| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
|
|
As follow-up to this discussion:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-August/171385.html
... make runto_main not pass no-message to runto. This means that if we
fail to run to main, for some reason, we'll emit a FAIL. This is the
behavior we want the majority of (if not all) the time.
Without this, we rely on tests logging a failure if runto_main fails,
otherwise. They do so in a very inconsisteny mannet, sometimes using
"fail", "unsupported" or "untested". The messages also vary widly.
This patch removes all these messages as well.
Also, remove a few "fail" where we call runto (and not runto_main). by
default (without an explicit no-message argument), runto prints a
failure already. In two places, gdb.multi/multi-re-run.exp and
gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp, remove "message" passed to runto.
This removes a few PASSes that we don't care about (but FAILs will still
be printed if we fail to run to where we want to). This aligns their
behavior with the rest of the testsuite.
Change-Id: Ib763c98c5f4fb6898886b635210d7c34bd4b9023
|
|
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start
of New Year procedure...
gdb/ChangeLog
Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
|
|
When running test-case gdb.base/info-shared.exp, I see in gdb.log:
...
Executing on host: \
gcc ... -fPIC -fpic -c -o info-shared-solib1.c.o info-shared-solib1.c
...
The -fPIC comes from the test-case:
...
if { [gdb_compile_shlib $srcfile_lib1 $binfile_lib1 \
[list additional_flags=-fPIC]] != "" } {
...
but the -fpic, which overrides the -fPIC comes from gdb_compile_shlib.
The proc gdb_compile_shlib adds the -fpic or similar dependent on platform
and compiler. However, in some cases it doesn't add anything, which is
probably why all those test-case pass -fPIC.
Fix this by removing -fPIC from all the calls to gdb_compile_shlib, and
ensuring that gdb_compile_shlib takes care of adding it, if required.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-12-14 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
* lib/gdb.exp (gdb_compile_shlib): Make sure it's not necessary to
pass -fPIC.
* gdb.ada/catch_ex_std.exp: Don't pass -fPIC to gdb_compile_shlib.
* gdb.base/break-probes.exp: Same.
* gdb.base/ctxobj.exp: Same.
* gdb.base/dso2dso.exp: Same.
* gdb.base/global-var-nested-by-dso.exp: Same.
* gdb.base/info-shared.exp: Same.
* gdb.base/jit-reader-simple.exp: Same.
* gdb.base/print-file-var.exp: Same.
* gdb.base/skip-solib.exp: Same.
* gdb.btrace/dlopen.exp: Same.
|
|
GDB's JIT handler stores an objfile (and data associated with it) per
program space to keep track of JIT breakpoint information. This assumes
that there is at most one JITer objfile in the program space. However,
there may be multiple. If so, only the first JITer's hook breakpoints
would be realized and the JIT events from the other JITers would be
missed.
This patch removes that assumption, allowing an arbitrary number of
objfiles within a program space to be JITers.
- The "unique" program_space -> JITer objfile pointer in
jit_program_space_data is removed. In fact, jit_program_space_data
becomes empty, so it is removed entirely.
- jit_breakpoint_deleted is modified, it now has to assume that any
objfile in a program space is a potential JITer. It now iterates on
all objfiles, checking if they are indeed JITers, and if they are,
whether the deleted breakpoint belongs to them.
- jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal also has to assume that any objfile in
a program space is a potential JITer. It creates (or updates) one
jiter_objfile_data structure for each JITer it finds.
- Same for jit_inferior_init. It now iterates all objfiles to read the
initial JIT object list.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2020-07-22 Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
* jit.c (struct jit_program_space_data): Remove.
(jit_program_space_key): Remove.
(jiter_objfile_data::~jiter_objfile_data): Remove program space
stuff.
(get_jit_program_space_data): Remove.
(jit_breakpoint_deleted): Iterate on all of the program space's
objfiles.
(jit_inferior_init): Likewise.
(jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal): Likewise. Also change return
type to void.
(jit_breakpoint_re_set): Pass current_program_space to
jit_breakpoint_re_set_internal.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-07-22 Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
* gdb.base/jit-reader-simple.exp: Add a scenario for a binary that
loads two JITers.
|
|
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-06-15 Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
* gdb.base/jit-elf-so.exp: Refer to the global main_loader_basename
variable.
* gdb.base/jit-reader-simple.exp: Fix typo ("Built" -> "Build"),
and use the already-defined 'options' variable.
|
|
Reorganizes how JIT related test files to be more clear what are related
to JIT reader system tests and what use JIT from ELF objfiles. Those two
approaches are quite different in GDB implementation and require very
different test setup. Keeping distinction clear at the file name level
makes it easier to maintain the testsuite.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-02-18 Mihails Strasuns <mihails.strasuns@intel.com>
* gdb.base: Rename all jit related test and source files.
|
