aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/cpu
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>2024-01-04 14:24:12 +0000
committerAndrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>2024-01-12 11:21:28 +0000
commit2f47f48fe55eb72bfe4d3c5291a74f4a53121c5e (patch)
treec5120bbce76f071a5dfd82b6e2d1780d85a4adcf /cpu
parentd6defe8761ca7db47e3c1e1168f7869ffbb7e087 (diff)
downloadgdb-2f47f48fe55eb72bfe4d3c5291a74f4a53121c5e.zip
gdb-2f47f48fe55eb72bfe4d3c5291a74f4a53121c5e.tar.gz
gdb-2f47f48fe55eb72bfe4d3c5291a74f4a53121c5e.tar.bz2
gdb/python: remove users ability to create gdb.Progspace objects
I noticed that it is possible for the user to create a new gdb.Progspace object, like this: (gdb) pi >>> p = gdb.Progspace() >>> p <gdb.Progspace object at 0x7ffad4219c10> >>> p.is_valid() False As the new gdb.Progspace object is not associated with an actual C++ program_space object within GDB core, then the new gdb.Progspace is created invalid, and there is no way in which the new object can ever become valid. Nor do I believe there's anywhere in the Python API where it makes sense to consume an invalid gdb.Progspace created in this way, for example, the gdb.Progspace could be passed as the locus to register_type_printer, but all that would happen is that the registered printer would never be used. In this commit I propose to remove the ability to create new gdb.Progspace objects. Attempting to do so now gives an error, like this: (gdb) pi >>> gdb.Progspace() Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: cannot create 'gdb.Progspace' instances Of course, there is a small risk here that some existing user code might break ... but if that happens I don't believe the user code can have been doing anything useful, so I see this as a small risk. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'cpu')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions