aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
9 daysChange file initialization to use INIT_GDB_FILE macroTom Tromey1-3/+1
This patch introduces a new macro, INIT_GDB_FILE. This is used to replace the current "_initialize_" idiom when introducing a per-file initialization function. That is, rather than write: void _initialize_something (); void _initialize_something () { ... } ... now you would write: INIT_GDB_FILE (something) { ... } The macro handles both the declaration and definition of the function. The point of this approach is that it makes it harder to accidentally cause an initializer to be omitted; see commit 2711e475 ("Ensure cooked_index_entry self-tests are run"). Specifically, the regexp now used by make-init-c seems harder to trick. New in v2: un-did some erroneous changes made by the script. The bulk of this patch was written by script. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 41.
2025-04-08Update copyright dates to include 2025Tom Tromey1-1/+1
This updates the copyright headers to include 2025. I did this by running gdb/copyright.py and then manually modifying a few files as noted by the script. Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2025-03-03gdb/dwarf: rename dwarf2_per_cu_data -> dwarf2_per_cuSimon Marchi1-3/+2
This scratches an itch I had for a while. I don't know why this struct type has "data" in its name. Others like "dwarf2_per_objfile" and "dwarf2_per_bfd" don't. The primary job of a structure is to hold data, there's no need to specify it. It also makes the name a bit shorter, which is always nice. Rename related types too. Change-Id: Ifb63195ff105809fc15b502f639c0bb4d18a675e Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Reviewed-By: Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com>
2025-02-27gdb, gdbserver, gdbsupport: fix some namespace comment formattingSimon Marchi1-1/+1
I noticed a // namespace selftests comment, which doesn't follow our comment formatting convention. I did a find & replace to fix all the offenders. Change-Id: Idf8fe9833caf1c3d99e15330db000e4bab4ec66c
2025-02-19Move producer_is_realview to producer.cTom Tromey1-0/+1
This moves the producer_is_realview to producer.c.
2025-02-19gdb/dwarf: std::unordered_{set,map} -> gdb::unordered_{set,map} throughoutSimon Marchi1-2/+1
No behavior changes expected. Change-Id: I16ff6c67058362c65cc8edb05d1948e48be6b2e1 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-01-17Add missing includes of extract-store-integer.hTom Tromey1-0/+1
I found a number of .c files that need to include extract-store-integer.h but that were only including it indirectly. This patch adds the missing includes. This change enables the next patch. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-01-17gdb: introduce ability to disable frame unwindersGuinevere Larsen1-30/+0
Sometimes, in the GDB testsuite, we want to test the ability of specific unwinders to handle some piece of code. Usually this is done by trying to outsmart GDB, or by coercing the compiler to remove information that GDB would rely on. Both approaches have problems as GDB gets smarter with time, and that compilers might differ in version and behavior, or simply introduce new useful information. This was requested back in 2003 in PR backtrace/8434. To improve our ability to thoroughly test GDB, this patch introduces a new maintenance command that allows a user to disable some unwinders, based on either the name of the unwinder or on its class. With this change, it will now be possible for GDB to not find any frame unwinders for a given frame, which would previously cause GDB to assert. GDB will now check if any frame unwinder has been disabled, and if some has, it will just error out instead of asserting. Unwinders can be disabled or re-enabled in 3 different ways: * Disabling/enabling all at once (using '-all'). * By specifying an unwinder class to be disabled (option '-class'). * By specifying the name of an unwinder (option '-name'). If you give no options to the command, GDB assumes the input is an unwinder class. '-class' would make no difference if used, is just here for completeness. This command is meant to be used once the inferior is already at the desired location for the test. An example session would be: (gdb) start Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at omp.c:17 17 func(); (gdb) maint frame-unwinder disable ARCH (gdb) bt \#0 main () at omp.c:17 (gdb) maint frame-unwinder enable ARCH (gdb) cont Continuing. This commit is a more generic version of commit 3c3bb0580be0, and so, based on the final paragraph of the commit message: gdb: Add switch to disable DWARF stack unwinders <...> If in the future we find ourselves adding more switches to disable different unwinders, then we should probably move to a more generic solution, and remove this patch. this patch also reverts 3c3bb0580be0 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8434 Co-Authored-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> temp adding completion
2025-01-17gdb: Migrate frame unwinders to use C++ classesGuinevere Larsen1-8/+6
Frame unwinders have historically been a structure populated with callback pointers, so that architectures (or other specific unwinders) could install their own way to handle the inferior. However, since moving to C++, we could use polymorphism to get the same functionality in a more readable way. Polymorphism also makes it simpler to add new functionality to all frame unwinders, since all that's required is adding it to the base class. As part of the changes to add support to disabling frame unwinders, this commit makes the first baby step in using polymorphism for the frame unwinders, by making frame_unwind a virtual class, and adds a couple of new classes. The main class added is frame_unwind_legacy, which works the same as the previous structs, using function pointers as callbacks. This class was added to allow the transition to happen piecemeal. New unwinders should instead follow the lead of the other classes implemented. 2 of the others, frame_unwind_python and frame_unwind_trampoline, were added because it seemed simpler at the moment to do that instead of reworking the dynamic allocation to work with the legacy class, and can be used as an example to future implementations. Finally, the cygwin unwinder was converted to a class since it was most of the way there already. Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-01-17gdb: add "unwinder class" to frame unwindersGuinevere Larsen1-0/+2
A future patch will add a way to disable certain unwinders based on different characteristics. This patch aims to make it more convenient to disable related unwinders in bulk, such as architecture specific ones, by identifying all unwinders by which part of the code adds it. The classes, and explanations, are as follows: * GDB: An internal unwinder, added by GDB core, such as the unwinder for dummy frames; * EXTENSION: Unwinders added by extension languages; * DEBUGINFO: Unwinders installed by the debug info reader; * ARCH: Unwinders installed by the architecture specific code. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-11-23[gdb/contrib] Add two rules in common-misspellings.txtTom de Vries1-1/+1
Eli mentioned [1] that given that we use US English spelling in our documentation, we should use "behavior" instead of "behaviour". In wikipedia-common-misspellings.txt there's a rule: ... behavour->behavior, behaviour ... which leaves this as a choice. Add an overriding rule to hardcode the choice to common-misspellings.txt: ... behavour->behavior ... and add a rule to rewrite behaviour into behavior: ... behaviour->behavior ... and re-run spellcheck.sh on gdb*. Tested on x86_64-linux. [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2024-November/213371.html
2024-10-06[gdb] Fix common misspellingsTom de Vries1-2/+2
Fix the following common misspellings: ... accidently -> accidentally additonal -> additional addresing -> addressing adress -> address agaisnt -> against albiet -> albeit arbitary -> arbitrary artifical -> artificial auxillary -> auxiliary auxilliary -> auxiliary bcak -> back begining -> beginning cannonical -> canonical compatiblity -> compatibility completetion -> completion diferent -> different emited -> emitted emiting -> emitting emmitted -> emitted everytime -> every time excercise -> exercise existance -> existence fucntion -> function funtion -> function guarentee -> guarantee htis -> this immediatly -> immediately layed -> laid noone -> no one occurances -> occurrences occured -> occurred originaly -> originally preceeded -> preceded preceeds -> precedes propogate -> propagate publically -> publicly refering -> referring substract -> subtract substracting -> subtracting substraction -> subtraction taht -> that targetting -> targeting teh -> the thier -> their thru -> through transfered -> transferred transfering -> transferring upto -> up to vincinity -> vicinity whcih -> which whereever -> wherever wierd -> weird withing -> within writen -> written wtih -> with doesnt -> doesn't ... Tested on x86_64-linux.
2024-08-30gdb/dwarf2: cleanup includesSimon Marchi1-2/+0
Cleanup includes in dwarf2/*. 1. Add the necessary includes so that clangd reports no errors when opening header files. This ensures that header files include what they use. 2. Remove all includes reported as unused by clangd (except gdb-safe-ctype.h, which I think does some magic that affects what follows). Built-tested --enable-threading at "yes" and "no", since there are some portions of code gated by `#ifdef CXX_STD_THREAD`. Change-Id: I21debffcd7c2caf90f08e1e0fbba3ce30422d042 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-03-26gdb, gdbserver, gdbsupport: remove includes of early headersSimon Marchi1-1/+0
Now that defs.h, server.h and common-defs.h are included via the `-include` option, it is no longer necessary for source files to include them. Remove all the inclusions of these files I could find. Update the generation scripts where relevant. Change-Id: Ia026cff269c1b7ae7386dd3619bc9bb6a5332837 Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
2024-02-20gdb: pass frames as `const frame_info_ptr &`Simon Marchi1-19/+21
We currently pass frames to function by value, as `frame_info_ptr`. This is somewhat expensive: - the size of `frame_info_ptr` is 64 bytes, which is a bit big to pass by value - the constructors and destructor link/unlink the object in the global `frame_info_ptr::frame_list` list. This is an `intrusive_list`, so it's not so bad: it's just assigning a few points, there's no memory allocation as if it was `std::list`, but still it's useless to do that over and over. As suggested by Tom Tromey, change many function signatures to accept `const frame_info_ptr &` instead of `frame_info_ptr`. Some functions reassign their `frame_info_ptr` parameter, like: void the_func (frame_info_ptr frame) { for (; frame != nullptr; frame = get_prev_frame (frame)) { ... } } I wondered what to do about them, do I leave them as-is or change them (and need to introduce a separate local variable that can be re-assigned). I opted for the later for consistency. It might not be clear why some functions take `const frame_info_ptr &` while others take `frame_info_ptr`. Also, if a function took a `frame_info_ptr` because it did re-assign its parameter, I doubt that we would think to change it to `const frame_info_ptr &` should the implementation change such that it doesn't need to take `frame_info_ptr` anymore. It seems better to have a simple rule and apply it everywhere. Change-Id: I59d10addef687d157f82ccf4d54f5dde9a963fd0 Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-01-29Fix backtrace limit stopping on inline frameHannes Domani1-1/+1
If you have set up a backtrace limit, and the backtrace stops because of this in an inline frame with arguments, you get an assertion failure: ``` (gdb) bt (gdb) set backtrace limit 2 (gdb) bt C:/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/frame.c:3346: internal-error: reinflate: Assertion `m_cached_level >= -1' failed. ``` And if this one is fixed, there is another one as well: ``` (gdb) bt C:/src/repos/binutils-gdb.git/gdb/dwarf2/loc.c:1160: internal-error: dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter: Assertion `frame != NULL' failed. ``` The reason for both of them is this kind of loop: ``` while (get_frame_type (frame) == INLINE_FRAME) frame = get_prev_frame (frame); ``` Since get_prev_frame respects the backtrace limit, it will return NULL, and from there on you can't continue. This changes these loops to use get_prev_frame_always instead, so you always get a non-inline frame in the end. With this backtrace works: ``` (gdb) bt (gdb) ``` Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29865 Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-01-12Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
This commit is the result of the following actions: - Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to include 2024, - Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the file, - Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright date, - Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've updated them this year to 2024. I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as you spot them.
2023-12-14gdb: read pseudo register through frameSimon Marchi1-1/+4
Change gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value to take a frame instead of a regcache. The frame (and formerly the regcache) is used to read raw registers needed to make up the pseudo register value. The problem with using the regcache is that it always provides raw register values for the current frame (frame 0). Let's say the user wants to read the ebx register on amd64. ebx is a pseudo register, obtained by reading the bottom half (bottom 4 bytes) of the rbx register, which is a raw register. If the currently selected frame is frame 0, it works fine: (gdb) frame 0 #0 break_here_asm () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S:36 36 in /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S (gdb) p/x $ebx $1 = 0x24252627 (gdb) p/x $rbx $2 = 0x2021222324252627 But if the user is looking at another frame, and the raw register behind the pseudo register has been saved at some point in the call stack, then we get a wrong answer: (gdb) frame 1 #1 0x000055555555517d in caller () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S:56 56 in /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/amd64-pseudo-unwind-asm.S (gdb) p/x $ebx $3 = 0x24252627 (gdb) p/x $rbx $4 = 0x1011121314151617 Here, the value of ebx was computed using the value of rbx in frame 0 (through the regcache), it should have been computed using the value of rbx in frame 1. In other to make this work properly, make the following changes: - Make dwarf2_frame_prev_register return nullptr if it doesn't know how to unwind a register and that register is a pseudo register. Previously, it returned `frame_unwind_got_register`, meaning, in our example, "the value of ebx in frame 1 is the same as the value of ebx in frame 0", which is obviously false. Return nullptr as a way to say "I don't know". - In frame_unwind_register_value, when prev_register (for instance dwarf2_frame_prev_register) returns nullptr, and we are trying to read a pseudo register, try to get the register value through gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value or gdbarch_pseudo_register_read. If using gdbarch_pseudo_register_read, the behavior is known to be broken. Implementations should be migrated to use gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value to fix that. - Change gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value to take a frame_info instead of a regcache, update implementations (aarch64, amd64, i386). In i386-tdep.c, I made a copy of i386_mmx_regnum_to_fp_regnum that uses a frame instead of a regcache. The version using the regcache is still used by i386_pseudo_register_write. It will get removed in a subsequent patch. - Add some helpers in value.{c,h} to implement the common cases of pseudo registers: taking part of a raw register and concatenating multiple raw registers. - Update readable_regcache::{cooked_read,cooked_read_value} to pass the current frame to gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value. Passing the current frame will give the same behavior as before: for frame 0, raw registers will be read from the current thread's regcache. Notes: - I do not plan on changing gdbarch_pseudo_register_read to receive a frame instead of a regcache. That method is considered deprecated. Instead, we should be working on migrating implementations to use gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value instead. - In frame_unwind_register_value, we still ask the unwinder to try to unwind pseudo register values. It's apparently possible for the debug info to provide information about [1] pseudo registers, so we want to try that first, before falling back to computing them ourselves. [1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20180528174715.A954AD804AD@oc3748833570.ibm.com/ Change-Id: Id6ef1c64e19090a183dec050e4034d8c2394e7ca Reviewed-by: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
2023-11-21gdb: Use C++17's std::make_unique instead of gdb::make_uniqueLancelot Six1-1/+1
gdb::make_unique is a wrapper around std::make_unique when compiled with C++17. Now that C++17 is required, use std::make_unique directly in the codebase, and remove gdb::make_unique. Change-Id: I80b615e46e4b7c097f09d78e579a9bdce00254ab Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net
2023-08-23gdb: add gdb::make_unique functionAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
While GDB is still C++11, lets add a gdb::make_unique template function that can be used to create std::unique_ptr objects, just like the C++14 std::make_unique. If GDB is being compiled with a C++14 compiler then the new gdb::make_unique function will delegate to the std::make_unique. I checked with gcc, and at -O1 and above gdb::make_unique will be optimised away completely in this case. If C++14 (or later) becomes our minimum, then it will be easy enough to go through the code and replace gdb::make_unique with std::make_unique later on. I've make use of this function in all the places I think this can easily be used, though I'm sure I've probably missed some. Should be no user visible changes after this commit. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-06-05Use unrelocated_addr in dwarf2_fdeTom Tromey1-32/+39
This changes dwarf2_fde to use the unrelocated_addr type. This pointed out a latent bug in dwarf2_frame_cache, where a relocated address is compared to an unrelocated address.
2023-06-05Use local "text offset" variable in dwarf2_frame_cacheTom Tromey1-5/+6
A few spots in dwarf2_frame_cache use: cache->per_objfile->objfile->text_section_offset () ... and a subsequent patch will add more, so move this into a local variable.
2023-06-05Constify dwarf2_cie::augmentationTom Tromey1-3/+3
I noticed that dwarf2_cie::augmentation could be 'const'.
2023-02-13Remove deprecated_lval_hackTom Tromey1-1/+1
This removes deprecated_lval_hack and the VALUE_LVAL macro, replacing all uses with a call to value::lval. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-02-13Turn value_address and set_value_address functions into methodsTom Tromey1-1/+1
This changes the value_address and set_value_address functions to be methods of value. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2023-01-25gdb: dwarf2 generic implementation for caching function dataTorbjörn SVENSSON1-0/+60
When there is no dwarf2 data for a register, a function can be called to provide the value of this register. In some situations, it might not be trivial to determine the value to return and it would cause a performance bottleneck to do the computation each time. This patch allows the called function to have a "cache" object that it can use to store some metadata between calls to reduce the performance impact of the complex logic. The cache object is unique for each function and frame, so if there are more than one function pointer stored in the dwarf2_frame_cache->reg array, then the appropriate pointer will be supplied (the type is not known by the dwarf2 implementation). dwarf2_frame_get_fn_data can be used to retrieve the function unique cache object. dwarf2_frame_allocate_fn_data can be used to allocate and retrieve the function unique cache object. Signed-off-by: Torbjörn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@foss.st.com> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
2023-01-01Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script, which automated the update of the copyright year range for all source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include year 2023.
2022-12-08gdb: skip objfiles with no BFD in DWARF unwinderJan Vrany1-0/+3
While playing with JIT reader I experienced GDB to crash on null-pointer dereference when stepping through non-jitted code. The problem was that dwarf2_frame_find_fde () assumed that all objfiles have BFD but that's not always true. To address this problem, this commit skips such objfiles. To test the fix we put breakpoint in jit_function_add (). The JIT reader does not know how unwind this function so unwinding eventually falls back to DWARF unwinder which in turn iterates over objfiles. Since the the code is jitted, it is guaranteed it would eventually process JIT objfile. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2022-10-25gdb: remove spurious spaces after frame_info_ptrSimon Marchi1-2/+2
Fix some whitespace issues introduced with the frame_info_ptr patch. Change-Id: I158d30d8108c97564276c647fc98283ff7b12163
2022-10-19internal_error: remove need to pass __FILE__/__LINE__Pedro Alves1-12/+8
Currently, every internal_error call must be passed __FILE__/__LINE__ explicitly, like: internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__, "foo %d", var); The need to pass in explicit __FILE__/__LINE__ is there probably because the function predates widespread and portable variadic macros availability. We can use variadic macros nowadays, and in fact, we already use them in several places, including the related gdb_assert_not_reached. So this patch renames the internal_error function to something else, and then reimplements internal_error as a variadic macro that expands __FILE__/__LINE__ itself. The result is that we now should call internal_error like so: internal_error ("foo %d", var); Likewise for internal_warning. The patch adjusts all calls sites. 99% of the adjustments were done with a perl/sed script. The non-mechanical changes are in gdbsupport/errors.h, gdbsupport/gdb_assert.h, and gdb/gdbarch.py. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> Change-Id: Ia6f372c11550ca876829e8fd85048f4502bdcf06
2022-10-10Change GDB to use frame_info_ptrTom Tromey1-19/+20
This changes GDB to use frame_info_ptr instead of frame_info * The substitution was done with multiple sequential `sed` commands: sed 's/^struct frame_info;/class frame_info_ptr;/' sed 's/struct frame_info \*/frame_info_ptr /g' - which left some issues in a few files, that were manually fixed. sed 's/\<frame_info \*/frame_info_ptr /g' sed 's/frame_info_ptr $/frame_info_ptr/g' - used to remove whitespace problems. The changed files were then manually checked and some 'sed' changes undone, some constructors and some gets were added, according to what made sense, and what Tromey originally did Co-Authored-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> Approved-by: Tom Tomey <tom@tromey.com>
2022-08-04Use registry in gdbarchTom Tromey1-31/+27
gdbarch implements its own registry-like approach. This patch changes it to instead use registry.h. It's a rather large patch but largely uninteresting -- it's mostly a straightforward conversion from the old approach to the new one. The main benefit of this change is that it introduces type safety to the gdbarch registry. It also removes a bunch of code. One possible drawback is that, previously, the gdbarch registry differentiated between pre- and post-initialization setup. This doesn't seem very important to me, though.
