aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc')
-rw-r--r--gcc/fortran/ChangeLog7
-rw-r--r--gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c2
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog5
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_63.f9080
4 files changed, 93 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
index a871fc2..7ad2427 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2017-10-28 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/81758
+ * trans-expr.c (trans_class_vptr_len_assignment): 'vptr_expr'
+ must only be set if the right hand side expression is of type
+ class.
+
2017-10-27 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/82620
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
index 4e8bfc5..71ec176 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
@@ -8053,7 +8053,7 @@ trans_class_vptr_len_assignment (stmtblock_t *block, gfc_expr * le,
{
/* Get the vptr from the rhs expression only, when it is variable.
Functions are expected to be assigned to a temporary beforehand. */
- vptr_expr = re->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE
+ vptr_expr = (re->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE && re->ts.type == BT_CLASS)
? gfc_find_and_cut_at_last_class_ref (re)
: NULL;
if (vptr_expr != NULL && vptr_expr->ts.type == BT_CLASS)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index e4e6ee1..1646f4c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2017-10-28 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/81758
+ * gfortran.dg/class_63.f90: New test.
+
2017-10-27 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/82620
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_63.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_63.f90
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cf99bcf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_63.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+!
+! Tests the fix for PR81758, in which the vpointer for 'ptr' in
+! function 'pointer_value' would be set to the vtable of the component
+! 'container' rather than that of the component 'vec_elem'. In this test
+! case it is ensured that there is a single typebound procedure for both
+! types, so that different values are returned. In the original problem
+! completely different procedures were involved so that a segfault resulted.
+!
+! Reduced from the original code of Dimitry Liakh <liakhdi@ornl.gov> by
+! Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
+!
+module types
+ type, public:: gfc_container_t
+ contains
+ procedure, public:: get_value => ContTypeGetValue
+ end type gfc_container_t
+
+ !Element of a container:
+ type, public:: gfc_cont_elem_t
+ integer :: value_p
+ contains
+ procedure, public:: get_value => ContElemGetValue
+ end type gfc_cont_elem_t
+
+ !Vector element:
+ type, extends(gfc_cont_elem_t), public:: vector_elem_t
+ end type vector_elem_t
+
+ !Vector:
+ type, extends(gfc_container_t), public:: vector_t
+ type(vector_elem_t), allocatable, private :: vec_elem
+ end type vector_t
+
+ type, public :: vector_iter_t
+ class(vector_t), pointer, private :: container => NULL()
+ contains
+ procedure, public:: get_vector_value => vector_Value
+ procedure, public:: get_pointer_value => pointer_value
+ end type
+
+contains
+ integer function ContElemGetValue (this)
+ class(gfc_cont_elem_t) :: this
+ ContElemGetValue = this%value_p
+ end function
+
+ integer function ContTypeGetValue (this)
+ class(gfc_container_t) :: this
+ ContTypeGetValue = 0
+ end function
+
+ integer function vector_Value (this)
+ class(vector_iter_t) :: this
+ vector_value = this%container%vec_elem%get_value()
+ end function
+
+ integer function pointer_value (this)
+ class(vector_iter_t), target :: this
+ class(gfc_cont_elem_t), pointer :: ptr
+ ptr => this%container%vec_elem
+ pointer_value = ptr%get_value()
+ end function
+
+ subroutine factory (arg)
+ class (vector_iter_t), pointer :: arg
+ allocate (vector_iter_t :: arg)
+ allocate (vector_t :: arg%container)
+ allocate (arg%container%vec_elem)
+ arg%container%vec_elem%value_p = 99
+ end subroutine
+end module
+
+ use types
+ class (vector_iter_t), pointer :: x
+
+ call factory (x)
+ if (x%get_vector_value() .ne. 99) call abort
+ if (x%get_pointer_value() .ne. 99) call abort
+end