aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-10-02gdb: final cleanup of various gdbarch_register_name methodsAndrew Burgess29-146/+66
Building on the previous commits, this commit goes through the various gdbarch_register_name methods and removes all the remaining 'return NULL' cases, I claim that these either couldn't be hit, or should be returning the empty string. In all cases the return of NULL was used if the register number being passed to gdbarch_register_name was "invalid", i.e. negative, or greater than the total number of declared registers. I don't believe either of these cases can occur, and the previous commit asserts that this is the case. As a result we can simplify the code by removing these checks. In many cases, where the register names are held in an array, I was able to add a static assert that the array contains the correct number of strings, after that, a direct access into the array is fine. I don't have any means of testing these changes.
2022-10-02gdb/csky: remove nullptr return from csky_pseudo_register_nameAndrew Burgess2-20/+11
Building on the previous commits, in this commit I remove two instances of 'return NULL' from csky_pseudo_register_name, and replace them with a return of the empty string. These two are particularly interesting, and worth pulling into their own commit, because these returns of NULL appear to be depended on within other parts of the csky code. In csky-linux-tdep.c in the register collect/supply code, GDB checks for the register name being nullptr in order to decide if a target supports a particular feature or not. I've updated the code to check for the empty string. I have no way of testing this change.
2022-10-02gdb: add asserts to gdbarch_register_nameAndrew Burgess3-2/+41
This commit adds asserts to gdbarch_register_name that validate the parameters, and the return value. The interesting thing here is that gdbarch_register_name is generated by gdbarch.py, and so, to add these asserts, I need to update the generation script. I've added two new arguments for Functions and Methods (as declared in gdbarch-components.py), these arguments are 'param_checks' and 'result_checks'. Each of these new arguments can be used to list some expressions that are then used within gdb_assert calls in the generated code. The asserts that validate the API as described in the comment I added to gdbarch_register_name a few commits back; the register number passed in needs to be a valid cooked register number, and the result being returned should not be nullptr.
2022-10-02gdb: check for duplicate register names in selftestAndrew Burgess5-11/+26
Building on the previous commit, this commit extends the register_name selftest to check for duplicate register names. If two registers in the cooked register set (real + pseudo registers) have the same name, then this will show up as duplicate registers in the 'info all-registers' output, but the user will only be able to interact with one copy of the register. In this commit I extend the selftest that I added in the previous commit to check for duplicate register names, I didn't include this functionality in the previous commit because one architecture needed fixing, and I wanted to keep those fixes separate from the fixes in the previous commit. The problematic architecture(s) are powerpc:750 and powerpc:604. In both of these cases the 'dabr' register appears twice, there's a definition of dabr in power-oea.xml which is included into both powerpc-604.xml and powerpc-750.xml. Both of these later two xml files also define the dabr register. I'm hopeful that this change shouldn't break anything, but I don't have the ability to actually test this change, however: On the gdbserver side, neither powerpc-604.xml nor powerpc-750.xml are mentioned in gdbserver/configure.srv, which I think means that gdbserver will never use these descriptions, and, Within GDB the problematic descriptions are held in the variables tdesc_powerpc_604 and tdesc_powerpc_750, which are only mentioned in the variants array in rs6000-tdep.c, this is used when looking up a description based on the architecture. For a native Linux target however, this will not be used as ppc_linux_nat_target::read_description exists, which calls ppc_linux_match_description, which I don't believe can return either of the problematic descriptions. This leaves the other native targets, FreeBSD, AIX, etc. These don't appear to override the ::read_description method, so will potentially return the problematic descriptions, but, in each case I think the ::fetch_registers and ::store_registers methods will ignore the dabr register, which will leave the register as <unavailable>. So, my proposed solution is to just remove the duplicate register from each of powerpc-604.xml and powerpc-750.xml, then regenerate the corresponding C++ source file. With this change made, the selftest now passes for all architectures.
2022-10-02gdb: add a gdbarch_register_name self test, and fix some architecturesAndrew Burgess7-71/+69
This commit adds a self-test that checks that gdbarch_register_name never returns nullptr for any valid register number. Most architectures already met this requirement, there were just 6 that failed the new selftest, and are updated in this commit. Beyond the self-tests I don't have any facilities to test that the architectures I've adjusted still work correctly. If you review all the various gdbarch_register_name implementations then you will see that there are far more architectures that seem like they might return nullptr in some situations, e.g. alpha, avr, bpf, etc. This commit doesn't attempt to address these cases as non of them are hit during the selftest. Many of these cases can never be hit, for example, in alpha_register_name GDB checks for a register number less than zero, this case can't happen and could be changed into an assert. A later commit in this series will have a general cleanup of all the various register_name methods, and remove all references to NULL from their code, however, as that commit will be mostly adjusting code that is never hit, I want to keep those changes separate. The selftest has been tested on x86-64, but I don't have access to suitable systems to fully test any of the *-tdep.c code I've changed in this commit.
2022-10-02gdb/gdbarch: add a comment to gdbarch_register_nameAndrew Burgess2-0/+13
After the previous commit, this commit sets out to formalise the API for gdbarch_register_name. Not every architecture is actually in compliance with the API I set out here, but I believe that most are. I think architectures that don't comply with the API laid out here will fail the gdb.base/completion.exp test. The claims in the comment are I feel, best demonstrated with the asserts in this code: const char * gdbarch_register_name (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnr) { gdb_assert (regnr >= 0); gdb_assert (regnr < gdbarch_num_cooked_regs (gdbarch)); const char *name = gdbarch->register_name (gdbarch, regnr); gdb_assert (name != nullptr); return name; } Like I said, I don't believe every architecture follows these rules right now, which is why I'm not actually adding any asserts. Instead, this commit adds a comment to gdbarch_register_name, this comment is where I'd like to get to, rather than where we are right now. Subsequent commits will fix all targets to be in compliance with this comment, and will even add the asserts shown above to gdbarch_register_name.
2022-10-02gdb/riscv: fix failure in gdb.base/completion.expAndrew Burgess1-13/+12
I noticed a test failure in gdb.base/completion.exp for RISC-V on a native Linux target, this is the failure: (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/completion.exp: complete 'info registers ' The problem is caused by a mismatch in the output of 'maint print registers' and the completion list for 'info registers'. The 'info registers' completion list contains less registers than expected. Additionally, the list of registers extracted from the 'maint print registers' list was wrong too, in some cases the test was grabbing the register number, rather than a register name, Both of these problems have the same root cause, riscv_register_name returns nullptr for some registers when it should return an empty string. The gdbarch_register_name API is not clearly documented anywhere, and at first glance it would appear that the function can return either nullptr, or an empty string to indicate that a register is not available on the current target. Indeed, there are plenty of places in GDB where we compare the output of gdbarch_register_name to both nullptr and '\0' in order to see if a register is supported or not, and there are plenty of targets that return empty string in some cases, and nullptr in others. However, the 'info registers' completion code (reg_or_group_completer) clearly depends on user_reg_map_regnum_to_name only returning nullptr when the passed in regnum is greater than the maximum possible register number (i.e. after all physical registers, pseudo-registers, and user-registers), this means that gdbarch_register_name should not be returning nullptr. I did consider "fixing" user_reg_map_regnum_to_name, if gdbarch_register_name returns nullptr, I could convert to an empty string at this point, but that felt like a real hack, so I discarded that plan. The next possibility I considered was "fixing" reg_or_group_completer to not rely on nullptr to indicate the end marker. Or rather, I could have reg_or_group_completer use gdbarch_num_cooked_regs, we know that we should check at least that many register numbers. Then, once we're passed that limit, we keep checking until we hit a nullptr. This would absolutely work, and didn't actually feel that bad, but, it still felt a little weird that gdbarch_register_name could return nullptr OR the empty string to mean the same thing, so I wondered if the "right" solution was to have gdbarch_register_name not return nullptr. With this in mind I tried an experiment: I added a self-test that, for each architecture, calls gdbarch_register_name for every register number up to the gdbarch_num_cooked_regs limit, and checks that the name is not nullptr. Only a handful of architectures failed this test, RISC-V being one of them. This seems to suggest that most architectures agree that the correct API for gdbarch_register_name is to return an empty string for registers that are not supported on the current target, and that returning nullptr is really a mistake. In this commit I will update the RISC-V target so that GDB no longer returns nullptr from riscv_register_name, instead we return the empty string. In subsequent commits I will add the selftest that I mention above, and will fix the targets that fail the selftest. With this change the gdb.base/completion.exp test now passes.
2022-10-02gdb/testsuite: rewrite capture_command_output procAndrew Burgess1-3/+32
I noticed a test failure in gdb.base/completion.exp for RISC-V on a native Linux target. Upon investigation I discovered a couple of reasons for the failure, this commit addresses one of them. A later commit will address the other issue. The completion.exp test makes use of the capture_command_output proc to collect the output of the 'maint print registers' command. For RISC-V this command produces a lot of output. Currently the capture_command_output proc tries to collect the complete command output in a single expect buffer, and what I see is an error caused by the expect buffer becoming full. This commit rewrites capture_command_output to make use of gdb_test_multiple to collect the command output line at a time, in this way we avoid overflowing the expect buffer. The capture_command_output proc has some logic for skipping a prefix pattern, which is passed in to the proc as an argument. In order to handle this correctly (only matching the prefix at the start of the command output), I use two gdb_test_multiple calls, the first spots and discards the echoed command and the (optional) prefix pattern, the second gdb_test_multiple call then collects the rest of the command output line at a time until a prompt is seen. There is one slight oddity with the current implementation, which I have changed in my rewrite, this does, slightly, change the behaviour of the proc. The current implementation uses this pattern: -re "[string_to_regexp ${command}]\[\r\n\]+${prefix}(.*)\[\r\n\]+$gdb_prompt $" Now a typical command output will look like this: output here\r\n (gdb) As the TCL regexp matching is greedy, TCL will try to match as much as possible in one part of the pattern before moving on to the next. Thus, when this matches against (.*)[\r\n]+, the (.*) will end up matching against 'output here\r' and the [\r\n]+ will match '\n' only. In short the previous implementation would leave the '\r' on the end of the returned text, but not the final trailing '\n'. Now clearly I could make a new version of capture_command_output that maintained this behaviour, but I couldn't see any reason to do this. So, my new implementation drops the final '\r\n' completely, in our example above we now return 'output here' with no '\r'. This change doesn't seem to affect any of the existing tests, but I thought it was worth mentioning.
2022-10-02gdb/mi: new options for -data-disassemble commandAndrew Burgess3-48/+188
Now that the disassembler has two different strategies for laying out the opcode bytes of an instruction (see /r vs /b for the disassemble command), I wanted to add support for this to the MI disassemble command. Currently the -data-disassemble command takes a single 'mode' value, which currently has 6 different values (0 -> 5), 3 of these modes relate to opcode display. So, clearly I should just add an additional 3 modes to handle the new opcode format, right? No, I didn't think that was a great idea either. So, I wonder, could I adjust the -data-disassemble command in a backward compatible way, that would allow GDB to move away from using the mode value altogether? I think we can. In this commit, I propose adding two new options to -data-disassemble, these are: --opcodes none|bytes|display --source Additionally, I will make the mode optional, and default to mode 0 if no mode value is given. Mode 0 is the simplest, no source code, no opcodes disassembly mode. The two new options are only valid for mode 0, if they are used with any other mode then an error is thrown. The --opcodes option can add opcodes to the result, with 'bytes' being equivalent to 'disassemble /b' and 'display' being 'disassemble /r'. The --source option will enable the /s style source code display, this is equivalent to modes 4 and 5. There is no way, using the new command options to get the now deprecated /m style source code display, that is mode 1 and 3. My hope is that new users of the MI will not use the mode at all, and instead will just use the new options to achieve the output they need. Existing MI users can continue to use the mode, and will not need to be updated to use the new options.
2022-10-02gdb/mi: some int to bool conversionAndrew Burgess1-12/+12
Just some simple int to bool conversion in mi_cmd_disassemble. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-10-02gdb/doc: update syntax of -data-disassemble command argumentsAndrew Burgess1-3/+7
The argument documentation for -data-disassemble looks like this: -data-disassemble [ -s @var{start-addr} -e @var{end-addr} ] | [ -a @var{addr} ] | [ -f @var{filename} -l @var{linenum} [ -n @var{lines} ] ] -- @var{mode} However, I believe, according to the 'Notation and Terminology' section, this means that the there are 3 optional location specification argument groups for the command, followed by a non-optional '-- mode'. However, this is not true, one of the location specifications must be given, i.e. we can't choose to give NO location specification, which is what the above implies. I propose that we change this to instead be: -data-disassemble ( -s @var{start-addr} -e @var{end-addr} | -a @var{addr} | -f @var{filename} -l @var{linenum} [ -n @var{lines} ] ) -- @var{mode} By placing all the location specifications within '( ... )' we indication that these are a group, from which one of the options, separated by '|', must be selected. However, the 'Notation and Terminology' section only describes two uses for parenthesis: '( GROUP )*' and '( GROUP )+', in the first case GROUP is repeated zero or more times, and in the second GROUP is repeated 1 or more times. Neither of those exactly describe what I want, which is GROUP must appear exactly once. I propose to extend 'Notation and Terminology' to include '( GROUP )' which means that GROUP should appear exactly once. This change is important because, in a later commit, I want to add additional optional arguments to the -data-disassemble command, and things start to get confusing with the original syntax.
