[gdb/tdep] Don't use i386 unwinder for amd64

For i386 we have these unwinders:
...
$ gdb -q -batch -ex "set arch i386" -ex "maint info frame-unwinders"
The target architecture is set to "i386".
dummy                   DUMMY_FRAME
dwarf2 tailcall         TAILCALL_FRAME
inline                  INLINE_FRAME
i386 epilogue           NORMAL_FRAME
dwarf2                  NORMAL_FRAME
dwarf2 signal           SIGTRAMP_FRAME
i386 stack tramp        NORMAL_FRAME
i386 sigtramp           SIGTRAMP_FRAME
i386 prologue           NORMAL_FRAME
...
and for amd64:
...
$ gdb -q -batch -ex "set arch i386:x86-64" -ex "maint info frame-unwinders"
The target architecture is set to "i386:x86-64".
dummy                   DUMMY_FRAME
dwarf2 tailcall         TAILCALL_FRAME
inline                  INLINE_FRAME
python                  NORMAL_FRAME
amd64 epilogue          NORMAL_FRAME
i386 epilogue           NORMAL_FRAME
dwarf2                  NORMAL_FRAME
dwarf2 signal           SIGTRAMP_FRAME
amd64 sigtramp          SIGTRAMP_FRAME
amd64 prologue          NORMAL_FRAME
i386 stack tramp        NORMAL_FRAME
i386 sigtramp           SIGTRAMP_FRAME
i386 prologue           NORMAL_FRAME
...

ISTM me there's no reason for the i386 unwinders to be there for amd64.

Furthermore, there's a generic need to play around with enabling and disabling
unwinders, see PR8434.  Currently, that's only available for both the dwarf2
unwinders at once using "maint set dwarf unwinders on/off".

If I manually disable the "amd64 epilogue" unwinder, the "i386 epilogue"
unwinder becomes active and gives the wrong answer, while I'm actually
interested in the result of the dwarf2 unwinder.  Of course I can also
manually disable the "i386 epilogue", but I take the fact that I have to do
that as evidence that on amd64, the "i386 epilogue" is not only unnecessary,
but in the way.

Fix this by only adding the i386 unwinders if
"info.bfd_arch_info->bits_per_word == 32".

Note that the x32 abi (x86_64/-mx32):
- has the same unwinder list as amd64 (x86_64/-m64) before this commit,
- has info.bfd_arch_info->bits_per_word == 64, the same as amd64, and
  consequently,
- has the same unwinder list as amd64 after this commit.

Tested on x86_64-linux, -m64 and -m32.  Not tested with -mx32.

Reviewed-By: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>

PR tdep/30102
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30102

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions