler requires gcc, however, this isn't true. I think at one point, when the DWARF assembler was first added, we did use some techniques that were not portable (see the comments in lib/dwarf.exp on function_range for details), however, I think most DWARF assembler tests will now work fine with Clang. The two tests that I modify in this commit both work fine with Clang, at least, I've tested with Clang 9.0.1 and 15.0.2, and don't see any problems, so I'm removing the early return logic that stops these tests from running with Clang. Reviewed-By: Lancelot SIX <lancelot.six@amd.com>
2022-11-14PowerPC, fix support for printing the function return value for non-trivial ↵Carl Love1-1/+8
values. Currently, a non-trivial return value from a function cannot currently be reliably determined on PowerPC. This is due to the fact that the PowerPC ABI uses register r3 to store the address of the buffer containing the non-trivial return value when the function is called. The PowerPC ABI does not guarantee the value in register r3 is not modified in the function. Thus the value in r3 cannot be reliably used to obtain the return addreses on exit from the function. This patch adds a new gdbarch method to allow PowerPC to access the value of r3 on entry to a function. On PowerPC, the new gdbarch method attempts to use the DW_OP_entry_value for the DWARF entries, when exiting the function, to determine the value of r3 on entry to the function. This requires the use of the -fvar-tracking compiler option to compile the user application thus generating the DW_OP_entry_value in the binary. The DW_OP_entry_value entries in the binary file allows GDB to resolve the DW_TAG_call_site entries. This new gdbarch method is used to get the return buffer address, in the case of a function returning a nontrivial data type, on exit from the function. The GDB function should_stop checks to see if RETURN_BUF is non-zero. By default, RETURN_BUF will be set to zero by the new gdbarch method call for all architectures except PowerPC. The get_return_value function will be used to obtain the return value on all other architectures as is currently being done if RETURN_BUF is zero. On PowerPC, the new gdbarch method will return a nonzero address in RETURN_BUF if the value can be determined. The value_at function uses the return buffer address to get the return value. This patch fixes five testcase failures in gdb.cp/non-trivial-retval.exp. The correct function return values are now reported. Note this patch is dependent on patch: "PowerPC, function ppc64_sysv_abi_return_value add missing return value convention". This patch has been tested on Power 10 and x86-64 with no regressions.
2022-11-11gdb/testsuite: disable gdb.cp/call-method-register.exp when not using gccBruno Larsen1-0/+5
The test gdb.cp/call-method-register.exp assumes that the class will be placed on a register. However, this keyword has been deprecated since C++11, and Clang, for instance, does not feel the need to follow it. Since this test is not usable without this working, this commit marks this test as untested. Approved-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-11-11gdb/testsuite: remove XFAIL on gdb.cp/temargs.expBruno Larsen1-2/+4
gdb.cp/temargs.exp last 2 tests always setup an XFAILs, despite checking for old gcc versions. However, Clang does not fail in this test, turning into XPASSes and slighty annoying when comparing between compilers. To change this, make the xfails only happen if we using gcc. Approved-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-11-11gdb/testsuite: disable some tests of gdb.cp/typeid.exp when using ClangBruno Larsen1-1/+9
Since Clang chooses to not add any debug information for base types, expecting it to be included with libraries' informations, gdb.cp/typeid.exp will always fail if the program hasn't started. This commit fixes that by making it so when using Clang, the base type variables aren't tested. Approved-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-11-11gdb/testsuite: skip gdb.cp/anon-struct.exp when using ClangBruno Larsen1-0/+10
When Clang compiles anonymous structures, it does not add linkage names in their dwarf representations. This is compounded by Clang not adding linkage names to subprograms of those anonymous structs (for instance, the constructor). With these 2 things together, GDB is unable to refer to any of them, so there is no way to pass any of the tests of gdb.cp/anon-struct.exp Since this isn't a bug on Clang or GDB according to the DWARF specifications as DW_AT_name is optional for all DIEs, the test was marked as untested. Since I was already touching the file, I also added a comment at the top of the file explaining what it is testing for. Approved-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-11-11gdb/testsuite: allow for Clang style destructors on gdb.cp/m-static.expBruno Larsen1-5/+6
when running gdb.cp/m-static.exp using Clang, we get the following failures: print test1.~gnu_obj_1^M $6 = {void (gnu_obj_1 * const)} 0x555555555470 <gnu_obj_1::~gnu_obj_1()>^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/m-static.exp: simple object instance, print destructor ptype test1.~gnu_obj_1^M type = void (gnu_obj_1 * const)^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/m-static.exp: simple object instance, ptype destructor print test1.'~gnu_obj_1'^M $7 = {void (gnu_obj_1 * const)} 0x555555555470 <gnu_obj_1::~gnu_obj_1()>^M (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/m-static.exp: simple object instance, print quoted destructor This is because the test is expecting an extra integer parameter on the destructor. Looking at the debuginfo, it seems that there is nothing actually wrong with this output, so these tests were changed to test multiple possible regexps. Approved-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-11-11gdb/testsuite: add XFAIL to gdb.cp/derivation.exp when using ClangBruno Larsen1-0/+4
When running gdb.cp/derivation.exp using Clang, we get an unexpected failure when printing the type of a class with an internal typedef. This happens because Clang doesn't add accessibility information for typedefs inside classes (see https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57608 for more info). To help with Clang testing, an XFAIL was added to this test. Approved-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-11-11gdb/testsuite: account for clang's nested destructor calls on gdb.cp/mb-ctor.expBruno Larsen1-0/+18
When compiling virtual classes's destructors, two versions are compiled, one with a single parameter (this) and the other with 2 parameters (this and vtt). GCC's compilation makes it so either the version with 1 parameter or the one with 2 parameters is called, depending on whether the destructor is being called by the class itself or by an inherited class. On the test gdb.cp/mb-ctor.exp, this means that the breakpoint set at the destructor will be hit 4 times. Clang, on the other hand, makes the single-parameter version call the 2 parameter version, probably in an attempt to reduce the size of the resulting executable. This means that the gdb.cp/mb-ctor.exp will hit 6 breakpoints before finishing, and is the reason why this test was failing. To make this test stop failing, a compiler check is added and another "continue" instruction is issued to account for this difference. Approved-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-11-11gdb/testsuite: enable running gdb.cp/classes.exp with clangBruno Larsen1-1/+35
When attempting to run the gdb.cp/classes.exp test using Clang++, the test fails to prepare with -Wnon-c-typedef-for-linkage like the previously fixed gdb.cp/class2.exp. Upon fixing this, the test shows 5 unexpected failures. One such failures is: ptype/r class class_with_public_typedef type = class class_with_public_typedef { private: int a; public: class_with_public_typedef::INT b; private: typedef int INT; } (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/classes.exp: ptype class class_with_public_typedef // wrong access specifier for typedef: private While g++ provided the following output: ptype/r class class_with_public_typedef type = class class_with_public_typedef { private: int a; public: class_with_public_typedef::INT b; typedef int INT; } (gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/classes.exp: ptype class class_with_public_typedef This error happens because Clang does not add DW_AT_accessibility to typedefs inside classes, and without this information GDB defaults to assuming the typedef is private. Since there is nothing that GDB can do about this, these tests have been set as xfails, and Clang bug 57608 has been filed. Bug: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57608 Approved-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-11-11gdb/testsuite: ignore Non-C-typedefs for gdb.cp/class2.expBruno Larsen1-1/+8
When attempting to test gdb.cp/class2.exp using Clang, it fails to prepare with the following error: Executing on host: clang++ -fdiagnostics-color=never -Wno-unknown-warning-option -c -g -o /home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.cp/class2/class20.o /home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.cc (timeout = 300) builtin_spawn -ignore SIGHUP clang++ -fdiagnostics-color=never -Wno-unknown-warning-option -c -g -o /home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.cp/class2/class20.o /home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.cc /home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.cc:53:14: warning: anonymous non-C-compatible type given name for linkage purposes by typedef declaration; add a tag name here [-Wnon-c-typedef-for-linkage] typedef class { ^ Dbase /home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.cc:54:2: note: type is not C-compatible due to this member declaration public: ^~~~~~~ /home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.cc:58:3: note: type is given name 'Dbase' for linkage purposes by this typedef declaration } Dbase; ^ 1 warning generated. gdb compile failed, /home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.cc:53:14: warning: anonymous non-C-compatible type given name for linkage purposes by typedef declaration; add a tag name here [-Wnon-c-typedef-for-linkage] typedef class { ^ Dbase /home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.cc:54:2: note: type is not C-compatible due to this member declaration public: ^~~~~~~ /home/blarsen/Documents/fsf_build/gdb/testsuite/../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/class2.cc:58:3: note: type is given name 'Dbase' for linkage purposes by this typedef declaration } Dbase; ^ 1 warning generated. UNTESTED: gdb.cp/class2.exp: failed to prepare This can be silenced by adding -Wno-non-c-typedef-for-linkage for Clang 11 or later. The test shows no failures with this change. Approved-by: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-11-10gdb/c++: Improve error messages in overload resolutionBruno Larsen2-0/+228
When resolving overloaded functions, GDB relies on knowing relationships between types, i.e. if a type inherits from another. However, some compilers may not add complete information for given types as a way to reduce unnecessary debug information. In these cases, GDB would just say that it couldn't resolve the method or function, with no extra information. The problem is that sometimes the user may not know that the type information is incomplete, and may just assume that there is a bug in GDB. To improve the user experience, we attempt to detect if the overload match failed because of an incomplete type, and warn the user of this. This commit also adds a testcase confirming that the message is only triggered in the correct scenario. This test was not developed as an expansion of gdb.cp/overload.cc because it needed the dwarf assembler, and porting all of overload.cc seemed unnecessary. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-10-31Fix regression in pointer-to-member printingTom Tromey2-0/+12
PR c++/29243 points out that "info func" on a certain C++ executable will cause an infinite loop in gdb. I tracked this down to a bug introduced by commit 6b5a7bc76 ("Handle member pointers directly in generic_value_print"). Before this commit, the C++ code to print a member pointer would wind up calling value_print_scalar_formatted; but afterward it simply calls generic_value_print and gets into a loop. This patch restores the previous behavior and adds a regression test.