Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Convert solib_ops into an abstract base class (with abstract methods,
some of them with default implementations) and convert all the existing
solib_ops instances to solib_ops derived classes / implementations.
Prior to this patch, solib_ops is a structure holding function pointers,
of which there are only a handful of global instances (in the
`solib-*.c` files). When passing an `solib_ops *` around, it's a
pointer to one of these instances. After this patch, there are no more
global solib_ops instances. Instances are created as needed and stored
in struct program_space. These instances could eventually be made to
contain the program space-specific data, which is currently kept in
per-program space registries (I have some pending patches for that).
Prior to this patch, `gdbarch_so_ops` is a gdbarch method that returns a
pointer to the appropriate solib_ops implementation for the gdbarch.
This is replaced with the `gdbarch_make_solib_ops` method, which returns
a new instance of the appropriate solib_ops implementation for this
gdbarch. This requires introducing some factory functions for the
various solib_ops implementation, to be used as `gdbarch_make_solib_ops`
callbacks. For instance:
solib_ops_up
make_linux_ilp32_svr4_solib_ops ()
{
return std::make_unique<linux_ilp32_svr4_solib_ops> ();
}
The previous code is full of cases of tdep files copying some base
solib_ops implementation, and overriding one or more function pointer
(see ppc_linux_init_abi, for instance). I tried to convert all of this
is a class hierarchy. I like that it's now possible to get a good
static view of all the existing solib_ops variants. The hierarchy looks
like this:
solib_ops
├── aix_solib_ops
├── darwin_solib_ops
├── dsbt_solib_ops
├── frv_solib_ops
├── rocm_solib_ops
├── svr4_solib_ops
│ ├── ilp32_svr4_solib_ops
│ ├── lp64_svr4_solib_ops
│ ├── linux_ilp32_svr4_solib_ops
│ │ ├── mips_linux_ilp32_svr4_solib_ops
│ │ └── ppc_linux_ilp32_svr4_solib_ops
│ ├── linux_lp64_svr4_solib_ops
│ │ └── mips_linux_lp64_svr4_solib_ops
│ ├── mips_nbsd_ilp32_svr4_solib_ops
│ ├── mips_nbsd_lp64_svr4_solib_ops
│ ├── mips_fbsd_ilp32_svr4_solib_ops
│ └── mips_fbsd_lp64_svr4_solib_ops
└── target_solib_ops
└── windows_solib_ops
The solib-svr4 code has per-arch specialization to provide a
link_map_offsets, containing the offsets of the interesting fields in
`struct link_map` on that particular architecture. Prior to this patch,
arches would set a callback returning the appropriate link_map_offsets
by calling `set_solib_svr4_fetch_link_map_offsets`, which also happened
to set the gdbarch's so_ops to `&svr_so_ops`. I converted this to an
abstract virtual method of `struct svr4_solib_ops`, meaning that all
classes deriving from svr4_solib_ops must provide a method returning the
appropriate link_map_offsets for the architecture. I renamed
`set_solib_svr4_fetch_link_map_offsets` to `set_solib_svr4_ops`. This
function is still necessary because it also calls
set_gdbarch_iterate_over_objfiles_in_search_order, but if it was not for
that, we could get rid of it.
There is an instance of CRTP in mips-linux-tdep.c, because both
mips_linux_ilp32_svr4_solib_ops and mips_linux_lp64_svr4_solib_ops need
to derive from different SVR4 base classes (linux_ilp32_svr4_solib_ops
and linux_lp64_svr4_solib_ops), but they both want to override the
in_dynsym_resolve_code method with the same implementation.
The solib_ops::supports_namespaces method is new: the support for
namespaces was previously predicated by the presence or absence of a
find_solib_ns method. It now needs to be explicit.
There is a new progspace::release_solib_ops method, which is only needed
for rocm_solib_ops. For the moment, rocm_solib_ops replaces and wraps
the existing svr4_solib_ops instance, in order to combine the results of
the two. The plan is to have a subsequent patch to allow program spaces to have
multiple solib_ops, removing the need for release_solib_ops.
Speaking of rocm_solib_ops: it previously overrode only a few methods by
copying svr4_solib_ops and overwriting some function pointers. Now, it
needs to implement all the methods that svr4_solib_ops implements, in
order to forward the call. Otherwise, the default solib_ops method
would be called, hiding the svr4_solib_ops implementation. Again, this
can be removed once we have support for multiple solib_ops in a
program_space.
There is also a small change in how rocm_solib_ops is activated. Prior
to this patch, it's done at the end of rocm_update_solib_list. Since it
overrides the function pointer in the static svr4_solib_ops, and then
overwrites the host gdbarch, so_ops field, it's something that happens
only once. After the patch though, we need to set rocm_solib_ops in all
the program spaces that appear. We do this in
rocm_solib_target_inferior_created and in the new
rocm_solib_target_inferior_execd. After this, I will explore doing a
change where rocm_solib_ops is only set when we detect the ROCm runtime
is loaded.
Change-Id: I5896b5bcbf8bdb024d67980380feba1ffefaa4c9
Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
|
|
This updates the copyright headers to include 2025. I did this by
running gdb/copyright.py and then manually modifying a few files as
noted by the script.
Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
This patch is the result of running check-include-guards.py on the
current tree. Running it a second time causes no changes.
Reviewed-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
|
|
I don't like the name `target_so_ops`, because:
- The name `target` is so overloaded, and in this case it's not even
related to target_ops or anything else called "target".
- We do have an implementation that actually fetches solibs from the
target (solib_target_so_op in solib-target.c), so it's confusing for
the "base class" to be called target_something as well.
Rename to solib_ops.
Change-Id: I46a983d44e81400470e22deb09aaf26ad8a3587f
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
This commit is the result of the following actions:
- Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to
include 2024,
- Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to
update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the
file,
- Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright
date,
- Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If
these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've
updated them this year to 2024.
I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as
you spot them.
|
|
I'm starting to work on these files, I thought it would be a good time
to remove unused imports. These were identified by
include-what-you-use. Tested by rebuilding.
Change-Id: I3eaf3fa0ea3506c7ecfbc8ecff5031433b1dadb8
Reviewed-By: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
|
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This changes some target_so_ops instances to be const. This makes
their use a little more obvious (they can't be mutated) and also
allows for the removal of some initialization code.
|