aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/frame.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>2002-10-31 20:14:33 +0000
committerAndrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>2002-10-31 20:14:33 +0000
commitf908a0eb77062c13097eb673c4d8470b2dbda9d2 (patch)
tree542bd91c8c2a52c11ea904b30fcbb47e65ac144e /gdb/frame.c
parentc5646e1120a55b7e13f8f843486432b8961448a8 (diff)
downloadgdb-f908a0eb77062c13097eb673c4d8470b2dbda9d2.zip
gdb-f908a0eb77062c13097eb673c4d8470b2dbda9d2.tar.gz
gdb-f908a0eb77062c13097eb673c4d8470b2dbda9d2.tar.bz2
2002-10-31 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* frame.c (frame_read_unsigned_register): New function. (frame_read_signed_register): New function. * frame.h (frame_read_unsigned_register): Declare. (frame_read_signed_register): Declare.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/frame.c')
-rw-r--r--gdb/frame.c34
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
index 1ad3b09..9a5914c 100644
--- a/gdb/frame.c
+++ b/gdb/frame.c
@@ -153,6 +153,40 @@ frame_unwind_unsigned_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum,
}
void
+frame_read_unsigned_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum,
+ ULONGEST *val)
+{
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2002-10-31: There is a bit of dogma here - there is
+ always a frame. Both this, and the equivalent
+ frame_read_signed_register() function, can only be called with a
+ valid frame. If, for some reason, this function is called
+ without a frame then the problem isn't here, but rather in the
+ caller. It should of first created a frame and then passed that
+ in. */
+ /* NOTE: cagney/2002-10-31: As a side bar, keep in mind that the
+ ``current_frame'' should not be treated as a special case. While
+ ``get_next_frame (current_frame) == NULL'' currently holds, it
+ should, as far as possible, not be relied upon. In the future,
+ ``get_next_frame (current_frame)'' may instead simply return a
+ normal frame object that simply always gets register values from
+ the register cache. Consequently, frame code should try to avoid
+ tests like ``if get_next_frame() == NULL'' and instead just rely
+ on recursive frame calls (like the below code) when manipulating
+ a frame chain. */
+ gdb_assert (frame != NULL);
+ frame_unwind_unsigned_register (get_next_frame (frame), regnum, val);
+}
+
+void
+frame_read_signed_register (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum,
+ LONGEST *val)
+{
+ /* See note in frame_read_unsigned_register(). */
+ gdb_assert (frame != NULL);
+ frame_unwind_signed_register (get_next_frame (frame), regnum, val);
+}
+
+void
generic_unwind_get_saved_register (char *raw_buffer,
int *optimizedp,
CORE_ADDR *addrp,