2022-08-03Use gdb_bfd_ref_ptr in objfileTom Tromey1-3/+3
This changes struct objfile to use a gdb_bfd_ref_ptr. In addition to removing some manual memory management, this fixes a use-after-free that was introduced by the registry rewrite series. The issue there was that, in some cases, registry shutdown could refer to memory that had already been freed. This help fix the bug by delaying the destruction of the BFD reference (and thus the per-bfd object) until after the registry has been shut down.
2022-07-28Rewrite registry.hTom Tromey1-2/+2
This rewrites registry.h, removing all the macros and replacing it with relatively ordinary template classes. The result is less code than the previous setup. It replaces large macros with a relatively straightforward C++ class, and now manages its own cleanup. The existing type-safe "key" class is replaced with the equivalent template class. This approach ended up requiring relatively few changes to the users of the registry code in gdb -- code using the key system just required a small change to the key's declaration. All existing users of the old C-like API are now converted to use the type-safe API. This mostly involved changing explicit deletion functions to be an operator() in a deleter class. The old "save/free" two-phase process is removed, and replaced with a single "free" phase. No existing code used both phases. The old "free" callbacks took a parameter for the enclosing container object. However, this wasn't truly needed and is removed here as well.
2022-03-29Unify gdb printf functionsTom Tromey1-3/+3
Now that filtered and unfiltered output can be treated identically, we can unify the printf family of functions. This is done under the name "gdb_printf". Most of this patch was written by script.
2022-03-22Fix some stale header names from dwarf filesLuis Machado1-2/+2
Some of these references were not updated when they were moved to a separate directory.
2022-02-06gdb: remove COMPUNIT_PRODUCER macro, add getter/setterSimon Marchi1-1/+1
Add a getter and a setter for a compunit_symtab's producer. Remove the corresponding macro and adjust all callers. Change-Id: Ia1d6d8a0e247a08a21af23819d71e49b37d8931b
2022-01-01Automatic Copyright Year update after running gdb/copyright.pyJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure. For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were performed by the script.
2021-08-05Add as_lval argument to expression evaluatorZoran Zaric1-1/+1
There are cases where the result of the expression evaluation is expected to be in a form of a value and not location description. One place that has this requirement is dwarf_entry_parameter_to_value function, but more are expected in the future. Until now, this requirement was fulfilled by extending the evaluated expression with a DW_OP_stack_value operation at the end. New implementation, introduces a new evaluation argument instead. * dwarf2/expr.c (dwarf_expr_context::fetch_result): Add as_lval argument. (dwarf_expr_context::eval_exp): Add as_lval argument. * dwarf2/expr.h (struct dwarf_expr_context): Add as_lval argument to fetch_result and eval_exp methods. * dwarf2/frame.c (execute_stack_op): Add as_lval argument. * dwarf2/loc.c (dwarf_entry_parameter_to_value): Remove DWARF expression extension. (dwarf2_evaluate_loc_desc_full): Add as_lval argument support. (dwarf2_evaluate_loc_desc): Add as_lval argument support. (dwarf2_locexpr_baton_eval): Add as_lval argument support.
