* dwarf2dbg.c (dwarf2dbg_final_check): Rename local variable exp from expr.

Trying to build (for mmix-knuth-mmixware but I don't think that
matters) yields the following (repeatable on e.g. CompileFarm gcc20
sporting gcc-4.7.2 as default):

gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/home/hp/binutils/src/gas  -I. -I/home/hp/binutils/src/gas -I../bfd -I/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/config -I/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/../include -I/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/.. -I/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/../bfd -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/local/share/locale\""  -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -Werror -Wwrite-strings -I/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/../zlib -g -O2 -MT dwarf2dbg.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/dwarf2dbg.Tpo -c -o dwarf2dbg.o /home/hp/binutils/src/gas/dwarf2dbg.c
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/dwarf2dbg.c: In function 'dwarf2dbg_final_check':
/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/dwarf2dbg.c:2246: error: declaration of 'expr' shadows a global declaration
/home/hp/binutils/src/gas/expr.h:180: error: shadowed declaration is here
make[4]: *** [dwarf2dbg.o] Error 1

IIRC this is a false namespace clash and the warning is not observable
with a new-enough gcc.  Committed as obvious.

brgds, H-P
PS. Idea: -Wcompiler; warn about constructs problematic with e.g. old gcc. 1/2 ;-)

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/gas/dwarf2dbg.c b/gas/dwarf2dbg.c
index 4f70330..ad9d3f3 100644
--- a/gas/dwarf2dbg.c
+++ b/gas/dwarf2dbg.c
@@ -2243,21 +2243,21 @@ dwarf2dbg_final_check (void)
      holding the check value in X_op_symbol.  */
   while (view_assert_failed)
     {
-      expressionS *expr;
+      expressionS *exp;
       symbolS *sym;
       offsetT failed;
 
       gas_assert (!symbol_resolved_p (view_assert_failed));
 
-      expr = symbol_get_value_expression (view_assert_failed);
+      exp = symbol_get_value_expression (view_assert_failed);
       sym = view_assert_failed;
 
       /* If view_assert_failed looks like a compound check in the
 	 chain, break it up.  */
-      if (expr->X_op == O_add && expr->X_add_number == 0 && expr->X_unsigned)
+      if (exp->X_op == O_add && exp->X_add_number == 0 && exp->X_unsigned)
 	{
-	  view_assert_failed = expr->X_add_symbol;
-	  sym = expr->X_op_symbol;
+	  view_assert_failed = exp->X_add_symbol;
+	  sym = exp->X_op_symbol;
 	}
       else
 	view_assert_failed = NULL;