diff options
| author | Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> | 2018-05-03 00:37:09 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> | 2018-05-03 00:48:05 +0100 |
| commit | 3fffc0701a26bc0baa563fdc793cafb3d3f02a93 (patch) | |
| tree | d06a731f3dea412b5cf392e43d0baf78d6b5151d /gdb/mi/mi-interp.c | |
| parent | 6798487f5bc66ab9c34ad81fa28ba25d32a00bd9 (diff) | |
| download | gdb-3fffc0701a26bc0baa563fdc793cafb3d3f02a93.zip gdb-3fffc0701a26bc0baa563fdc793cafb3d3f02a93.tar.gz gdb-3fffc0701a26bc0baa563fdc793cafb3d3f02a93.tar.bz2 | |
Eliminate target_ops::to_xclose
In the multi-target branch, I found no need for the target_close vs
target_xclose distinction. Heap-allocated targets simply delete
themselves in their target_close implementation, while
singleton/static targets don't.
The target_ops C++ification patches will add more commentary around
target_ops's destructor, but there's no destructor yet...
gdb/ChangeLog:
2018-05-02 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* bfd-target.c (target_bfd_xclose): Rename to ...
(target_bfd_close): ... this.
(target_bfd_reopen): Adjust.
* target.c (target_close): Remove references to to_xclose.
* target.h (target_ops::to_xclose): Delete.
(target_ops::to_close): Update comments.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/mi/mi-interp.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions