aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb')
-rw-r--r--gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb181
1 files changed, 96 insertions, 85 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb
index 5e84889..b752a6b 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/sem_ch6.adb
@@ -3843,7 +3843,8 @@ package body Sem_Ch6 is
-- user entities, as internally generated entitities might still need
-- to be expanded (e.g. those generated for types).
- if Present (Ghost_Config.Ignored_Ghost_Region)
+ if not CodePeer_Mode
+ and then Present (Ghost_Config.Ignored_Ghost_Region)
and then Comes_From_Source (Body_Id)
then
Expander_Active := False;
@@ -5029,7 +5030,9 @@ package body Sem_Ch6 is
end if;
<<Leave>>
- if Present (Ghost_Config.Ignored_Ghost_Region) then
+ if not CodePeer_Mode
+ and then Present (Ghost_Config.Ignored_Ghost_Region)
+ then
Expander_Active := Saved_EA;
end if;
@@ -5270,10 +5273,95 @@ package body Sem_Ch6 is
-- both subprogram bodies and subprogram declarations (specs).
function Analyze_Subprogram_Specification (N : Node_Id) return Entity_Id is
+ procedure Analyze_Direct_Attribute_Definition (Designator : Entity_Id);
+ -- This procedure checks whether the direct attribute definition for N
+ -- is correct for the given attribute name, and analyzes it.
+
function Is_Invariant_Procedure_Or_Body (E : Entity_Id) return Boolean;
-- Determine whether entity E denotes the spec or body of an invariant
-- procedure.
+ -----------------------------------------
+ -- Analyze_Direct_Attribute_Definition --
+ -----------------------------------------
+
+ procedure Analyze_Direct_Attribute_Definition (Designator : Entity_Id) is
+ Att_N : constant Node_Id := Original_Node (N);
+ Prefix_E : constant Entity_Id :=
+ Get_Name_Entity_Id (Chars (Prefix (Defining_Unit_Name (Att_N))));
+ Att_Name : constant Name_Id :=
+ Attribute_Name (Defining_Unit_Name (Att_N));
+ begin
+ pragma Assert (N /= Att_N);
+
+ if not Is_Direct_Attribute_Definition_Name (Att_Name) then
+ Error_Msg_Name_1 := Att_Name;
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("direct definition syntax not supported for attribute%",
+ Designator);
+ end if;
+
+ -- Handle each kind of attribute separately
+
+ case Att_Name is
+
+ when Name_Constructor =>
+ Error_Msg_Name_1 := Att_Name;
+
+ -- No further action required in a subprogram body
+
+ if Parent_Kind (N) not in N_Subprogram_Declaration then
+ return;
+
+ elsif No (Prefix_E) or else not Is_Type (Prefix_E) then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("prefix& of attribute% must be a type",
+ Prefix (Defining_Unit_Name (Att_N)));
+
+ elsif Ekind (Designator) /= E_Procedure then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("attribute% can only be specified to a procedure", N);
+
+ elsif No (First_Formal (Designator))
+ or else Etype (First_Formal (Designator)) /= Prefix_E
+ or else Ekind (First_Formal (Designator))
+ /= E_In_Out_Parameter
+ then
+ declare
+ Problem : constant Source_Ptr :=
+ (if No (First_Formal (Designator))
+ then Sloc (N)
+ else Sloc (First_Formal (Designator)));
+ begin
+ Error_Msg_Node_1 := Defining_Unit_Name (Att_N);
+ Error_Msg_Node_2 := Prefix_E;
+ Error_Msg
+ ("& must have a first IN OUT formal of type&", Problem);
+ end;
+
+ elsif Is_Frozen (Prefix_E)
+ or else Current_Scope /= Scope (Prefix_E)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_Sloc := Sloc (Freeze_Node (Prefix_E));
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("& must be defined before freezing#", Designator);
+
+ elsif Parent_Kind (Enclosing_Package_Or_Subprogram (Designator))
+ /= N_Package_Specification
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("& is required to be a primitive operation", Designator);
+
+ else
+ Set_Needs_Construction (Prefix_E);
+ end if;
+
+ when others =>
+ null;
+
+ end case;
+ end Analyze_Direct_Attribute_Definition;
+
------------------------------------
-- Is_Invariant_Procedure_Or_Body --
------------------------------------
@@ -5416,89 +5504,6 @@ package body Sem_Ch6 is
End_Scope;
- -- Register the subprogram in a Constructor_List when it is a valid
- -- constructor.
-
- if All_Extensions_Allowed
- and then Present (First_Formal (Designator))
- then
-
- declare
- First_Form_Type : constant Entity_Id :=
- Etype (First_Formal (Designator));
-
- Construct : Elmt_Id;
- begin
- -- Valid constructors have a "controlling" formal of a type
- -- with the Constructor aspect specified. Additionally, the
- -- subprogram name must match value described by the aspect.
-
- -- Additionally, constructor declarations must exist within the
- -- same scope as the type declaration and before the type is
- -- frozen.
-
- -- For example:
- --
- -- type Foo is null record with Constructor => Bar;
- --
- -- procedure Bar (Self : in out Foo);
- --
-
- if Present (Constructor_Name (First_Form_Type))
- and then Current_Scope = Scope (First_Form_Type)
- and then Chars (Constructor_Name (First_Form_Type))
- = Chars (Designator)
- and then Ekind (Designator) = E_Procedure
- and then Nkind (Parent (N)) = N_Subprogram_Declaration
- then
- -- If the constructor list is empty than we don't have to
- -- look for duplicates - we simply create the list and
- -- add it.
-
- if No (Constructor_List (First_Form_Type)) then
- Set_Constructor_List
- (First_Form_Type, New_Elmt_List (Designator));
-
- -- Otherwise, we need to check the constructor hasen't
- -- already been added (e.g. a specification and body) and
- -- that there isn't a constructor with the same number of
- -- type of formals.
-
- -- NOTE: The Constructor_List is sorted by the number of
- -- parameters.
-
- else
- Construct := First_Elmt
- (Constructor_List (First_Form_Type));
-
- -- Skip over constructors with less than the number of
- -- parameters than Designator ???
-
- -- Loop through the constructors looking for ones which
- -- "match."
-
- Outter : loop
-
- -- When we are at the end of the constructor list we
- -- know there are no matches, so it is safe to add.
-
- if No (Construct) then
- Append_Elmt
- (Designator,
- Constructor_List (First_Form_Type));
- exit Outter;
- end if;
-
- -- Loop through the formals and check the formals
- -- match on type ???
-
- Next_Elmt (Construct);
- end loop Outter;
- end if;
- end if;
- end;
- end if;
-
-- The subprogram scope is pushed and popped around the processing of
-- the return type for consistency with call above to Process_Formals
-- (which itself can call Analyze_Return_Type), and to ensure that any
@@ -5511,6 +5516,12 @@ package body Sem_Ch6 is
End_Scope;
end if;
+ -- Handle subprogram specification directly referencing an attribute
+
+ if Is_Direct_Attribute_Subp_Spec (N) then
+ Analyze_Direct_Attribute_Definition (Designator);
+ end if;
+
-- Function case
if Nkind (N) = N_Function_Specification then