diff options
author | Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> | 2016-04-22 15:35:07 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org> | 2016-04-22 15:35:07 +0100 |
commit | 495346f6f07ea711662106f0e6f8d684fe489cd8 (patch) | |
tree | 98ff10b144c3c84a5e142c434f2200702a18a797 /gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp | |
parent | 0f60e29b5a13066f7625dfeadcc329aeefd9d5a5 (diff) | |
download | gdb-495346f6f07ea711662106f0e6f8d684fe489cd8.zip gdb-495346f6f07ea711662106f0e6f8d684fe489cd8.tar.gz gdb-495346f6f07ea711662106f0e6f8d684fe489cd8.tar.bz2 |
Fix fail in gdb.base/annota1.exp and gdb.base/annota3.exp
Hi,
I am seeing the fail below on aarch64-linux with gcc 4.9.2,
break main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4006e8: file binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.c, line 14.^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/annota1.exp: breakpoint main
the test expects the breakpoint is set on line 15. Let us look at
the main function,
12 int
13 main (void)
14 {
15 int my_array[3] = { 1, 2, 3 }; /* break main */
16
17 value = 7;
18
19 #ifdef SIGUSR1
20 signal (SIGUSR1, handle_USR1);
21 #endif
(gdb) disassemble main
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x00000000004006e0 <+0>: stp x29, x30, [sp,#-48]!
0x00000000004006e4 <+4>: mov x29, sp
0x00000000004006e8 <+8>: adrp x0, 0x411000 <signal@got.plt>
0x00000000004006ec <+12>: add x0, x0, #0x40
the breakpoint is set on the right address after skipping prologue, but
0x00000000004006e8 is mapped to the line 14, as shown below,
(gdb) maintenance info line-table
objfile: /home/yao.qi/source/build-aarch64/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/annota1/annota1 ((struct objfile *) 0x2b0e1850)
compunit_symtab: ((struct compunit_symtab *) 0x2b0ded50)
symtab: /home/yao.qi/source/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.c ((struct symtab *) 0x2b0dedd0)
linetable: ((struct linetable *) 0x2b12c8b0):
INDEX LINE ADDRESS
0 7 0x00000000004006d0
1 8 0x00000000004006d8
2 14 0x00000000004006e0
3 14 0x00000000004006e8
4 15 0x00000000004006fc
so GDB does nothing wrong. Program hits breakpoint on either line 14
or line 15 is right to me. With anther gcc (4.9.3), the line-table looks
correct, and no test fail. Instead of setting breakpoint on main and
assuming the line is what we get from the source, we can set breakpoint
on that line. On the other hand, the test prints the values of the
array and check, so we need to set breakpoint on the line setting the
values of array and "next", rather than setting the breakpoint on main.
gdb/testsuite:
2016-04-22 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* gdb.base/annota1.exp: Set breakpoint on line $main_line.
* gdb.base/annota3.exp: Likewise.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp | 13 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp index 36de636..38b594c 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp @@ -46,12 +46,12 @@ clean_restart ${binfile} gdb_test_no_output "set height 0" # -# break at main +# break in main # set main_line [gdb_get_line_number "break main"] -gdb_test "break main" \ +gdb_test "break ${srcfile}:${main_line}" \ "Breakpoint.*at.* file .*$srcfile, line $main_line\\." \ "breakpoint main" @@ -293,16 +293,17 @@ gdb_test_multiple "delete 3" "delete bp 3" { } # -# break at main, after value is initialized. This is in preparation +# break in main, after value is initialized. This is in preparation # to test the annotate output for the display command. # -gdb_test_multiple "break main" "break at main" { +set test "break in main" +gdb_test_multiple "break ${srcfile}:${main_line}" $test { -re "post-prompt.*Breakpoint 4 at $hex: file ${escapedsrcfile}, line $main_line.*\032\032breakpoints-invalid.*$gdb_prompt$" { - pass "break at main" + pass $test } -re "post-prompt.*Breakpoint 4 at $hex: file .*${srcfile}, line $main_line.*\032\032breakpoints-invalid.*$gdb_prompt$" { setup_xfail "*-*-*" 1270 - fail "break at main" + fail $test } } |