2022-10-02gdb: make gdb_disassembly_flag unsignedAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
In a later commit I want to use operator~ on a gdb_disassembly_flag flag value. This is currently not possible as gdb_disassembly_flag is, by default, signed. This commit just makes this enum unsigned. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-10-02gdb: disassembler opcode display formattingAndrew Burgess8-16/+109
This commit changes the format of 'disassemble /r' to match GNU objdump. Specifically, GDB will now display the instruction bytes in as 'objdump --wide --disassemble' does. Here is an example for RISC-V before this patch: (gdb) disassemble /r 0x0001018e,0x0001019e Dump of assembler code from 0x1018e to 0x1019e: 0x0001018e <call_me+66>: 03 26 84 fe lw a2,-24(s0) 0x00010192 <call_me+70>: 83 25 c4 fe lw a1,-20(s0) 0x00010196 <call_me+74>: 61 65 lui a0,0x18 0x00010198 <call_me+76>: 13 05 85 6a addi a0,a0,1704 0x0001019c <call_me+80>: f1 22 jal 0x10368 <printf> End of assembler dump. And here's an example after this patch: (gdb) disassemble /r 0x0001018e,0x0001019e Dump of assembler code from 0x1018e to 0x1019e: 0x0001018e <call_me+66>: fe842603 lw a2,-24(s0) 0x00010192 <call_me+70>: fec42583 lw a1,-20(s0) 0x00010196 <call_me+74>: 6561 lui a0,0x18 0x00010198 <call_me+76>: 6a850513 addi a0,a0,1704 0x0001019c <call_me+80>: 22f1 jal 0x10368 <printf> End of assembler dump. There are two differences here. First, the instruction bytes after the patch are grouped based on the size of the instruction, and are byte-swapped to little-endian order. Second, after the patch, GDB now uses the bytes-per-line hint from libopcodes to add whitespace padding after the opcode bytes, this means that in most cases the instructions are nicely aligned. It is still possible for a very long instruction to intrude into the disassembled text space. The next example is x86-64, before the patch: (gdb) disassemble /r main Dump of assembler code for function main: 0x0000000000401106 <+0>: 55 push %rbp 0x0000000000401107 <+1>: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 0x000000000040110a <+4>: c7 87 d8 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 movl $0x1,0xd8(%rdi) 0x0000000000401114 <+14>: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax 0x0000000000401119 <+19>: 5d pop %rbp 0x000000000040111a <+20>: c3 ret End of assembler dump. And after the patch: (gdb) disassemble /r main Dump of assembler code for function main: 0x0000000000401106 <+0>: 55 push %rbp 0x0000000000401107 <+1>: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp 0x000000000040110a <+4>: c7 87 d8 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 movl $0x1,0xd8(%rdi) 0x0000000000401114 <+14>: b8 00 00 00 00 mov $0x0,%eax 0x0000000000401119 <+19>: 5d pop %rbp 0x000000000040111a <+20>: c3 ret End of assembler dump. Most instructions are aligned, except for the very long instruction. Notice too that for x86-64 libopcodes doesn't request that GDB group the instruction bytes. This matches the behaviour of objdump. In case the user really wants the old behaviour, I have added a new modifier 'disassemble /b', this displays the instruction byte at a time. For x86-64, which never groups instruction bytes, /b and /r are equivalent, but for RISC-V, using /b gets the old layout back (except that the whitespace for alignment is still present). Consider our original RISC-V example, this time using /b: (gdb) disassemble /b 0x0001018e,0x0001019e Dump of assembler code from 0x1018e to 0x1019e: 0x0001018e <call_me+66>: 03 26 84 fe lw a2,-24(s0) 0x00010192 <call_me+70>: 83 25 c4 fe lw a1,-20(s0) 0x00010196 <call_me+74>: 61 65 lui a0,0x18 0x00010198 <call_me+76>: 13 05 85 6a addi a0,a0,1704 0x0001019c <call_me+80>: f1 22 jal 0x10368 <printf> End of assembler dump. Obviously, this patch is a potentially significant change to the behaviour or /r. I could have added /b with the new behaviour and left /r alone. However, personally, I feel the new behaviour is significantly better than the old, hence, I made /r be what I consider the "better" behaviour. The reason I prefer the new behaviour is that, when I use /r, I almost always want to manually decode the instruction for some reason, and having the bytes displayed in "instruction order" rather than memory order, just makes this easier. The 'record instruction-history' command also takes a /r modifier, and has been modified in the same way as disassemble; /r gets the new behaviour, and /b has been added to retain the old behaviour. Finally, the MI command -data-disassemble, is unchanged in behaviour, this command now requests the raw bytes of the instruction, which is equivalent to the /b modifier. This means that the MI output will remain backward compatible.
2022-10-02gdb/disasm: read opcodes bytes with a single read_code callAndrew Burgess2-9/+10
This commit reduces the number of times we call read_code when printing the instruction opcode bytes during disassembly. I've added a new gdb::byte_vector within the gdb_pretty_print_disassembler class, in line with all the other buffers that gdb_pretty_print_disassembler needs. This byte_vector is then resized as needed, and filled with a single read_code call for each instruction. There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
2022-10-02gdb/testsuite: new test for -data-disassemble opcodes formatAndrew Burgess2-0/+110
Add another test for the output of MI command -data-disassemble. The new check validates the format of the 'opcodes' field, specifically, this test checks that the field contains a series of bytes, separated by a single space. We also check that the bytes are in the correct order, that is, the first byte is from the lowest address, and subsequent bytes are from increasing addresses. The motivation for this test (besides more tests being generally good) is that I plan to make changes to how opcode bytes are displayed in the disassembler output, and I want to ensure that I don't break any existing MI behaviour. There should be no user visible changes to GDB after this commit.
2022-10-02Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-10-01Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-09-30RISC-V: Relax "fmv.[sdq]" requirementsTsukasa OI7-3/+9
This commit relaxes requirements to "fmv.s" instructions from 'F' to ('F' or 'Zfinx'). The same applies to "fmv.d" and "fmv.q". Note that 'Zhinx' extension already contains "fmv.h" instruction (as well as 'Zfh'). gas/ChangeLog: * testsuite/gas/riscv/zfinx.s: Add "fmv.s" instruction. * testsuite/gas/riscv/zfinx.d: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx.s: Add "fmv.d" instruction. * testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx.d: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx.d: Add "fmv.q" instruction. * testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx.s: Likewise. opcodes/ChangeLog: * riscv-opc.c (riscv_opcodes): Relax requirements to "fmv.[sdq]" instructions to support those in 'Zfinx'/'Zdinx'/'Zqinx'.
2022-09-30RISC-V: Reorganize and enhance 'Zfinx' testsTsukasa OI6-106/+207
This commit adds certain test cases for 'Zfinx'/'Zdinx'/'Zqinx' extensions and reorganizes them, fixing coding style while improving coverage. This is partially based on jiawei's 'Zhinx' testcases. gas/ChangeLog: * testsuite/gas/riscv/zfinx.s: Use different registers for better encode space testing. Make indentation consistent. Add tests for instruction with rounding mode. Change march to minimum required extensions. Remove source line. * testsuite/gas/riscv/zfinx.d: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx.s: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/riscv/zdinx.d: Likewise. * testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx.s: Likewise. Also use even-numbered registers to use valid register pairs. * testsuite/gas/riscv/zqinx.d: Likewise. Signed-off-by: Tsukasa OI <research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com> Signed-off-by: jiawei <jiawei@iscas.ac.cn>
2022-09-30RISC-V: Eliminate long-casts of X_add_number in diagnosticsChristoph Müllner1-8/+8
There is no need for casts to (signed/unsigned) long, as we can use C99's PRId64/PRIu64 format specifiers.
2022-09-30RISC-V: fallout from "re-arrange opcode table for consistent alias handling"Jan Beulich4-14/+14
Several new testcasee have appeared since the submission of said change, some of which now also need adjustment.
2022-09-30RISC-V: fix build after "Add support for arbitrary immediate encoding formats"Jan Beulich2-6/+6
Pre- and post-increment/decrement are side effects, the behavior of which is undefined when combined with passing an address of the accessed variable in the same function invocation. There's no need for the increments here - simply adding 1 achieves the intended effect without triggering compiler diagnostics (which are fatal with -Werror).
2022-09-30objcopy: avoid "shadowing" of remove() function nameJan Beulich1-4/+4
remove() is a standard library function (declared in stdio.h), which triggers a "shadows a global declaration" warning with some gcc versions.
2022-09-30RISC-V: drop stray INSN_ALIAS flagsJan Beulich3-3/+38
FENCE.TSO isn't an alias. ZIP and UNZIP in the long run likely are, but presently they aren't. This fixes disassembly of these insns with -Mno-aliases.
2022-09-30RISC-V: re-arrange opcode table for consistent alias handlingJan Beulich28-206/+422
For disassembly to pick up aliases in favor of underlying insns (helping readability in the common case), the aliases need to come ahead of the "base" insns. Slightly more code movement is needed because of insns with the same name needing to stay next to each other. Note that the "rorw" alias entry also has the missing INSN_ALIAS added here. Clone a few testcases to exercise -Mno-aliases some more, better covering the differences between the default and that disassembly mode.
2022-09-30x86: correct build dependencies in opcodes/Jan Beulich2-12/+16
With the command in the rule merely being "echo", i386-tbl.h won't be rebuilt if missing, when at the same time i386-init.h is present and up-to-date. Use a pattern rule instead to express the multiple targets correctly (the &: rule separator is supported only by GNU make 4.3 and newer). Note that now, for the opposite case to work (i386-tbl.h is up-to-date but i386-init.h is missing), i386-init.h also needs mentioning as a dependency somewhere: Add a fake dependency for i386-opc.lo ("fake" because i386-opc.c doesn't include that header). At the same time use $(AM_V_GEN) in the actual rule, replacing the earlier (open-coded) "echo". And while there also drop a duplicate dependency of i386-gen.o on i386-opc.h.
2022-09-30x86: improve match_template()'s diagnosticsJan Beulich7-67/+86
At the example of extractps $0, %xmm0, %xmm0 insertps $0, %xmm0, %eax (both having respectively the same mistake of using the wrong kind of destination register) it is easy to see that current behavior is far from ideal: The former results in "unsupported instruction" for 32-bit code simply because the 2nd template we have is a Cpu64 one. Instead we should aim at emitting the "best" possible error, which will typically be the one where we passed the largest number of checks. Generalize the original "specific_error" approach by making it apply to the entire matching loop, utilizing that line numbers increase as we pass further checks.
2022-09-30x86/Intel: restrict suffix derivationJan Beulich10-7542/+7693
While in some cases deriving an AT&T-style suffix from an Intel syntax memory operand size specifier is necessary, in many cases this is not only pointless, but has led to the introduction of various workarounds: Excessive use of IgnoreSize and NoRex64 as well as the ToDword and ToQword attributes. Suppress suffix derivation when we can clearly tell that the memory operand's size isn't going to be needed to infer the possible need for the low byte/word opcode bit or an operand size prefix (0x66 or REX.W). As a result ToDword and ToQword can be dropped entirely, plus a fair number of IgnoreSize and NoRex64 can also be got rid of. Note that IgnoreSize needs to remain on legacy encoded SIMD insns with GPR operand, to avoid emitting an operand size prefix in 16-bit mode. (Since 16-bit code using SIMD insns isn't well tested, clone an existing testcase just enough to cover a few insns which are potentially problematic but are being touched here.) Note that while folding the VCVT{,T}S{S,D}2SI templates, VCVT{,T}SH2SI isn't included there. This is to fulfill the request of not allowing L and Q suffixes there, despite the inconsistency with VCVT{,T}S{S,D}2SI.
2022-09-30LoongArch: Update ELF e_flags handling according to specification.liuzhensong4-41/+54
Update handling of e_flags according to the documentation update [1] (discussions [2][3]). Object file bitness is now represented in the EI_CLASS byte. The e_flags field is now interpreted as follows: e_flags[2:0]: Base ABI modifier - 0x1: soft-float - 0x2: single-precision hard-float - 0x3: double-precision hard-float e_flags[7:6]: ELF object ABI version - 0x0: v0 - 0x1: v1 [1]: https://github.com/loongson/LoongArch-Documentation/blob/main/docs/LoongArch-ELF-ABI-EN.adoc#e_flags-identifies-abi-type-and-version [2]: https://github.com/loongson/LoongArch-Documentation/pull/61 [3]: https://github.com/loongson/LoongArch-Documentation/pull/47
2022-09-29gprofng: fix cppcheck warningsVladimir Mezentsev3-3/+3
gprofng/ChangeLog 2022-09-29 Vladimir Mezentsev <vladimir.mezentsev@oracle.com> * common/hwcdrv.c: Fix cppcheck warning. * src/ABS.h: Likewise. * src/CompCom.cc: Likewise.
2022-09-30[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.mi/mi-sym-info.exp on openSUSE TumbleweedTom de Vries1-1/+2
On openSUSE Tumbleweed, I run into: ... FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-sym-info.exp: List all functions from debug information only ... The problem is in matching this string: ... {name="_start",type="void (void)",description="void _start(void);"} ... using regexp fun_re, which requires a line field: ... set fun_re \ "\{line=\"$decimal\",name=${qstr},type=${qstr},description=${qstr}\}" ... Fix this by making the line field optional in fun_re. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-09-30RISC-V: Add privileged extensions without instructions/CSRsTsukasa OI1-0/+3
Currently, GNU Binutils does not support following privileged extensions: - 'Smepmp' - 'Svnapot' - 'Svpbmt' as they do not provide new CSRs or new instructions ('Smepmp' extends the privileged architecture CSRs but does not define the CSR itself). However, adding them might be useful as we no longer have to "filter" ISA strings just for toolchains (if full ISA string is given by a vendor, we can straightly use it). And there's a fact that supports this theory: there's already an (unprivileged) extension which does not provide CSRs or instructions (but only an architectural guarantee): 'Zkt' (constant timing guarantee for certain subset of RISC-V instructions). This simple commit simply adds three privileged extensions listed above. bfd/ChangeLog: * elfxx-riscv.c (riscv_supported_std_s_ext): Add 'Smepmp', 'Svnapot' and 'Svpbmt' extensions.
