diff options
author | Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> | 2023-04-21 12:08:42 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> | 2023-05-29 10:09:24 -0400 |
commit | f818c32ba4596a60e77b464cb690aea65ed31346 (patch) | |
tree | e15154a0735dc0133816311c6d00a216b50da140 /gdb/mi | |
parent | 417bfaa9b5cefb52bc87749251cd3dd37f396aba (diff) | |
download | gdb-f818c32ba4596a60e77b464cb690aea65ed31346.zip gdb-f818c32ba4596a60e77b464cb690aea65ed31346.tar.gz gdb-f818c32ba4596a60e77b464cb690aea65ed31346.tar.bz2 |
gdb/mi: fix ^running record with multiple MI interpreters
I stumbled on the mi_proceeded and running_result_record_printed
globals, which are shared by all MI interpreter instances (it's unlikely
that people use multiple MI interpreter instances, but it's possible).
After poking at it, I found this bug:
1. Start GDB in MI mode
2. Add a second MI interpreter with the new-ui command
3. Use -exec-run on the second interpreter
This is the output I get on the first interpreter:
=thread-group-added,id="i1"
~"Reading symbols from a.out...\n"
~"New UI allocated\n"
(gdb)
=thread-group-started,id="i1",pid="94718"
=thread-created,id="1",group-id="i1"
^running
*running,thread-id="all"
And this is the output I get on the second intepreter:
=thread-group-added,id="i1"
(gdb)
-exec-run
=thread-group-started,id="i1",pid="94718"
=thread-created,id="1",group-id="i1"
*running,thread-id="all"
The problem here is that the `^running` reply to the -exec-run command
is printed on the wrong UI. It is printed on the first one, it should
be printed on the second (the one on which we sent the -exec-run).
What happens under the hood is that captured_mi_execute_command, while
executing a command for the second intepreter, clears the
running_result_record_printed and mi_proceeded globals.
mi_about_to_proceed then sets mi_proceeded. Then, mi_on_resume_1 gets
called for the first intepreter first. Since the
!running_result_record_printed && mi_proceeded
condition is true, it prints a ^running, and sets
running_result_record_printed. When mi_on_resume_1 gets called for the
second interpreter, running_result_record_printed is already set, so
^running is not printed there.
It took me a while to understand the relationship between these two
variables. I think that in the end, this is what we want to track:
1. When executing an MI command, take note if that command causes a
"proceed". This is done in mi_about_to_proceed.
2. In mi_on_resume_1, if the command indeed caused a "proceed", we want
to output a ^running record. And we want to remember that we did,
because...
3. Back in captured_mi_execute_command, if we did not output a
^running, we want to output a ^done.
Moving those two variables to the mi_interp struture appears to fix it.
Only for the interpreter doing the -exec-run command does the
running_result_record_printed flag get cleared, and therefore only or
that one does the ^running record get printed.
Add a new test for this, that does pretty much what the reproducer above
shows. Without the fix, the test fails because
mi_send_resuming_command_raw never sees the ^running record.
Change-Id: I63ea30e6cb61a8e1dd5ef03377e6003381a9209b
Tested-By: Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova <ahajkova@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/mi')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/mi/mi-interp.c | 13 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/mi/mi-interp.h | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/mi/mi-main.c | 14 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/mi/mi-main.h | 3 |
4 files changed, 19 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/mi/mi-interp.c b/gdb/mi/mi-interp.c index 47aeabd..d8b49ae 100644 --- a/gdb/mi/mi-interp.c +++ b/gdb/mi/mi-interp.c @@ -677,7 +677,12 @@ mi_about_to_proceed (void) return; } - mi_proceeded = 1; + mi_interp *mi = as_mi_interp (top_level_interpreter ()); + + if (mi == nullptr) + return; + + mi->mi_proceeded = 1; } /* When the element is non-zero, no MI notifications will be emitted in @@ -961,7 +966,7 @@ mi_on_resume_1 (struct mi_interp *mi, will make it impossible for frontend to know what's going on. In future (MI3), we'll be outputting "^done" here. */ - if (!running_result_record_printed && mi_proceeded) + if (!mi->running_result_record_printed && mi->mi_proceeded) { gdb_printf (mi->raw_stdout, "%s^running\n", current_token ? current_token : ""); @@ -977,9 +982,9 @@ mi_on_resume_1 (struct mi_interp *mi, for (thread_info *tp : all_non_exited_threads (targ, ptid)) mi_output_running (tp); - if (!running_result_record_printed && mi_proceeded) + if (!mi->running_result_record_printed && mi->mi_proceeded) { - running_result_record_printed = 1; + mi->running_result_record_printed = 1; /* This is what gdb used to do historically -- printing prompt even if it cannot actually accept any input. This will be surely removed for MI3, and may be removed even earlier. */ diff --git a/gdb/mi/mi-interp.h b/gdb/mi/mi-interp.h index e07be12..eb81cbe 100644 --- a/gdb/mi/mi-interp.h +++ b/gdb/mi/mi-interp.h @@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ public: /* MI's CLI builder (wraps OUT). */ struct ui_out *cli_uiout; + + int running_result_record_printed = 1; + + /* Flag indicating that the target has proceeded since the last + command was issued. */ + int mi_proceeded; }; /* Output the shared object attributes to UIOUT. */ diff --git a/gdb/mi/mi-main.c b/gdb/mi/mi-main.c index 7a8c35c..dc7d717 100644 --- a/gdb/mi/mi-main.c +++ b/gdb/mi/mi-main.c @@ -84,12 +84,6 @@ char *current_token; command including all option, and make it possible. */ static struct mi_parse *current_context; -int running_result_record_printed = 1; - -/* Flag indicating that the target has proceeded since the last - command was issued. */ -int mi_proceeded; - static void mi_cmd_execute (struct mi_parse *parse); static void mi_execute_async_cli_command (const char *cli_command, @@ -1818,8 +1812,8 @@ captured_mi_execute_command (struct ui_out *uiout, struct mi_parse *context) scoped_restore save_token = make_scoped_restore (¤t_token, context->token); - running_result_record_printed = 0; - mi_proceeded = 0; + mi->running_result_record_printed = 0; + mi->mi_proceeded = 0; switch (context->op) { case MI_COMMAND: @@ -1837,7 +1831,7 @@ captured_mi_execute_command (struct ui_out *uiout, struct mi_parse *context) to directly use the mi_interp's uiout, since the command could have reset the interpreter, in which case the current uiout will most likely crash in the mi_out_* routines. */ - if (!running_result_record_printed) + if (!mi->running_result_record_printed) { gdb_puts (context->token, mi->raw_stdout); /* There's no particularly good reason why target-connect results @@ -1876,7 +1870,7 @@ captured_mi_execute_command (struct ui_out *uiout, struct mi_parse *context) || current_interp_named_p (INTERP_MI3) || current_interp_named_p (INTERP_MI4)) { - if (!running_result_record_printed) + if (!mi->running_result_record_printed) { gdb_puts (context->token, mi->raw_stdout); gdb_puts ("^done", mi->raw_stdout); diff --git a/gdb/mi/mi-main.h b/gdb/mi/mi-main.h index 18687d5..1741f48 100644 --- a/gdb/mi/mi-main.h +++ b/gdb/mi/mi-main.h @@ -36,9 +36,6 @@ extern int mi_async_p (void); extern char *current_token; -extern int running_result_record_printed; -extern int mi_proceeded; - struct mi_suppress_notification { /* Breakpoint notification suppressed? */ |