2021-08-05Simplify dwarf_expr_context class interfaceZoran Zaric1-13/+4
Idea of this patch is to get a clean and simple public interface for the dwarf_expr_context class, looking like: - constructor, - destructor, - push_address method and - evaluate method. Where constructor should only ever require a target architecture information. This information is held in per object file (dwarf2_per_objfile) structure, so it makes sense to keep that structure as a constructor argument. It also makes sense to get the address size from that structure, but unfortunately that interface doesn't exist at the moment, so the dwarf_expr_context class user needs to provide that information. The push_address method is used to push a CORE_ADDR as a value on top of the DWARF stack before the evaluation. This method can be later changed to push any struct value object on the stack. The evaluate method is the method that evaluates a DWARF expression and provides the evaluation result, in a form of a single struct value object that describes a location. To do this, the method requires a context of the evaluation, as well as expected result type information. If the type information is not provided, the DWARF generic type will be used instead. To avoid storing the gdbarch information in the evaluator object, that information is now always acquired from the per_objfile object. All data members are now private and only visible to the evaluator class, so a m_ prefix was added to all of their names to reflect that. To make this distinction clear, they are also accessed through objects this pointer, wherever that was not the case before. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/expr.c (dwarf_expr_context::dwarf_expr_context): Add address size argument. (dwarf_expr_context::read_mem): Change to use property_addr_info structure. (dwarf_expr_context::evaluate): New function. (dwarf_expr_context::execute_stack_op): Change to use property_addr_info structure. * dwarf2/expr.h (struct dwarf_expr_context): New evaluate declaration. Change eval and fetch_result method to private. (dwarf_expr_context::gdbarch): Remove member. (dwarf_expr_context::stack): Make private and add m_ prefix. (dwarf_expr_context::addr_size): Make private and add m_ prefix. (dwarf_expr_context::recursion_depth): Make private and add m_ prefix. (dwarf_expr_context::max_recursion_depth): Make private and add m_ prefix. (dwarf_expr_context::len): Make private and add m_ prefix. (dwarf_expr_context::data): Make private and add m_ prefix. (dwarf_expr_context::initialized): Make private and add m_ prefix. (dwarf_expr_context::pieces): Make private and add m_ prefix. (dwarf_expr_context::per_objfile): Make private and add m_ prefix. (dwarf_expr_context::frame): Make private and add m_ prefix. (dwarf_expr_context::per_cu): Make private and add m_ prefix. (dwarf_expr_context::addr_info): Make private and add m_ prefix. * dwarf2/frame.c (execute_stack_op): Change to call evaluate method. * dwarf2/loc.c (dwarf2_evaluate_loc_desc_full): Change to call evaluate method. (dwarf2_locexpr_baton_eval): Change to call evaluate method.
2021-08-05Make DWARF evaluator return a single struct valueZoran Zaric1-13/+6
The patch is addressing the issue of class users writing and reading the internal data of the dwarf_expr_context class. At this point, all conditions are met for the DWARF evaluator to return an evaluation result in a form of a single struct value object. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/expr.c (pieced_value_funcs): Chenge to static function. (allocate_piece_closure): Change to static function. (dwarf_expr_context::fetch_result): New function. * dwarf2/expr.h (struct piece_closure): Remove declaration. (struct dwarf_expr_context): fetch_result new declaration. fetch, fetch_address and fetch_in_stack_memory members move to private. (allocate_piece_closure): Remove. * dwarf2/frame.c (execute_stack_op): Change to use fetch_result. * dwarf2/loc.c (dwarf2_evaluate_loc_desc_full): Change to use fetch_result. (dwarf2_locexpr_baton_eval): Change to use fetch_result. * dwarf2/loc.h (invalid_synthetic_pointer): Expose function.
2021-08-05Remove empty frame and full evaluatorsZoran Zaric1-17/+1
There are no virtual methods that require different specialization in dwarf_expr_context class. This means that derived classes dwarf_expr_executor and dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc are not needed any more. As a result of this, the evaluate_for_locexpr_baton class base class is now the dwarf_expr_context class. There might be a need for a better class hierarchy when we know more about the direction of the future DWARF versions and gdb extensions, but that is out of the scope of this patch series. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/frame.c (class dwarf_expr_executor): Remove class. (execute_stack_op): Instantiate dwarf_expr_context instead of dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc class. * dwarf2/loc.c (class dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc): Remove class. (dwarf2_evaluate_loc_desc_full): Instantiate dwarf_expr_context instead of dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc class. (struct evaluate_for_locexpr_baton): Derive from dwarf_expr_context.
2021-08-05Move push_dwarf_reg_entry_value to expr.cZoran Zaric1-7/+0
Following the idea of merging the evaluators, the push_dwarf_reg_entry_value method can be moved from dwarf_expr_executor and dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc classes to their base class dwarf_expr_context. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/expr.c (dwarf_expr_context::push_dwarf_reg_entry_value): Move from dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc. * dwarf2/frame.c (dwarf_expr_executor::push_dwarf_reg_entry_value): Remove method. * dwarf2/loc.c (dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter): Expose function. (dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc::push_dwarf_reg_entry_value): Move to dwarf_expr_context. * dwarf2/loc.h (dwarf_expr_reg_to_entry_parameter): Expose function.
2021-08-05Move read_mem to dwarf_expr_contextZoran Zaric1-5/+0
Following the idea of merging the evaluators, the read_mem method can be moved from dwarf_expr_executor and dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc classes to their base class dwarf_expr_context. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/expr.c (dwarf_expr_context::read_mem): Move from dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc. * dwarf2/frame.c (dwarf_expr_executor::read_mem): Remove method. * dwarf2/loc.c (dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc::read_mem): Move to dwarf_expr_context.
2021-08-05Move get_object_address to dwarf_expr_contextZoran Zaric1-5/+0
Following the idea of merging the evaluators, the get_object_address and can be moved from dwarf_expr_executor and dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc classes to their base class dwarf_expr_context. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/expr.c (dwarf_expr_context::get_object_address): Move from dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc. (class dwarf_expr_context): Add object address member to dwarf_expr_context. * dwarf2/expr.h (dwarf_expr_context::get_frame_pc): Remove method. * dwarf2/frame.c (dwarf_expr_executor::get_object_address): Remove method. * dwarf2/loc.c (dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc::get_object_address): move to dwarf_expr_context. (class dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc): Move object address member to dwarf_expr_context.
2021-08-05Move dwarf_call to dwarf_expr_contextZoran Zaric1-10/+0
Following the idea of merging the evaluators, the dwarf_call and get_frame_pc method can be moved from dwarf_expr_executor and dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc classes to their base class dwarf_expr_context. Once this is done, the get_frame_pc can be replace with lambda function. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/expr.c (dwarf_expr_context::dwarf_call): Move from dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc. (dwarf_expr_context::get_frame_pc): Replace with lambda. * dwarf2/expr.h (dwarf_expr_context::get_frame_pc): Remove method. * dwarf2/frame.c (dwarf_expr_executor::dwarf_call): Remove method. (dwarf_expr_executor::get_frame_pc): Remove method. * dwarf2/loc.c (dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc::get_frame_pc): Remove method. (dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc::dwarf_call): Move to dwarf_expr_context. (per_cu_dwarf_call): Inline function.
2021-08-05Move compilation unit info to dwarf_expr_contextZoran Zaric1-11/+0
This patch moves the compilation unit context information and support from dwarf_expr_executor and dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc to dwarf_expr_context evaluator. The idea is to report an error when a given operation requires a compilation unit information to be resolved, which is not available. With this change, it also makes sense to always acquire ref_addr_size information from the compilation unit context, considering that all DWARF operations that refer to that information require a compilation unit context to be present during their evaluation. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/expr.c (ensure_have_per_cu): New function. (dwarf_expr_context::dwarf_expr_context): Add compilation unit context information. (dwarf_expr_context::get_base_type): Move from dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc. (dwarf_expr_context::get_addr_index): Remove method. (dwarf_expr_context::dwarf_variable_value): Remove method. (dwarf_expr_context::execute_stack_op): Call compilation unit context info check. Inline get_addr_index and dwarf_variable_value methods. * dwarf2/expr.h (struct dwarf_expr_context): Add compilation context info. (dwarf_expr_context::get_addr_index): Remove method. (dwarf_expr_context::dwarf_variable_value): Remove method. (dwarf_expr_context::ref_addr_size): Remove member. * dwarf2/frame.c (dwarf_expr_executor::get_addr_index): Remove method. (dwarf_expr_executor::dwarf_variable_value): Remove method. * dwarf2/loc.c (sect_variable_value): Expose function. (dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc::get_addr_index): Remove method. (dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc::dwarf_variable_value): Remove method. (class dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc): Move compilation unit context information to dwarf_expr_context class. * dwarf2/loc.h (sect_variable_value): Expose function.
2021-08-05Remove get_frame_cfa from dwarf_expr_contextZoran Zaric1-5/+0
Following the idea of merging the evaluators, the get_frame_cfa method can be moved from dwarf_expr_executor and dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc classes to their base class dwarf_expr_context. Once this is done, it becomes apparent that the method is only called once and it can be inlined. It is also necessary to check if the frame context information was provided before the DW_OP_call_frame_cfa operation is executed. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/expr.c (dwarf_expr_context::get_frame_cfa): Remove method. (dwarf_expr_context::execute_stack_op): Call frame context info check for DW_OP_call_frame_cfa. Remove use of get_frame_cfa. * dwarf2/expr.h (dwarf_expr_context::get_frame_cfa): Remove method. * dwarf2/frame.c (dwarf_expr_context::get_frame_cfa): Remove method. * dwarf2/loc.c (dwarf_expr_context::get_frame_cfa): Remove method.
2021-08-05Move frame context info to dwarf_expr_contextZoran Zaric1-34/+2
Following 15 patches in this patch series is cleaning up the design of the DWARF expression evaluator (dwarf_expr_context) to make future extensions of that evaluator easier and cleaner to implement. There are three subclasses of the dwarf_expr_context class (dwarf_expr_executor, dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc and evaluate_for_locexpr_baton). Here is a short description of each class: - dwarf_expr_executor is evaluating a DWARF expression in a context of a Call Frame Information. The overridden methods of this subclass report an error if a specific DWARF operation, represented by that method, is not allowed in a CFI context. The source code of this subclass lacks the support for composite as well as implicit pointer location description. - dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc can evaluate any expression with no restrictions. All of the methods that this subclass overrides are actually doing what they are intended to do. This subclass contains a full support for all location description types. - evaluate_for_locexpr_baton subclass is a specialization of the dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc subclass and it's function is to add support for passed in buffers. This seems to be a way to go around the fact that DWARF standard lacks a bit offset support for memory location descriptions as well as using any location description for the push object address functionality. It all comes down to this question: what is a function of a DWARF expression evaluator? Is it to evaluate the expression in a given context or to check the correctness of that expression in that context? Currently, the only reason why there is a dwarf_expr_executor subclass is to report an invalid DWARF expression in a context of a CFI, but is that what the evaluator is supposed to do considering that the evaluator is not tied to a given DWARF version? There are more and more vendor and GNU extensions that are not part of the DWARF standard, so is it that impossible to expect that some of the extensions could actually lift the previously imposed restrictions of the CFI context? Not to mention that every new DWARF version is lifting some restrictions anyway. The thing that makes more sense for an evaluator to do, is to take the context of an evaluation and checks the requirements of every operation evaluated against that context. With this approach, the evaluator would report an error only if parts of the context, necessary for the evaluation, are missing. If this approach is taken, then the unification of the dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc, dwarf_expr_executor and dwarf_expr_context is the next logical step. This makes a design of the DWARF expression evaluator cleaner and allows more flexibility when supporting future vendor and GNU extensions. Additional benefit here is that now all evaluators have access to all location description types, which means that a vendor extended CFI rules could support composite location description as well. This also means that a new evaluator interface can be changed to return a single struct value (that describes the result of the evaluation) instead of a caller poking around the dwarf_expr_context internal data for answers (like it is done currently). This patch starts the merging process by moving the frame context information and support from dwarf_expr_executor and dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc to dwarf_expr_context evaluator. The idea is to report an error when a given operation requires a frame information to be resolved, if that information is not present. gdb/ChangeLog: * dwarf2/expr.c (ensure_have_frame): New function. (read_addr_from_reg): Add from frame.c. (dwarf_expr_context::dwarf_expr_context): Add frame info to dwarf_expr_context. (dwarf_expr_context::read_addr_from_reg): Remove. (dwarf_expr_context::get_reg_value): Move from dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc. (dwarf_expr_context::get_frame_base): Move from dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc. (dwarf_expr_context::execute_stack_op): Call frame context info check. Remove use of read_addr_from_reg method. * dwarf2/expr.h (struct dwarf_expr_context): Add frame info member, read_addr_from_reg, get_reg_value and get_frame_base declaration. (read_addr_from_reg): Move to expr.c. * dwarf2/frame.c (read_addr_from_reg): Move to dwarf_expr_context. (dwarf_expr_executor::read_addr_from_reg): Remove. (dwarf_expr_executor::get_frame_base): Remove. (dwarf_expr_executor::get_reg_value): Remove. (execute_stack_op): Use read_addr_from_reg function instead of read_addr_from_reg method. * dwarf2/loc.c (dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc::get_frame_base): Move to dwarf_expr_context. (dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc::get_reg_value): Move to dwarf_expr_context. (dwarf_evaluate_loc_desc::read_addr_from_reg): Remove. (dwarf2_locexpr_baton_eval):Use read_addr_from_reg function instead of read_addr_from_reg method.
2021-06-29gdb: add names to unwinders, add debug messages when looking for unwinderSimon Marchi1-0/+2
I wrote this while debugging a problem where the expected unwinder for a frame wasn't used. It adds messages to show which unwinders are considered for a frame, why they are not selected (if an exception is thrown), and finally which unwinder is selected in the end. To be able to show a meaningful, human-readable name for the unwinders, add a "name" field to struct frame_unwind, and update all instances to include a name. Here's an example of the output: [frame] frame_unwind_find_by_frame: this_frame=0 [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "dummy" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "dwarf2 tailcall" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "inline" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "jit" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "python" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "amd64 epilogue" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "i386 epilogue" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: no [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: trying unwinder "dwarf2" [frame] frame_unwind_try_unwinder: yes gdb/ChangeLog: * frame-unwind.h (struct frame_unwind) <name>: New. Update instances everywhere to include this field. * frame-unwind.c (frame_unwind_try_unwinder, frame_unwind_find_by_frame): Add debug messages. Change-Id: I813f17777422425f0d08b22499817b23922e8ddb