diff options
| author | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2019-04-16 11:11:10 -0600 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2019-04-24 12:01:03 -0600 |
| commit | a59240a41ac34d91e4ef5dd8b484763639388364 (patch) | |
| tree | 8543a94201f810ff63de79fcf095c68bb84f2eb1 /README | |
| parent | 1b8dd6432644c256ab294d205a8e00f6c6dc5073 (diff) | |
| download | gdb-a59240a41ac34d91e4ef5dd8b484763639388364.zip gdb-a59240a41ac34d91e4ef5dd8b484763639388364.tar.gz gdb-a59240a41ac34d91e4ef5dd8b484763639388364.tar.bz2 | |
Fix passing of struct with bitfields on x86-64
Commit 4aa866af ("Fix AMD64 return value ABI in expression
evaluation") introduced a regression when calling a function with a
structure that contains bitfields.
Because the caller of amd64_has_unaligned_fields handles bitfields
already, it seemed to me that the simplest fix was to ignore bitfields
here.
gdb/ChangeLog
2019-04-24 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* amd64-tdep.c (amd64_has_unaligned_fields): Ignore bitfields.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-04-24 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* gdb.arch/amd64-eval.exp: Test bitfield return.
* gdb.arch/amd64-eval.cc (struct Bitfields): New.
(class Foo) <return_bitfields>: New method.
(main): Call it.
Diffstat (limited to 'README')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions