aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authormark <mark@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2017-03-13 18:26:47 +0000
committerMark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>2017-03-13 20:51:42 +0100
commitb9da89d161e3903faa335f444af2bf05e40f926e (patch)
tree0fbdb729ff3259739ed1e64802cf9a25a641f26f /gdb/testsuite
parentc793cac124dd2eb34042f2e43abb099a26e34cb0 (diff)
downloadgdb-b9da89d161e3903faa335f444af2bf05e40f926e.zip
gdb-b9da89d161e3903faa335f444af2bf05e40f926e.tar.gz
gdb-b9da89d161e3903faa335f444af2bf05e40f926e.tar.bz2
Merge libiberty: Initialize d_printing in all cplus_demangle_fill_* functions.
While integrating the d_printing recursion guard change into gdb I noticed we forgot to initialize the demangle_component d_printing field in cplus_demangle_fill_{name,extended_operator,ctor,dtor}. As is done in cplus_demangle_fill_{component,builtin_type,operator}. It happened to work because in gcc all demangle_components were allocated through d_make_empty. But gdb has its own allocation mechanism (as might other users). libiberty/ChangeLog: * cp-demangle.c (cplus_demangle_fill_name): Initialize demangle_component d_printing. (cplus_demangle_fill_extended_operator): Likewise. (cplus_demangle_fill_ctor): Likewise. (cplus_demangle_fill_dtor): Likewise. gdb/ChangeLog: * cp-name-parser.y (make_empty): Initialize d_printing to zero.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/testsuite')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions