diff options
author | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2020-05-08 14:26:11 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2020-05-08 14:26:11 -0600 |
commit | 4f7bc5edbd3ffaad52022849d6263d982c23ff3c (patch) | |
tree | d1a4c5ee8cd682341f6488f2600ed6c652924737 /gdbsupport | |
parent | 8be4b118a9343197291d23c666f6a8ad24bce76a (diff) | |
download | gdb-4f7bc5edbd3ffaad52022849d6263d982c23ff3c.zip gdb-4f7bc5edbd3ffaad52022849d6263d982c23ff3c.tar.gz gdb-4f7bc5edbd3ffaad52022849d6263d982c23ff3c.tar.bz2 |
Don't re-process a DIE in read_lexical_block_scope
A customer reported a crash in the DWARF reader.
Investigation showed that the crash occurred in an unusual scenario: a
function was lexically scoped within some other function -- but the
inner function inlined the outer function and referred to its DIE via
DW_AT_abstract_origin. With the executable in question,
inherit_abstract_dies could eventually call read_lexical_block_scope,
which in turn could recurse into process_die, to process a DIE that
was already being read, triggering an assert.
This came up once before; see:
https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-02/msg00652.html
However, in this case, I don't have an easy way to reproduce. So,
there is no test case.
I did experiment with the failing executable. This patch fixes the
bug and doesn't seem to cause other issues. For example, I can still
set breakpoints on the relevant functions.
gdb/ChangeLog
2020-05-08 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* dwarf2/read.c (read_lexical_block_scope): Don't process a DIE
already being processed.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdbsupport')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions