| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This commit is the result of the following actions:
- Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to
include 2024,
- Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to
update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the
file,
- Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright
date,
- Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If
these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've
updated them this year to 2024.
I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as
you spot them.
|
|
This changes some tests to use "require is_aarch64_target".
|
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
|
|
As follow-up to this discussion:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-August/171385.html
... make runto_main not pass no-message to runto. This means that if we
fail to run to main, for some reason, we'll emit a FAIL. This is the
behavior we want the majority of (if not all) the time.
Without this, we rely on tests logging a failure if runto_main fails,
otherwise. They do so in a very inconsisteny mannet, sometimes using
"fail", "unsupported" or "untested". The messages also vary widly.
This patch removes all these messages as well.
Also, remove a few "fail" where we call runto (and not runto_main). by
default (without an explicit no-message argument), runto prints a
failure already. In two places, gdb.multi/multi-re-run.exp and
gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp, remove "message" passed to runto.
This removes a few PASSes that we don't care about (but FAILs will still
be printed if we fail to run to where we want to). This aligns their
behavior with the rest of the testsuite.
Change-Id: Ib763c98c5f4fb6898886b635210d7c34bd4b9023
|
|
Add an AArch64-specific test and a more generic memory tagging test that
other architectures can run.
Even though architectures not supporting memory tagging can run the memory
tagging tests, the runtime check will make the tests bail out early, as it
would make no sense to proceed without proper support.
It is also tricky to do any further runtime tests for memory tagging, given
we'd need to deal with tags, and those are arch-specific. Therefore the
test in gdb.base is more of a smoke test.
If an architecture wants to implement memory tagging, then it makes sense to
have tests within gdb.arch instead.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2021-03-24 Luis Machado <luis.machado@linaro.org>
* gdb.arch/aarch64-mte.c: New file.
* gdb.arch/aarch64-mte.exp: New test.
* gdb.base/memtag.c: New file.
* gdb.base/memtag.exp: New test.
* lib/gdb.exp (supports_memtag): New function.
|