2022-09-30gdb: Remove unused extra_lines variableTsukasa OI1-8/+0
Clang generates a warning if there is a variable that is set but not used otherwise ("-Wunused-but-set-variable"). On the default configuration, it causes a build failure (unless "--disable-werror" is specified). The only extra_lines use in arrange_linetable function is removed on the commit 558802e4d1c5dcbd0df7d2c6ef62a6deac247a2f ("gdb: change subfile::line_vector to an std::vector"). So, this variable should be removed to prevent a build failure.
2022-09-30[gdb/testsuite] Add aranges to gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.expTom de Vries2-2/+29
Since commit 52b920c5d20 ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.dwarf2/dw2-dir-file-name.exp for ppc64le"), the test-case fails with target board cc-with-debug-names, due to missing .debug_aranges info. Add the missing .debug_aranges info. Also add a file_id option to Dwarf::assemble, to make it possible to contribute to an already open file. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-09-30[gdb/c++] Print destructor the same for gcc and clangTom de Vries5-26/+111
Consider the test-case contained in this patch. With g++ (7.5.0) we have for "ptype A": ... type = class A { public: int a; A(void); ~A(); } ... and with clang++ (13.0.1): ... type = class A { public: int a; A(void); ~A(void); } ... and we observe that the destructor is printed differently. There's a difference in debug info between the two cases: in the clang case, there's one artificial parameter, but in the g++ case, there are two, and these similar cases are handled differently in cp_type_print_method_args. This is due to this slightly convoluted bit of code: ... i = staticp ? 0 : 1; if (nargs > i) { while (i < nargs) ... } else if (varargs) gdb_printf (stream, "..."); else if (language == language_cplus) gdb_printf (stream, "void"); ... The purpose of "i = staticp ? 0 : 1" is to skip the printing of the implicit this parameter. In commit 5f4d1085085 ("c++/8218: Destructors w/arguments"), skipping of other artificial parameters was added, but using a different method: rather than adjusting the potential loop start, it skips the parameter in the loop. The observed difference in printing is explained by whether we enter the loop: - in the clang case, the loop is not entered and we print "void". - in the gcc case, the loop is entered, and nothing is printed. Fix this by rewriting the code to: - always enter the loop - handle whether arguments need printing in the loop - keep track of how many arguments are printed, and use that after the loop to print void etc. such that we have the same for both gcc and clang: ... A(void); ~A(void); ... Note that I consider the discussion of whether we want to print: - A(void) / ~A(void), or - A() / ~A() out-of-scope for this patch. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-09-30PR29626, Segfault when disassembling ARM codeAlan Modra1-63/+61
PR 29626 * arm-dis.c (mapping_symbol_for_insn): Return false on zero symtab_size. Delete later symtab_size test.
2022-09-30Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-09-29gdb: make target_auxv_parse static and renameSimon Marchi2-12/+9
It is only used in auxv.c. Also, given it is not strictly a wrapper around target_ops::auxv (since 27a48a9223d0 "Add auxv parsing to the architecture vector."), I think that the name prefixed with target is a bit misleading. Rename to just parse_auxv. Change-Id: I41cca055b92c8ede37c258ba6583746a07d8f77e
2022-09-29gdb: make fprint_target_auxv staticSimon Marchi2-4/+1
It's only used in auxv.c. Change-Id: I4992d9aae37b6631a074ab99bbab2f619725b642
2022-09-29gdb: constify auxv parse functionsSimon Marchi10-43/+43
Constify the input parameters of the various auxv parse functions, they don't need to modify the raw auxv data. Change-Id: I13eacd5ab8e925ec2b5c1f7722cbab39c41516ec
2022-09-29gdb: constify target_stack::is_pushedSimon Marchi2-2/+2
The target_ops parameters here can be made const. Change-Id: Ibc18b17d6b21d06145251a03e68aca90538117d6
2022-09-29Constify target_desc declarationsKeith Seitz78-115/+116
This patch changes various global target_desc declarations to const, thereby correcting a prominent source of ODR violations in PowerPC-related target code. The majority of files/changes are mechanical const-ifications accomplished by regenerating the C files in features/. This also required manually updating mips-linux-tdep.h, s390-linux-tdep.h, nios2-tdep.h, s390-tdep.h, arch/ppc-linux-tdesc.h, arch/ppc-linux-common.c, and rs6000-tdep.c. Patch tested against the sourceware trybot, and fully regression tested against our (Red Hat's) internal test infrastructure on Rawhide aarch64, s390x, x86_64, and powerpcle. With this patch, I can finally enable LTO in our GDB package builds. [Tested with a rawhide scratch build containing this patch.] Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22395 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24835
2022-09-29cleanup: Add missing feature/ XML files to MakefileKeith Seitz4-20/+24
This patch adds some missing .xml files to features/Makefile so that when the directory's C files are regenerated, all files are appropriately remade. This has demonstrated that there have been several "misses" in regenerating files in this directory. Namely, arm-secext.c and sparc{32,64}-solaris.c. For the former case, there was what essentially amounts to a typo regarding the create feature function's name. In the later case, this file has missed at least one important update in July, 2020, when allocate_target_description was changed to return a unique pointer. Those corrections are included.
2022-09-29Add -B to the help output from gprof, and add suitable documentation.Nick Clifton3-2/+12
PR 29627 * gprof.c (usage): Add -B. * gprof.texi (synopsis): Add -B. (Output Options): Add entry for -B.
2022-09-29Automatic date update in version.inGDB Administrator1-1/+1
2022-09-28Fix GDB build: ELF support check & -lzstdPedro Alves2-6/+6
GDB fails to build for me, on Ubuntu 20.04. I get: ... CXXLD gdb /usr/bin/ld: linux-tdep.o: in function `linux_corefile_thread(thread_info*, linux_corefile_thread_data*)': /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/linux-tdep.c:1831: undefined reference to `gcore_elf_build_thread_register_notes(gdbarch*, thread_info*, gdb_signal, bfd*, std::unique_ptr<char, gdb::xfree_deleter<char> >*, int*)' /usr/bin/ld: linux-tdep.o: in function `linux_make_corefile_notes(gdbarch*, bfd*, int*)': /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/linux-tdep.c:2117: undefined reference to `gcore_elf_make_tdesc_note(bfd*, std::unique_ptr<char, gdb::xfree_deleter<char> >*, int*)' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:2149: gdb] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/build/gdb' make[1]: *** [Makefile:11847: all-gdb] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/build' make: *** [Makefile:1004: all] Error 2 Those undefined functions exist in gdb/gcore-elf.c, which is only included in the build if GDB's configure thinks that the target you're configuring for is an ELF target. GDB's configure thinks my system isn't ELF, which is incorrect. For the ELF support check, gdb/config.log shows: configure:17387: checking for ELF support in BFD configure:17407: gcc -o conftest -I/home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/../include -I../bfd -I/home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/gdb/../bfd -g3 -O0 -L../bfd -L../libiberty -lzstd conftest.c -lbfd -liberty -lz -lncursesw -lm -ldl >&5 /usr/bin/ld: ../bfd/libbfd.a(compress.o): in function `decompress_contents': /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/bfd/compress.c:42: undefined reference to `ZSTD_decompress' /usr/bin/ld: /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/bfd/compress.c:44: undefined reference to `ZSTD_isError' /usr/bin/ld: ../bfd/libbfd.a(compress.o): in function `bfd_compress_section_contents': /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/bfd/compress.c:195: undefined reference to `ZSTD_compress' /usr/bin/ld: /home/pedro/gdb/binutils-gdb/src/bfd/compress.c:198: undefined reference to `ZSTD_isError' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status configure:17407: $? = 1 ... configure:17417: result: no Note how above, in the gcc command line, "-lzstd" appears before "-lbfd". That explain the link failure. It should appear after, like -lz does. This commit fixes it, by moving ZSTD_LIBS from LDFLAGS to LIBS, next to -lz, in GDB_AC_CHECK_BFD, and regenerating gdb/configure. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29630 Change-Id: I1f4128dde634e8ea04c9002904f1005a8b3a6863
2022-09-28gdb: remove trailing spaces in READMESimon Marchi1-4/+4
Change-Id: Ic7f8e415acd1bff6194cf08ed646bff45571f165
2022-09-28Treat Character as a discrete type in AdaTom Tromey3-1/+69
A user noticed that gdb would assert when printing a certain array with array-indexes enabled. This turned out to be caused by the array having an index type of Character, which is completely valid in Ada. This patch changes the Ada support to recognize Character as a discrete type, and adds some tests. Because this is Ada-specific and was also reviewed internally, I am checking it in.
2022-09-28The help document of size misses an option.Nick Clifton3-2/+19
PR 29628 * size.c (usage): Add -f. * doc/binutils.texi (size): Add -f.
2022-09-28ld/testsuite: force warnings when dealing with execstack testsClément Chigot1-10/+3
Binutils can be configured to avoid printing the execstack or RWD segment warnings. In this case, the first test of PR ld/29072 will fail. Fix that by always manually forcing the warnings for it. ld/ChangeLog: * testsuite/ld-elf/elf.exp (PR ld/29072): Force execstack and RWD segment warnings.