aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>2024-07-31 15:50:50 +0100
committerAndrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>2024-11-10 10:18:22 +0000
commit73d7312ff6196747ff64f74ddcc6cb1c032a68b4 (patch)
tree73d92e435d950e2b54adc00f47c70274008c1e8c /gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod
parent3da8ce337cb5d57626988e124da50013c082ed88 (diff)
downloadgdb-73d7312ff6196747ff64f74ddcc6cb1c032a68b4.zip
gdb-73d7312ff6196747ff64f74ddcc6cb1c032a68b4.tar.gz
gdb-73d7312ff6196747ff64f74ddcc6cb1c032a68b4.tar.bz2
gdb: use mapped file information to improve debuginfod text
When opening a core-file GDB is able to use debuginfod to download the executable that matches the core-file if GDB can find a build-id for the executable in the core-file. In this case GDB calls debuginfod_exec_query to download the executable and GDB prints a message like: Downloading executable for /path/to/core-file... which makes sense in that case. For a long time GDB has also had the ability to download memory-mapped files and shared libraries when opening a core-file. However, recent commits have made these cases more likely to trigger, which is a good thing, but the messaging from GDB in these cases is not ideal. When downloading a memory-mapped file GDB prints: Downloading executable for /path/to/memory-mapped-file And for a shared library: Downloading executable for /path/to/libfoo.so These last two messages could, I think, be improved. I propose making two changes. First, I suggest instead of using /path/to/core-file in the first case, we use the name of the executable that GDB is fetching. This makes the messaging consistent in that we print the name of the file we're fetching rather than the name of the file we're fetching something for. I further propose that we replace 'executable for' with the more generic word 'file'. The messages will then become: Downloading file /path/to/exec-file... Downloading file /path/to/memory-mapped-file... Downloading file /path/to/libfoo.so... I think these messages are clearer than what we used to have, and they are consistent in that we name the thing being downloaded in all cases. There is one tiny problem. The first case relies on GDB knowing the name of the executable it wants to download. The only place we can currently get that from is, I think, the memory-mapped file list. [ ASIDE: There is `bfd_core_file_failing_command` which reports the executable and argument list from the core file, but this information is not ideal for this task. First, the executable and arguments are merged into a single string, and second, the string is a relatively short, fixed length string, so the executable name is often truncated. For these reasons I don't consider fetching the executable name using this bfd function as a solution. ] We do have to consider the case that the core file does not have any mapped file information. This shouldn't ever be the case for a Linux target, but it's worth considering. [ ASIDE: I mention Linux specifically because this only becomes a problem if we try to do a lookup via debuginfod, which requires that we have build-ids available. Linux has special support for embedding build-ids into the core file, but I'm not sure if other kernels do this. ] For the unlikely edge case of a core-file that has build-ids, but doesn't have any mapped file information then I propose that we synthesis a filename like: 'with build-id xxxxxx'. We would then see a message like: Downloading file with build-id xxxxxx... Where 'xxxxxx' would be replaced by the actual build-id. This isn't ideal, but I think is good enough, and, as I said, I think this case is not going to be hit very often, or maybe at all. We already had some tests that emitted two of the above messages, which I've updated, these cover the mapped-file and shared library case. The message about downloading the exec for the core-file is actually really hard to trigger now as usually the exec will also appear in the memory-mapped file list and GDB will download the file at this stage. Then when GDB needs the executable for loading the symbols it'll ask debuginfod, and debuginfod will find the file in its cache, and so no message will be printed. If anyone has any ideas about how to trigger this case then I'm happy to add additional tests. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod')
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod/corefile-mapped-file.exp2
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod/solib-with-soname.exp2
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod/corefile-mapped-file.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod/corefile-mapped-file.exp
index cf96b41..cad70aa 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod/corefile-mapped-file.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod/corefile-mapped-file.exp
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ with_debuginfod_env $cache {
gdb_load $binfile
load_core_file "load corefile, download library from debuginfod" \
- "Downloading\[^\r\n\]* executable for [string_to_regexp $library_filename]\\.\\.\\."
+ "Downloading\[^\r\n\]* file [string_to_regexp $library_filename]\\.\\.\\."
set ptr_value [read_ptr_value]
gdb_assert { $ptr_value == $ptr_expected_value } \
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod/solib-with-soname.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod/solib-with-soname.exp
index 9ef1204..31ca718 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod/solib-with-soname.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.debuginfod/solib-with-soname.exp
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ proc load_exec_and_core_file { expect_warning expect_download testname \
set saw_warning true
exp_continue
}
- -re "^Downloading executable for \[^\r\n\]+/libfoo_1\\.so\\.\\.\\.\r\n" {
+ -re "^Downloading file \[^\r\n\]+/libfoo_1\\.so\\.\\.\\.\r\n" {
set saw_download true
exp_continue
}