| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This commit is the result of the following actions:
- Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to
include 2024,
- Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to
update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the
file,
- Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright
date,
- Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If
these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've
updated them this year to 2024.
I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as
you spot them.
|
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
|
|
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start
of New Year procedure...
gdb/ChangeLog
Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
This commit applies all changes made after running the gdb/copyright.py
script.
Note that one file was flagged by the script, due to an invalid
copyright header
(gdb/unittests/basic_string_view/element_access/char/empty.cc).
As the file was copied from GCC's libstdc++-v3 testsuite, this commit
leaves this file untouched for the time being; a patch to fix the header
was sent to gcc-patches first.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files
|
|
This applies the second part of GDB's End of Year Procedure, which
updates the copyright year range in all of GDB's files.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update year range in copyright notice of all files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update year range in copyright notice of all files.
|
|
If a thread trips on a breakpoint that needs stepping over just after
finishing a step over, GDB currently fails an assertion. This is a
regression caused by the "Handle multiple step-overs." patch
(99619beac6252113fed212fdb9e1ab97bface423) at
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-02/msg00765.html.
(gdb) x /4i $pc
=> 0x400540 <main+4>: movl $0x0,0x2003da(%rip) # 0x600924 <i>
0x40054a <main+14>: movl $0x1,0x2003d0(%rip) # 0x600924 <i>
0x400554 <main+24>: movl $0x2,0x2003c6(%rip) # 0x600924 <i>
0x40055e <main+34>: movl $0x3,0x2003bc(%rip) # 0x600924 <i>
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.exp: get breakpoint addresses
break *0x40054a
Breakpoint 2 at 0x40054a: file ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.c, line 23.
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.exp: insn 1: set breakpoint
condition $bpnum condition
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.exp: insn 1: set condition
break *0x400554
Breakpoint 3 at 0x400554: file ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.c, line 24.
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.exp: insn 2: set breakpoint
condition $bpnum condition
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.exp: insn 2: set condition
break *0x40055e
Breakpoint 4 at 0x40055e: file ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.c, line 25.
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.exp: insn 3: set breakpoint
condition $bpnum condition
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.exp: insn 3: set condition
break 27
Breakpoint 5 at 0x400568: file ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.c, line 27.
(gdb) continue
Continuing.
../../src/gdb/infrun.c:5200: internal-error: switch_back_to_stepped_thread: Assertion `!tp->control.trap_expected' failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable.
FAIL: gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.exp: continue to breakpoint: break here (GDB internal error)
The assertion fails, because the code is not expecting that the event
thread itself might need another step over. IOW, not expecting that
TP in:
tp = find_thread_needs_step_over (stepping_thread != NULL,
stepping_thread);
could be the event thread.
A small fix for this would be to clear the event thread's
trap_expected earlier, before asserting. But looking deeper, although
currently_stepping_or_nexting_callback's intention is finding the
thread that is doing a step/next, it also returns the thread that is
doing a step-over dance, with trap_expected set. If there ever was a
reason for that (it was I who added
currently_stepping_or_nexting_callback , but I can't recall why I put
trap_expected there in the first place), the only remaining reason
nowadays is to aid in implementing switch_back_to_stepped_thread's
assertion that is now triggering, by piggybacking on the walk over all
threads, thus avoiding a separate walk. This is quite obscure, and I
think we can do even better, by merging the walks that look for the
stepping thread, and the walk that looks for some thread that might
need a step over.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 17, native and gdbserver, and also native on
top of my "software single-step on x86_64" series.
gdb/
2014-04-22 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* infrun.c (schedlock_applies): New function, factored out from
find_thread_needs_step_over.
(find_thread_needs_step_over): Use it.
(switch_back_to_stepped_thread): Always clear trap_expected if the
step over is finished. Return early if scheduler locking applies.
Look for the stepping thread and a potential step-over thread with
a single loop.
(currently_stepping_or_nexting_callback): Delete.
2014-04-22 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.c: New file.
* gdb.base/consecutive-step-over.exp: New file.
|
