RISC-V: Report warning when linking the objects with different priv specs.

We do know some conflicts among different privileged specs.  For linker,
the safest approach is that don't allow the object linked with others which
may cause conflicts.  But this may cause inconvenience since not all objects
with conflicting priv specs are linked will cause problems.  But it is hard
to know the detailed conflict cases for linker, so we probably need a option
to tell linker that we do know there are no conflicts, or we are willing to
take risks to link the objects with conflicted priv specs.  But the option
is still under discussion.

Therefore, we can report warnings rather than errors when linking the objects
with conflicted priv specs.  This not only makes the linker more flexible,
but also warns people that the conflicts may happen.  We also need to update
the output priv spec version once the input priv spec is newer.

	bfd/
	* elfxx-riscv.c (struct priv_spec_t priv_specs[]): Move them from
	opcodes/riscv-opc.c to bfd/elfxx-riscv.c, since we need it in linker.
	(riscv_get_priv_spec_class): Likewise.
	(riscv_get_priv_spec_name): Likewise.
	(riscv_get_priv_spec_class_from_numbers): New function, convert
	the version numbers into string, then call riscv_get_priv_spec_class
	to get the priv spec class.
	* elfxx-riscv.h (riscv_get_priv_spec_class): Move forward declaration
	from include/opcode/riscv.h to bfd/elfxx-riscv.h.
	(riscv_get_priv_spec_name): Likewise.
	(riscv_get_priv_spec_class_from_numbers): New forward declaration.
	(opcode/riscv.h): Include it in the header rather than elfxx-riscv.c.
	* elfnn-riscv.c (riscv_merge_attributes):  Get the priv spec classes
	of input and output objects form their priv spec attributes by
	riscv_get_priv_spec_class_from_numbers.  Report warning rather than
	errors when linking objects with differnet priv spec versions.  We do
	know v1.9.1 may have conflicts to other versions, so report the
	warning, too.  After that, update the output priv spec version to the
	newest one so far.

	gas/
	* config/tc-riscv.c (buf_size, buf): Remove the unused variables.
	(riscv_set_default_priv_spec): Get the priv spec version from the
	priv spec attributes by riscv_get_priv_spec_class_from_numbers.

	include/
	* opcode/riscv.h (riscv_get_priv_spec_class): Move the function
	forward declarations to bfd/elfxx-riscv.h.
	(riscv_get_priv_spec_name): Likewise.

	opcodes/
	* riscv-opc.c: Move the structures and functions to bfd/elfxx-riscv.c.
	* riscv-dis.c: Include elfxx-riscv.h.

	ld/
	* testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/attr-merge-priv-spec-failed-01.d: Updated.
	* testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/attr-merge-priv-spec-failed-02.d: Updated.
	* testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/attr-merge-priv-spec-failed-03.d: Updated.
	* testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/attr-merge-priv-spec-failed-04.d: Updated.
	* testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/attr-merge-priv-spec-failed-05.d: Updated.
	* testsuite/ld-riscv-elf/attr-merge-priv-spec-failed-06.d: Updated.

1 files changed, 36 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
index 2804459..00553f7 100644
--- a/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
+++ b/bfd/elfnn-riscv.c
@@ -3052,25 +3052,31 @@ riscv_merge_attributes (bfd *ibfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
 	    unsigned int Tag_a = Tag_RISCV_priv_spec;
 	    unsigned int Tag_b = Tag_RISCV_priv_spec_minor;
 	    unsigned int Tag_c = Tag_RISCV_priv_spec_revision;
+	    enum riscv_priv_spec_class in_priv_spec;
+	    enum riscv_priv_spec_class out_priv_spec;
+
+	    /* Get the priv spec class from elf attribute numbers.  */
+	    riscv_get_priv_spec_class_from_numbers (in_attr[Tag_a].i,
+						    in_attr[Tag_b].i,
+						    in_attr[Tag_c].i,
+						    &in_priv_spec);
+	    riscv_get_priv_spec_class_from_numbers (out_attr[Tag_a].i,
+						    out_attr[Tag_b].i,
+						    out_attr[Tag_c].i,
+						    &out_priv_spec);
 
 	    /* Allow to link the object without the priv specs.  */
-	    if (out_attr[Tag_a].i == 0
-		&& out_attr[Tag_b].i == 0
-		&& out_attr[Tag_c].i == 0)
+	    if (out_priv_spec == PRIV_SPEC_CLASS_NONE)
 	      {
 		out_attr[Tag_a].i = in_attr[Tag_a].i;
 		out_attr[Tag_b].i = in_attr[Tag_b].i;
 		out_attr[Tag_c].i = in_attr[Tag_c].i;
 	      }
-	    else if ((in_attr[Tag_a].i != 0
-		      || in_attr[Tag_b].i != 0
-		      || in_attr[Tag_c].i != 0)
-		     && (out_attr[Tag_a].i != in_attr[Tag_a].i
-			 || out_attr[Tag_b].i != in_attr[Tag_b].i
-			 || out_attr[Tag_c].i != in_attr[Tag_c].i))
+	    else if (in_priv_spec != PRIV_SPEC_CLASS_NONE
+		     && in_priv_spec != out_priv_spec)
 	      {
 		_bfd_error_handler
-		  (_("error: %pB use privilege spec version %u.%u.%u but "
+		  (_("warning: %pB use privilege spec version %u.%u.%u but "
 		     "the output use version %u.%u.%u."),
 		   ibfd,
 		   in_attr[Tag_a].i,
@@ -3079,7 +3085,26 @@ riscv_merge_attributes (bfd *ibfd, struct bfd_link_info *info)
 		   out_attr[Tag_a].i,
 		   out_attr[Tag_b].i,
 		   out_attr[Tag_c].i);
-		result = FALSE;
+
+		/* The priv spec v1.9.1 can be linked with other spec
+		   versions since the conflicts.  We plan to drop the
+		   v1.9.1 in a year or two, so this confict should be
+		   removed in the future.  */
+		if (in_priv_spec == PRIV_SPEC_CLASS_1P9P1
+		    || out_priv_spec == PRIV_SPEC_CLASS_1P9P1)
+		  {
+		    _bfd_error_handler
+		      (_("warning: privilege spec version 1.9.1 can not be "
+			 "linked with other spec versions."));
+		  }
+
+		/* Update the output priv attributes to the newest.  */
+		if (in_priv_spec > out_priv_spec)
+		  {
+		    out_attr[Tag_a].i = in_attr[Tag_a].i;
+		    out_attr[Tag_b].i = in_attr[Tag_b].i;
+		    out_attr[Tag_c].i = in_attr[Tag_c].i;
+		  }
 	      }
 	    priv_attrs_merged = TRUE;
 	  }