diff options
| author | Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> | 2005-01-24 00:03:02 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paolo Carlini <paolo@gcc.gnu.org> | 2005-01-24 00:03:02 +0000 |
| commit | b142e2780cd6713ff068b5bd51302afe5c992231 (patch) | |
| tree | eeda3370014a3315d3241e355d1c5588e9e877b1 /libstdc++-v3/docs | |
| parent | ba4b172f0f602323bfde1043e1634f7d2f0f96d4 (diff) | |
| download | gcc-b142e2780cd6713ff068b5bd51302afe5c992231.zip gcc-b142e2780cd6713ff068b5bd51302afe5c992231.tar.gz gcc-b142e2780cd6713ff068b5bd51302afe5c992231.tar.bz2 | |
lwg-active.html, [...]: Import Revision 34.
2005-01-23 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
* docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html, lwg-defects.html: Import Revision 34.
From-SVN: r94131
Diffstat (limited to 'libstdc++-v3/docs')
| -rw-r--r-- | libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html | 1628 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-defects.html | 1756 |
2 files changed, 2098 insertions, 1286 deletions
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html b/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html index 4bc5b89..c0e5439 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html +++ b/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html @@ -5,11 +5,11 @@ <table> <tbody><tr> <td align="left">Doc. no.</td> -<td align="left">N1708=04-0148</td> +<td align="left">N1753=05-0013</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left">Date:</td> -<td align="left">5 Nov 2004</td> +<td align="left">2005-01-17</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left">Project:</td> @@ -20,18 +20,18 @@ <td align="left">Matt Austern <austern@apple.com></td> </tr> </tbody></table> -<h1>C++ Standard Library Active Issues List (Revision 33)</h1> +<h1>C++ Standard Library Active Issues List (Revision 34)</h1> <p>Reference ISO/IEC IS 14882:1998(E)</p> <p>Also see:</p> <ul> <li> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-toc.html">Table of Contents</a> for all library issues.</li> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-toc.html">Table of Contents</a> for all library issues.</li> <li> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-index.html">Index by Section</a> for all library issues.</li> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-index.html">Index by Section</a> for all library issues.</li> <li> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-status.html">Index by Status</a> for all library issues.</li> - <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html">Library Defect Reports List</a></li> - <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a></li> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-status.html">Index by Status</a> for all library issues.</li> + <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html">Library Defect Reports List</a></li> + <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a></li> </ul> <p>The purpose of this document is to record the status of issues which have come before the Library Working Group (LWG) of the ANSI @@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ <p>This document contains only library issues which are actively being considered by the Library Working Group. That is, issues which have a - status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>, - <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>. See - <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html">Library Defect Reports List</a> for issues considered defects and - <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a> for issues considered closed.</p> + status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>, + <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>. See + <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html">Library Defect Reports List</a> for issues considered defects and + <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a> for issues considered closed.</p> <p>The issues in these lists are not necessarily formal ISO Defect Reports (DR's). While some issues will eventually be elevated to @@ -88,33 +88,36 @@ directory as the issues list files. </p> <h2>Revision History</h2> <ul> +<li>R34: +2005-01 mid-term mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#488">488</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#494">494</a>. +</li> <li>R33: 2004-11 post-Redmond mailing. Reflections actions taken in Redmond. </li> <li>R32: 2004-09 pre-Redmond mailing: reflects new proposed resolutions and new issues received after the 2004-07 mailing. Added -new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#479">479</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#481">481</a>. +new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#479">479</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#481">481</a>. </li> <li>R31: 2004-07 mid-term mailing: reflects new proposed resolutions and new issues received after the post-Sydney mailing. Added -new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#463">463</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#478">478</a>. +new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#463">463</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#478">478</a>. </li> <li>R30: Post-Sydney mailing: reflects decisions made at the Sydney meeting. Voted all "Ready" issues from R29 into the working paper. -Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#460">460</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#462">462</a>. +Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#460">460</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#462">462</a>. </li> <li>R29: -Pre-Sydney mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#441">441</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#457">457</a>. +Pre-Sydney mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#441">441</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#457">457</a>. </li> <li>R28: Post-Kona mailing: reflects decisions made at the Kona meeting. -Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#432">432</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#440">440</a>. +Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#432">432</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#440">440</a>. </li> <li>R27: -Pre-Kona mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#404">404</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#431">431</a>. +Pre-Kona mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#404">404</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#431">431</a>. </li> <li>R26: Post-Oxford mailing: reflects decisions made at the Oxford meeting. @@ -122,139 +125,139 @@ All issues in Ready status were voted into DR status. All issues in DR status were voted into WP status. </li> <li>R25: -Pre-Oxford mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#390">390</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#402">402</a>. +Pre-Oxford mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#390">390</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#402">402</a>. </li> <li>R24: Post-Santa Cruz mailing: reflects decisions made at the Santa Cruz -meeting. All Ready issues from R23 with the exception of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, which has been given a new proposed resolution, were -moved to DR status. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#383">383</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a>. (Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#387">387</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a> were discussed -at the meeting.) Made progress on issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> have been moved to Ready status, and the only remaining -concerns with <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> involve wording. +meeting. All Ready issues from R23 with the exception of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, which has been given a new proposed resolution, were +moved to DR status. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#383">383</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a>. (Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#387">387</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a> were discussed +at the meeting.) Made progress on issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> have been moved to Ready status, and the only remaining +concerns with <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> involve wording. </li> <li>R23: -Pre-Santa Cruz mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#367">367</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#382">382</a>. +Pre-Santa Cruz mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#367">367</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#382">382</a>. Moved issues in the TC to TC status. </li> <li>R22: -Post-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#362">362</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#366">366</a>. +Post-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#362">362</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#366">366</a>. </li> <li>R21: -Pre-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#351">351</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#361">361</a>. +Pre-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#351">351</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#361">361</a>. </li> <li>R20: Post-Redmond mailing; reflects actions taken in Redmond. Added -new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#336">336</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a>, of which issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#347">347</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a> were added since Redmond, hence +new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#336">336</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a>, of which issues +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#347">347</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a> were added since Redmond, hence not discussed at the meeting. All Ready issues were moved to DR status, with the exception of issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>. +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>. Noteworthy issues discussed at Redmond include -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#202">202</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#270">270</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#254">254</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>. +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#202">202</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#270">270</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#254">254</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>. </li> <li>R19: Pre-Redmond mailing. Added new issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#335">335</a>. +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#335">335</a>. </li> <li>R18: Post-Copenhagen mailing; reflects actions taken in Copenhagen. -Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#317">317</a>, and discussed -new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>. +Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#317">317</a>, and discussed +new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>. Changed status of issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#118">118</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#153">153</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#165">165</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#171">171</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#183">183</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#184">184</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#185">185</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#186">186</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#214">214</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#234">234</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#237">237</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#248">248</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#251">251</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#256">256</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#260">260</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#261">261</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#262">262</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#263">263</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#268">268</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#118">118</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#153">153</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#165">165</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#171">171</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#183">183</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#184">184</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#185">185</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#186">186</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#214">214</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#234">234</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#237">237</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#248">248</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#251">251</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#256">256</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#260">260</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#261">261</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#262">262</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#263">263</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#268">268</a> to DR. Changed status of issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#117">117</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#230">230</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#238">238</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#259">259</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#266">266</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#272">272</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#273">273</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#275">275</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#281">281</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#285">285</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#286">286</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#288">288</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#292">292</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#295">295</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#297">297</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#298">298</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#301">301</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#306">306</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#307">307</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#308">308</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#117">117</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#230">230</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#238">238</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#259">259</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#266">266</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#272">272</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#273">273</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#275">275</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#281">281</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#285">285</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#286">286</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#288">288</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#292">292</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#295">295</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#297">297</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#298">298</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#301">301</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#306">306</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#307">307</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#308">308</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a> to Ready. Closed issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#287">287</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#289">289</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#293">293</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#302">302</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#313">313</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#287">287</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#289">289</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#293">293</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#302">302</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#313">313</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a> as NAD. </li> <li>R17: Pre-Copenhagen mailing. Converted issues list to XML. Added proposed -resolutions for issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#76">76</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>. -Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#278">278</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#311">311</a>. +resolutions for issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#76">76</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>. +Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#278">278</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#311">311</a>. </li> <li>R16: post-Toronto mailing; reflects actions taken in Toronto. Added new -issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a>. Changed status of issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#3">3</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#8">8</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#9">9</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#19">19</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#26">26</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#31">31</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#61">61</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#63">63</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#108">108</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#115">115</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#122">122</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#142">142</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#144">144</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#146">146</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#147">147</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#159">159</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#164">164</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#170">170</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#181">181</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#208">208</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#209">209</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#210">210</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#217">217</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#220">220</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#222">222</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#223">223</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#224">224</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> to "DR". Reopened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#23">23</a>. Reopened -issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#187">187</a>. Changed issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#2">2</a> and -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD. Fixed a typo in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a>. Fixed -issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#70">70</a>: signature should be changed both places it -appears. Fixed issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#160">160</a>: previous version didn't fix +issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a>. Changed status of issues +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#3">3</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#8">8</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#9">9</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#19">19</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#26">26</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#31">31</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#61">61</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#63">63</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#108">108</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#115">115</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#122">122</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#142">142</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#144">144</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#146">146</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#147">147</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#159">159</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#164">164</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#170">170</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#181">181</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#208">208</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#209">209</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#210">210</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#217">217</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#220">220</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#222">222</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#223">223</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#224">224</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> to "DR". Reopened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#23">23</a>. Reopened +issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#187">187</a>. Changed issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#2">2</a> and +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD. Fixed a typo in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a>. Fixed +issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#70">70</a>: signature should be changed both places it +appears. Fixed issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#160">160</a>: previous version didn't fix the bug in enough places. </li> <li>R15: pre-Toronto mailing. Added issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a>. Some small HTML formatting +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a>. Some small HTML formatting changes so that we pass Weblint tests. </li> <li>R14: post-Tokyo II mailing; reflects committee actions taken in -Tokyo. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a>. (00-0019R1/N1242) +Tokyo. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a>. (00-0019R1/N1242) </li> <li>R13: -pre-Tokyo II updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a>. +pre-Tokyo II updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a>. </li> <li>R12: -pre-Tokyo II mailing: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a> to -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>. Added "and paragraph 5" to the proposed resolution -of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#29">29</a>. Add further rationale to issue -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#178">178</a>. +pre-Tokyo II mailing: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a> to +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>. Added "and paragraph 5" to the proposed resolution +of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#29">29</a>. Add further rationale to issue +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#178">178</a>. </li> <li>R11: post-Kona mailing: Updated to reflect LWG and full committee actions in Kona (99-0048/N1224). Note changed resolution of issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#196">196</a> -to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#198">198</a>. Closed issues list split into "defects" and +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#196">196</a> +to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#198">198</a>. Closed issues list split into "defects" and "closed" documents. Changed the proposed resolution of issue -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD, and changed the wording of proposed resolution -of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD, and changed the wording of proposed resolution +of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. </li> <li>R10: -pre-Kona updated. Added proposed resolutions <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#92">92</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#190">190</a> to -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>. (99-0033/D1209, 14 Oct 99) +pre-Kona updated. Added proposed resolutions <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#92">92</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#190">190</a> to +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>. (99-0033/D1209, 14 Oct 99) </li> <li>R9: -pre-Kona mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a> to -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#189">189</a>. Issues list split into separate "active" and +pre-Kona mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a> to +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#189">189</a>. Issues list split into separate "active" and "closed" documents. (99-0030/N1206, 25 Aug 99) </li> <li>R8: @@ -262,36 +265,36 @@ post-Dublin mailing. Updated to reflect LWG and full committee actions in Dublin. (99-0016/N1193, 21 Apr 99) </li> <li>R7: -pre-Dublin updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#131">131</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#132">132</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#133">133</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#135">135</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#139">139</a> (31 Mar 99) +pre-Dublin updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#131">131</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#132">132</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#133">133</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#135">135</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#139">139</a> (31 Mar 99) </li> <li>R6: -pre-Dublin mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#128">128</a>, -and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>. (99-0007/N1194, 22 Feb 99) +pre-Dublin mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#128">128</a>, +and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>. (99-0007/N1194, 22 Feb 99) </li> <li>R5: -update issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>; added issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#126">126</a>. Format revisions to prepare +update issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>; added issues +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#126">126</a>. Format revisions to prepare for making list public. (30 Dec 98) </li> <li>R4: -post-Santa Cruz II updated: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#110">110</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#113">113</a> added, several +post-Santa Cruz II updated: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#110">110</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#113">113</a> added, several issues corrected. (22 Oct 98) </li> <li>R3: -post-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#94">94</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> +post-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#94">94</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> added, many issues updated to reflect LWG consensus (12 Oct 98) </li> <li>R2: -pre-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#93">93</a> added, -issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a> updated. (29 Sep 98) +pre-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#93">93</a> added, +issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a> updated. (29 Sep 98) </li> <li>R1: -Correction to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#55">55</a> resolution, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> code -format, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a> title. (17 Sep 98) +Correction to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#55">55</a> resolution, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> code +format, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a> title. (17 Sep 98) </li> </ul> <h2> @@ -366,24 +369,24 @@ format, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#64 status, the LWG believes that this issue should be revisited at the next revision of the standard. It is usually paired with NAD.</p> - <p>Issues are always given the status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> when + <p>Issues are always given the status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> when they first appear on the issues list. They may progress to - <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> while the LWG + <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> while the LWG is actively working on them. When the LWG has reached consensus on the disposition of an issue, the status will then change to - <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Dup">Dup</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#NAD">NAD</a>, or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> as appropriate. Once the full J16 committee votes to + <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Dup">Dup</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#NAD">NAD</a>, or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> as appropriate. Once the full J16 committee votes to forward Ready issues to the Project Editor, they are given the - status of Defect Report ( <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>). These in turn may - become the basis for Technical Corrigenda (<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>), + status of Defect Report ( <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>). These in turn may + become the basis for Technical Corrigenda (<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>), or are closed without action other than a Record of Response - (<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#RR">RR</a> ). The intent of this LWG process is that + (<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#RR">RR</a> ). The intent of this LWG process is that only issues which are truly defects in the Standard move to the formal ISO DR status. </p> <h2>Active Issues</h2> <hr> -<a name="23"><h3>23. Num_get overflow result</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="23"><h3>23. Num_get overflow result</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>The current description of numeric input does not account for the possibility of overflow. This is an implicit result of changing the description to rely on the definition of scanf() (which fails to @@ -408,7 +411,7 @@ and hard to trace, so I will describe it briefly: <ul> <li> - According to 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> + According to 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> paragraph 11 <tt>failbit</tt> is set if <tt>scanf()</tt> would return an input error; otherwise a value is converted to the rules of <tt>scanf</tt>. @@ -502,10 +505,10 @@ upon overflow. We considered three options based on this:</p> it.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>typo: 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, para 2, bullet 3. Strike "in." from +<p>typo: 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, para 2, bullet 3. Strike "in." from the end.</p> -<p>Change 22.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.nm.put"> [lib.locale.nm.put]</a>, para 11, bullet 2 from:</p> +<p>Change 22.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.nm.put"> [lib.locale.nm.put]</a>, para 11, bullet 2 from:</p> <blockquote> The sequence of chars accumulated in stage 2 would have caused scanf to report an input failure. ios_base::failbit is @@ -535,7 +538,7 @@ what kind of error happened. Martin will provide wording, Howard may help.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="96"><h3>96. Vector<bool> is not a container</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.bool"> [lib.vector.bool]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> AFNOR <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> +<a name="96"><h3>96. Vector<bool> is not a container</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.bool"> [lib.vector.bool]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> AFNOR <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> <p><tt>vector<bool></tt> is not a container as its reference and pointer types are not references and pointers. </p> @@ -602,7 +605,7 @@ solution.]</i></p> be a fully conforming container. These options are not mutually exclusive.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="130"><h3>130. Return type of container::erase(iterator) differs for associative containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 2 Mar 1999</p> +<a name="130"><h3>130. Return type of container::erase(iterator) differs for associative containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 2 Mar 1999</p> <p>Table 67 (23.1.1) says that container::erase(iterator) returns an iterator. Table 69 (23.1.2) says that in addition to this requirement, associative containers also say that container::erase(iterator) @@ -612,7 +615,7 @@ fail to meet the requirements for containers.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in Table 69 Associative container +In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in Table 69 Associative container requirements, change the return type of <tt>a.erase(q)</tt> from <tt>void</tt> to <tt>iterator</tt>. Change the assertion/not/pre/post-condition from "erases the element pointed to @@ -623,7 +626,7 @@ is returned." </p> <p> -In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in Table 69 Associative container +In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in Table 69 Associative container requirements, change the return type of <tt>a.erase(q1, q2)</tt> from <tt>void</tt> to <tt>iterator</tt>. Change the assertion/not/pre/post-condition from "erases the elements in the @@ -632,10 +635,10 @@ q2)</tt>. Returns q2." </p> <p> -In 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, in the <tt>map</tt> class synopsis; and -in 23.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.multimap"> [lib.multimap]</a>, in the <tt>multimap</tt> class synopsis; and -in 23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a>, in the <tt>set</tt> class synopsis; and -in 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a>, in the <tt>multiset</tt> class synopsis: +In 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, in the <tt>map</tt> class synopsis; and +in 23.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.multimap"> [lib.multimap]</a>, in the <tt>multimap</tt> class synopsis; and +in 23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a>, in the <tt>set</tt> class synopsis; and +in 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a>, in the <tt>multiset</tt> class synopsis: change the signature of the first <tt>erase</tt> overload to </p> <pre> iterator erase(iterator position); @@ -661,7 +664,7 @@ Matt provided wording.]</i></p> ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="197"><h3>197. max_size() underspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 21 Oct 1999</p> +<a name="197"><h3>197. max_size() underspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 21 Oct 1999</p> <p>Must the value returned by max_size() be unchanged from call to call? </p> <p>Must the value returned from max_size() be meaningful? </p> @@ -693,21 +696,21 @@ into account the actual currently available resources). This, obviously, has to be determined dynamically each time max_size() is called. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> table 32 max_size() wording from:<br> +<p>Change 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> table 32 max_size() wording from:<br> <br> the largest value that can meaningfully be passed to X::allocate<br> to:<br> the value of the largest constant expression -(5.19 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/expr.html#expr.const"> [expr.const]</a>) that could ever meaningfully be passed to X::allocate</p> +(5.19 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/expr.html#expr.const"> [expr.const]</a>) that could ever meaningfully be passed to X::allocate</p> <p> -Change 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> table 65 max_size() wording from:<br> +Change 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> table 65 max_size() wording from:<br> <br> size() of the largest possible container.<br> to:<br> the value of the largest constant expression -(5.19 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/expr.html#expr.const"> [expr.const]</a>) that could ever meaningfully be returned by X::size(). +(5.19 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/expr.html#expr.const"> [expr.const]</a>) that could ever meaningfully be returned by X::size(). </p> <p><i>[Kona: The LWG informally discussed this and asked Andy Sawyer to submit @@ -716,7 +719,7 @@ an issue.]</i></p> <p><i>[Tokyo: The LWG believes (1) above is the intended meaning.]</i></p> <p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Beman Dawes supplied the above resolution at the -request of the LWG. 21.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.capacity"> [lib.string.capacity]</a> was not changed because it +request of the LWG. 21.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.capacity"> [lib.string.capacity]</a> was not changed because it references max_size() in 23.1. The term "compile-time" was avoided because it is not defined anywhere in the standard (even though it is used several places in the library clauses).]</i></p> @@ -727,7 +730,7 @@ function than as an allocator member function. For the latter, it is probably best thought of as an architectural limit. Nathan will provide new wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="201"><h3>201. Numeric limits terminology wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.limits"> [lib.limits]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Stephen Cleary <b>Date:</b> 21 Dec 1999</p> +<a name="201"><h3>201. Numeric limits terminology wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.limits"> [lib.limits]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Stephen Cleary <b>Date:</b> 21 Dec 1999</p> <p> In some places in this section, the terms "fundamental types" and "scalar types" are used when the term "arithmetic types" is intended. @@ -822,7 +825,7 @@ types and for user-defined types, and the standard doesn't make it clear how numeric_limits applies to each of those cases. A wholesale review of numeric_limits is needed. A paper would be welcome.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="233"><h3>233. Insertion hints in associative containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 30 Apr 2000</p> +<a name="233"><h3>233. Insertion hints in associative containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 30 Apr 2000</p> <p> If <tt>mm</tt> is a multimap and <tt>p</tt> is an iterator into the multimap, then <tt>mm.insert(p, x)</tt> inserts @@ -857,7 +860,7 @@ proposed "before or after, if possible, otherwise [...]". <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In table 69 "Associative Container Requirements" in 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in the row for <tt>a.insert(p, t)</tt>, +<p>In table 69 "Associative Container Requirements" in 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in the row for <tt>a.insert(p, t)</tt>, change</p> <blockquote> @@ -918,7 +921,7 @@ enough to make the detailed semantics hard to satisfy."]</i></p> suggests so the LWG can decide between the two options.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="247"><h3>247. <tt>vector</tt>, <tt>deque::insert</tt> complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Lisa Lippincott <b>Date:</b> 06 June 2000</p> +<a name="247"><h3>247. <tt>vector</tt>, <tt>deque::insert</tt> complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Lisa Lippincott <b>Date:</b> 06 June 2000</p> <p>Paragraph 2 of 23.2.4.3 [lib.vector.modifiers] describes the complexity of <tt>vector::insert</tt>:</p> @@ -951,7 +954,7 @@ inserting at the end of the <tt>vector</tt>, and then using <p>I looked to see if <tt>deque</tt> had a similar problem, and was surprised to find that <tt>deque</tt> places no requirement on the -complexity of inserting multiple elements (23.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.deque.modifiers"> [lib.deque.modifiers]</a>, +complexity of inserting multiple elements (23.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.deque.modifiers"> [lib.deque.modifiers]</a>, paragraph 3):</p> <blockquote> @@ -988,7 +991,7 @@ complicated than a while loop whose body is a single-element insert.]</i></p> <hr> <a name="254"><h3>254. Exception types in clause 19 are constructed from <tt>std::string</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 19.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.std.exceptions"> [lib.std.exceptions]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 01 Aug 2000</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 19.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.std.exceptions"> [lib.std.exceptions]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 01 Aug 2000</p> <p> Many of the standard exception types which implementations are required to throw are constructed with a const std::string& @@ -1078,7 +1081,7 @@ copy constructor is potentially invoked during stack unwinding.</p> <p>The copy constructor is a more serious problem, becuase failure during stack unwinding invokes <tt>terminate</tt>. The copy constructor must be nothrow. <i>Curaçao: Howard thinks this -requirement is already present.</i></p> +requirement may already be present.</i></p> <p>The fundamental problem is that it's difficult to get the nothrow requirement to work well with the requirement that the exception @@ -1088,8 +1091,8 @@ include:</p> <ul> <li>Limit the size of a string that exception objects are required to -throw: change the postconditions of 19.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.domain.error"> [lib.domain.error]</a> paragraph 3 -and 19.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.runtime.error"> [lib.runtime.error]</a> paragraph 3 to something like this: +throw: change the postconditions of 19.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.domain.error"> [lib.domain.error]</a> paragraph 3 +and 19.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.runtime.error"> [lib.runtime.error]</a> paragraph 3 to something like this: "strncmp(what(), what_arg._str(), N) == 0, where N is an implementation defined constant no smaller than 256".</li> <li>Allow the const string& constructor to throw, but not the @@ -1110,11 +1113,6 @@ throw, the string must compare equal to the argument.</li> exception-derived class is not necessarily a bad thing. And the bad_alloc constructor already has a no throw spec on it (18.4.2.1).</p> -<p> -The copy constructors of all exception-derived classes already have a -no throw spec. Reference 18.6.1, 19.1 and 15.4/13. -</p> - <p><b>Future:</b></p> <p>All involved would like to see const char* constructors added, but @@ -1126,12 +1124,17 @@ mechanism (in a future C++ language). As they stand, the copy constructors might fail via a call to unexpected. I think what is intended here is that the copy constructors can't fail.</p> -<p><i>[Pre-Sydney: reopened at the request of Howard Hinnant.]</i></p> +<p><i>[Pre-Sydney: reopened at the request of Howard Hinnant. + Post-Redmond: James Kanze noticed that the copy constructors of + exception-derived classes do not have nothrow clauses. Those + classes have no copy constructors declared, meaning the + compiler-generated implicit copy constructors are used, and those + compiler-generated constructors might in principle throw anything.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="258"><h3>258. Missing allocator requirement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 22 Aug 2000</p> +<a name="258"></a><h3><a name="258">258. Missing allocator requirement</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 22 Aug 2000</p> <p> ->From lib-7752: +From lib-7752: </p> <p> @@ -1198,10 +1201,10 @@ the second line from the bottom in table 32 already implies the desired property. This issue should be considered in light of other issues related to allocator instances.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="280"><h3>280. Comparison of reverse_iterator to const reverse_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterators"> [lib.reverse.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Cleary <b>Date:</b> 27 Nov 2000</p> +<a name="280"><h3>280. Comparison of reverse_iterator to const reverse_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterators"> [lib.reverse.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Cleary <b>Date:</b> 27 Nov 2000</p> <p> This came from an email from Steve Cleary to Fergus in reference to -issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#179">179</a>. The library working group briefly discussed +issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#179">179</a>. The library working group briefly discussed this in Toronto and believed it should be a separate issue. There was also some reservations about whether this was a worthwhile problem to fix. @@ -1222,7 +1225,7 @@ that, I don't see how <i>any</i> user code could break." </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -<b>Section:</b> 24.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterator"> [lib.reverse.iterator]</a> +<b>Section:</b> 24.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterator"> [lib.reverse.iterator]</a> add/change the following declarations:</p> <pre> A) Add a templated assignment operator, after the same manner as the templated copy constructor, i.e.: @@ -1248,7 +1251,7 @@ add/change the following declarations:</p> </pre> <p> Also make the addition/changes for these signatures in -24.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.ops"> [lib.reverse.iter.ops]</a>. +24.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.ops"> [lib.reverse.iter.ops]</a>. </p> <p><i>[ @@ -1260,7 +1263,7 @@ desirable to provide this feature in a different way. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="290"><h3>290. Requirements to for_each and its function object</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 03 Jan 2001</p> +<a name="290"><h3>290. Requirements to for_each and its function object</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 03 Jan 2001</p> <p>The specification of the for_each algorithm does not have a "Requires" section, which means that there are no restrictions imposed on the function object whatsoever. In essence it @@ -1288,7 +1291,7 @@ algorithm does not say so. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Add a "Requires" section to section 25.1.1 similar to those proposed for transform and the numeric algorithms (see issue -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a>): +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a>): </p> <blockquote> @@ -1304,8 +1307,8 @@ blanket statement in Clause 25, not just a special requirement for ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="294"><h3>294. User defined macros and standard headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> James Kanze <b>Date:</b> 11 Jan 2001</p> -<p>Paragraph 2 of 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a> reads: "A +<a name="294"><h3>294. User defined macros and standard headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> James Kanze <b>Date:</b> 11 Jan 2001</p> +<p>Paragraph 2 of 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a> reads: "A translation unit that includes a header shall not contain any macros that define names declared in that header." As I read this, it would mean that the following program is legal:</p> @@ -1321,30 +1324,30 @@ which <sstream> didn't include <string>.</p> <p>I think that this phrase was probably formulated before it was decided that a standard header may freely include other standard headers. The phrase would be perfectly appropriate for C, for -example. In light of 17.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.headers"> [lib.res.on.headers]</a> paragraph 1, however, +example. In light of 17.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.headers"> [lib.res.on.headers]</a> paragraph 1, however, it isn't stringent enough.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In paragraph 2 of 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a>, change "A +<p>In paragraph 2 of 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a>, change "A translation unit that includes a header shall not contain any macros that define names declared in that header." to "A translation unit that includes a header shall not contain any macros that define names declared in any standard header."</p> <p><i>[Copenhagen: the general idea is clearly correct, but there is -concern about making sure that the two paragraphs in 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a> remain consistent. Nathan will provide new +concern about making sure that the two paragraphs in 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a> remain consistent. Nathan will provide new wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="299"><h3>299. Incorrect return types for iterator dereference</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a>, 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> John Potter <b>Date:</b> 22 Jan 2001</p> +<a name="299"><h3>299. Incorrect return types for iterator dereference</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a>, 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> John Potter <b>Date:</b> 22 Jan 2001</p> <p> -In section 24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a>, +In section 24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a>, Table 75 gives the return type of *r-- as convertible to T. This is not consistent with Table 74 which gives the return type of *r++ as T&. *r++ = t is valid while *r-- = t is invalid. </p> <p> -In section 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a>, +In section 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a>, Table 76 gives the return type of a[n] as convertible to T. This is not consistent with the semantics of *(a + n) which returns T& by Table 74. *(a + n) = t is valid while a[n] = t is invalid. @@ -1435,11 +1438,11 @@ with a return type of convertible to <tt>T</tt> and operational semantics of </p> <hr> -<a name="309"><h3>309. Does sentry catch exceptions?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.format"> [lib.iostream.format]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 19 Mar 2001</p> +<a name="309"><h3>309. Does sentry catch exceptions?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.format"> [lib.iostream.format]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 19 Mar 2001</p> <p> The descriptions of the constructors of basic_istream<>::sentry -(27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>) and basic_ostream<>::sentry -(27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>) do not explain what the functions do in +(27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>) and basic_ostream<>::sentry +(27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>) do not explain what the functions do in case an exception is thrown while they execute. Some current implementations allow all exceptions to propagate, others catch them and set ios_base::badbit instead, still others catch some but let @@ -1450,16 +1453,16 @@ others propagate. The text also mentions that the functions may call setstate(failbit) (without actually saying on what object, but presumably the stream argument is meant). That may have been fine for -basic_istream<>::sentry prior to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>, since +basic_istream<>::sentry prior to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>, since the function performs an input operation which may fail. However, -issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a> amends 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>, p2 to +issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a> amends 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>, p2 to clarify that the function should actually call setstate(failbit | eofbit), so the sentence in p3 is redundant or even somewhat contradictory. </p> <p> -The same sentence that appears in 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>, p3 +The same sentence that appears in 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>, p3 doesn't seem to be very meaningful for basic_istream<>::sentry which performs no input. It is actually rather misleading since it would appear to guide library implementers to calling @@ -1664,9 +1667,9 @@ result of a call to strm.clear(). <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Remove the last sentence of 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> p5 (but not +<p>Remove the last sentence of 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> p5 (but not the footnote, which should be moved to the preceding sentence).</p> -<p>Remove the last sentence of 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> p3 (but not +<p>Remove the last sentence of 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> p3 (but not the footnote, which should be moved to the preceding sentence).</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The LWG feels that no clarification of EH policy is necessary: the @@ -1674,11 +1677,11 @@ result of a call to strm.clear(). performs, and about which of those operations can throw. However, the sentence at the end should be removed because it's redundant.</p> <hr> -<a name="342"><h3>342. seek and eofbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 09 Oct 201</p> +<a name="342"><h3>342. seek and eofbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 09 Oct 201</p> <p>I think we have a defect.</p> -<p>According to lwg issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> which is now a dr, the -description of seekg in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 38 now looks +<p>According to lwg issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> which is now a dr, the +description of seekg in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 38 now looks like:</p> <blockquote> @@ -1689,7 +1692,7 @@ gcount(). After constructing a sentry object, if fail() != true, executes rdbuf()>pubseekpos( pos). </blockquote> -<p>And according to lwg issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> which is also now a dr, +<p>And according to lwg issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> which is also now a dr, 27.6.1.3, paragraph 1 looks like:</p> <blockquote> @@ -1754,7 +1757,7 @@ examined by the user to determine why something failed.</p> and propose a resolution.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="356"><h3>356. Meaning of ctype_base::mask enumerators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 23 Jan 2002</p> +<a name="356"><h3>356. Meaning of ctype_base::mask enumerators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 23 Jan 2002</p> <p>What should the following program print?</p> @@ -1798,7 +1801,7 @@ The above program assumes that ctype_base::mask enumerators like <tt>space</tt> and <tt>print</tt> are disjoint, and that the way to say that a character is both a space and a printing character is to or those two enumerators together. This is suggested by the "exposition -only" values in 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a>, but it is nowhere specified in +only" values in 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a>, but it is nowhere specified in normative text. An alternative interpretation is that the more specific categories subsume the less specific. The above program gives the results it does on the Microsoft compiler because, on that @@ -1823,8 +1826,8 @@ lib-9224, lib-9226, lib-9229, lib-9270, lib-9272, lib-9273, lib-9274, lib-9277, lib-9279. </p> -<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#339">339</a> is related, but not identical. The -proposed resolution if issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#339">339</a> says that +<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#339">339</a> is related, but not identical. The +proposed resolution if issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#339">339</a> says that ctype_base::mask must be a bitmask type. It does not say that the ctype_base::mask elements are bitmask elements, so it doesn't directly affect this issue.</p> @@ -1896,9 +1899,9 @@ option 1 is required for C99 compatibility. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="362"><h3>362. bind1st/bind2nd type safety</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3.6.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.1st"> [lib.bind.1st]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Demkin <b>Date:</b> 26 Apr 2002</p> +<a name="362"><h3>362. bind1st/bind2nd type safety</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3.6.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.1st"> [lib.bind.1st]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Demkin <b>Date:</b> 26 Apr 2002</p> <p> -The definition of bind1st() (20.3.6.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.1st"> [lib.bind.1st]</a>) can result in +The definition of bind1st() (20.3.6.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.1st"> [lib.bind.1st]</a>) can result in the construction of an unsafe binding between incompatible pointer types. For example, given a function whose first parameter type is 'pointer to T', it's possible without error to bind an argument of @@ -1926,12 +1929,12 @@ map its argument to the expected argument type of the bound function </pre> <p> -A functional-style conversion (5.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/expr.html#expr.type.conv"> [expr.type.conv]</a>) is defined to be -semantically equivalent to an explicit cast expression (5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/expr.html#expr.cast"> [expr.cast]</a>), which may (according to 5.4, paragraph 5) be interpreted +A functional-style conversion (5.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/expr.html#expr.type.conv"> [expr.type.conv]</a>) is defined to be +semantically equivalent to an explicit cast expression (5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/expr.html#expr.cast"> [expr.cast]</a>), which may (according to 5.4, paragraph 5) be interpreted as a reinterpret_cast, thus masking the error. </p> -<p>The problem and proposed change also apply to 20.3.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.2nd"> [lib.bind.2nd]</a>.</p> +<p>The problem and proposed change also apply to 20.3.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.2nd"> [lib.bind.2nd]</a>.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> The simplest and most localized change to prevent such errors is to @@ -1962,7 +1965,7 @@ programming. all. Jeremy will check with the original author of this part of the Standard and will see what the original intent was.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="366"><h3>366. Excessive const-qualification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Walter Brown, Marc Paterno <b>Date:</b> 10 May 2002</p> +<a name="366"><h3>366. Excessive const-qualification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Walter Brown, Marc Paterno <b>Date:</b> 10 May 2002</p> <p> The following member functions are declared const, yet return non-const pointers. We believe they are should be changed, because they allow code @@ -2064,9 +2067,9 @@ those terms, does not appear in the standard.]</i></p> const basic_filebuf<charT,traits>* rdbuf() const; </pre> <hr> -<a name="368"></a><h3><a name="368">368. basic_string::replace has two "Throws" paragraphs</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::replace"> [lib.string::replace]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 3 Jun 2002</p> +<a name="368"><h3>368. basic_string::replace has two "Throws" paragraphs</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::replace"> [lib.string::replace]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 3 Jun 2002</p> <p> -21.3.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::replace"> [lib.string::replace]</a> basic_string::replace, second +21.3.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::replace"> [lib.string::replace]</a> basic_string::replace, second signature, given in paragraph 1, has two "Throws" paragraphs (3 and 5). </p> @@ -2082,7 +2085,7 @@ part of the "Effects" paragraph. Someone who understands string replace well needs to work on this.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="369"><h3>369. io stream objects and static ctors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ruslan Abdikeev <b>Date:</b> 8 Jul 2002</p> +<a name="369"><h3>369. io stream objects and static ctors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ruslan Abdikeev <b>Date:</b> 8 Jul 2002</p> <p> Is it safe to use standard iostream objects from constructors of static objects? Are standard iostream objects constructed and are @@ -2213,7 +2216,7 @@ including the following example: int main () { return i; } </pre> <hr> -<a name="371"><h3>371. Stability of multiset and multimap member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Frank Compagner <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 2002</p> +<a name="371"><h3>371. Stability of multiset and multimap member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Frank Compagner <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 2002</p> <p> The requirements for multiset and multimap containers (23.1 [lib.containers.requirements], 23.1.2 [lib.associative.reqmnts], @@ -2265,7 +2268,7 @@ be hard to track down by users. This would also make the need for an erase_if() member function that much greater. </p> -<p>This issue is somewhat related to LWG issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>.</p> +<p>This issue is somewhat related to LWG issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>.</p> <p><i>[Santa Cruz: More people need to look at this. Much user code may assume stability. On the other hand, it seems drastic to add a @@ -2273,9 +2276,9 @@ erase_if() member function that much greater. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <hr> -<a name="376"><h3>376. basic_streambuf semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ray Lischner <b>Date:</b> 14 Aug 2002</p> +<a name="376"><h3>376. basic_streambuf semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ray Lischner <b>Date:</b> 14 Aug 2002</p> <p> -In Section 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, Table 90, the implication is that +In Section 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, Table 90, the implication is that the four conditions should be mutually exclusive, but they are not. The first two cases, as written, are subcases of the third. I think it would be clearer if the conditions were rewritten as follows: @@ -2313,7 +2316,7 @@ implementations before we decide on a solution.]</i></p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <hr> -<a name="382"><h3>382. codecvt do_in/out result</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 30 Aug 2002</p> +<a name="382"><h3>382. codecvt do_in/out result</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 30 Aug 2002</p> <p> It seems that the descriptions of codecvt do_in() and do_out() leave sufficient room for interpretation so that two implementations of @@ -2338,7 +2341,7 @@ the following seems less than adequately specified: <ol> <li> - 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p2 says this about the effects of the + 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p2 says this about the effects of the function: ...Stops if it encounters a character it cannot convert... This assumes that there *is* a character to convert. What happens when there is a sequence that doesn't form a @@ -2371,7 +2374,7 @@ the following seems less than adequately specified: </li> </ol> <p> -Finally, the conditions described at the end of 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p4 don't seem to be possible: +Finally, the conditions described at the end of 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p4 don't seem to be possible: </p> <blockquote> "A return value of partial, if (from_next == from_end), @@ -2385,7 +2388,7 @@ If the value is partial, it's not clear to me that (from_next ==from_end) could ever hold if there isn't enough room in the destination buffer. In order for (from_next==from_end) to hold, all characters in that range must have been successfully -converted (according to 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p2) and since there are no +converted (according to 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p2) and since there are no further source characters to convert, no more room in the destination buffer can be needed. </p> @@ -2482,9 +2485,9 @@ written with the assumption of 1->N conversion in mind, not M->N. Bill, Howard, and Martin will provide new wording. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="384"><h3>384. equal_range has unimplementable runtime complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Hans Bos <b>Date:</b> 18 Oct 2002</p> +<a name="384"><h3>384. equal_range has unimplementable runtime complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Hans Bos <b>Date:</b> 18 Oct 2002</p> <p> -Section 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a> +Section 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a> states that at most 2 * log(last - first) + 1 comparisons are allowed for equal_range. </p> @@ -2529,11 +2532,11 @@ other questions matter.)]</i></p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <hr> -<a name="385"><h3>385. Does call by value imply the CopyConstructible requirement?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 23 Oct 2002</p> +<a name="385"><h3>385. Does call by value imply the CopyConstructible requirement?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 23 Oct 2002</p> <p> Many function templates have parameters that are passed by value; a typical example is <tt>find_if</tt>'s <i>pred</i> parameter in -25.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find"> [lib.alg.find]</a>. Are the corresponding template parameters +25.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find"> [lib.alg.find]</a>. Are the corresponding template parameters (<tt>Predicate</tt> in this case) implicitly required to be CopyConstructible, or does that need to be spelled out explicitly? </p> @@ -2552,8 +2555,8 @@ my_predicate& is not CopyConstructible. <p> The scope of this problem, if it is a problem, is unknown. Function -object arguments to generic algorithms in clauses 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> -and 26 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.numerics"> [lib.numerics]</a> are obvious examples. A review of the whole +object arguments to generic algorithms in clauses 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> +and 26 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.numerics"> [lib.numerics]</a> are obvious examples. A review of the whole library is necessary. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> @@ -2565,8 +2568,8 @@ into references? References aren't copy constructible, so this should not be allowed. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="386"><h3>386. Reverse iterator's operator[] has impossible return type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.4.1.3.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opindex"> [lib.reverse.iter.opindex]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 23 Oct 2002</p> -<p>In 24.4.1.3.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opindex"> [lib.reverse.iter.opindex]</a>, <tt>reverse_iterator<>::operator[]</tt> +<a name="386"></a><h3><a name="386">386. Reverse iterator's operator[] has impossible return type</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 24.4.1.3.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opindex"> [lib.reverse.iter.opindex]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 23 Oct 2002</p> +<p>In 24.4.1.3.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opindex"> [lib.reverse.iter.opindex]</a>, <tt>reverse_iterator<>::operator[]</tt> is specified as having a return type of <tt>reverse_iterator::reference</tt>, which is the same as <tt>iterator_traits<Iterator>::reference</tt>. (Where <tt>Iterator</tt> is the underlying iterator type.)</p> @@ -2578,7 +2581,7 @@ which is the same as <tt>iterator_traits<Iterator>::reference</tt>. to <tt>Iterator</tt>'s value type. The return type specified for reverse_iterator's operator[] would thus appear to be impossible.</p> -<p>With the resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#299">299</a>, the type of +<p>With the resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#299">299</a>, the type of <tt>a[n]</tt> will continue to be required (for random access iterators) to be convertible to the value type, and also <tt>a[n] = t</tt> will be a valid expression. Implementations of @@ -2590,7 +2593,7 @@ which is the same as <tt>iterator_traits<Iterator>::reference</tt>. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 24.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.requirements"> [lib.reverse.iter.requirements]</a> change:</p> +<p>In 24.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.requirements"> [lib.reverse.iter.requirements]</a> change:</p> <blockquote> <pre>reference operator[](difference_type n) const; @@ -2616,7 +2619,7 @@ Comments from Dave Abrahams: IMO we should resolve 386 by just saying readable and writable, which is about as good as we can do. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="387"><h3>387. std::complex over-encapsulated</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.numbers"> [lib.complex.numbers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Gabriel Dos Reis <b>Date:</b> 8 Nov 2002</p> +<a name="387"><h3>387. std::complex over-encapsulated</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.numbers"> [lib.complex.numbers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Gabriel Dos Reis <b>Date:</b> 8 Nov 2002</p> <p> The absence of explicit description of std::complex<T> layout makes it imposible to reuse existing software developed in traditional @@ -2648,7 +2651,7 @@ of std::complex<> is not justified. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add the following requirements to 26.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.numbers"> [lib.complex.numbers]</a> as 26.2/4:</p> +<p>Add the following requirements to 26.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.numbers"> [lib.complex.numbers]</a> as 26.2/4:</p> <blockquote> <p>If z is an lvalue expression of type cv std::complex<T> then</p> @@ -2675,7 +2678,7 @@ imaginary part of a[i].</li> </ul> </blockquote> -<p>In the header synopsis in 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, replace</p> +<p>In the header synopsis in 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, replace</p> <pre> template<class T> T real(const complex<T>&); template<class T> T imag(const complex<T>&); </pre> @@ -2688,7 +2691,7 @@ imaginary part of a[i].</li> template<class T> T& imag( complex<T>&); </pre> -<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> paragraph 1, change</p> +<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> paragraph 1, change</p> <pre> template<class T> T real(const complex<T>&); </pre> <p>to</p> @@ -2698,7 +2701,7 @@ imaginary part of a[i].</li> <p>and change the <b>Returns</b> clause to "<b>Returns:</b> The real part of <i>x</i></p>. -<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> paragraph 2, change</p> +<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> paragraph 2, change</p> <pre> template<class T> T imag(const complex<T>&); </pre> <p>to</p> @@ -2726,7 +2729,7 @@ part of <i>x</i></p>. justification for this change even without other considerations. All existing implementations already have the layout proposed here.</p> <hr> -<a name="394"><h3>394. behavior of formatted output on failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 27 Dec 2002</p> +<a name="394"><h3>394. behavior of formatted output on failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 27 Dec 2002</p> <p> There is a contradiction in Formatted output about what bit is supposed to be set if the formatting fails. On sentence says it's @@ -2821,7 +2824,7 @@ functions should be changed as proposed below. <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <hr> -<a name="396"><h3>396. what are characters zero and one</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 5 Jan 2003</p> +<a name="396"></a><h3><a name="396">396. what are characters zero and one</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 5 Jan 2003</p> <p> 23.3.5.1, p6 [lib.bitset.cons] talks about a generic character having the value of 0 or 1 but there is no definition of what @@ -2855,7 +2858,7 @@ is a bitset, not a string. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Change the constructor's function declaration immediately before -23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> p3 to:</p> +23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> p3 to:</p> <pre> template <class charT, class traits, class Allocator> explicit bitset(const basic_string<charT, traits, Allocator>& str, @@ -2864,7 +2867,7 @@ is a bitset, not a string. basic_string<charT, traits, Allocator>::npos, charT zero = charT('0'), charT one = charT('1')) </pre> -<p>Change the first two sentences of 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> p6 to: "An +<p>Change the first two sentences of 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> p6 to: "An element of the constructed string has value 0 if the corresponding character in <i>str</i>, beginning at position <i>pos</i>, is <i>zero</i>. Otherwise, the element has the value 1.</p> @@ -2877,15 +2880,15 @@ is <i>zero</i>. Otherwise, the element has the value 1.</p> </p> <p>Change the declaration of the <tt>to_string</tt> member function - immediately before 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> p33 to:</p> + immediately before 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> p33 to:</p> <pre> template <class charT, class traits, class Allocator> basic_string<charT, traits, Allocator> to_string(charT zero = charT('0'), charT one = charT('1')) const; </pre> -<p>Change the last sentence of 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> p33 to: "Bit +<p>Change the last sentence of 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> p33 to: "Bit value 0 becomes the character <tt><i>zero</i></tt>, bit value 1 becomes the character <tt><i>one</i></tt>.</p> -<p>Change 23.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.operators"> [lib.bitset.operators]</a> p8 to:</p> +<p>Change 23.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.operators"> [lib.bitset.operators]</a> p8 to:</p> <p><b>Returns</b>:</p> <pre> os << x.template to_string<charT,traits,allocator<charT> >( use_facet<ctype<charT> >(<i>os</i>.getloc()).widen('0'), @@ -2901,10 +2904,10 @@ is <i>zero</i>. Otherwise, the element has the value 1.</p> resolution allows those users who care about this issue to get it right.</p> <p>We fix the inserter to use the new arguments. Note that we already - fixed the analogous problem with the extractor in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a>.</p> + fixed the analogous problem with the extractor in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a>.</p> <hr> -<a name="397"><h3>397. ostream::sentry dtor throws exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 5 Jan 2003</p> +<a name="397"><h3>397. ostream::sentry dtor throws exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 5 Jan 2003</p> <p> 17.4.4.8, p3 prohibits library dtors from throwing exceptions. </p> @@ -2936,7 +2939,7 @@ is the only one that can throw. PJP suggests specifying that sentry::~sentry() should internally catch any exceptions it might cause. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="398"><h3>398. effects of end-of-file on unformatted input functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 5 Jan 2003</p> +<a name="398"><h3>398. effects of end-of-file on unformatted input functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 5 Jan 2003</p> <p> While reviewing unformatted input member functions of istream for their behavior when they encounter end-of-file during input @@ -3051,9 +3054,9 @@ end-of-file): and changing it on an individual basis wouldn't make things better. Dietmar will do this work.</p> <hr> -<a name="401"><h3>401. incorrect type casts in table 32 in lib.allocator.requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Markus Mauhart <b>Date:</b> 27 Feb 2003</p> +<a name="401"><h3>401. incorrect type casts in table 32 in lib.allocator.requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Markus Mauhart <b>Date:</b> 27 Feb 2003</p> <p> -I think that in par2 of 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> the last two +I think that in par2 of 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> the last two lines of table 32 contain two incorrect type casts. The lines are ... </p> @@ -3090,7 +3093,7 @@ current requirement (being a random access iterator). <p> Note: Actually I would prefer to replace "((T*)p)?->dtor_name" with "p?->dtor_name", but AFAICS this is not possible cause of an omission -in 13.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/over.html#over.ref"> [over.ref]</a> (for which I have filed another DR on 29.11.2002). +in 13.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/over.html#over.ref"> [over.ref]</a> (for which I have filed another DR on 29.11.2002). </p> <p><i>[Kona: The LWG thinks this is somewhere on the border between @@ -3102,7 +3105,7 @@ in 13.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/over.html#over.re non-default pointer types.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="406"><h3>406. vector::insert(s) exception safety</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 27 Apr 2003</p> +<a name="406"><h3>406. vector::insert(s) exception safety</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 27 Apr 2003</p> <p> There is a possible defect in the standard: the standard text was never intended to prevent arbitrary ForwardIterators, whose operations @@ -3113,7 +3116,7 @@ standard appears to impose requirements that aren't met by any existing implementation. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Replace 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> paragraph 1 with:</p> +<p>Replace 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> paragraph 1 with:</p> <blockquote> 1- Notes: Causes reallocation if the new size is greater than the old capacity. If no reallocation happens, all the iterators and @@ -3125,14 +3128,14 @@ existing implementation. <p><i>[We probably need to say something similar for deque.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="408"><h3>408. Is vector<reverse_iterator<char*> > forbidden?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 3 June 2003</p> +<a name="408"><h3>408. Is vector<reverse_iterator<char*> > forbidden?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 3 June 2003</p> <p> I've been discussing iterator semantics with Dave Abrahams, and a surprise has popped up. I don't think this has been discussed before. </p> <p> -24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> says that the only operation that can be performed on "singular" +24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> says that the only operation that can be performed on "singular" iterator values is to assign a non-singular value to them. (It doesn't say they can be destroyed, and that's probably a defect.) Some implementations have taken this to imply that there is no need @@ -3182,7 +3185,7 @@ T(), and so copying is defined if the result of T() is copyable. </p> <p> -Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, which defines reverse_iterator's default +Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, which defines reverse_iterator's default constructor more precisely, has some relevance to this issue. However, it is not the whole story. </p> @@ -3208,7 +3211,7 @@ uninitialized, and possibly equal to an existing pointer value, or <p> 8.5 paragraph 5 seems to make clear that the second is required to -satisfy DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, at least for non-class Iterator argument +satisfy DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, at least for non-class Iterator argument types. </p> @@ -3235,7 +3238,7 @@ are default-initialized, and it should explicitly allow destroying any iterator value, singular or not, default-initialized or not. </p> -<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#407">407</a></p> +<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#407">407</a></p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p><i>[ @@ -3249,9 +3252,9 @@ wrong to impose so strict a requirement for iterators. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="409"><h3>409. Closing an fstream should clear error state</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a>, 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 3 June 2003</p> +<a name="409"><h3>409. Closing an fstream should clear error state</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a>, 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 3 June 2003</p> <p> -A strict reading of 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> shows that opening or +A strict reading of 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> shows that opening or closing a basic_[io]fstream does not affect the error bits. This means, for example, that if you read through a file up to EOF, and then close the stream and reopen it at the beginning of the file, @@ -3259,7 +3262,7 @@ the EOF bit in the stream's error state is still set. This is counterintuitive. </p> <p> -The LWG considered this issue once before, as issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#22">22</a>, +The LWG considered this issue once before, as issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#22">22</a>, and put in a footnote to clarify that the strict reading was indeed correct. We did that because we believed the standard was unambiguous and consistent, and that we should not make architectural @@ -3268,7 +3271,7 @@ language, those considerations no longer apply. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p> +<p>Change 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p> <blockquote> Calls rdbuf()->open(s,mode|in). If that function returns a null @@ -3283,7 +3286,7 @@ a null pointer, calls setstate(failbit) (which may throw ios_base::failure [Footnote: (lib.iostate.flags)), else calls clear(). </blockquote> -<p>Change 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p> +<p>Change 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p> <blockquote>Calls rdbuf()->open(s,mode|out). If that function returns a null pointer, calls setstate(failbit) (which may throw @@ -3297,7 +3300,7 @@ returns a null pointer, calls setstate(failbit) (which may throw ios_base::failure [Footnote: (lib.iostate.flags)), else calls clear(). </blockquote> -<p>Change 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p> +<p>Change 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p> <blockquote>Calls rdbuf()->open(s,mode), If that function returns a null pointer, calls setstate(failbit), (which may throw @@ -3324,7 +3327,7 @@ flags.]</i></p> of the three fstream class template instead.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="413"><h3>413. Proposed resolution to LDR#64 still wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bo Persson <b>Date:</b> 13 Jul 2003</p> +<a name="413"></a><h3><a name="413">413. Proposed resolution to LDR#64 still wrong</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bo Persson <b>Date:</b> 13 Jul 2003</p> <p> The second sentence of the proposed resolution says: </p> @@ -3343,7 +3346,7 @@ basic_istream (*this) and inserting into sb. I can't really tell if <p><i>[ Sydney: Definitely a real issue. We are, indeed, extracting characters from an istream and not from sb. The problem was there in the FDIS and -wasn't fixed by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a>. Probably what was intended was +wasn't fixed by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a>. Probably what was intended was to have *this instead of sb. We're talking about the exception flag state of a basic_istream object, and there's only one basic_istream object in this discussion, so that would be a consistent @@ -3369,7 +3372,7 @@ while extracting characters from *this and failbit is on in exceptions(), then the caught exception is rethrown. </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="416"><h3>416. definitions of XXX_MIN and XXX_MAX macros in climits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.c.limits"> [lib.c.limits]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="416"><h3>416. definitions of XXX_MIN and XXX_MAX macros in climits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.c.limits"> [lib.c.limits]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> Given two overloads of the function foo(), one taking an argument of type @@ -3418,7 +3421,7 @@ where the actual type is easily detectable by overload resolution. <climits>.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="417"><h3>417. what does ctype::do_widen() return on failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="417"></a><h3><a name="417">417. what does ctype::do_widen() return on failure</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> The Effects and Returns clauses of the do_widen() member function of the ctype facet fail to specify the behavior of the function on failure. @@ -3440,7 +3443,7 @@ and iostream to reliably detect this failure. existing library components aren't written with the assumption that <i>widen</i> can throw.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="418"><h3>418. exceptions thrown during iostream cleanup</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::Init"> [lib.ios::Init]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="418"><h3>418. exceptions thrown during iostream cleanup</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::Init"> [lib.ios::Init]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> The dtor of the ios_base::Init object is supposed to call flush() on the 6 standard iostream objects cout, cerr, clog, wcout, wcerr, and wclog. @@ -3466,7 +3469,7 @@ object throws. might reasonably swallow the exception, or call abort, or do something even more drastic.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="419"><h3>419. istream extractors not setting failbit if eofbit is already set</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="419"><h3>419. istream extractors not setting failbit if eofbit is already set</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> 27.6.1.1.2, p2 says that istream::sentry ctor prepares for input if is.good() @@ -3544,7 +3547,7 @@ corrected. clearer.</p> <hr> -<a name="421"><h3>421. is basic_streambuf copy-constructible?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="421"><h3>421. is basic_streambuf copy-constructible?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> The reflector thread starting with c++std-lib-11346 notes that the class template basic_streambuf, along with basic_stringbuf and basic_filebuf, @@ -3563,7 +3566,7 @@ of the standard provide a compiler-generated copy ctor and assignment operator yet fail to specify their semantics. It's believed that the only types for which this is actually a problem (i.e. types where the compiler-generated default may be inappropriate and may not have been -intended) are locale facets. See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#439">439</a>. +intended) are locale facets. See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#439">439</a>. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> @@ -3715,7 +3718,7 @@ basic_filebuf. </p> <hr> -<a name="422"><h3>422. explicit specializations of member functions of class templates</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="422"><h3>422. explicit specializations of member functions of class templates</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> It has been suggested that 17.4.3.1, p1 may or may not allow programs to explicitly specialize members of standard templates on user-defined types. @@ -3729,7 +3732,7 @@ the program) by relying on the "as if" rule. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> - Add the following sentence immediately after the text of 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>, p1: + Add the following sentence immediately after the text of 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>, p1: </p> <blockquote> @@ -3753,7 +3756,7 @@ library class templates. We need to consult with CWG to make sure we use the right wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="423"><h3>423. effects of negative streamsize in iostreams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="423"><h3>423. effects of negative streamsize in iostreams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> A third party test suite tries to exercise istream::ignore(N) with @@ -3783,7 +3786,7 @@ ostream::write(). negative. Martin will do that review.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="424"><h3>424. normative notes</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.summary"> [lib.structure.summary]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="424"><h3>424. normative notes</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.summary"> [lib.structure.summary]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> The text in 17.3.1.1, p1 says: @@ -3834,7 +3837,7 @@ None of these lists is meant to be exhaustive. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="427"><h3>427. stage 2 and rationale of DR 221</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="427"><h3>427. stage 2 and rationale of DR 221</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> The requirements specified in Stage 2 and reiterated in the rationale of DR 221 (and echoed again in DR 303) specify that num_get<charT>:: @@ -3865,7 +3868,7 @@ instantiate the num_get template on user-defined types. and traits is in order. The LWG considered and rejected the possibility of changing numeric facets to use narrowing instead of widening. This may be a good idea for other reasons (see issue - <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#459">459</a>), but it doesn't solve the problem raised by this + <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#459">459</a>), but it doesn't solve the problem raised by this issue. Whether we use widen or narrow the <tt>num_get</tt> facet still has no idea which traits class the user wants to use for the comparison, because only streams, not facets, are passed traits @@ -3881,7 +3884,7 @@ traits classes, then the facet could reasonably be required to use <tt>char_traits<charT></tt></p>. <hr> -<a name="430"><h3>430. valarray subset operations</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.sub"> [lib.valarray.sub]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="430"><h3>430. valarray subset operations</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.sub"> [lib.valarray.sub]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> The standard fails to specify the behavior of valarray::operator[](slice) and other valarray subset operations when they are passed an "invalid" @@ -3895,8 +3898,8 @@ object (e.g., slice (2, 1, 1) for a valarray of size 1). performance, so we don't want to require specific checking. We need wording to express this decision.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="431"><h3>431. Swapping containers with unequal allocators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 20 Sep 2003</p> -<p>Clause 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> paragraph 4 says that implementations +<a name="431"><h3>431. Swapping containers with unequal allocators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 20 Sep 2003</p> +<p>Clause 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> paragraph 4 says that implementations are permitted to supply containers that are unable to cope with allocator instances and that container implementations may assume that all instances of an allocator type compare equal. We gave @@ -3942,7 +3945,7 @@ object (e.g., slice (2, 1, 1) for a valarray of size 1). <p><i>[pre-Sydney: Howard argues for option 3 in n1599.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="434"><h3>434. bitset::to_string() hard to use</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 15 Oct 2003</p> +<a name="434"><h3>434. bitset::to_string() hard to use</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 15 Oct 2003</p> <p> It has been pointed out a number of times that the bitset to_string() member function template is tedious to use since callers must explicitly specify the @@ -3982,9 +3985,9 @@ to_string() member function template:</p> ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="438"><h3>438. Ambiguity in the "do the right thing" clause</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 20 Oct 2003</p> +<a name="438"><h3>438. Ambiguity in the "do the right thing" clause</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 20 Oct 2003</p> -<p>Section 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>, paragraphs 9-11, fixed up the problem +<p>Section 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>, paragraphs 9-11, fixed up the problem noticed with statements like:</p> <pre>vector<int> v(10, 1); </pre> @@ -4180,7 +4183,7 @@ T implicit_cast(const U& u) <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -Replace 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> paragraphs 9 - 11 with: +Replace 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> paragraphs 9 - 11 with: <p>For every sequence defined in this clause and in clause lib.strings:</p> @@ -4305,10 +4308,10 @@ then the implementation must reject the constructor as A is no longer implicitly convertible to B. </p> <hr> -<a name="444"><h3>444. Bad use of casts in fstream</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Vincent Leloup <b>Date:</b> 20 Nov 2003</p> +<a name="444"><h3>444. Bad use of casts in fstream</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Vincent Leloup <b>Date:</b> 20 Nov 2003</p> <p> -27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a> p1, 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a> p1, 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a> p1 seems have same problem as exposed in LWG issue -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a>. +27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a> p1, 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a> p1, 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a> p1 seems have same problem as exposed in LWG issue +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a>. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> @@ -4350,7 +4353,7 @@ implicitly convertible to B. <hr> -<a name="445"><h3>445. iterator_traits::reference unspecified for some iterator categories</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 9 Dec 2003</p> +<a name="445"><h3>445. iterator_traits::reference unspecified for some iterator categories</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 9 Dec 2003</p> <p> The standard places no restrictions at all on the reference type of input, output, or forward iterators (for forward iterators it @@ -4443,7 +4446,7 @@ so I've changed the wording to say that those types may be <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a>, after:</p> +<p>In 24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a>, after:</p> <blockquote> be defined as the iterator's difference type, value type and iterator @@ -4462,7 +4465,7 @@ is, the same type as the type of <tt>*a</tt> and <tt>a-></tt>, respectively. </blockquote> -<p>In 24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a>, change:</p> +<p>In 24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a>, change:</p> <blockquote> In the case of an output iterator, the types @@ -4483,7 +4486,7 @@ iterator_traits<Iterator>::pointer may be defined as <tt>void</tt>. </blockquote> -<p>In 24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a>, change:</p> +<p>In 24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a>, change:</p> <blockquote> <pre>typename traits::off_type, charT*, charT&> </pre> @@ -4502,7 +4505,7 @@ needed to be changed. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="446"><h3>446. Iterator equality between different containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>, 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Koenig <b>Date:</b> 16 Dec 2003</p> +<a name="446"><h3>446. Iterator equality between different containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>, 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Koenig <b>Date:</b> 16 Dec 2003</p> <p> What requirements does the standard place on equality comparisons between iterators that refer to elements of different containers. For example, if @@ -4526,7 +4529,7 @@ reachability. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="453"><h3>453. basic_stringbuf::seekoff need not always fail for an empty stream</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 30 Jan 2004</p> +<a name="453"><h3>453. basic_stringbuf::seekoff need not always fail for an empty stream</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 30 Jan 2004</p> <pre> pos_type basic_stringbuf::seekoff(off_type, ios_base::seekdir, ios_base::openmode); </pre> @@ -4556,7 +4559,7 @@ gptr() or pptr()) is a null pointer and the new offset newoff is nonzero, the positioning operation fails. </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="454"><h3>454. basic_filebuf::open should accept wchar_t names</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 30 Jan 2004</p> +<a name="454"><h3>454. basic_filebuf::open should accept wchar_t names</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 30 Jan 2004</p> <pre> basic_filebuf *basic_filebuf::open(const char *, ios_base::open_mode); </pre> @@ -4628,7 +4631,7 @@ counterargument, which most but not all LWG members accepted, is that the mapping between narrow files names and files is also implemenation defined.</p> <hr> -<a name="455"><h3>455. cerr::tie() and wcerr::tie() are overspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 30 Jan 2004</p> +<a name="455"><h3>455. cerr::tie() and wcerr::tie() are overspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 30 Jan 2004</p> <p> Both cerr::tie() and wcerr::tie() are obliged to be null at program startup. This is overspecification and overkill. It is both traditional @@ -4657,7 +4660,7 @@ Its state is otherwise the same as required for basic_ios<wchar_t>::init permit, cout and cerr to be tied on startup. Pre-Redmond: Bill will provide wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="456"></a><h3><a name="456">456. Traditional C header files are overspecified</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 30 Jan 2004</p> +<a name="456"><h3>456. Traditional C header files are overspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 30 Jan 2004</p> <p>The C++ Standard effectively requires that the traditional C headers (of the form <xxx.h>) be defined in terms of the newer C++ @@ -4741,7 +4744,7 @@ declaring C names in headers. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <hr> -<a name="457"><h3>457. bitset constructor: incorrect number of initialized bits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dag Henriksson <b>Date:</b> 30 Jan 2004</p> +<a name="457"><h3>457. bitset constructor: incorrect number of initialized bits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dag Henriksson <b>Date:</b> 30 Jan 2004</p> <p> The constructor from unsigned long says it initializes "the first M bit positions to the corresponding bit values in val. M is the smaller @@ -4755,14 +4758,14 @@ uses to hold the value. Thus, the first M bit position above is not guaranteed to have any corresponding bit values in val. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> paragraph 2, change "M is the smaller of +<p>In 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> paragraph 2, change "M is the smaller of N and the value CHAR_BIT * sizeof (unsigned long). (249)" to "<tt>M</tt> is the smaller of <tt>N</tt> and the number of bits in - the value representation (section 3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/basic.html#basic.types"> [basic.types]</a>) of <tt>unsigned + the value representation (section 3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/basic.html#basic.types"> [basic.types]</a>) of <tt>unsigned long</tt>." </p> <hr> -<a name="458"><h3>458. 24.1.5 contains unintented limitation for operator-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Daniel Frey <b>Date:</b> 27 Feb 2004</p> +<a name="458"><h3>458. 24.1.5 contains unintented limitation for operator-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Daniel Frey <b>Date:</b> 27 Feb 2004</p> <p> In 24.1.5 [lib.random.access.iterators], table 76 the operational semantics for the expression "r -= n" are defined as "return r += -n". @@ -4791,7 +4794,7 @@ operational semantics for this column to: </code> <hr> -<a name="459"><h3>459. Requirement for widening in stage 2 is overspecification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 16 Mar 2004</p> +<a name="459"><h3>459. Requirement for widening in stage 2 is overspecification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 16 Mar 2004</p> <p>When parsing strings of wide-character digits, the standard requires the library to widen narrow-character "atoms" and compare the widened atoms against the characters that are being parsed. @@ -4835,11 +4838,11 @@ drastic. Existing implementations with the exception of libstdc++ currently already use narrow() so the impact of the change on programs would presumably be isolated to just a single implementation. Further, since narrow() is not required to translate alternate wide digit -representations such as those mentioned in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> to +representations such as those mentioned in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> to their narrow equivalents (i.e., the portable source characters '0' through '9'), the change does not necessarily imply that these alternate digits would be treated as ordinary digits and accepted as -part of numbers during parsing. In fact, the requirement in 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>, p13 forbids narrow() to translate an alternate +part of numbers during parsing. In fact, the requirement in 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>, p13 forbids narrow() to translate an alternate digit character, wc, to an ordinary digit in the basic source character set unless the expression (ctype<charT>::is(ctype_base::digit, wc) == true) holds. This in @@ -4868,7 +4871,7 @@ technique to perform the comparison:</p> if it the source and destination types are the same</li> </ol> <hr> -<a name="460"><h3>460. Default modes missing from basic_fstream member specifications</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ben Hutchings <b>Date:</b> 1 Apr 2004</p> +<a name="460"><h3>460. Default modes missing from basic_fstream member specifications</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ben Hutchings <b>Date:</b> 1 Apr 2004</p> <p> The second parameters of the non-default constructor and of the open member function for basic_fstream, named "mode", are optional @@ -4879,21 +4882,21 @@ constructor declaration has the "explicit" function-specifier implying that it is intended to be callable with one argument. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.8.1.12 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.cons"> [lib.fstream.cons]</a>, change</p> +<p>In 27.8.1.12 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.cons"> [lib.fstream.cons]</a>, change</p> <pre> explicit basic_fstream(const char* s, ios_base::openmode mode); </pre> <p>to</p> <pre> explicit basic_fstream(const char* s, ios_base::openmode mode = ios_base::in|ios_base::out); </pre> -<p>In 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a>, change</p> +<p>In 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a>, change</p> <pre> void open(const char*s, ios_base::openmode mode); </pre> <p>to</p> void open(const char*s, ios_base::openmode mode = ios_base::in|ios_base::out); <hr> -<a name="461"><h3>461. time_get hard or impossible to implement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 23 Mar 2004</p> +<a name="461"><h3>461. time_get hard or impossible to implement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 23 Mar 2004</p> <p> Template time_get currently contains difficult, if not impossible, requirements for do_date_order, do_get_time, and do_get_date. All require @@ -4980,7 +4983,7 @@ on the value returned by date_order() as follows: ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="462"><h3>462. Destroying objects with static storage duration</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 3.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/basic.html#basic.start.term"> [basic.start.term]</a>, 18.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.start.term"> [lib.support.start.term]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 23 Mar 2004</p> +<a name="462"><h3>462. Destroying objects with static storage duration</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 3.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/basic.html#basic.start.term"> [basic.start.term]</a>, 18.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.start.term"> [lib.support.start.term]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bill Plauger <b>Date:</b> 23 Mar 2004</p> <p> 3.6.3 Termination spells out in detail the interleaving of static destructor calls and calls to functions registered with atexit. To @@ -5014,7 +5017,7 @@ even if we don't require it. <p> </p> <hr> -<a name="463"><h3>463. auto_ptr usability issues</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Rani Sharoni <b>Date:</b> 7 Dec 2003</p> +<a name="463"><h3>463. auto_ptr usability issues</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Rani Sharoni <b>Date:</b> 7 Dec 2003</p> <p> TC1 CWG DR #84 effectively made the template<class Y> operator auto_ptr<Y>() @@ -5268,7 +5271,7 @@ from r-value derived to base). want to fix auto_ptr for C++-0x, or remove it and replace it with move_ptr and unique_ptr.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="464"></a><h3><a name="464">464. Suggestion for new member functions in standard containers</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>, 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Thorsten Ottosen <b>Date:</b> 12 May 2004</p> +<a name="464"><h3>464. Suggestion for new member functions in standard containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>, 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Thorsten Ottosen <b>Date:</b> 12 May 2004</p> <p>To add slightly more convenience to vector<T> and map<Key,T> we should consider to add</p> <ol> @@ -5292,14 +5295,14 @@ at() (which will then throw if the vector is empty). </li> </ul> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>, add the following to the <tt>vector</tt> +<p>In 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>, add the following to the <tt>vector</tt> synopsis after "element access" and before "modifiers":</p> <pre> // <i>[lib.vector.data] data access</i> pointer data(); const_pointer data() const; </pre> -<p>Add a new subsection of 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>:</p> +<p>Add a new subsection of 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>23.2.4.x <tt>vector</tt> data access</p> <pre> pointer data(); @@ -5311,13 +5314,13 @@ at() (which will then throw if the vector is empty). </li> <p><b>Throws:</b> Nothing.</p> </blockquote> -<p>In 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, add the following to the <tt>map</tt> +<p>In 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, add the following to the <tt>map</tt> synopsis immediately after the line for operator[]:</p> <pre> T& at(const key_type& x); const T& at(const key_type& x) const; </pre> -<p>Add the following to 23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a>:</p> +<p>Add the following to 23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a>:</p> <blockquote> <pre> T& at(const key_type& x); const T& at(const key_type& x) const; @@ -5335,11 +5338,11 @@ synopsis immediately after the line for operator[]:</p> exception type chosen for <tt>at</tt>, <tt>std::out_of_range</tt>, was chosen to match <tt>vector::at</tt>.</p> <hr> -<a name="465"><h3>465. Contents of <ciso646></h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 3 Jun 2004</p> +<a name="465"><h3>465. Contents of <ciso646></h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 3 Jun 2004</p> <p>C header <iso646.h> defines macros for some operators, such as not_eq for !=.</p> -<p>Section 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> "Headers" says that except as noted in +<p>Section 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> "Headers" says that except as noted in clauses 18 through 27, the <cname> C++ header contents are the same as the C header <name.h>. In particular, table 12 lists <ciso646> as a C++ header.</p> @@ -5369,7 +5372,7 @@ or <ciso646> has no effect. </p> <p><i>[post-Redmond: Steve provided wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="466"><h3>466. basic_string ctor should prevent null pointer error</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Daniel Frey <b>Date:</b> 10 Jun 2004</p> +<a name="466"><h3>466. basic_string ctor should prevent null pointer error</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Daniel Frey <b>Date:</b> 10 Jun 2004</p> <p> Today, my colleagues and me wasted a lot of time. After some time, I found the problem. It could be reduced to the following short example: @@ -5398,7 +5401,7 @@ ambiguate any other legal ctors.</p> value is a null pointer), at run time, or both.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="467"><h3>467. char_traits::lt(), compare(), and memcmp()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.1.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.char"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.char]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jun 2004</p> +<a name="467"><h3>467. char_traits::lt(), compare(), and memcmp()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.1.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.char"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.char]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jun 2004</p> <p> Table 37 describes the requirements on Traits::compare() in terms of @@ -5438,7 +5441,7 @@ imposed by Table 37 on compare() when char is signed. Post-Redmond: Martin provided wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="468"><h3>468. unexpected consequences of ios_base::operator void*()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jun 2004</p> +<a name="468"><h3>468. unexpected consequences of ios_base::operator void*()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jun 2004</p> <p>The program below is required to compile but when run it typically produces unexpected results due to the user-defined conversion from @@ -5490,7 +5493,7 @@ the value need not be valid. <p><i>[Redmond: 5-4 straw poll in favor of doing this.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="469"></a><h3><a name="469">469. vector<bool> ill-formed relational operators</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.bool"> [lib.vector.bool]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jun 2004</p> +<a name="469"><h3>469. vector<bool> ill-formed relational operators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.bool"> [lib.vector.bool]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jun 2004</p> <p> The overloads of relational operators for vector<bool> specified @@ -5506,7 +5509,7 @@ Remove all overloads of overloads of relational operators for vector<bool> from [lib.vector.bool]. </p> <hr> -<a name="470"><h3>470. accessing containers from their elements' special functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.containers"> [lib.containers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jun 2004</p> +<a name="470"><h3>470. accessing containers from their elements' special functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.containers"> [lib.containers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jun 2004</p> <p> The standard doesn't prohibit the destructors (or any other special @@ -5538,7 +5541,7 @@ in some surprising (i.e., undefined) behavior. <hr> -<a name="471"><h3>471. result of what() implementation-defined</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jun 2004</p> +<a name="471"><h3>471. result of what() implementation-defined</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jun 2004</p> <p>[lib.exception] specifies the following:</p> <pre> exception (const exception&) throw(); @@ -5577,12 +5580,12 @@ ctor was called). <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <hr> -<a name="472"><h3>472. Missing "Returns" clause in std::equal_range</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Prateek R Karandikar <b>Date:</b> 29 Feb 1900</p> +<a name="472"><h3>472. Missing "Returns" clause in std::equal_range</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Prateek R Karandikar <b>Date:</b> 29 Feb 1900</p> <p> There is no "Returns:" clause for std::equal_range, which returns non-void. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a>, change</p> +<p>In 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a>, change</p> <blockquote> <b>Effects:</b> Finds the largest subrange [i, j)... </blockquote> @@ -5591,7 +5594,7 @@ There is no "Returns:" clause for std::equal_range, which returns non-void. <b>Returns:</b> The largest subrange [i, j)... </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="473"><h3>473. underspecified ctype calls</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype"> [lib.locale.ctype]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 1 Jul 2004</p> +<a name="473"><h3>473. underspecified ctype calls</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype"> [lib.locale.ctype]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 1 Jul 2004</p> <p> Most ctype member functions come in two forms: one that operates on a single character at a time and another form that operates @@ -5686,7 +5689,7 @@ p2, with the following text: </pre> <hr> -<a name="474"><h3>474. confusing Footnote 297</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 1 Jul 2004</p> +<a name="474"><h3>474. confusing Footnote 297</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 1 Jul 2004</p> <p> I think Footnote 297 is confused. The paragraph it applies to seems @@ -5699,7 +5702,7 @@ value of widen(c) is otherwise. I propose to strike the Footnote. </p> <hr> -<a name="475"><h3>475. May the function object passed to for_each modify the elements of the iterated sequence?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Stephan T. Lavavej, Jaakko Jarvi <b>Date:</b> 9 Jul 2004</p> +<a name="475"><h3>475. May the function object passed to for_each modify the elements of the iterated sequence?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Stephan T. Lavavej, Jaakko Jarvi <b>Date:</b> 9 Jul 2004</p> <p> It is not clear whether the function object passed to for_each is allowed to modify the elements of the sequence being iterated over. @@ -5758,7 +5761,7 @@ We suggest that the standard be clarified to explicitly allow the function objec passed to for_each modify its argument.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add the following sentence to the Effects in 25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a>:</p> +<p>Add the following sentence to the Effects in 25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a>:</p> <blockquote> "f may apply non-constant functions through the dereferenced iterators @@ -5767,7 +5770,7 @@ of a mutable iterator (24.1)." </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="476"><h3>476. Forward Iterator implied mutability</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 9 Jul 2004</p> +<a name="476"><h3>476. Forward Iterator implied mutability</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 9 Jul 2004</p> <p>24.1/3 says:</p> <blockquote> @@ -5796,7 +5799,7 @@ relationship between forward iterator and output iterator. requirements. </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="477"><h3>477. Operator-> for const forward iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 11 Jul 2004</p> +<a name="477"><h3>477. Operator-> for const forward iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 11 Jul 2004</p> <p> The Forward Iterator requirements table contains the following: </p> @@ -5826,10 +5829,10 @@ of referenced members. But Paragraph 11 of [lib.iterator.requirements] says: <p>AFAICT if we need the second line at all, it should read the same as the first line.</p> -<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#478">478</a></p> +<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#478">478</a></p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <hr> -<a name="478"><h3>478. Should forward iterator requirements table have a line for r->m?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 11 Jul 2004</p> +<a name="478"><h3>478. Should forward iterator requirements table have a line for r->m?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 11 Jul 2004</p> <p> The Forward Iterator requirements table contains the following: </p> @@ -5873,10 +5876,10 @@ answer is to change <p>in paragraph 11 of [lib.iterator.requirements].</p> -<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#477">477</a></p> +<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#477">477</a></p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <hr> -<a name="479"><h3>479. Container requirements and placement new</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Herb Sutter <b>Date:</b> 1 Aug 2004</p> +<a name="479"><h3>479. Container requirements and placement new</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Herb Sutter <b>Date:</b> 1 Aug 2004</p> <p>Nothing in the standard appears to make this program ill-formed:</p> <pre> struct C { @@ -5896,7 +5899,7 @@ answer is to change <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <hr> -<a name="480"><h3>480. unary_function and binary_function should have protected nonvirtual destructors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.base"> [lib.base]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Joe Gottman <b>Date:</b> 19 Aug 2004</p> +<a name="480"></a><h3><a name="480">480. unary_function and binary_function should have protected nonvirtual destructors</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.base"> [lib.base]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Joe Gottman <b>Date:</b> 19 Aug 2004</p> <p>The classes std::unary_function and std::binary_function are both designed to be inherited from but contain no virtual functions. This makes it too easy for a novice programmer to write code like @@ -5944,7 +5947,7 @@ nonvirtual destructors.</p> }; </pre> <hr> -<a name="481"><h3>481. unique's effects on the range [result, last)</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 30 Aug 2004</p> +<a name="481"><h3>481. unique's effects on the range [result, last)</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 30 Aug 2004</p> <p> The standard says that unique(first, last) "eliminates all but the first element from every consecutive group of equal elements" in @@ -5963,7 +5966,7 @@ last) except that duplicates have been eliminated. <p> </p> <hr> -<a name="482"><h3>482. Swapping pairs</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a>, 25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 14 Sep 2004</p> +<a name="482"><h3>482. Swapping pairs</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a>, 25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 14 Sep 2004</p> <p>(Based on recent comp.std.c++ discussion)</p> <p>Pair (and tuple) should specialize std::swap to work in terms of @@ -5972,99 +5975,7 @@ why swapping two objects of type pair<vector<int>, list<double> > should not take O(1).</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <hr> -<a name="483"><h3>483. Heterogeneous equality and EqualityComparable</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.nonmodifying"> [lib.alg.nonmodifying]</a>, 25.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.modifying.operations"> [lib.alg.modifying.operations]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Peter Dimov <b>Date:</b> 20 Sep 2004</p> -<p>c++std-lib-14262</p> - -<p>[lib.alg.find] requires T to be EqualityComparable:</p> - -<pre>template <class InputIterator, class T> - InputIterator find(InputIterator first, InputIterator last, - const T& value); -</pre> - -<p> -However the condition being tested, as specified in the Effects -clause, is actually *i == value, where i is an InputIterator. -</p> - -<p> -The two clauses are in agreement only if the type of *i is T, but this -isn't necessarily the case. *i may have a heterogeneous comparison -operator that takes a T, or a T may be convertible to the type of *i. -</p> - -<p>Further discussion (c++std-lib-14264): this problem affects a - number of algorithsm in clause 25, not just <tt>find</tt>. We - should try to resolve this problem everywhere it appears.</p> -<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> - -<p>[lib.alg.find]:</p> -<blockquote> - Remove [lib.alg.find]/1. -</blockquote> - -<p>[lib.alg.count]:</p> -<blockquote> - Remove [lib.alg.count]/1. -</blockquote> - -<p>[lib.alg.search]:</p> -<blockquote> - Remove "Type T is EqualityComparable (20.1.1), " from [lib.alg.search]/4. -</blockquote> - -<p>[lib.alg.replace]:</p> - -<blockquote> - <p> - Remove [lib.alg.replace]/1. - Replace [lb.alg.replace]/2 with: - </p> - - <blockquote> - For every iterator i in the range [first, last) for which *i == value - or pred(*i) holds perform *i = new_value. - </blockquote> - - <p> - Remove the first sentence of /4. - Replace the beginning of /5 with: - </p> - - <blockquote> - For every iterator i in the range [result, result + (last - - first)), assign to *i either... - </blockquote> - - <p>(Note the defect here, current text says assign to i, not *i).</p> -</blockquote> - -<p>[lib.alg.fill]:</p> - -<blockquote> - <p> - Remove "Type T is Assignable (23.1), " from /1. - Replace /2 with: - </p> - - <blockquote> - For every iterator i in the range [first, last) or [first, first + n), - perform *i = value. - </blockquote> -</blockquote> - -<p>[lib.alg.remove]:</p> -<blockquote> - Remove /1. - Remove the first sentence of /6. -</blockquote> - -<p><b>Rationale:</b></p> -<p>Specifying EqualityComparable is redundant where it's correct, - because the equality requirements are implicit in the descriptions - of the algorithms' behavior.</p> -<hr> -<a name="484"><h3>484. Convertible to T</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Chris <b>Date:</b> 16 Sep 2004</p> +<a name="484"><h3>484. Convertible to T</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Chris <b>Date:</b> 16 Sep 2004</p> <p>From comp.std.c++:</p> <p> @@ -6106,7 +6017,7 @@ class I expect?</p> <p> </p> <hr> -<a name="485"><h3>485. output iterator insufficently constrained</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Chris <b>Date:</b> 13 Oct 2004</p> +<a name="485"><h3>485. output iterator insufficently constrained</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Chris <b>Date:</b> 13 Oct 2004</p> <p> The note on 24.1.2 Output iterators insufficently limits what can be performed on output iterators. While it requires that each iterator is @@ -6148,13 +6059,7 @@ to instead allow something more along the lines of:</p> are generated. With the exception of '*r++=t', an iterator must always be assigned to before it is incremented".</p> <hr> -<a name="486"><h3>486. min/max CopyConstructible requirement is too strict</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 13 Oct 2004</p> -<p>A straightforward implementation of these algorithms does not need to -copy T.</p> -<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>drop the the words "and CopyConstructible" from paragraphs 1 and 4</p> -<hr> -<a name="487"><h3>487. Allocator::construct is too limiting</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dhruv Matani <b>Date:</b> 17 Oct 2004</p> +<a name="487"><h3>487. Allocator::construct is too limiting</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dhruv Matani <b>Date:</b> 17 Oct 2004</p> <p> The standard's version of allocator::construct(pointer, const_reference) severely limits what you can construct using this @@ -6180,5 +6085,910 @@ be called! Doesn't that sound great? <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> </p> +<hr> +<a name="488"><h3>488. rotate throws away useful information</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.rotate"> [lib.alg.rotate]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 22 Nov 2004</p> +<p> +rotate takes 3 iterators: first, middle and last which point into a +sequence, and rearranges the sequence such that the subrange [middle, +last) is now at the beginning of the sequence and the subrange [first, +middle) follows. The return type is void. +</p> + +<p> +In many use cases of rotate, the client needs to know where the +subrange [first, middle) starts after the rotate is performed. This +might look like: +</p> +<pre> rotate(first, middle, last); + Iterator i = advance(first, distance(middle, last)); +</pre> + +<p> +Unless the iterators are random access, the computation to find the +start of the subrange [first, middle) has linear complexity. However, +it is not difficult for rotate to return this information with +negligible additional computation expense. So the client could code: +</p> +<pre> Iterator i = rotate(first, middle, last); +</pre> + +<p> +and the resulting program becomes significantly more efficient. +</p> + +<p> +While the backwards compatibility hit with this change is not zero, it +is very small (similar to that of lwg <ire ref="130"></ire>), and there is +a significant benefit to the change. +</p> + +<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> +<p>In 25p2, change:</p> +<pre> template<class ForwardIterator> + void rotate(ForwardIterator first, ForwardIterator middle, + ForwardIterator last); +</pre> + +<p>to:</p> + +<pre> template<class ForwardIterator> + ForwardIterator rotate(ForwardIterator first, ForwardIterator middle, + ForwardIterator last); +</pre> + +<p>In 25.2.10, change:</p> + +<pre> template<class ForwardIterator> + void rotate(ForwardIterator first, ForwardIterator middle, + ForwardIterator last); +</pre> + +<p>to:</p> + +<pre> template<class ForwardIterator> + ForwardIterator rotate(ForwardIterator first, ForwardIterator middle, + ForwardIterator last); +</pre> + +<p>In 25.2.10 insert a new paragraph after p1:</p> + +<blockquote> +<p><b>Returns</b>: advance(first, distance(middle, last)).</p> +</blockquote> +<hr> +<a name="489"><h3>489. std::remove / std::remove_if wrongly specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.remove"> [lib.alg.remove]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Thomas Mang <b>Date:</b> 12 Dec 2004</p> +<p>In Section 25.2.7 [lib.alg.remove], paragraphs 1 to 5 describe the +behavior of the mutating sequence operations std::remove and +std::remove_if. However, the wording does not reflect the intended +behavior [Note: See definition of intended behavior below] of these +algorithms, as it is known to the C++ community [1]. +</p> + + + +<p>1) Analysis of current wording:</p> + + +<p>25.2.7 [lib.alg.remove], paragraph 2:</p> + +<p>Current wording says: +"Effects: Eliminates all the elements referred to by iterator i in the +range [first, last) for which the following corresponding conditions +hold: *i == value, pred(*i) != false."</p> + +<p> +This sentences expresses specifically that all elements denoted by the +(original) range [first, last) for which the corresponding condition +hold will be eliminated. Since there is no formal definition of the term +"eliminate" provided, the meaning of "eliminate" in everyday language +implies that as postcondition, no element in the range denoted by +[first, last) will hold the corresponding condition on reiteration over +the range [first, last). +</p> + +<p> +However, this is neither the intent [Note: See definition of intended +behavior below] nor a general possible approach. It can be easily proven +that if all elements of the original range[first, last) will hold the +condition, it is not possible to substitute them by an element for which +the condition will not hold. +</p> + + +<p>25.2.7 [lib.alg.remove], paragraph 3:</p> + +<p> +Current wording says: +"Returns: The end of the resulting range." +</p> + +<p> +The resulting range is not specified. In combination with 25.2.7 +[lib.alg.remove], paragraph 2, the only reasonable interpretation of +this so-called resulting range is the range [first,last) - thus +returning always the ForwardIterator 'last' parameter. +</p> + + +<p> +25.2.7 [lib.alg.remove], paragraph 4: +</p> + +<p> +Current wording says: +"Notes: Stable: the relative order of the elements that are not removed +is the same as their relative order in the original range" +</p> + +<p> +This sentences makes use of the term "removed", which is neither +specified, nor used in a previous paragraph (which uses the term +"eliminate"), nor unamgiuously separated from the name of the algorithm. +</p> + + +<p>2) Description of intended behavior:</p> + +<p> +For the rest of this Defect Report, it is assumed that the intended +behavior was that all elements of the range [first, last) which do not +hold the condition *i == value (std::remove) or pred(*i) != false +(std::remove_if)], call them s-elements [Note: s...stay], will be placed +into a contiguous subrange of [first, last), denoted by the iterators +[first, return value). The number of elements in the resulting range +[first, return value) shall be equal to the number of s-elements in the +original range [first, last). The relative order of the elements in the +resulting subrange[first, return value) shall be the same as the +relative order of the corresponding elements in the original range. It +is undefined whether any elements in the resulting subrange [return +value, last) will hold the corresponding condition, or not. +</p> + +<p> +All implementations known to the author of this Defect Report comply +with this intent. Since the intent of the behavior (contrary to the +current wording) is also described in various utility references serving +the C++ community [1], it is not expected that fixing the paragraphs +will influence current code - unless the code relies on the behavior as +it is described by current wording and the implementation indeed +reflects the current wording, and not the intent. +</p> + + + +<p>3) Proposed fixes:</p> + + +<p>Change 25.2.7 [lib.alg.remove], paragraph 2 to:</p> + +<p> +"Effect: Places all the elements referred to by iterator i in the range +[first, last) for which the following corresponding conditions hold : +!(*i == value), pred(*i) == false into the subrange [first, k) of the +original range, where k shall denote a value of type ForwardIterator. It +is undefined whether any elements in the resulting subrange [k, last) +will hold the corresponding condition, or not." +</p> + +<p>Comments to the new wording:</p> + +<p> +a) "Places" has no special meaning, and the everyday language meaning +should fit. +b) The corresponding conditions were negated compared to the current +wording, becaue the new wording requires it. +c) The wording "of the original range" might be redundant, since any +subrange starting at 'first' and containing no more elements than the +original range is implicitly a subrange of the original range [first, +last). +d) The iterator k was introduced instead of "return value" in order to +avoid a cyclic dependency on 25.2.7/3. The wording ", where k shall +denote a value of type ForwardIterator" might be redundant, because it +follows implicitly by 25.2.7/3. +e) "Places" does, in the author's opinion, explicitly forbid duplicating +any element holding the corresponding condition in the original range +[first, last) within the resulting range [first, k). If there is doubt +this term might be not unambiguous regarding this, it is suggested that +k is specified more closely by the following wording: "k shall denote a +value of type ForwardIterator [Note: see d)] so that k - first is equal +to the number of elements in the original range [first, last) for which +the corresponding condition did hold". This could also be expressed as a +separate paragraph "Postcondition:" +f) The senctence "It is undefined whether any elements in the resulting +subrange [k, last) will hold the corresponding condition, or not." was +added consciously so the term "Places" does not imply if the original +range [first, last) contains n elements holding the corresponding +condition, the identical range[first, last) will also contain exactly n +elements holding the corresponding condition after application of the +algorithm. +</p> + +<p> +Change 25.2.7 [lib.alg.remove], paragraph 3 to: + +"Returns: The iterator k." +</p> + +<p> +Change 25.2.7 [lib.alg.remove], paragraph 4 to: + +"Notes: Stable: the relative order of the elements that are placed into +the subrange [first, return value) shall be the same as their relative +order was in the original range [first, last) prior to application of +the algorithm." +</p> + +<p> +Comments to the new wording: +</p> + +<p> +a) the wording "was ... prior to application of the algorithm" is used +to explicitly distinguish the original range not only by means of +iterators, but also by a 'chronological' factor from the resulting range +[first, return value). It might be redundant. +</p> + +<p> +[1]: +The wording of these references is not always unambiguous, and provided +examples partially contradict verbal description of the algorithms, +because the verbal description resembles the problematic wording of +ISO/IEC 14882:2003. +</p> +<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> +<p> +</p> +<hr> +<a name="490"><h3>490. std::unique wrongly specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Thomas Mang <b>Date:</b> 12 Dec 2004</p> +<p>In Section 25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], paragraphs 1 to 3 describe the +behavior of the mutating sequence operation std::unique. However, the +wording does not reflect the intended behavior [Note: See definition of +intended behavior below] of these algorithms, as it is known to the C++ +community [1].</p> + + + +<p>1) Analysis of current wording:</p> + + +<p>25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], paragraph 1:</p> + +<p> +Current wording says: +"Effects: Eliminates all but the first element from every consecutive +group of equal elements referred to by the iterator i in the range +[first, last) for which the following corresponding conditions hold: *i +== *(i - 1) or pred(*i, *(i -1)) != false" +</p> + +<p> +This sentences expresses specifically that all elements denoted by the +(original) range [first, last) which are not but the first element from +a consecutive group of equal elements (where equality is defined as *i +== *(i - 1) or pred(*i, *(i - 1)) ! = false) [Note: See DR 202], call +them r-elements [Note: r...remove], will be eliminated. Since there is +no formal definition of the term "eliminate" provided, it is undefined +how this "elimination" takes place. But the meaning of "eliminate" in +everyday language seems to disallow explicitly that after application of +the algorithm, any r-element will remain at any position of the range +[first, last) [2]. +</p> + +<p> +Another defect in the current wording concerns the iterators used to +compare two elements for equality: The current wording contains the +expression "(i - 1)", which is not covered by 25/9 [Note: See DR +submitted by Thomas Mang regarding invalid iterator arithmetic +expressions]. +</p> + + +<p> +25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], paragraph 2: +</p> +<p>Current wording says: +"Returns: The end of the resulting range."</p> + +<p> +The resulting range is not specified. In combination with 25.2.8 +[lib.alg.unique], paragraph 1, one reasonable interpretation (in the +author's opinion even the only possible interpretation) of this +so-called resulting range is the range [first, last) - thus returning +always the ForwardIterator 'last' parameter. +</p> + +<p>2) Description of intended behavior:</p> + +<p> +For the rest of this Defect Report, it is assumed that the intended +behavior was that all elements denoted by the original range [first, +last) which are the first element from a consecutive group of elements +for which the corresponding conditions: *(i-1) == *i (for the version of +unique without a predicate argument) or pred(*(i-1), *i) ! = false (for +the version of unique with a predicate argument) [Note: If such a group +of elements consists of only a single element, this is also considered +the first element] [Note: See resolutions of DR 202], call them +s-elements [Note: s...stay], will be placed into a contiguous subrange +of [first, last), denoted by the iterators [first, return value). The +number of elements in the resulting range [first, return value) shall be +equal to the number of s-elements in the original range [first, last). +Invalid iterator arithmetic expressions are expected to be resolved as +proposed in DR submitted by Thomas Mang regarding invalid iterator +arithmetic expressions. It is also assumed by the author that the +relative order of the elements in the resulting subrange [first, return +value) shall be the same as the relative order of the corresponding +elements (the s-elements) in the original range [Note: If this was not +intended behavior, the additional proposed paragraph about stable order +will certainly become obsolete]. +Furthermore, the resolutions of DR 202 are partially considered. +</p> + +<p> +All implementations known to the author of this Defect Report comply +with this intent [Note: Except possible effects of DR 202]. Since this +intent of the behavior (contrary to the current wording) is also +described in various utility references serving the C++ community [1], +it is not expected that fixing the paragraphs will influence current +code [Note: Except possible effects of DR 202] - unless the code relies +on the behavior as it is described by current wording and the +implementation indeed reflects the current wording, and not the intent. +</p> + + + +<p>3) Proposed fixes:</p> + +<p> +Change 25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], paragraph 1 to: +</p> + +<p> +"Effect: Places the first element from every consecutive group of +elements, referred to by the iterator i in the range [first, last), for +which the following conditions hold: *(i-1) == *i (for the version of +unique without a predicate argument) or pred(*(i -1), *i) != false (for +the version of unique with a predicate argument), into the subrange +[first, k) of the original range, where k shall denote a value of type +ForwardIterator." +</p> + +<p>Comments to the new wording:</p> + +<p> +a) The new wording was influenced by the resolutions of DR 202. If DR +202 is resolved in another way, the proposed wording need also +additional review. +b) "Places" has no special meaning, and the everyday language meaning +should fit. +c) The expression "(i - 1)" was left, but is expected that DR submitted +by Thomas Mang regarding invalid iterator arithmetic expressions will +take this into account. +d) The wording "(for the version of unique without a predicate +argument)" and "(for the version of unique with a predicate argument)" +was added consciously for clarity and is in resemblence with current +23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraph 19. It might be considered redundant. +e) The wording "of the original range" might be redundant, since any +subrange starting at first and containing no more elements than the +original range is implicitly a subrange of the original range [first, +last). +f) The iterator k was introduced instead of "return value" in order to +avoid a cyclic dependency on 25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], paragraph 2. The +wording ", where k shall denote a value of type ForwardIterator" might +be redundant, because it follows implicitly by 25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], +paragraph 2. +g) "Places" does, in the author's opinion, explicitly forbid duplicating +any s-element in the original range [first, last) within the resulting +range [first, k). If there is doubt this term might be not unambiguous +regarding this, it is suggested that k is specified more closely by the +following wording: "k shall denote a value of type ForwardIterator +[Note: See f)] so that k - first is equal to the number of elements in +the original range [first, last) being the first element from every +consecutive group of elements for which the corresponding condition did +hold". This could also be expressed as a separate paragraph +"Postcondition:". +h) If it is considered that the wording is unclear whether it declares +the element of a group which consists of only a single element +implicitly to be the first element of this group [Note: Such an +interpretation could eventually arise especially in case last - first == +1] , the following additional sentence is proposed: "If such a group of +elements consists of only a single element, this element is also +considered the first element." +</p> + +<p> +Change 25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], paragraph 2 to: +"Returns: The iterator k." +</p> + +<p> +Add a separate paragraph "Notes:" as 25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], paragraph +2a or 3a, or a separate paragraph "Postcondition:" before 25.2.8 +[lib.alg.unique], paragraph 2 (wording inside {} shall be eliminated if +the preceding expressions are used, or the preceding expressions shall +be eliminated if wording inside {} is used): +</p> + +<p> +"Notes:{Postcondition:} Stable: the relative order of the elements that +are placed into the subrange [first, return value {k}) shall be the same +as their relative order was in the original range [first, last) prior to +application of the algorithm." +</p> + +<p>Comments to the new wording:</p> + +<p> +a) It is assumed by the author that the algorithm was intended to be +stable. +In case this was not the intent, this paragraph becomes certainly +obsolete. +b) The wording "was ... prior to application of the algorithm" is used +to explicitly distinguish the original range not only by means of +iterators, but also by a 'chronological' factor from the resulting range +[first, return value). It might be redundant. +</p> + +<p> +25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], paragraph 3: +</p> +<p>See DR 239.</p> + +<p> +4) References to other DRs: +</p> + +<p> +See DR 202, but which does not address any of the problems described in +this Defect Report [Note: This DR is supposed to complement DR 202]. +See DR 239. +See DR submitted by Thomas Mang regarding invalid iterator arithmetic +expressions. +</p> + +<p> +[1]: +The wording of these references is not always unambiguous, and provided +examples partially contradict verbal description of the algorithms, +because the verbal description resembles the problematic wording of +ISO/IEC 14882:2003. +</p> + +<p> +[2]: +Illustration of conforming implementations according to current wording: +</p> + +<p> +One way the author of this DR considers how this "elimination" could be +achieved by a conforming implementation according to current wording is +by substituting each r-element by _any_ s-element [Note: s...stay; any +non-r-element], since all r-elements are "eliminated". +</p> + +<p> +In case of a sequence consisting of elements being all 'equal' [Note: +See DR 202], substituting each r-element by the single s-element is the +only possible solution according to current wording. +</p> +<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> +<p> +</p> +<hr> +<a name="491"><h3>491. std::list<>::unique incorrectly specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Thomas Mang <b>Date:</b> 12 Dec 2004</p> +<p>In Section 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraphs 19 to 21 describe the +behavior of the std::list<T, Allocator>::unique operation. However, the +current wording is defective for various reasons.</p> + + + +<p> +1) Analysis of current wording: +</p> + +<p>23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraph 19:</p> + +<p> +Current wording says: +"Effects: Eliminates all but the first element from every consecutive +group of equal elements referred to by the iterator i in the range +[first + 1, last) for which *i == *(i - 1) (for the version of unique +with no argument) or pred(*i, *(i -1)) (for the version of unique with a +predicate argument) holds."</p> + +<p> +This sentences makes use of the undefined term "Eliminates". Although it +is, to a certain degree, reasonable to consider the term "eliminate" +synonymous with "erase", using "Erase" in the first place, as the +wording of 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraph 15 does, would be clearer.</p> + +<p> +The range of the elements referred to by iterator i is "[first + 1, +last)". However, neither "first" nor "last" is defined.</p> + +<p> +The sentence makes three times use of iterator arithmetic expressions ( +"first + 1", "*i == *(i - 1)", "pred(*i, *(i -1))" ) which is not +defined for bidirectional iterator [see DR submitted by Thomas Mang +regarding invalid iterator arithmetic expressions].</p> + +<p> +The same problems as pointed out in DR 202 (equivalence relation / order +of arguments for pred()) apply to this paragraph.</p> + +<p> +23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraph 20: +</p> + +<p> +Current wording says: +"Throws: Nothing unless an exception in thrown by *i == *(i-1) or +pred(*i, *(i - 1))"</p> + +<p> +The sentence makes two times use of invalid iterator arithmetic +expressions ( "*i == *(i - 1)", "pred(*i, *(i -1))" ). +</p> +<p> +[Note: Minor typos: "in" / missing dot at end of sentence.] +</p> + +<p> +23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraph 21:</p> + +<p> +Current wording says: +"Complexity: If the range (last - first) is not empty, exactly (last - +first) - 1 applications of the corresponding predicate, otherwise no +application of the predicate.</p> + +<p> +See DR 315 regarding "(last - first)" not yielding a range.</p> + +<p> +Invalid iterator arithmetic expression "(last - first) - 1" left .</p> + + +<p>2) Description of intended behavior:</p> + +<p> +For the rest of this Defect Report, it is assumed that "eliminate" is +supposed to be synonymous to "erase", that "first" is equivalent to an +iterator obtained by a call to begin(), "last" is equivalent to an +iterator obtained by a call to end(), and that all invalid iterator +arithmetic expressions are resolved as described in DR submitted by +Thomas Mang regarding invalid iterator arithmetic expressions.</p> + +<p> +Furthermore, the resolutions of DR 202 are considered regarding +equivalence relation and order of arguments for a call to pred.</p> + +<p> +All implementations known to the author of this Defect Report comply +with these assumptions, apart from the impact of the alternative +resolution of DR 202. Except for the changes implied by the resolutions +of DR 202, no impact on current code is expected.</p> + +<p> +3) Proposed fixes:</p> + +<p> +Change 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraph 19 to:</p> + +<p> +"Effect: Erases all but the first element from every consecutive group +of elements, referred to by the iterator i in the range [begin(), +end()), for which the following conditions hold: *(i-1) == *i (for the +version of unique with no argument) or pred(*(i-1), *i) != false (for +the version of unique with a predicate argument)."</p> + +<p> +Comments to the new wording:</p> + +<p> +a) The new wording was influenced by DR 202 and the resolutions +presented there. If DR 202 is resolved in another way, the proposed +wording need also additional review. +b) "Erases" refers in the author's opinion unambiguously to the member +function "erase". In case there is doubt this might not be unamgibuous, +a direct reference to the member function "erase" is suggested [Note: +This would also imply a change of 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraph +15.]. +c) The expression "(i - 1)" was left, but is expected that DR submitted +by Thomas Mang regarding invalid iterator arithmetic expressions will +take this into account. +d) The wording "(for the version of unique with no argument)" and "(for +the version of unique with a predicate argument)" was kept consciously +for clarity. +e) "begin()" substitutes "first", and "end()" substitutes "last". The +range need adjustment from "[first + 1, last)" to "[begin(), end())" to +ensure a valid range in case of an empty list. +f) If it is considered that the wording is unclear whether it declares +the element of a group which consists of only a single element +implicitly to be the first element of this group [Note: Such an +interpretation could eventually arise especially in case size() == 1] , +the following additional sentence is proposed: "If such a group of +elements consists of only a single element, this element is also +considered the first element."</p> + +<p> +Change 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraph 20 to:</p> + +<p> +"Throws: Nothing unless an exception is thrown by *(i-1) == *i or +pred(*(i-1), *i)."</p> + +<p> +Comments to the new wording:</p> + +<p> +a) The wording regarding the conditions is identical to proposed +23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraph 19. If 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], +paragraph 19 is resolved in another way, the proposed wording need also +additional review. +b) The expression "(i - 1)" was left, but is expected that DR submitted +by Thomas Mang regarding invalid iterator arithmetic expressions will +take this into account. +c) Typos fixed.</p> + +<p> +Change 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraph 21 to:</p> + +<p> +"Complexity: If empty() == false, exactly size() - 1 applications of the +corresponding predicate, otherwise no applications of the corresponding +predicate."</p> + +<p> +Comments to the new wording:</p> + +<p> +a) The new wording is supposed to also replace the proposed resolution +of DR 315, which suffers from the problem of undefined "first" / "last". +</p> + +<p> +5) References to other DRs:</p> + +<p>See DR 202. +See DR 239. +See DR 315. +See DR submitted by Thomas Mang regarding invalid iterator arithmetic +expressions.</p> + +<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> +<p> +</p> +<hr> +<a name="492"><h3>492. Invalid iterator arithmetic expressions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.containers"> [lib.containers]</a>, 24 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterators"> [lib.iterators]</a>, 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Thomas Mang <b>Date:</b> 12 Dec 2004</p> +<p>Various clauses other than clause 25 make use of iterator arithmetic not +supported by the iterator category in question. +Algorithms in clause 25 are exceptional because of 25 [lib.algorithms], +paragraph 9, but this paragraph does not provide semantics to the +expression "iterator - n", where n denotes a value of a distance type +between iterators.</p> + +<p>1) Examples of current wording:</p> + +<p>Current wording outside clause 25:</p> + +<p> +23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraphs 19-21: "first + 1", "(i - 1)", +"(last - first)" +23.3.1.1 [lib.map.cons], paragraph 4: "last - first" +23.3.2.1 [lib.multimap.cons], paragraph 4: "last - first" +23.3.3.1 [lib.set.cons], paragraph 4: "last - first" +23.3.4.1 [lib.multiset.cons], paragraph 4: "last - first" +24.4.1 [lib.reverse.iterators], paragraph 1: "(i - 1)" +</p> + +<p> +[Important note: The list is not complete, just an illustration. The +same issue might well apply to other paragraphs not listed here.]</p> + +<p>None of these expressions is valid for the corresponding iterator +category.</p> + +<p>Current wording in clause 25:</p> + +<p> +25.1.1 [lib.alg.foreach], paragraph 1: "last - 1" +25.1.3 [lib.alg.find.end], paragraph 2: "[first1, last1 - +(last2-first2))" +25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], paragraph 1: "(i - 1)" +25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], paragraph 5: "(i - 1)" +</p> + +<p> +However, current wording of 25 [lib.algorithms], paragraph 9 covers +neither of these four cases:</p> + +<p>Current wording of 25 [lib.algorithms], paragraph 9:</p> + +<p> +"In the description of the algorithms operator + and - are used for some +of the iterator categories for which they do not have to be defined. In +these cases the semantics of a+n is the same as that of</p> +<pre>{X tmp = a; +advance(tmp, n); +return tmp; +} +</pre> +<p>and that of b-a is the same as of return distance(a, b)"</p> + +<p> +This paragrpah does not take the expression "iterator - n" into account, +where n denotes a value of a distance type between two iterators [Note: +According to current wording, the expression "iterator - n" would be +resolved as equivalent to "return distance(n, iterator)"]. Even if the +expression "iterator - n" were to be reinterpreted as equivalent to +"iterator + -n" [Note: This would imply that "a" and "b" were +interpreted implicitly as values of iterator types, and "n" as value of +a distance type], then 24.3.4/2 interfers because it says: "Requires: n +may be negative only for random access and bidirectional iterators.", +and none of the paragraphs quoted above requires the iterators on which +the algorithms operate to be of random access or bidirectional category. +</p> + +<p>2) Description of intended behavior:</p> + +<p> +For the rest of this Defect Report, it is assumed that the expression +"iterator1 + n" and "iterator1 - iterator2" has the semantics as +described in current 25 [lib.algorithms], paragraph 9, but applying to +all clauses. The expression "iterator1 - n" is equivalent to an +result-iterator for which the expression "result-iterator + n" yields an +iterator denoting the same position as iterator1 does. The terms +"iterator1", "iterator2" and "result-iterator" shall denote the value of +an iterator type, and the term "n" shall denote a value of a distance +type between two iterators.</p> + +<p> +All implementations known to the author of this Defect Report comply +with these assumptions. +No impact on current code is expected.</p> + +<p>3) Proposed fixes:</p> + + +<p>Change 25 [lib.algorithms], paragraph 9 to:</p> + +<p> +"In the description of the algorithms operator + and - are used for some +of the iterator categories for which they do not have to be defined. In +this paragraph, a and b denote values of an iterator type, and n denotes +a value of a distance type between two iterators. In these cases the +semantics of a+n is the same as that of</p> +<pre>{X tmp = a; +advance(tmp, n); +return tmp; +} +</pre> +<p>,the semantics of a-n denotes the value of an iterator i for which the +following condition holds: +advance(i, n) == a, +and that of b-a is the same as of +return distance(a, b)". +</p> + +<p>Comments to the new wording:</p> + +<p> +a) The wording " In this paragraph, a and b denote values of an iterator +type, and n denotes a value of a distance type between two iterators." +was added so the expressions "b-a" and "a-n" are distinguished regarding +the types of the values on which they operate. +b) The wording ",the semantics of a-n denotes the value of an iterator i +for which the following condition holds: advance(i, n) == a" was added +to cover the expression 'iterator - n'. The wording "advance(i, n) == a" +was used to avoid a dependency on the semantics of a+n, as the wording +"i + n == a" would have implied. However, such a dependency might well +be deserved. +c) DR 225 is not considered in the new wording. +</p> + +<p> +Proposed fixes regarding invalid iterator arithmetic expressions outside +clause 25:</p> + +<p> +Either +a) Move modified 25 [lib.algorithms], paragraph 9 (as proposed above) +before any current invalid iterator arithmetic expression. In that case, +the first sentence of 25 [lib.algorithms], paragraph 9, need also to be +modified and could read: "For the rest of this International Standard, +...." / "In the description of the following clauses including this +...." / "In the description of the text below ..." etc. - anyways +substituting the wording "algorithms", which is a straight reference to +clause 25. +In that case, 25 [lib.algorithms] paragraph 9 will certainly become +obsolete. +Alternatively, +b) Add an appropiate paragraph similar to resolved 25 [lib.algorithms], +paragraph 9, to the beginning of each clause containing invalid iterator +arithmetic expressions. +Alternatively, +c) Fix each paragraph (both current wording and possible resolutions of +DRs) containing invalid iterator arithmetic expressions separately. +</p> + +<p>5) References to other DRs:</p> + +<p> +See DR 225. +See DR 237. The resolution could then also read "Linear in last - +first". +</p> +<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> +<p> +</p> +<hr> +<a name="493"><h3>493. Undefined Expression in Input Iterator Note Title</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Chris Jefferson <b>Date:</b> 13 Dec 2004</p> +<p>1) In 24.1.1/3, the following text is currently present.</p> + +<p>"Note: For input iterators, a==b does not imply ++a=++b (Equality does +not guarantee the substitution property or referential transparency)."</p> + +<p>However, when in Table 72, part of the definition of ++r is given as:</p> + +<p>"pre: r is dereferenceable. +post: any copies of the previous value of r are no longer required +either to be dereferenceable ..."</p> + +<p>While a==b does not imply that b is a copy of a, this statement should +perhaps still be made more clear.</p> + +<p>2) There are no changes to intended behaviour</p> + +<p> +3) This Note should be altered to say "Note: For input iterators a==b, +when its behaviour is defined ++a==++b may still be false (Equality does +not guarantee the substitution property or referential transparency).</p> + +<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> +<p> +</p> +<hr> +<a name="494"><h3>494. Wrong runtime complexity for associative container's insert and delete</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Hans B os <b>Date:</b> 19 Dec 2004</p> +<p>According to [lib.associative.reqmts] table 69, the runtime comlexity +of insert(p, t) and erase(q) can be done in amortized constant time.</p> + +<p>It was my understanding that an associative container could be +implemented as a balanced binary tree.</p> + +<p>For inser(p, t), you 'll have to iterate to p's next node to see if t +can be placed next to p. Furthermore, the insertion usually takes +place at leaf nodes. An insert next to the root node will be done at +the left of the root next node</p> + +<p>So when p is the root node you 'll have to iterate from the root to +its next node, which takes O(log(size)) time in a balanced tree.</p> + +<p>If you insert all values with insert(root, t) (where root is the +root of the tree before insertion) then each insert takes O(log(size)) +time. The amortized complexity per insertion will be O(log(size)) +also.</p> + +<p>For erase(q), the normal algorithm for deleting a node that has no +empty left or right subtree, is to iterate to the next (or previous), +which is a leaf node. Then exchange the node with the next and delete +the leaf node. Furthermore according to DR 130, erase should return +the next node of the node erased. Thus erasing the root node, +requires iterating to the next node.</p> + +<p>Now if you empty a map by deleting the root node until the map is +empty, each operation will take O(log(size)), and the amortized +complexity is still O(log(size)).</p> + +<p>The operations can be done in amortized constant time if iterating +to the next node can be done in (non amortized) constant time. This +can be done by putting all nodes in a double linked list. This +requires two extra links per node. To me this is a bit overkill since +you can already efficiently insert or erase ranges with erase(first, +last) and insert(first, last).</p> + +<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> +<p> +</p> <p>----- End of document -----</p> </body></html>
\ No newline at end of file diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-defects.html b/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-defects.html index 42f93f0..467a0e5 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-defects.html +++ b/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-defects.html @@ -5,11 +5,11 @@ <table> <tbody><tr> <td align="left">Doc. no.</td> -<td align="left">N1709=04-0149</td> +<td align="left">N1754=05-0014</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left">Date:</td> -<td align="left">5 Nov 2004</td> +<td align="left">2005-01-17</td> </tr> <tr> <td align="left">Project:</td> @@ -20,55 +20,58 @@ <td align="left">Matt Austern <austern@apple.com></td> </tr> </tbody></table> -<h1>C++ Standard Library Defect Report List (Revision 33)</h1> +<h1>C++ Standard Library Defect Report List (Revision 34)</h1> <p>Reference ISO/IEC IS 14882:1998(E)</p> <p>Also see:</p> <ul> <li> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-toc.html">Table of Contents</a> for all library issues.</li> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-toc.html">Table of Contents</a> for all library issues.</li> <li> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-index.html">Index by Section</a> for all library issues.</li> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-index.html">Index by Section</a> for all library issues.</li> <li> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-status.html">Index by Status</a> for all library issues.</li> - <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html">Library Active Issues List</a></li> - <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a></li> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-status.html">Index by Status</a> for all library issues.</li> + <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html">Library Active Issues List</a></li> + <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a></li> </ul> <p>This document contains only library issues which have been closed by the Library Working Group (LWG) after being found to be defects - in the standard. That is, issues which have a status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>, or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#RR">RR</a>. See the - <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a> for issues closed as non-defects. See the - <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html">Library Active Issues List</a> for active issues and more information. The + in the standard. That is, issues which have a status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>, or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#RR">RR</a>. See the + <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a> for issues closed as non-defects. See the + <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html">Library Active Issues List</a> for active issues and more information. The introductory material in that document also applies to this document.</p> <h2>Revision History</h2> <ul> +<li>R34: +2005-01 mid-term mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#488">488</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#494">494</a>. +</li> <li>R33: 2004-11 post-Redmond mailing. Reflections actions taken in Redmond. </li> <li>R32: 2004-09 pre-Redmond mailing: reflects new proposed resolutions and new issues received after the 2004-07 mailing. Added -new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#479">479</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#481">481</a>. +new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#479">479</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#481">481</a>. </li> <li>R31: 2004-07 mid-term mailing: reflects new proposed resolutions and new issues received after the post-Sydney mailing. Added -new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#463">463</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#478">478</a>. +new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#463">463</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#478">478</a>. </li> <li>R30: Post-Sydney mailing: reflects decisions made at the Sydney meeting. Voted all "Ready" issues from R29 into the working paper. -Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#460">460</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#462">462</a>. +Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#460">460</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#462">462</a>. </li> <li>R29: -Pre-Sydney mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#441">441</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#457">457</a>. +Pre-Sydney mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#441">441</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#457">457</a>. </li> <li>R28: Post-Kona mailing: reflects decisions made at the Kona meeting. -Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#432">432</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#440">440</a>. +Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#432">432</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#440">440</a>. </li> <li>R27: -Pre-Kona mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#404">404</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#431">431</a>. +Pre-Kona mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#404">404</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#431">431</a>. </li> <li>R26: Post-Oxford mailing: reflects decisions made at the Oxford meeting. @@ -76,139 +79,139 @@ All issues in Ready status were voted into DR status. All issues in DR status were voted into WP status. </li> <li>R25: -Pre-Oxford mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#390">390</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#402">402</a>. +Pre-Oxford mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#390">390</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#402">402</a>. </li> <li>R24: Post-Santa Cruz mailing: reflects decisions made at the Santa Cruz -meeting. All Ready issues from R23 with the exception of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, which has been given a new proposed resolution, were -moved to DR status. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#383">383</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a>. (Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#387">387</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a> were discussed -at the meeting.) Made progress on issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> have been moved to Ready status, and the only remaining -concerns with <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> involve wording. +meeting. All Ready issues from R23 with the exception of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, which has been given a new proposed resolution, were +moved to DR status. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#383">383</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a>. (Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#387">387</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a> were discussed +at the meeting.) Made progress on issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> have been moved to Ready status, and the only remaining +concerns with <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> involve wording. </li> <li>R23: -Pre-Santa Cruz mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#367">367</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#382">382</a>. +Pre-Santa Cruz mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#367">367</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#382">382</a>. Moved issues in the TC to TC status. </li> <li>R22: -Post-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#362">362</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#366">366</a>. +Post-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#362">362</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#366">366</a>. </li> <li>R21: -Pre-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#351">351</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#361">361</a>. +Pre-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#351">351</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#361">361</a>. </li> <li>R20: Post-Redmond mailing; reflects actions taken in Redmond. Added -new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#336">336</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a>, of which issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#347">347</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a> were added since Redmond, hence +new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#336">336</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a>, of which issues +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#347">347</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a> were added since Redmond, hence not discussed at the meeting. All Ready issues were moved to DR status, with the exception of issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>. +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>. Noteworthy issues discussed at Redmond include -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#202">202</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#270">270</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#254">254</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>. +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#202">202</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#270">270</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#254">254</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>. </li> <li>R19: Pre-Redmond mailing. Added new issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#335">335</a>. +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#335">335</a>. </li> <li>R18: Post-Copenhagen mailing; reflects actions taken in Copenhagen. -Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#317">317</a>, and discussed -new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>. +Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#317">317</a>, and discussed +new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>. Changed status of issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#118">118</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#153">153</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#165">165</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#171">171</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#183">183</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#184">184</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#185">185</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#186">186</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#214">214</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#234">234</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#237">237</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#248">248</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#251">251</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#256">256</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#260">260</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#261">261</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#262">262</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#263">263</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#268">268</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#118">118</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#153">153</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#165">165</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#171">171</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#183">183</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#184">184</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#185">185</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#186">186</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#214">214</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#234">234</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#237">237</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#248">248</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#251">251</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#256">256</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#260">260</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#261">261</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#262">262</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#263">263</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#268">268</a> to DR. Changed status of issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#117">117</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#230">230</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#238">238</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#259">259</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#266">266</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#272">272</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#273">273</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#275">275</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#281">281</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#285">285</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#286">286</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#288">288</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#292">292</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#295">295</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#297">297</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#298">298</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#301">301</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#306">306</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#307">307</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#308">308</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#117">117</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#230">230</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#238">238</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#259">259</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#266">266</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#272">272</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#273">273</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#275">275</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#281">281</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#285">285</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#286">286</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#288">288</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#292">292</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#295">295</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#297">297</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#298">298</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#301">301</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#306">306</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#307">307</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#308">308</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a> to Ready. Closed issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#287">287</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#289">289</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#293">293</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#302">302</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#313">313</a> -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#287">287</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#289">289</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#293">293</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#302">302</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#313">313</a> +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a> as NAD. </li> <li>R17: Pre-Copenhagen mailing. Converted issues list to XML. Added proposed -resolutions for issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#76">76</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>. -Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#278">278</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#311">311</a>. +resolutions for issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#76">76</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>. +Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#278">278</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#311">311</a>. </li> <li>R16: post-Toronto mailing; reflects actions taken in Toronto. Added new -issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a>. Changed status of issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#3">3</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#8">8</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#9">9</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#19">19</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#26">26</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#31">31</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#61">61</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#63">63</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#108">108</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#115">115</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#122">122</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#142">142</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#144">144</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#146">146</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#147">147</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#159">159</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#164">164</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#170">170</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#181">181</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#208">208</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#209">209</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#210">210</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#217">217</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#220">220</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#222">222</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#223">223</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#224">224</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> to "DR". Reopened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#23">23</a>. Reopened -issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#187">187</a>. Changed issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#2">2</a> and -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD. Fixed a typo in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a>. Fixed -issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#70">70</a>: signature should be changed both places it -appears. Fixed issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#160">160</a>: previous version didn't fix +issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a>. Changed status of issues +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#3">3</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#8">8</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#9">9</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#19">19</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#26">26</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#31">31</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#61">61</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#63">63</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#108">108</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#115">115</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#122">122</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#142">142</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#144">144</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#146">146</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#147">147</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#159">159</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#164">164</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#170">170</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#181">181</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#208">208</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#209">209</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#210">210</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#217">217</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#220">220</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#222">222</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#223">223</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#224">224</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> to "DR". Reopened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#23">23</a>. Reopened +issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#187">187</a>. Changed issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#2">2</a> and +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD. Fixed a typo in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a>. Fixed +issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#70">70</a>: signature should be changed both places it +appears. Fixed issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#160">160</a>: previous version didn't fix the bug in enough places. </li> <li>R15: pre-Toronto mailing. Added issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a>. Some small HTML formatting +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a>. Some small HTML formatting changes so that we pass Weblint tests. </li> <li>R14: post-Tokyo II mailing; reflects committee actions taken in -Tokyo. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a>. (00-0019R1/N1242) +Tokyo. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a>. (00-0019R1/N1242) </li> <li>R13: -pre-Tokyo II updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a>. +pre-Tokyo II updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a>. </li> <li>R12: -pre-Tokyo II mailing: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a> to -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>. Added "and paragraph 5" to the proposed resolution -of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#29">29</a>. Add further rationale to issue -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#178">178</a>. +pre-Tokyo II mailing: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a> to +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>. Added "and paragraph 5" to the proposed resolution +of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#29">29</a>. Add further rationale to issue +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#178">178</a>. </li> <li>R11: post-Kona mailing: Updated to reflect LWG and full committee actions in Kona (99-0048/N1224). Note changed resolution of issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#196">196</a> -to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#198">198</a>. Closed issues list split into "defects" and +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#196">196</a> +to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#198">198</a>. Closed issues list split into "defects" and "closed" documents. Changed the proposed resolution of issue -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD, and changed the wording of proposed resolution -of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD, and changed the wording of proposed resolution +of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. </li> <li>R10: -pre-Kona updated. Added proposed resolutions <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#92">92</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#190">190</a> to -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>. (99-0033/D1209, 14 Oct 99) +pre-Kona updated. Added proposed resolutions <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#92">92</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#190">190</a> to +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>. (99-0033/D1209, 14 Oct 99) </li> <li>R9: -pre-Kona mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a> to -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#189">189</a>. Issues list split into separate "active" and +pre-Kona mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a> to +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#189">189</a>. Issues list split into separate "active" and "closed" documents. (99-0030/N1206, 25 Aug 99) </li> <li>R8: @@ -216,47 +219,47 @@ post-Dublin mailing. Updated to reflect LWG and full committee actions in Dublin. (99-0016/N1193, 21 Apr 99) </li> <li>R7: -pre-Dublin updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#131">131</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#132">132</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#133">133</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#135">135</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#139">139</a> (31 Mar 99) +pre-Dublin updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#131">131</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#132">132</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#133">133</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#135">135</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#139">139</a> (31 Mar 99) </li> <li>R6: -pre-Dublin mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#128">128</a>, -and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>. (99-0007/N1194, 22 Feb 99) +pre-Dublin mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#128">128</a>, +and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>. (99-0007/N1194, 22 Feb 99) </li> <li>R5: -update issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>; added issues -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#126">126</a>. Format revisions to prepare +update issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>; added issues +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#126">126</a>. Format revisions to prepare for making list public. (30 Dec 98) </li> <li>R4: -post-Santa Cruz II updated: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#110">110</a>, -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#113">113</a> added, several +post-Santa Cruz II updated: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#110">110</a>, +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#113">113</a> added, several issues corrected. (22 Oct 98) </li> <li>R3: -post-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#94">94</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> +post-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#94">94</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> added, many issues updated to reflect LWG consensus (12 Oct 98) </li> <li>R2: -pre-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#93">93</a> added, -issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a> updated. (29 Sep 98) +pre-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#93">93</a> added, +issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a> updated. (29 Sep 98) </li> <li>R1: -Correction to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#55">55</a> resolution, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> code -format, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a> title. (17 Sep 98) +Correction to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#55">55</a> resolution, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> code +format, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a> title. (17 Sep 98) </li> </ul> <h2>Defect Reports</h2> <hr> -<a name="1"><h3>1. C library linkage editing oversight</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 16 Nov 1997</p> +<a name="1"><h3>1. C library linkage editing oversight</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 16 Nov 1997</p> <p>The change specified in the proposed resolution below did not make it into the Standard. This change was accepted in principle at the London meeting, and the exact wording below was accepted at the Morristown meeting.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a> paragraph 2 +<p>Change 17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a> paragraph 2 from:</p> <blockquote> @@ -274,7 +277,7 @@ from:</p> use extern "C++" linkage for this purpose.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="3"><h3>3. Atexit registration during atexit() call is not described</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.start.term"> [lib.support.start.term]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 12 Dec 1997</p> +<a name="3"><h3>3. Atexit registration during atexit() call is not described</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.start.term"> [lib.support.start.term]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 12 Dec 1997</p> <p>We appear not to have covered all the possibilities of exit processing with respect to atexit registration. <br> @@ -393,7 +396,7 @@ committee decides. </p> <p>See 99-0039/N1215, October 22, 1999, by Stephen D. Clamage for the analysis supporting to the proposed resolution.</p> <hr> -<a name="5"><h3>5. String::compare specification questionable</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Jack Reeves <b>Date:</b> 11 Dec 1997</p> +<a name="5"><h3>5. String::compare specification questionable</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Jack Reeves <b>Date:</b> 11 Dec 1997</p> <p>At the very end of the basic_string class definition is the signature: int compare(size_type pos1, size_type n1, const charT* s, size_type n2 = npos) const; In the following text this is defined as: returns @@ -413,7 +416,7 @@ something like: str.compare(1, str.size()-1, s, strlen(s)-1); </p> pos1, size_type n1, const charT* s) const int compare(size_type pos1, size_type n1, const charT* s, size_type n2) const; each defined in terms of the corresponding constructor. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Replace the compare signature in 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> +<p>Replace the compare signature in 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> (at the very end of the basic_string synopsis) which reads:</p> <blockquote> @@ -432,7 +435,7 @@ charT* s, size_type n2) const; each defined in terms of the corresponding constr size_type n2) const;</tt></p> </blockquote> -<p>Replace the portion of 21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a> +<p>Replace the portion of 21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a> paragraphs 5 and 6 which read:</p> <blockquote> @@ -471,8 +474,8 @@ becomes const, matching the existing synopsis.</p> the Standard which must be fixed. The same problem was also identified in issues 7 (item 5) and 87.</p> <hr> -<a name="7"><h3>7. String clause minor problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.strings"> [lib.strings]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1997</p> -<p>(1) In 21.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::insert"> [lib.string::insert]</a>, the description of template +<a name="7"><h3>7. String clause minor problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.strings"> [lib.strings]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1997</p> +<p>(1) In 21.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::insert"> [lib.string::insert]</a>, the description of template <class InputIterator> insert(iterator, InputIterator, InputIterator) makes no sense. It refers to a member function that doesn't exist. It also talks about the return value of a void @@ -493,9 +496,9 @@ possible const charT&. </p> charT* in the description. Second, given what it says in RETURNS, leaving out the final argument will always result in an exception getting thrown. This is paragraphs 5 and 6 of -21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a></p> +21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a></p> -<p>(6) In table 37, in section 21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a>, +<p>(6) In table 37, in section 21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a>, there's a note for X::move(s, p, n). It says "Copies correctly even where p is in [s, s+n)". This is correct as far as it goes, but it doesn't go far enough; it should also guarantee that the copy @@ -540,7 +543,7 @@ with:<br> "Copies correctly even where the ranges [p, p+n) and [s, s+n) overlap."</p> <hr> -<a name="8"><h3>8. Locale::global lacks guarantee</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.statics"> [lib.locale.statics]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 24 Dec 1997</p> +<a name="8"><h3>8. Locale::global lacks guarantee</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.statics"> [lib.locale.statics]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 24 Dec 1997</p> <p>It appears there's an important guarantee missing from clause 22. We're told that invoking locale::global(L) sets the C locale if L has a name. However, we're not told whether or not invoking @@ -549,7 +552,7 @@ setlocale(s) sets the global C++ locale. </p> <p>The intent, I think, is that it should not, but I can't find any such words anywhere. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add a sentence at the end of 22.1.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.statics"> [lib.locale.statics]</a>, +<p>Add a sentence at the end of 22.1.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.statics"> [lib.locale.statics]</a>, paragraph 2: </p> <blockquote> @@ -558,7 +561,7 @@ paragraph 2: </p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="9"><h3>9. Operator new(0) calls should not yield the same pointer</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete"> [lib.new.delete]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 4 Jan 1998</p> +<a name="9"><h3>9. Operator new(0) calls should not yield the same pointer</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete"> [lib.new.delete]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 4 Jan 1998</p> <p>Scott Meyers, in a comp.std.c++ posting: I just noticed that section 3.7.3.1 of CD2 seems to allow for the possibility that all calls to operator new(0) yield the same pointer, an implementation @@ -612,7 +615,7 @@ list maintainer's note: the IS is the same.]</p> <p>See 99-0040/N1216, October 22, 1999, by Stephen D. Clamage for the analysis supporting to the proposed resolution.</p> <hr> -<a name="11"><h3>11. Bitset minor problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 22 Jan 1998</p> +<a name="11"><h3>11. Bitset minor problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 22 Jan 1998</p> <p>(1) bitset<>::operator[] is mentioned in the class synopsis (23.3.5), but it is not documented in 23.3.5.2. </p> @@ -626,7 +629,7 @@ go in the Effects clause.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>ITEMS 1 AND 2:<br> <br> -In the bitset synopsis (23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a>), +In the bitset synopsis (23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a>), replace the member function <br> <br> <tt> reference operator[](size_t pos);<br> @@ -636,7 +639,7 @@ with the two member functions<br> <tt> bool operator[](size_t pos) const; <br> reference operator[](size_t pos); <br> </tt><br> -Add the following text at the end of 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>, +Add the following text at the end of 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>, immediately after paragraph 45:</p> <blockquote> @@ -654,18 +657,18 @@ immediately after paragraph 45:</p> </blockquote> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The LWG believes Item 3 is not a defect. "Formatted -input" implies the desired semantics. See 27.6.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted"> [lib.istream.formatted]</a>. +input" implies the desired semantics. See 27.6.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted"> [lib.istream.formatted]</a>. </p> <hr> -<a name="13"><h3>13. Eos refuses to die</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> William M. Miller <b>Date:</b> 3 Mar 1998</p> +<a name="13"><h3>13. Eos refuses to die</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> William M. Miller <b>Date:</b> 3 Mar 1998</p> <p>In 27.6.1.2.3, there is a reference to "eos", which is the only one in the whole draft (at least using Acrobat search), so it's undefined. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, replace "eos" with +<p>In 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, replace "eos" with "charT()"</p> <hr> -<a name="14"><h3>14. Locale::combine should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="14"><h3>14. Locale::combine should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>locale::combine is the only member function of locale (other than constructors and destructor) that is not const. There is no reason for it not to be const, and good reasons why it should have been const. Furthermore, leaving it non-const conflicts with 22.1.1 @@ -677,31 +680,31 @@ function. As constructors are never const, there was no "const" in the interface which was transformed into member "combine". It should have been added at that time, but the omission was not noticed. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> and also in 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>, add +<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> and also in 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>, add "const" to the declaration of member combine: </p> <blockquote> <pre>template <class Facet> locale combine(const locale& other) const; </pre> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="15"><h3>15. Locale::name requirement inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="15"><h3>15. Locale::name requirement inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>locale::name() is described as returning a string that can be passed to a locale constructor, but there is no matching constructor. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>, paragraph 5, replace +<p>In 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>, paragraph 5, replace "<tt>locale(name())</tt>" with "<tt>locale(name().c_str())</tt>". </p> <hr> -<a name="16"><h3>16. Bad ctype_byname<char> decl</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="16"><h3>16. Bad ctype_byname<char> decl</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>The new virtual members ctype_byname<char>::do_widen and do_narrow did not get edited in properly. Instead, the member do_widen appears four times, with wrong argument lists. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>The correct declarations for the overloaded members <tt>do_narrow</tt> and <tt>do_widen</tt> should be copied -from 22.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.special"> [lib.facet.ctype.special]</a>.</p> +from 22.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.special"> [lib.facet.ctype.special]</a>.</p> <hr> -<a name="17"><h3>17. Bad bool parsing</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="17"><h3>17. Bad bool parsing</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>This section describes the process of parsing a text boolean value from the input stream. It does not say it recognizes either of the sequences "true" or "false" and returns the corresponding bool value; instead, it says it recognizes @@ -743,7 +746,7 @@ I believe the correct algorithm is "as if": </p> when one is a substring of the other. The proposed text below captures the logic of the code above.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, in the first line of paragraph 14, +<p>In 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, in the first line of paragraph 14, change "&&" to "&".</p> <p>Then, replace paragraphs 15 and 16 as follows:</p> @@ -780,17 +783,17 @@ change "&&" to "&".</p> <tt>err==str.failbit</tt>. --end example]</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="18"><h3>18. Get(...bool&) omitted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="18"><h3>18. Get(...bool&) omitted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>In the list of num_get<> non-virtual members on page 22-23, the member that parses bool values was omitted from the list of definitions of non-virtual members, though it is listed in the class definition and the corresponding virtual is listed everywhere appropriate. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add at the beginning of 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a> +<p>Add at the beginning of 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a> another get member for bool&, copied from the entry in -22.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.num.get"> [lib.locale.num.get]</a>.</p> +22.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.num.get"> [lib.locale.num.get]</a>.</p> <hr> -<a name="19"><h3>19. "Noconv" definition too vague</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="19"><h3>19. "Noconv" definition too vague</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p> In the definitions of codecvt<>::do_out and do_in, they are specified to return noconv if "no conversion is @@ -800,7 +803,7 @@ normatively what is done with the buffers. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> Change the entry for noconv in the table under paragraph 4 in section -22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> to read: +22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> to read: </p> <blockquote> <p><tt>noconv</tt>: <tt>internT</tt> and <tt>externT</tt> are the same type, @@ -814,22 +817,22 @@ Change the entry for noconv in the table under paragraph 4 in section unchanged, and there are no changes to the values in <tt>[to, to_limit)</tt>.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="20"><h3>20. Thousands_sep returns wrong type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="20"><h3>20. Thousands_sep returns wrong type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>The synopsis for numpunct<>::do_thousands_sep, and the definition of numpunct<>::thousands_sep which calls it, specify that it returns a value of type char_type. Here it is erroneously described as returning a "string_type". </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>, above paragraph 2, change +<p>In 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>, above paragraph 2, change "string_type" to "char_type". </p> <hr> -<a name="21"><h3>21. Codecvt_byname<> instantiations</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="21"><h3>21. Codecvt_byname<> instantiations</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>In the second table in the section, captioned "Required instantiations", the instantiations for codecvt_byname<> have been omitted. These are necessary to allow users to construct a locale by name from facets. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add in 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> to the table captioned +<p>Add in 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> to the table captioned "Required instantiations", in the category "ctype" the lines </p> @@ -838,7 +841,7 @@ the lines </p> codecvt_byname<wchar_t,char,mbstate_t> </pre> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="22"><h3>22. Member open vs. flags</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="22"><h3>22. Member open vs. flags</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>The description of basic_istream<>::open leaves unanswered questions about how it responds to or changes flags in the error status for the stream. A strict reading indicates that it ignores the bits and does not change them, which confuses users who do @@ -846,7 +849,7 @@ not expect eofbit and failbit to remain set after a successful open. There are t reasonable resolutions: 1) status quo 2) fail if fail(), ignore eofbit 3) clear failbit and eofbit on call to open(). </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a> paragraph 3, <i>and</i> in 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a> paragraph 3, under open() effects, add a footnote: +<p>In 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a> paragraph 3, <i>and</i> in 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a> paragraph 3, under open() effects, add a footnote: </p> <blockquote> @@ -864,22 +867,22 @@ one case. The resolution of this issue clarifies what the LWG believes to have been the original intent.</p> <hr> -<a name="24"><h3>24. "do_convert" doesn't exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="24"><h3>24. "do_convert" doesn't exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>The description of codecvt<>::do_out and do_in mentions a symbol "do_convert" which is not defined in the standard. This is a leftover from an edit, and should be "do_in and do_out". </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>, paragraph 3, change -"do_convert" to "do_in or do_out". Also, in 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, change "do_convert()" to "do_in +<p>In 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>, paragraph 3, change +"do_convert" to "do_in or do_out". Also, in 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, change "do_convert()" to "do_in or do_out". </p> <hr> -<a name="25"><h3>25. String operator<< uses width() value wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="25"><h3>25. String operator<< uses width() value wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>In the description of operator<< applied to strings, the standard says that uses the smaller of os.width() and str.size(), to pad "as described in stage 3" elsewhere; but this is inconsistent, as this allows no possibility of space for padding. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 4 from:<br> +<p>Change 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 4 from:<br> <br> "... where <tt>n</tt> is the smaller of <tt>os.width()</tt> and <tt>str.size()</tt>; ..."<br> @@ -889,7 +892,7 @@ to: <br> "... where <tt>n</tt> is the larger of <tt>os.width()</tt> and <tt>str.size()</tt>; ..."</p> <hr> -<a name="26"><h3>26. Bad sentry example</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="26"><h3>26. Bad sentry example</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>In paragraph 6, the code in the example: </p> <pre> template <class charT, class traits = char_traits<charT> > @@ -913,7 +916,7 @@ particular, it fails to use traits operators, and specifies incorrect semantics. (E.g. it specifies skipping over the first character in the sequence without examining it.) </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Remove the example above from 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> +<p>Remove the example above from 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> paragraph 6.</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The originally proposed replacement code for the example was not @@ -923,13 +926,13 @@ code ran over one page in length and was quite complicated. The LWG decided that it would be counter-productive to include such a lengthy example, which might well still contain errors.</p> <hr> -<a name="27"><h3>27. String::erase(range) yields wrong iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="27"></a><h3><a name="27">27. String::erase(range) yields wrong iterator</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>The string::erase(iterator first, iterator last) is specified to return an element one place beyond the next element after the last one erased. E.g. for the string "abcde", erasing the range ['b'..'d') would yield an iterator for element 'e', while 'd' has not been erased. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a>, paragraph 10, change: </p> +<p>In 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a>, paragraph 10, change: </p> <blockquote> <p>Returns: an iterator which points to the element immediately following _last_ prior to @@ -943,7 +946,7 @@ while 'd' has not been erased. </p> other elements being erased. </p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="28"><h3>28. Ctype<char>is ambiguous</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="28"><h3>28. Ctype<char>is ambiguous</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>The description of the vector form of ctype<char>::is can be interpreted to mean something very different from what was intended. Paragraph 4 says </p> @@ -955,22 +958,22 @@ something very different from what was intended. Paragraph 4 says </p> <p>This is intended to copy the value indexed from table()[] into the place identified in vec[]. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a>, paragraph 4, to read </p> +<p>Change 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a>, paragraph 4, to read </p> <blockquote> <p>Effects: The second form, for all *p in the range [low, high), assigns into vec[p-low] the value table()[(unsigned char)*p]. </p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="29"><h3>29. Ios_base::init doesn't exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> -<p>Sections 27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a> and 27.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.wide.stream.objects"> [lib.wide.stream.objects]</a> mention +<a name="29"><h3>29. Ios_base::init doesn't exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<p>Sections 27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a> and 27.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.wide.stream.objects"> [lib.wide.stream.objects]</a> mention a function ios_base::init, which is not defined. Probably they mean -basic_ios<>::init, defined in 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>, +basic_ios<>::init, defined in 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>, paragraph 3. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>[R12: modified to include paragraph 5.]</p> -<p>In 27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a> paragraph 2 and 5, change </p> +<p>In 27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a> paragraph 2 and 5, change </p> <blockquote> <p>ios_base::init </p> @@ -982,27 +985,27 @@ paragraph 3. </p> <p>basic_ios<char>::init </p> </blockquote> -<p>Also, make a similar change in 27.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.wide.stream.objects"> [lib.wide.stream.objects]</a> except it +<p>Also, make a similar change in 27.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.wide.stream.objects"> [lib.wide.stream.objects]</a> except it should read </p> <blockquote> <p>basic_ios<wchar_t>::init </p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="30"><h3>30. Wrong header for LC_*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="30"><h3>30. Wrong header for LC_*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>Paragraph 2 implies that the C macros LC_CTYPE etc. are defined in <cctype>, where they are in fact defined elsewhere to appear in <clocale>. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, paragraph 2, change +<p>In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, paragraph 2, change "<cctype>" to read "<clocale>". </p> <hr> -<a name="31"><h3>31. Immutable locale values</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="31"><h3>31. Immutable locale values</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>Paragraph 6, says "An instance of <tt>locale</tt> is <i>immutable</i>; once a facet reference is obtained from it, ...". This has caused some confusion, because locale variables are manifestly assignable. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> replace paragraph 6</p> +<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> replace paragraph 6</p> <blockquote> <p>An instance of <tt>locale</tt> is immutable; once a facet @@ -1019,7 +1022,7 @@ are manifestly assignable. </p> long as some locale object refers to that facet.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="32"><h3>32. Pbackfail description inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.pback"> [lib.streambuf.virt.pback]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="32"><h3>32. Pbackfail description inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.pback"> [lib.streambuf.virt.pback]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>The description of the required state before calling virtual member basic_streambuf<>::pbackfail requirements is inconsistent with the conditions described in 27.5.2.2.4 [lib.streambuf.pub.pback] where member sputbackc calls it. @@ -1033,7 +1036,7 @@ Specifically, the latter says it calls pbackfail if: </p> <p>It appears that the pbackfail description is wrong. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.5.2.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.pback"> [lib.streambuf.virt.pback]</a>, paragraph 1, change:</p> +<p>In 27.5.2.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.pback"> [lib.streambuf.virt.pback]</a>, paragraph 1, change:</p> <blockquote> <p>"<tt>traits::eq(*gptr(),traits::to_char_type( c))</tt>"</p> @@ -1049,7 +1052,7 @@ Specifically, the latter says it calls pbackfail if: </p> <p>Note deliberate reordering of arguments for clarity in addition to the correction of the argument value.</p> <hr> -<a name="33"><h3>33. Codecvt<> mentions from_type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="33"><h3>33. Codecvt<> mentions from_type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>In the table defining the results from do_out and do_in, the specification for the result <i>error</i> says </p> @@ -1060,19 +1063,19 @@ result <i>error</i> says </p> <p>but from_type is not defined. This clearly is intended to be an externT for do_in, or an internT for do_out. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 4, replace the definition +<p>In 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 4, replace the definition in the table for the case of _error_ with </p> <blockquote> <p>encountered a character in <tt>[from,from_end)</tt> that it could not convert. </p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="34"><h3>34. True/falsename() not in ctype<></h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="34"><h3>34. True/falsename() not in ctype<></h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>In paragraph 19, Effects:, members truename() and falsename are used from facet ctype<charT>, but it has no such members. Note that this is also a problem in 22.2.2.1.2, addressed in (4). </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 19, in the Effects: +<p>In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 19, in the Effects: clause for member put(...., bool), replace the initialization of the string_type value s as follows: </p> @@ -1081,12 +1084,12 @@ string_type value s as follows: </p> string_type s = val ? np.truename() : np.falsename(); </pre> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="35"><h3>35. No manipulator unitbuf in synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreams.base"> [lib.iostreams.base]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> -<p>In 27.4.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.manip"> [lib.fmtflags.manip]</a>, we have a definition for a manipulator +<a name="35"><h3>35. No manipulator unitbuf in synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreams.base"> [lib.iostreams.base]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<p>In 27.4.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.manip"> [lib.fmtflags.manip]</a>, we have a definition for a manipulator named "unitbuf". Unlike other manipulators, it's not listed in synopsis. Similarly for "nounitbuf". </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add to the synopsis for <ios> in 27.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreams.base"> [lib.iostreams.base]</a>, after +<p>Add to the synopsis for <ios> in 27.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreams.base"> [lib.iostreams.base]</a>, after the entry for "nouppercase", the prototypes: </p> <blockquote> @@ -1094,7 +1097,7 @@ the entry for "nouppercase", the prototypes: </p> ios_base& nounitbuf(ios_base& str); </pre> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="36"><h3>36. Iword & pword storage lifetime omitted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="36"><h3>36. Iword & pword storage lifetime omitted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>In the definitions for ios_base::iword and pword, the lifetime of the storage is specified badly, so that an implementation which only keeps the last value stored appears to conform. In particular, it says: </p> @@ -1104,7 +1107,7 @@ member with a different index ... </p> <p>This is not idle speculation; at least one implementation was done this way. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add in 27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a>, in both paragraph 2 and also in +<p>Add in 27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a>, in both paragraph 2 and also in paragraph 4, replace the sentence: </p> <blockquote> @@ -1123,7 +1126,7 @@ paragraph 4, replace the sentence: </p> <p>substituting "iword" or "pword" as appropriate. </p> <hr> -<a name="37"><h3>37. Leftover "global" reference</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="37"><h3>37. Leftover "global" reference</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>In the overview of locale semantics, paragraph 4, is the sentence </p> <blockquote> @@ -1134,14 +1137,14 @@ paragraph 4, replace the sentence: </p> <p>This is not supported by the definition of use_facet<>, and represents semantics from an old draft. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>, paragraph 4, delete the parenthesized +<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>, paragraph 4, delete the parenthesized expression </p> <blockquote> <p>(or, failing that, in the global locale) </p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="38"><h3>38. Facet definition incomplete</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.global.templates"> [lib.locale.global.templates]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="38"><h3>38. Facet definition incomplete</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.global.templates"> [lib.locale.global.templates]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>It has been noticed by Esa Pulkkinen that the definition of "facet" is incomplete. In particular, a class derived from another facet, but which does not define a member <i>id</i>, cannot @@ -1160,7 +1163,7 @@ reads: </p> <blockquote> <p>Requires: <tt>Facet</tt> is a facet class whose definition - contains the public static member <tt>id</tt> as defined in 22.1.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.facet"> [lib.locale.facet]</a>. </p> + contains the public static member <tt>id</tt> as defined in 22.1.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.facet"> [lib.locale.facet]</a>. </p> </blockquote> <p><i>[ @@ -1171,7 +1174,7 @@ contains (not inherits) the public static member ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="39"><h3>39. istreambuf_iterator<>::operator++(int) definition garbled</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="39"><h3>39. istreambuf_iterator<>::operator++(int) definition garbled</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>Following the definition of istreambuf_iterator<>::operator++(int) in paragraph 3, the standard contains three lines of garbage text left over from a previous edit. </p> @@ -1181,26 +1184,26 @@ sbuf_->sbumpc(); return(tmp); </pre> </blockquote> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 24.5.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++]</a>, delete the three lines of code at the +<p>In 24.5.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++]</a>, delete the three lines of code at the end of paragraph 3. </p> <hr> -<a name="40"><h3>40. Meaningless normative paragraph in examples</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="40"><h3>40. Meaningless normative paragraph in examples</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>Paragraph 3 of the locale examples is a description of part of an implementation technique that has lost its referent, and doesn't mean anything. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Delete 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 3 which begins "This +<p>Delete 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 3 which begins "This initialization/identification system depends...", or (at the editor's option) replace it with a place-holder to keep the paragraph numbering the same. </p> <hr> -<a name="41"><h3>41. Ios_base needs clear(), exceptions()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> -<p>The description of ios_base::iword() and pword() in 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>, say that if they fail, they "set badbit, +<a name="41"><h3>41. Ios_base needs clear(), exceptions()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<p>The description of ios_base::iword() and pword() in 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>, say that if they fail, they "set badbit, which may throw an exception". However, ios_base offers no interface to set or to test badbit; those interfaces are defined in basic_ios<>. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change the description in 27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a> in +<p>Change the description in 27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a> in paragraph 2, and also in paragraph 4, as follows. Replace</p> <blockquote> @@ -1220,7 +1223,7 @@ paragraph 2, and also in paragraph 4, as follows. Replace</p> setstate(badbit).]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="42"><h3>42. String ctors specify wrong default allocator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="42"><h3>42. String ctors specify wrong default allocator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>The basic_string<> copy constructor: </p> <pre>basic_string(const basic_string& str, size_type pos = 0, @@ -1236,7 +1239,7 @@ vector) do not have this form of constructor, so it is inconsistent, and an evident source of confusion, for basic_string<> to have it, so it might better be removed. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p> In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, replace the declaration of the copy +<p> In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, replace the declaration of the copy constructor as follows: </p> <blockquote> @@ -1245,7 +1248,7 @@ basic_string(const basic_string& str, size_type pos, size_type n = npos, const Allocator& a = Allocator());</pre> </blockquote> -<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace the copy constructor declaration +<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace the copy constructor declaration as above. Add to paragraph 5, Effects:</p> <blockquote> @@ -1258,7 +1261,7 @@ just an unfortunate design choice.</p> <p>The LWG considered two other possible resolutions:</p> -<p>A. In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, replace the declaration of the copy +<p>A. In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, replace the declaration of the copy constructor as follows:</p> <blockquote> @@ -1268,7 +1271,7 @@ basic_string(const basic_string& str, size_type pos, size_type n, const Allocator& a); </pre> </blockquote> -<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace the copy constructor declaration +<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace the copy constructor declaration as above. Add to paragraph 5, Effects: </p> <blockquote> @@ -1276,7 +1279,7 @@ as above. Add to paragraph 5, Effects: </p> value <tt>str.get_allocator()</tt>. </p> </blockquote> -<p>B. In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, and also in 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace +<p>B. In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, and also in 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace the declaration of the copy constructor as follows: </p> <blockquote> @@ -1293,7 +1296,7 @@ Kona: issue editing snafu fixed - the proposed resolution now correctly reflects the LWG consensus. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="44"><h3>44. Iostreams use operator== on int_type values</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="44"><h3>44. Iostreams use operator== on int_type values</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>Many of the specifications for iostreams specify that character values or their int_type equivalents are compared using operators == or !=, though in other places traits::eq() or traits::eq_int_type is @@ -1559,10 +1562,10 @@ change uses of == and != to use the traits members instead. </p> </ul> <hr> -<a name="46"><h3>46. Minor Annex D errors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.str.strstreams"> [depr.str.strstreams]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Brendan Kehoe <b>Date:</b> 1 Jun 1998</p> +<a name="46"><h3>46. Minor Annex D errors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.str.strstreams"> [depr.str.strstreams]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Brendan Kehoe <b>Date:</b> 1 Jun 1998</p> <p>See lib-6522 and edit-814.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change D.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf"> [depr.strstreambuf]</a> (since streambuf is a typedef of +<p>Change D.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf"> [depr.strstreambuf]</a> (since streambuf is a typedef of basic_streambuf<char>) from:</p> <pre> virtual streambuf<char>* setbuf(char* s, streamsize n);</pre> @@ -1571,7 +1574,7 @@ basic_streambuf<char>) from:</p> <pre> virtual streambuf* setbuf(char* s, streamsize n);</pre> -<p>In D.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstream"> [depr.strstream]</a> insert the semicolon now missing after +<p>In D.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstream"> [depr.strstream]</a> insert the semicolon now missing after int_type:</p> <pre> namespace std { @@ -1583,27 +1586,27 @@ int_type:</p> typedef typename char_traits<char>::int_type int_type typedef typename char_traits<char>::pos_type pos_type;</pre> <hr> -<a name="47"><h3>47. Imbue() and getloc() Returns clauses swapped</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 21 Jun 1998</p> +<a name="47"></a><h3><a name="47">47. Imbue() and getloc() Returns clauses swapped</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 21 Jun 1998</p> <p>Section 27.4.2.3 specifies how imbue() and getloc() work. That section has two RETURNS clauses, and they make no sense as stated. They make perfect sense, though, if you swap them. Am I correct in thinking that paragraphs 2 and 4 just got mixed up by accident?</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> swap paragraphs 2 and 4.</p> +<p>In 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> swap paragraphs 2 and 4.</p> <hr> -<a name="48"><h3>48. Use of non-existent exception constructor</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 21 Jun 1998</p> +<a name="48"><h3>48. Use of non-existent exception constructor</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 21 Jun 1998</p> <p>27.4.2.1.1, paragraph 2, says that class failure initializes the base class, exception, with exception(msg). Class exception (see 18.6.1) has no such constructor.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Replace 27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a>, paragraph 2, with</p> +<p>Replace 27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a>, paragraph 2, with</p> <blockquote> <p>EFFECTS: Constructs an object of class <tt>failure</tt>.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="49"><h3>49. Underspecification of ios_base::sync_with_stdio</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 21 Jun 1998</p> +<a name="49"><h3>49. Underspecification of ios_base::sync_with_stdio</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 21 Jun 1998</p> <p>Two problems</p> <p>(1) 27.4.2.4 doesn't say what ios_base::sync_with_stdio(f) @@ -1616,7 +1619,7 @@ synchronized with stdio. Again, of course, I can make some guesses. (And I'm unhappy about the performance implications of those guesses, but that's another matter.)</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change the following sentence in 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a> +<p>Change the following sentence in 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a> returns clause from:</p> <blockquote> @@ -1632,7 +1635,7 @@ returns clause from:</p> <tt>false</tt>.</p> </blockquote> -<p>Add the following immediately after 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>, +<p>Add the following immediately after 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>, paragraph 2:</p> <blockquote> @@ -1677,7 +1680,7 @@ of "synchronization"]</i></p> text was added in the non-normative footnote to say that operations on the two streams can be mixed arbitrarily.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="50"><h3>50. Copy constructor and assignment operator of ios_base</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 21 Jun 1998</p> +<a name="50"><h3>50. Copy constructor and assignment operator of ios_base</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 21 Jun 1998</p> <p>As written, ios_base has a copy constructor and an assignment operator. (Nothing in the standard says it doesn't have one, and all classes have copy constructors and assignment operators unless you @@ -1697,13 +1700,13 @@ that intention would have required a explicit description of the semantics (e.g. what happens to the iarray and parray stuff). </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a>, class ios_base, specify the copy +<p>In 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a>, class ios_base, specify the copy constructor and operator= members as being private.</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The LWG believes the difficulty of specifying correct semantics outweighs any benefit of allowing ios_base objects to be copyable.</p> <hr> -<a name="51"><h3>51. Requirement to not invalidate iterators missing</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> David Vandevoorde <b>Date:</b> 23 Jun 1998</p> +<a name="51"><h3>51. Requirement to not invalidate iterators missing</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> David Vandevoorde <b>Date:</b> 23 Jun 1998</p> <p>The std::sort algorithm can in general only sort a given sequence by moving around values. The list<>::sort() member on the other hand could move around values or just update internal pointers. Either @@ -1749,15 +1752,15 @@ proposed resolution below is somewhat updated from CD2-23-011, particularly the addition of the phrase "or change the values of"</p> <hr> -<a name="52"><h3>52. Small I/O problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.operations"> [lib.fpos.operations]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 23 Jun 1998</p> -<p>First, 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>, table 89. This is pretty obvious: +<a name="52"><h3>52. Small I/O problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.operations"> [lib.fpos.operations]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 23 Jun 1998</p> +<p>First, 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>, table 89. This is pretty obvious: it should be titled "basic_ios<>() effects", not "ios_base() effects". </p> -<p>[The second item is a duplicate; see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#6">6</a> for +<p>[The second item is a duplicate; see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#6">6</a> for resolution.]</p> -<p>Second, 27.4.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.operations"> [lib.fpos.operations]</a> table 88 . There are a couple +<p>Second, 27.4.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.operations"> [lib.fpos.operations]</a> table 88 . There are a couple different things wrong with it, some of which I've already discussed with Jerry, but the most obvious mechanical sort of error is that it uses expressions like P(i) and p(i), without ever defining what sort @@ -1772,16 +1775,16 @@ streampos arithmetic, but that it wasn't actually supposed to do anything meaningful except on platforms, like Unix, where genuine arithmetic is possible.) </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a> table 89 title from +<p>Change 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a> table 89 title from "ios_base() effects" to "basic_ios<>() effects". </p> <hr> -<a name="53"><h3>53. Basic_ios destructor unspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 23 Jun 1998</p> +<a name="53"><h3>53. Basic_ios destructor unspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 23 Jun 1998</p> <p>There's nothing in 27.4.4 saying what basic_ios's destructor does. The important question is whether basic_ios::~basic_ios() destroys rdbuf().</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add after 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a> paragraph 2:</p> +<p>Add after 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a> paragraph 2:</p> <blockquote> <p><tt>virtual ~basic_ios();</tt></p> @@ -1790,25 +1793,25 @@ rdbuf().</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The LWG reviewed the additional question of whether or not <tt>rdbuf(0)</tt> may set <tt>badbit</tt>. The answer is -clearly yes; it may be set via <tt>clear()</tt>. See 27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a>, paragraph 6. This issue was reviewed at length +clearly yes; it may be set via <tt>clear()</tt>. See 27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a>, paragraph 6. This issue was reviewed at length by the LWG, which removed from the original proposed resolution a footnote which incorrectly said "<tt>rdbuf(0)</tt> does not set <tt>badbit</tt>".</p> <hr> -<a name="54"><h3>54. Basic_streambuf's destructor</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 25 Jun 1998</p> +<a name="54"><h3>54. Basic_streambuf's destructor</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 25 Jun 1998</p> <p>The class synopsis for basic_streambuf shows a (virtual) destructor, but the standard doesn't say what that destructor does. My assumption is that it does nothing, but the standard should say so explicitly. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add after 27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a> paragraph 2:</p> +<p>Add after 27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a> paragraph 2:</p> <blockquote> <p><tt>virtual ~basic_streambuf();</tt></p> <p><b>Effects</b>: None.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="55"></a><h3><a name="55">55. Invalid stream position is undefined</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 26 Jun 1998</p> +<a name="55"><h3>55. Invalid stream position is undefined</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 26 Jun 1998</p> <p>Several member functions in clause 27 are defined in certain circumstances to return an "invalid stream position", a term that is defined nowhere in the standard. Two places (27.5.2.4.2, @@ -1829,52 +1832,52 @@ should not be changed. Here are the three places where "invalid stream position" should not be changed:</p> <blockquote> - <p>27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 14<br> - 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 14<br> - D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 17 + <p>27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 14<br> + 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 14<br> + D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 17 </p> </blockquote> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 4, change "Returns an +<p>In 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 4, change "Returns an object of class pos_type that stores an invalid stream position (_lib.iostreams.definitions_)" to "Returns <tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>". </p> -<p>In 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 6, change "Returns +<p>In 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 6, change "Returns an object of class pos_type that stores an invalid stream position" to "Returns <tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>".</p> -<p>In 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 13, change "the object +<p>In 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 13, change "the object stores an invalid stream position" to "the return value is <tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>". </p> -<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 13, change "returns an +<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 13, change "returns an invalid stream position (27.4.3)" to "returns <tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>" </p> -<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 15, change "Otherwise +<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 15, change "Otherwise returns an invalid stream position (_lib.iostreams.definitions_)" to "Otherwise returns <tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>" </p> -<p>In D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 15, change "the object +<p>In D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 15, change "the object stores an invalid stream position" to "the return value is <tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>" </p> -<p>In D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 18, change "the object +<p>In D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 18, change "the object stores an invalid stream position" to "the return value is <tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>"</p> <hr> -<a name="56"><h3>56. Showmanyc's return type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 29 Jun 1998</p> +<a name="56"><h3>56. Showmanyc's return type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 29 Jun 1998</p> <p>The class summary for basic_streambuf<>, in 27.5.2, says that showmanyc has return type int. However, 27.5.2.4.3 says that its return type is streamsize. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Change <tt>showmanyc</tt>'s return type in the -27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> class summary to <tt>streamsize</tt>.</p> +27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> class summary to <tt>streamsize</tt>.</p> <hr> -<a name="57"><h3>57. Mistake in char_traits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 1 Jul 1998</p> +<a name="57"><h3>57. Mistake in char_traits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 1 Jul 1998</p> <p>21.1.3.2, paragraph 3, says "The types streampos and wstreampos may be different if the implementation supports no shift encoding in narrow-oriented iostreams but supports one or more shift @@ -1888,11 +1891,11 @@ to clause 21, we see in 21.1.3.1 and 21.1.3.2 that char_traits<char>::state_type and char_traits<wchar_t>::state_type must both be mbstate_t. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Remove the sentence in 21.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t]</a> paragraph 3 which +<p>Remove the sentence in 21.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t]</a> paragraph 3 which begins "The types streampos and wstreampos may be different..." . </p> <hr> -<a name="59"><h3>59. Ambiguity in specification of gbump</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.get.area"> [lib.streambuf.get.area]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 28 Jul 1998</p> +<a name="59"><h3>59. Ambiguity in specification of gbump</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.get.area"> [lib.streambuf.get.area]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 28 Jul 1998</p> <p>27.5.2.3.1 says that basic_streambuf::gbump() "Advances the next pointer for the input sequence by n." </p> @@ -1905,7 +1908,7 @@ pbump. </p> <p>(The "classic" AT&T implementation used the former interpretation.)</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 27.5.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.get.area"> [lib.streambuf.get.area]</a> paragraph 4 gbump effects from:</p> +<p>Change 27.5.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.get.area"> [lib.streambuf.get.area]</a> paragraph 4 gbump effects from:</p> <blockquote> <p>Effects: Advances the next pointer for the input sequence by n.</p> @@ -1917,10 +1920,10 @@ former interpretation.)</p> <p>Effects: Adds <tt>n</tt> to the next pointer for the input sequence.</p> </blockquote> -<p>Make the same change to 27.5.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.put.area"> [lib.streambuf.put.area]</a> paragraph 4 pbump +<p>Make the same change to 27.5.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.put.area"> [lib.streambuf.put.area]</a> paragraph 4 pbump effects.</p> <hr> -<a name="60"><h3>60. What is a formatted input function?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 3 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="60"><h3>60. What is a formatted input function?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 3 Aug 1998</p> <p>Paragraph 1 of 27.6.1.2.1 contains general requirements for all formatted input functions. Some of the functions defined in section 27.6.1.2 explicitly say that those requirements apply ("Behaves @@ -1952,16 +1955,16 @@ that the "Common requirements" listed in section 27.6.1.2.1 apply to them. </p> <p>Additional comments from Dietmar Kühl: It appears to be somewhat -nonsensical to consider the functions defined in 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> paragraphs 1 to 5 to be "Formatted input +nonsensical to consider the functions defined in 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> paragraphs 1 to 5 to be "Formatted input function" but since these functions are defined in a section labeled "Formatted input functions" it is unclear to me whether these operators are considered formatted input functions which -have to conform to the "common requirements" from 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>: If this is the case, all manipulators, not +have to conform to the "common requirements" from 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>: If this is the case, all manipulators, not just <tt>ws</tt>, would skip whitespace unless <tt>noskipws</tt> is set (... but setting <tt>noskipws</tt> using the manipulator syntax would also skip whitespace :-)</p> <p>It is not clear which functions are to be considered unformatted input functions. As written, it seems -that all functions in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> are unformatted input +that all functions in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> are unformatted input functions. However, it does not really make much sense to construct a sentry object for <tt>gcount()</tt>, <tt>sync()</tt>, ... Also it is unclear what happens to the <tt>gcount()</tt> if @@ -2216,7 +2219,7 @@ unformatted output function (as described in 27.6.2.6, paragraph 1)." by Judy Ward and Matt Austern. This proposed resolution is section VI of that paper.</p> <hr> -<a name="61"><h3>61. Ambiguity in iostreams exception policy</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="61"><h3>61. Ambiguity in iostreams exception policy</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>The introduction to the section on unformatted input (27.6.1.3) says that every unformatted input function catches all exceptions that were thrown during input, sets badbit, and then conditionally rethrows @@ -2251,7 +2254,7 @@ parenthetical comment: "(Exceptions thrown from <p>The LWG looked to two alternative wordings, and choose the proposed resolution as better standardese.</p> <hr> -<a name="62"><h3>62. <tt>Sync</tt>'s return value</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="62"></a><h3><a name="62">62. <tt>Sync</tt>'s return value</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 6 Aug 1998</p> <p>The Effects clause for sync() (27.6.1.3, paragraph 36) says that it "calls rdbuf()->pubsync() and, if that function returns -1 ... returns traits::eof()." </p> @@ -2259,11 +2262,11 @@ resolution as better standardese.</p> <p>That looks suspicious, because traits::eof() is of type traits::int_type while the return type of sync() is int. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, paragraph 36, change "returns +<p>In 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, paragraph 36, change "returns <tt>traits::eof()</tt>" to "returns <tt>-1</tt>". </p> <hr> -<a name="63"><h3>63. Exception-handling policy for unformatted output</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 11 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="63"><h3>63. Exception-handling policy for unformatted output</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 11 Aug 1998</p> <p>Clause 27 details an exception-handling policy for formatted input, unformatted input, and formatted output. It says nothing for unformatted output (27.6.2.6). 27.6.2.6 should either include the same @@ -2293,12 +2296,12 @@ input, unformatted input, and formatted output. </p> <hr> <a name="64"><h3>64. Exception handling in <tt>basic_istream::operator>>(basic_streambuf*)</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 11 Aug 1998 </p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 11 Aug 1998 </p> <p>27.6.1.2.3, paragraph 13, is ambiguous. It can be interpreted two different ways, depending on whether the second sentence is read as an elaboration of the first. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Replace 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, paragraph 13, which begins +<p>Replace 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, paragraph 13, which begins "If the function inserts no characters ..." with:</p> <blockquote> @@ -2310,14 +2313,14 @@ elaboration of the first. </p> (27.4.4.3), then the caught exception is rethrown. </p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="66"><h3>66. Strstreambuf::setbuf</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 18 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="66"><h3>66. Strstreambuf::setbuf</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 18 Aug 1998</p> <p>D.7.1.3, paragraph 19, says that strstreambuf::setbuf "Performs an operation that is defined separately for each class derived from strstreambuf". This is obviously an incorrect cut-and-paste from basic_streambuf. There are no classes derived from strstreambuf. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 19, replace the setbuf effects +<p>D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 19, replace the setbuf effects clause which currently says "Performs an operation that is defined separately for each class derived from strstreambuf" with:</p> @@ -2327,7 +2330,7 @@ with:</p> <tt>setbuf(0,0)</tt> has no effect.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="68"><h3>68. Extractors for char* should store null at end</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 14 Jul 1998</p> +<a name="68"><h3>68. Extractors for char* should store null at end</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 14 Jul 1998</p> <p>Extractors for char* (27.6.1.2.3) do not store a null character after the extracted character sequence whereas the unformatted functions like get() do. Why is this?</p> @@ -2337,7 +2340,7 @@ glitch. You'll notice that the last item of the list of what stops extraction doesn't make any sense. It was supposed to be the line that said a null is stored.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, paragraph 7, change the last list +<p>27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, paragraph 7, change the last list item from:</p> <blockquote> @@ -2353,7 +2356,7 @@ item from:</p> extracted. </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="69"><h3>69. Must elements of a vector be contiguous?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 29 Jul 1998</p> +<a name="69"><h3>69. Must elements of a vector be contiguous?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 29 Jul 1998</p> <p>The issue is this: Must the elements of a vector be in contiguous memory?</p> <p>(Please note that this is entirely separate from the question of @@ -2361,7 +2364,7 @@ whether a vector iterator is required to be a pointer; the answer to that question is clearly "no," as it would rule out debugging implementations)</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add the following text to the end of 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>, +<p>Add the following text to the end of 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>, paragraph 1. </p> <blockquote> @@ -2378,15 +2381,15 @@ directly defined in the standard. Discussion included:</p> <ul> <li>An operational definition similar to the above proposed resolution is - already used for valarray (26.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.access"> [lib.valarray.access]</a>).</li> + already used for valarray (26.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.access"> [lib.valarray.access]</a>).</li> <li>There is no need to explicitly consider a user-defined operator& - because elements must be copyconstructible (23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> para 3) - and copyconstructible (20.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.copyconstructible"> [lib.copyconstructible]</a>) specifies + because elements must be copyconstructible (23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> para 3) + and copyconstructible (20.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.copyconstructible"> [lib.copyconstructible]</a>) specifies requirements for operator&.</li> <li>There is no issue of one-past-the-end because of language rules.</li> </ul> <hr> -<a name="70"><h3>70. Uncaught_exception() missing throw() specification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.exception"> [lib.support.exception]</a>, 18.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.uncaught"> [lib.uncaught]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> Unknown</p> +<a name="70"><h3>70. Uncaught_exception() missing throw() specification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.exception"> [lib.support.exception]</a>, 18.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.uncaught"> [lib.uncaught]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> Unknown</p> <p>In article 3E04@pratique.fr, Valentin Bonnard writes: </p> <p>uncaught_exception() doesn't have a throw specification.</p> @@ -2397,29 +2400,29 @@ handle exceptions thrown from uncaught_exception() ?</p> <p>uncaught_exception() is called in exception handling contexts where exception safety is very important.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 15.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/except.html#except.uncaught"> [except.uncaught]</a>, paragraph 1, 18.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.exception"> [lib.support.exception]</a>, and 18.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.uncaught"> [lib.uncaught]</a>, add "throw()" to uncaught_exception().</p> +<p>In 15.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/except.html#except.uncaught"> [except.uncaught]</a>, paragraph 1, 18.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.exception"> [lib.support.exception]</a>, and 18.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.uncaught"> [lib.uncaught]</a>, add "throw()" to uncaught_exception().</p> <hr> -<a name="71"><h3>71. Do_get_monthname synopsis missing argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get"> [lib.locale.time.get]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 13 Aug 1998</p> +<a name="71"><h3>71. Do_get_monthname synopsis missing argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get"> [lib.locale.time.get]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 13 Aug 1998</p> <p>The locale facet member <tt>time_get<>::do_get_monthname</tt> -is described in 22.2.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.get.virtuals]</a> with five arguments, +is described in 22.2.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.get.virtuals]</a> with five arguments, consistent with do_get_weekday and with its specified use by member get_monthname. However, in the synopsis, it is specified instead with four arguments. The missing argument is the "end" iterator value.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get"> [lib.locale.time.get]</a>, add an "end" argument to +<p>In 22.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get"> [lib.locale.time.get]</a>, add an "end" argument to the declaration of member do_monthname as follows:</p> <pre> virtual iter_type do_get_monthname(iter_type s, iter_type end, ios_base&, ios_base::iostate& err, tm* t) const;</pre> <hr> <a name="74"><h3>74. Garbled text for <tt>codecvt::do_max_length</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 8 Sep 1998</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 8 Sep 1998</p> <p>The text of <tt>codecvt::do_max_length</tt>'s "Returns" clause (22.2.1.5.2, paragraph 11) is garbled. It has unbalanced parentheses and a spurious <b>n</b>.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Replace 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 11 with the +<p>Replace 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 11 with the following:</p> <blockquote> @@ -2430,7 +2433,7 @@ following:</p> mbstate_t>::do_max_length()</tt> returns 1. </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="75"><h3>75. Contradiction in <tt>codecvt::length</tt>'s argument types</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt +<a name="75"><h3>75. Contradiction in <tt>codecvt::length</tt>'s argument types</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 1998</p> <p>The class synopses for classes <tt>codecvt<></tt> (22.2.1.5) and <tt>codecvt_byname<></tt> (22.2.1.6) say that the first @@ -2444,7 +2447,7 @@ synopsis or the summary must be changed. </p> then we must also add text saying how <tt>do_length</tt> changes its <tt>stateT</tt> argument. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>, and also in 22.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.byname"> [lib.locale.codecvt.byname]</a>, +<p>In 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>, and also in 22.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.byname"> [lib.locale.codecvt.byname]</a>, change the <tt>stateT</tt> argument type on both member <tt>length()</tt> and member <tt>do_length()</tt> from </p> @@ -2458,7 +2461,7 @@ change the <tt>stateT</tt> argument type on both member <p><tt>stateT&</tt></p> </blockquote> -<p>In 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, add to the definition for member +<p>In 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, add to the definition for member <tt>do_length</tt> a paragraph:</p> <blockquote> @@ -2468,7 +2471,7 @@ change the <tt>stateT</tt> argument type on both member <tt>max</tt> elements.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="76"><h3>76. Can a <tt>codecvt</tt> facet always convert one internal character at a time?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 25 Sep 1998</p> +<a name="76"><h3>76. Can a <tt>codecvt</tt> facet always convert one internal character at a time?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 25 Sep 1998</p> <p>This issue concerns the requirements on classes derived from <tt>codecvt</tt>, including user-defined classes. What are the restrictions on the conversion from external characters @@ -2503,8 +2506,8 @@ sequence of <i>M</i> external characters that maps to a sequence of subsequence that maps to <i>N-1</i> internal characters.) </p> <p>Some of the wording in the standard, such as the description of -<tt>codecvt::do_max_length</tt> (22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, -paragraph 11) and <tt>basic_filebuf::underflow</tt> (27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 3) suggests that it must always be +<tt>codecvt::do_max_length</tt> (22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, +paragraph 11) and <tt>basic_filebuf::underflow</tt> (27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 3) suggests that it must always be possible to pick off internal characters one at a time from a sequence of external characters. However, this is never explicitly stated one way or the other. </p> @@ -2517,11 +2520,11 @@ be aware of the assumptions that the library makes. This issue affects positioning operations on <tt>basic_filebuf</tt>, unbuffered input, and several of <tt>codecvt</tt>'s member functions. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add the following text as a new paragraph, following 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 2:</p> +<p>Add the following text as a new paragraph, following 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 2:</p> <blockquote> <p>A <tt>codecvt</tt> facet that is used by <tt>basic_filebuf</tt> -(27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>) must have the property that if</p> +(27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>) must have the property that if</p> <pre> do_out(state, from, from_end, from_next, to, to_lim, to_next) </pre> would return <tt>ok</tt>, where <tt>from != from_end</tt>, then @@ -2576,34 +2579,34 @@ return value.]</i></p> does not expect <tt>basic_filebuf</tt> to be able to use it. </p> <hr> -<a name="78"><h3>78. Typo: event_call_back</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> +<a name="78"><h3>78. Typo: event_call_back</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> <p>typo: event_call_back should be event_callback </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In the 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> synopsis change +<p>In the 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> synopsis change "event_call_back" to "event_callback". </p> <hr> -<a name="79"><h3>79. Inconsistent declaration of polar()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> -<p>In 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a> polar is declared as follows:</p> +<a name="79"><h3>79. Inconsistent declaration of polar()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> +<p>In 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a> polar is declared as follows:</p> <pre> template<class T> complex<T> polar(const T&, const T&); </pre> -<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> it is declared as follows:</p> +<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> it is declared as follows:</p> <pre> template<class T> complex<T> polar(const T& rho, const T& theta = 0); </pre> <p>Thus whether the second parameter is optional is not clear. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a> change:</p> +<p>In 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a> change:</p> <pre> template<class T> complex<T> polar(const T&, const T&);</pre> <p>to:</p> <pre> template<class T> complex<T> polar(const T& rho, const T& theta = 0); </pre> <hr> -<a name="80"><h3>80. Global Operators of complex declared twice</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, 26.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex"> [lib.complex]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> +<a name="80"><h3>80. Global Operators of complex declared twice</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, 26.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex"> [lib.complex]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> <p>Both 26.2.1 and 26.2.2 contain declarations of global operators for class complex. This redundancy should be removed.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Reduce redundancy according to the general style of the standard. </p> <hr> -<a name="83"><h3>83. String::npos vs. string::max_size()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> +<a name="83"><h3>83. String::npos vs. string::max_size()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> <p>Many string member functions throw if size is getting or exceeding npos. However, I wonder why they don't throw if size is getting or exceeding max_size() instead of npos. May be npos is known at compile @@ -2611,7 +2614,7 @@ time, while max_size() is known at runtime. However, what happens if size exceeds max_size() but not npos, then? It seems the standard lacks some clarifications here.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>After 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 4 ("The functions +<p>After 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 4 ("The functions described in this clause...") add a new paragraph:</p> <blockquote> @@ -2622,7 +2625,7 @@ described in this clause...") add a new paragraph:</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The LWG believes length_error is the correct exception to throw.</p> <hr> -<a name="86"><h3>86. String constructors don't describe exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> +<a name="86"><h3>86. String constructors don't describe exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> <p>The constructor from a range:</p> <pre>template<class InputIterator> @@ -2633,15 +2636,15 @@ described in this clause...") add a new paragraph:</p> according to the other constructors if the numbers of characters in the range equals npos (or exceeds max_size(), see above). </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, Strike throws paragraphs for +<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, Strike throws paragraphs for constructors which say "Throws: length_error if n == npos."</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Throws clauses for length_error if n == npos are no longer needed because they are subsumed by the general wording added by the -resolution for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>.</p> +resolution for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>.</p> <hr> -<a name="90"><h3>90. Incorrect description of operator >> for strings</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> +<a name="90"><h3>90. Incorrect description of operator >> for strings</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> <p>The effect of operator >> for strings contain the following item:</p> <p> <tt>isspace(c,getloc())</tt> is true for the next available input @@ -2649,7 +2652,7 @@ character c.</p> <p>Here <tt>getloc()</tt> has to be replaced by <tt>is.getloc()</tt>. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 1 Effects clause replace:</p> +<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 1 Effects clause replace:</p> <blockquote> <p><tt>isspace(c,getloc())</tt> is true for the next available input character c.</p> @@ -2661,13 +2664,13 @@ character c.</p> <p><tt>isspace(c,is.getloc())</tt> is true for the next available input character c.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="91"><h3>91. Description of operator>> and getline() for string<> might cause endless loop</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> +<a name="91"><h3>91. Description of operator>> and getline() for string<> might cause endless loop</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> <p>Operator >> and getline() for strings read until eof() in the input stream is true. However, this might never happen, if the stream can't read anymore without reaching EOF. So shouldn't it be changed into that it reads until !good() ? </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>, paragraph 1, replace:</p> +<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>, paragraph 1, replace:</p> <blockquote> Effects: Begins by constructing a sentry object k as if k were constructed by typename basic_istream<charT,traits>::sentry k( is). If @@ -2679,7 +2682,7 @@ extracted and appended until any of the following occurs: </blockquote> <p>with:</p> <blockquote> -Effects: Behaves as a formatted input function (27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>). After constructing a sentry object, if the +Effects: Behaves as a formatted input function (27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>). After constructing a sentry object, if the sentry converts to true, calls str.erase() and then extracts characters from is and appends them to str as if by calling str.append(1,c). If is.width() is greater than zero, the maximum @@ -2688,7 +2691,7 @@ str.max_size(). Characters are extracted and appended until any of the following occurs: </blockquote> -<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>, paragraph 6, replace</p> +<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>, paragraph 6, replace</p> <blockquote> Effects: Begins by constructing a sentry object k as if by typename basic_istream<charT,traits>::sentry k( is, true). If bool( k) is true, @@ -2698,7 +2701,7 @@ following occurs: </blockquote> <p>with:</p> <blockquote> -Effects: Behaves as an unformatted input function (27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), except that it does not affect the value returned +Effects: Behaves as an unformatted input function (27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), except that it does not affect the value returned by subsequent calls to basic_istream<>::gcount(). After constructing a sentry object, if the sentry converts to true, calls str.erase() and then extracts characters from is and appends them to @@ -2722,7 +2725,7 @@ returning eof or by throwing an exception; there are no other possibilities. The proposed resolution makes it clear that these two functions do get characters from a streambuf.</p> <hr> -<a name="92"><h3>92. Incomplete Algorithm Requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> +<a name="92"><h3>92. Incomplete Algorithm Requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 29 Sep 1998</p> <p>The standard does not state, how often a function object is copied, called, or the order of calls inside an algorithm. This may lead to surprising/buggy behavior. Consider the following example: </p> @@ -2771,7 +2774,7 @@ cost it could be avoided (just implement it directly instead of calling find_if()). </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add a new paragraph following 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> paragraph 8:</p> +<p>Add a new paragraph following 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> paragraph 8:</p> <blockquote> [Note: Unless otherwise specified, algorithms that take function objects as arguments are permitted to copy those function objects @@ -2799,7 +2802,7 @@ library book for a detailed discussion.]</i></p> <p><i>[Kona: Nico will provide wording to the effect that "unless otherwise specified, the number of copies of and calls to function objects by algorithms is unspecified". Consider placing in -25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> after paragraph 9.]</i></p> +25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> after paragraph 9.]</i></p> <p><i>[Santa Cruz: The standard doesn't currently guarantee that functions object won't be copied, and what isn't forbidden is @@ -2814,8 +2817,8 @@ objects by algorithms is unspecified". Consider placing in <hr> -<a name="98"><h3>98. Input iterator requirements are badly written</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> AFNOR <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> -<p>Table 72 in 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a> specifies semantics for +<a name="98"><h3>98. Input iterator requirements are badly written</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> AFNOR <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> +<p>Table 72 in 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a> specifies semantics for <tt>*r++</tt> of:</p> <p> <tt>{ T tmp = *r; ++r; return tmp; }</tt></p> @@ -2828,11 +2831,11 @@ This is too specific: we want to allow *r++ to return an lvalue.</p> suggests that the effects *r++ should precisely replicate the behavior of this code, including side effects. (Does this mean that *r++ should invoke the copy constructor exactly as many times as the sample -code above would?) See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#334">334</a> for a similar +code above would?) See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#334">334</a> for a similar problem.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -In Table 72 in 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a>, change the return type +In Table 72 in 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a>, change the return type for <tt>*r++</tt> from <tt>T</tt> to "convertible to T". <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>This issue has two parts: the return type, and the number of times @@ -2854,7 +2857,7 @@ for <tt>*r++</tt> from <tt>T</tt> to "convertible to T". of input iterators, we can't impose any requirements in the Input Iterator requirements table that forward iterators don't satisfy.</p> <hr> -<a name="103"><h3>103. set::iterator is required to be modifiable, but this allows modification of keys</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> AFNOR <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> +<a name="103"><h3>103. set::iterator is required to be modifiable, but this allows modification of keys</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> AFNOR <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> <p>Set::iterator is described as implementation-defined with a reference to the container requirement; the container requirement says that const_iterator is an iterator pointing to const T and iterator an @@ -2869,7 +2872,7 @@ const_iterator. Set, for example, has the following: </p> <p><tt>typedef implementation defined iterator;<br> // See _lib.container.requirements_</tt></p> -<p>23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> actually requires that iterator type pointing +<p>23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> actually requires that iterator type pointing to T (table 65). Disallowing user modification of keys by changing the standard to require an iterator for associative container to be the same as const_iterator would be overkill since that will unnecessarily @@ -2882,7 +2885,7 @@ goes in line with trusting user knows what he is doing. </p> <p><b>Other Options Evaluated:</b> </p> -<p>Option A. In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, paragraph 2, after +<p>Option A. In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, paragraph 2, after first sentence, and before "In addition,...", add one line: </p> @@ -2890,7 +2893,7 @@ first sentence, and before "In addition,...", add one line: <p>Modification of keys shall not change their strict weak ordering. </p> </blockquote> -<p>Option B. Add three new sentences to 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>:</p> +<p>Option B. Add three new sentences to 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>At the end of paragraph 5: "Keys in an associative container @@ -2902,7 +2905,7 @@ first sentence, and before "In addition,...", add one line: type."</p> </blockquote> -<p>Option C. To 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, paragraph 3, which +<p>Option C. To 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, paragraph 3, which currently reads:</p> <blockquote> @@ -2925,7 +2928,7 @@ currently reads:</p> different than it was the previous time k2 was in the container.]</p> </blockquote> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add the following to 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> at +<p>Add the following to 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> at the indicated location:</p> <blockquote> @@ -2963,7 +2966,7 @@ conversion from <tt>iterator</tt> to <tt>const_iterator</tt>. <p><i>[Tokyo: The LWG crafted the proposed resolution and rationale.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="106"><h3>106. Numeric library private members are implementation defined</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> AFNOR <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> +<a name="106"><h3>106. Numeric library private members are implementation defined</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> AFNOR <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> <p>This is the only place in the whole standard where the implementation has to document something private.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> @@ -2972,23 +2975,23 @@ Remove the comment which says "// remainder implementation defined" from: </p> <ul> - <li>26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> + <li>26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> </li> - <li>26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> + <li>26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> </li> - <li>26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> + <li>26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> </li> - <li>26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a> + <li>26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a> </li> </ul> <hr> -<a name="108"><h3>108. Lifetime of exception::what() return unspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> AFNOR <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> +<a name="108"><h3>108. Lifetime of exception::what() return unspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> AFNOR <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> <p>In 18.6.1, paragraphs 8-9, the lifetime of the return value of exception::what() is left unspecified. This issue has implications with exception safety of exception handling: some exceptions should not throw bad_alloc.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add to 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> paragraph 9 (exception::what notes +<p>Add to 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> paragraph 9 (exception::what notes clause) the sentence:</p> <blockquote> @@ -3001,7 +3004,7 @@ to set internal state that should affect the contents of the string returned by <tt>what()</tt>. </p> <hr> -<a name="109"><h3>109. Missing binders for non-const sequence elements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.binders"> [lib.binders]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bjarne Stroustrup <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> +<a name="109"><h3>109. Missing binders for non-const sequence elements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.binders"> [lib.binders]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Bjarne Stroustrup <b>Date:</b> 7 Oct 1998</p> <p>There are no versions of binders that apply to non-const elements of a sequence. This makes examples like for_each() using bind2nd() on @@ -3076,7 +3079,7 @@ public: <p><b>Howard believes there is a flaw</b> in this resolution. See c++std-lib-9127. We may need to reopen this issue.</p> -<p>In 20.3.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.binder.1st"> [lib.binder.1st]</a> in the declaration of binder1st after:</p> +<p>In 20.3.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.binder.1st"> [lib.binder.1st]</a> in the declaration of binder1st after:</p> <blockquote> <p><tt>typename Operation::result_type<br> operator()(const typename Operation::second_argument_type& x) const;</tt></p> @@ -3086,7 +3089,7 @@ See c++std-lib-9127. We may need to reopen this issue.</p> <p><tt>typename Operation::result_type<br> operator()(typename Operation::second_argument_type& x) const;</tt></p> </blockquote> -<p>In 20.3.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.binder.2nd"> [lib.binder.2nd]</a> in the declaration of binder2nd after:</p> +<p>In 20.3.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.binder.2nd"> [lib.binder.2nd]</a> in the declaration of binder2nd after:</p> <blockquote> <p><tt>typename Operation::result_type<br> operator()(const typename Operation::first_argument_type& x) const;</tt></p> @@ -3107,12 +3110,12 @@ Strap poll: NAD - 0. Accept proposed resolution - 10. Leave open - 1.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="110"><h3>110. istreambuf_iterator::equal not const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a>, 24.5.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 15 Oct 1998</p> +<a name="110"><h3>110. istreambuf_iterator::equal not const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a>, 24.5.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 15 Oct 1998</p> <p>Member istreambuf_iterator<>::equal is not declared -"const", yet 24.5.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op=="> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op==]</a> says that operator==, +"const", yet 24.5.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op=="> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op==]</a> says that operator==, which is const, calls it. This is contradictory. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a> and also in 24.5.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal]</a>, +<p>In 24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a> and also in 24.5.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal]</a>, replace:</p> <blockquote> @@ -3125,13 +3128,13 @@ replace:</p> <pre>bool equal(const istreambuf_iterator& b) const;</pre> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="112"><h3>112. Minor typo in <tt>ostreambuf_iterator</tt> constructor</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons"> [lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 20 Oct 1998</p> +<a name="112"><h3>112. Minor typo in <tt>ostreambuf_iterator</tt> constructor</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons"> [lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 20 Oct 1998</p> <p>The <b>requires</b> clause for <tt>ostreambuf_iterator</tt>'s constructor from an <tt>ostream_type</tt> (24.5.4.1, paragraph 1) reads "<i>s</i> is not null". However, <i>s</i> is a reference, and references can't be null. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 24.5.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons"> [lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons]</a>:</p> +<p>In 24.5.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons"> [lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons]</a>:</p> <p>Move the current paragraph 1, which reads "Requires: s is not null.", from the first constructor to the second constructor.</p> @@ -3143,7 +3146,7 @@ reading:</p> <p><b>Requires</b>: <tt>s.rdbuf()</tt> is not null.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="114"><h3>114. Placement forms example in error twice</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.placement"> [lib.new.delete.placement]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 28 Oct 1998</p> +<a name="114"><h3>114. Placement forms example in error twice</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.placement"> [lib.new.delete.placement]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 28 Oct 1998</p> <p>Section 18.4.1.3 contains the following example: </p> <pre>[Example: This can be useful for constructing an object at a known address: @@ -3161,14 +3164,14 @@ believes the () are correct.]</p> likely to fail.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Replace the <u> first line of code</u> in the example in -18.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.placement"> [lib.new.delete.placement]</a> with: +18.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.placement"> [lib.new.delete.placement]</a> with: </p> <blockquote> <pre>void* place = operator new(sizeof(Something));</pre> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="115"><h3>115. Typo in strstream constructors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.7.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstream.cons"> [depr.strstream.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 2 Nov 1998</p> +<a name="115"><h3>115. Typo in strstream constructors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.7.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstream.cons"> [depr.strstream.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 2 Nov 1998</p> <p>D.7.4.1 strstream constructors paragraph 2 says: </p> <blockquote> @@ -3185,11 +3188,11 @@ likely to fail.</p> should be "If mode&app==app", or "mode&app!=0", meaning that the append bit is set.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In D.7.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ostrstream.cons"> [depr.ostrstream.cons]</a> paragraph 2 and D.7.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstream.cons"> [depr.strstream.cons]</a> +<p>In D.7.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ostrstream.cons"> [depr.ostrstream.cons]</a> paragraph 2 and D.7.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstream.cons"> [depr.strstream.cons]</a> paragraph 2, change the first condition to <tt>(mode&app)==0</tt> and the second condition to <tt>(mode&app)!=0</tt>.</p> <hr> -<a name="117"><h3>117. <tt>basic_ostream</tt> uses nonexistent <tt>num_put</tt> member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.arithmetic"> [lib.ostream.inserters.arithmetic]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 20 Nov 1998</p> +<a name="117"><h3>117. <tt>basic_ostream</tt> uses nonexistent <tt>num_put</tt> member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.arithmetic"> [lib.ostream.inserters.arithmetic]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 20 Nov 1998</p> <p>The <b>effects</b> clause for numeric inserters says that insertion of a value <tt>x</tt>, whose type is either <tt>bool</tt>, <tt>short</tt>, <tt>unsigned short</tt>, <tt>int</tt>, <tt>unsigned @@ -3295,7 +3298,7 @@ complicated, but gives more expected results for hex and octal output of signed short and signed int. (On a system with 16-bit short, for example, printing short(-1) in hex format should yield 0xffff.)</p> <hr> -<a name="118"><h3>118. <tt>basic_istream</tt> uses nonexistent <tt>num_get</tt> member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 20 Nov 1998</p> +<a name="118"><h3>118. <tt>basic_istream</tt> uses nonexistent <tt>num_get</tt> member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 20 Nov 1998</p> <p>Formatted input is defined for the types <tt>short</tt>, <tt>unsigned short</tt>, <tt>int</tt>, <tt>unsigned int</tt>, <tt>long</tt>, <tt>unsigned long</tt>, <tt>float</tt>, <tt>double</tt>, <tt>long double</tt>, <tt>bool</tt>, and <tt>void*</tt>. According to section 27.6.1.2.2, @@ -3306,7 +3309,7 @@ iostate err = 0; use_facet< numget >(loc).get(*this, 0, *this, err, val); setstate(err);</pre> -<p>According to section 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>, however, +<p>According to section 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>, however, <tt>num_get<>::get()</tt> is only overloaded for the types <tt>bool</tt>, <tt>long</tt>, <tt>unsigned short</tt>, <tt>unsigned int</tt>, <tt>unsigned long</tt>, <tt>unsigned long</tt>, @@ -3315,7 +3318,7 @@ int</tt>, <tt>unsigned long</tt>, <tt>unsigned long</tt>, that 27.6.1.2.2 is using a nonexistent function for types <tt>short</tt> and <tt>int</tt>. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> Arithmetic Extractors, remove the +<p>In 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> Arithmetic Extractors, remove the two lines (1st and 3rd) which read:</p> <blockquote> <pre>operator>>(short& val); @@ -3352,8 +3355,8 @@ operator>>(int& val);</pre> <p><i>[Post-Tokyo: PJP provided the above wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="119"><h3>119. Should virtual functions be allowed to strengthen the exception specification?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> -<p>Section 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> states: </p> +<a name="119"><h3>119. Should virtual functions be allowed to strengthen the exception specification?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> +<p>Section 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> states: </p> <p>"An implementation may strengthen the exception-specification for a function by removing listed exceptions." </p> @@ -3375,7 +3378,7 @@ public: // overridden virtual function ios_base::failure::~failure() };</pre> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change Section 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> from:</p> +<p>Change Section 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> from:</p> <p> "may strengthen the exception-specification for a function"</p> @@ -3385,7 +3388,7 @@ exception-specification for a function"</p> <p> "may strengthen the exception-specification for a non-virtual function". </p> <hr> -<a name="120"><h3>120. Can an implementor add specializations?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> +<a name="120"><h3>120. Can an implementor add specializations?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> <p>The original issue asked whether a library implementor could specialize standard library templates for built-in types. (This was @@ -3430,7 +3433,7 @@ special: the "undefined behavior" that results from having two different explicit instantiations might be harmless.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> - <p>Append to 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> paragraph 1: </p> + <p>Append to 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> paragraph 1: </p> <blockquote> A program may explicitly instantiate any templates in the standard library only if the declaration depends on the name of a user-defined @@ -3446,7 +3449,7 @@ different explicit instantiations might be harmless.</p> <blockquote> <p>In light of the resolution to core issue 259, no normative changes in the library clauses are necessary. Add the following non-normative - note to the end of 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> paragraph 1:</p> + note to the end of 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> paragraph 1:</p> <blockquote> [<i>Note:</i> A program may explicitly instantiate standard library templates, even when an explicit instantiation does not depend on @@ -3485,7 +3488,7 @@ different explicit instantiations might be harmless.</p> linking. If there are such changes in the future, it may be appropriate to revisit this issue later.</p> <hr> -<a name="122"></a><h3><a name="122">122. streambuf/wstreambuf description should not say they are specializations</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> +<a name="122"><h3>122. streambuf/wstreambuf description should not say they are specializations</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> <p>Section 27.5.2 describes the streambuf classes this way: </p> <blockquote> @@ -3502,27 +3505,27 @@ specialized for the type wchar_t. </p> <p>It doesn't seem this was intended, since Section 27.5 has them declared as typedefs. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Remove 27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> paragraphs 2 and 3 (the above two +<p>Remove 27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> paragraphs 2 and 3 (the above two sentences). </p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The <tt>streambuf</tt> synopsis already has a declaration for the typedefs and that is sufficient. </p> <hr> -<a name="123"><h3>123. Should valarray helper arrays fill functions be const?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a>, 26.3.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.fill"> [lib.gslice.array.fill]</a>, 26.3.8.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.fill"> [lib.mask.array.fill]</a>, 26.3.9.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.fill"> [lib.indirect.array.fill]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998 </p> +<a name="123"><h3>123. Should valarray helper arrays fill functions be const?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a>, 26.3.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.fill"> [lib.gslice.array.fill]</a>, 26.3.8.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.fill"> [lib.mask.array.fill]</a>, 26.3.9.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.fill"> [lib.indirect.array.fill]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998 </p> <p>One of the operator= in the valarray helper arrays is const and one is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section -26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a> is const: </p> +26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a> is const: </p> <p> <tt>void operator=(const valarray<T>&) const;</tt> </p> -<p>but this one in Section 26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a> is not: </p> +<p>but this one in Section 26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a> is not: </p> <p> <tt>void operator=(const T&); </tt></p> <p>The description of the semantics for these two functions is similar. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> Template class slice_array</p> +<p>26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> Template class slice_array</p> <blockquote> <p>In the class template definition for slice_array, replace the member @@ -3534,7 +3537,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section </pre> </blockquote> -<p>26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a> slice_array fill function</p> +<p>26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a> slice_array fill function</p> <blockquote> <p>Change the function declaration</p> @@ -3545,7 +3548,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section </pre> </blockquote> -<p>26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> Template class gslice_array</p> +<p>26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> Template class gslice_array</p> <blockquote> <p>In the class template definition for gslice_array, replace the member @@ -3557,7 +3560,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section </pre> </blockquote> -<p>26.3.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.fill"> [lib.gslice.array.fill]</a> gslice_array fill function</p> +<p>26.3.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.fill"> [lib.gslice.array.fill]</a> gslice_array fill function</p> <blockquote> <p>Change the function declaration</p> @@ -3568,7 +3571,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section </pre> </blockquote> -<p>26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> Template class mask_array</p> +<p>26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> Template class mask_array</p> <blockquote> <p>In the class template definition for mask_array, replace the member @@ -3580,19 +3583,18 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section </pre> </blockquote> -<p>26.3.8.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.fill"> [lib.mask.array.fill]</a> mask_array fill function</p> +<p>26.3.8.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.fill"> [lib.mask.array.fill]</a> mask_array fill function</p> <blockquote> <p>Change the function declaration</p> - <pre> - void operator=(const T&); + <pre> void operator=(const T&); </pre> <p>to</p> <pre> void operator=(const T&) const; </pre> </blockquote> -<p>26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a> Template class indirect_array</p> +<p>26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a> Template class indirect_array</p> <blockquote> <p>In the class template definition for indirect_array, replace the member @@ -3604,7 +3606,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section </pre> </blockquote> -<p>26.3.9.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.fill"> [lib.indirect.array.fill]</a> indirect_array fill function</p> +<p>26.3.9.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.fill"> [lib.indirect.array.fill]</a> indirect_array fill function</p> <blockquote> <p>Change the function declaration</p> @@ -3620,32 +3622,32 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>There's no good reason for one version of operator= being const and -another one not. Because of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, this now +another one not. Because of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, this now matters: these functions are now callable in more circumstances. In many existing implementations, both versions are already const.</p> <hr> -<a name="124"><h3>124. ctype_byname<charT>::do_scan_is & do_scan_not return type should be const charT*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> -<p>In Section 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a> +<a name="124"><h3>124. ctype_byname<charT>::do_scan_is & do_scan_not return type should be const charT*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> +<p>In Section 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a> ctype_byname<charT>::do_scan_is() and do_scan_not() are declared to return a const char* not a const charT*. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change Section 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a> <tt>do_scan_is()</tt> and +<p>Change Section 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a> <tt>do_scan_is()</tt> and <tt>do_scan_not()</tt> to return a <tt> const charT*</tt>. </p> <hr> -<a name="125"><h3>125. valarray<T>::operator!() return type is inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> -<p>In Section 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> valarray<T>::operator!() is -declared to return a valarray<T>, but in Section 26.3.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.unary"> [lib.valarray.unary]</a> it is declared to return a valarray<bool>. The +<a name="125"><h3>125. valarray<T>::operator!() return type is inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> +<p>In Section 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> valarray<T>::operator!() is +declared to return a valarray<T>, but in Section 26.3.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.unary"> [lib.valarray.unary]</a> it is declared to return a valarray<bool>. The latter appears to be correct. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change in Section 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> the declaration of +<p>Change in Section 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> the declaration of <tt>operator!()</tt> so that the return type is <tt>valarray<bool></tt>. </p> <hr> -<a name="126"><h3>126. typos in Effects clause of ctype::do_narrow()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> +<a name="126"><h3>126. typos in Effects clause of ctype::do_narrow()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 1998</p> <p>Typos in 22.2.1.1.2 need to be fixed.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In Section 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> change: </p> +<p>In Section 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> change: </p> <pre> do_widen(do_narrow(c),0) == c</pre> @@ -3661,7 +3663,7 @@ latter appears to be correct. </p> <pre> (is(M,c) || !ctc.is(M, do_narrow(c,dfault)) )</pre> <hr> -<a name="127"><h3>127. auto_ptr<> conversion issues</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Greg Colvin <b>Date:</b> 17 Feb 1999</p> +<a name="127"><h3>127. auto_ptr<> conversion issues</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Greg Colvin <b>Date:</b> 17 Feb 1999</p> <p>There are two problems with the current <tt>auto_ptr</tt> wording in the standard: </p> @@ -3698,23 +3700,23 @@ object parameter may be bound to an rvalue [13.3.3.1.4/3] <p>Tokyo: The LWG removed the following from the proposed resolution:</p> - <p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, and 20.4.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr.conv"> [lib.auto.ptr.conv]</a>, + <p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, and 20.4.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr.conv"> [lib.auto.ptr.conv]</a>, paragraph 2, make the conversion to auto_ptr_ref const:</p> <blockquote> <pre>template<class Y> operator auto_ptr_ref<Y>() const throw();</pre> </blockquote> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, move +<p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, move the <tt>auto_ptr_ref</tt> definition to namespace scope.</p> -<p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, add +<p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, add a public assignment operator to the <tt>auto_ptr</tt> definition: </p> <blockquote> <pre>auto_ptr& operator=(auto_ptr_ref<X> r) throw();</pre> </blockquote> -<p>Also add the assignment operator to 20.4.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr.conv"> [lib.auto.ptr.conv]</a>: </p> +<p>Also add the assignment operator to 20.4.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr.conv"> [lib.auto.ptr.conv]</a>: </p> <blockquote> <pre>auto_ptr& operator=(auto_ptr_ref<X> r) throw()</pre> @@ -3725,7 +3727,7 @@ a public assignment operator to the <tt>auto_ptr</tt> definition: </p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="129"><h3>129. Need error indication from seekp() and seekg()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, 27.6.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.seeks"> [lib.ostream.seeks]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 22 Feb 1999</p> +<a name="129"><h3>129. Need error indication from seekp() and seekg()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, 27.6.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.seeks"> [lib.ostream.seeks]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 22 Feb 1999</p> <p>Currently, the standard does not specify how seekg() and seekp() indicate failure. They are not required to set failbit, and they can't return an error indication because they must return *this, i.e. the @@ -3738,8 +3740,8 @@ stream must perform a state-dependent code conversion, etc. </p> stream state in case of failure.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Add to the Effects: clause of seekg() in -27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> and to the Effects: clause of seekp() in -27.6.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.seeks"> [lib.ostream.seeks]</a>: </p> +27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> and to the Effects: clause of seekp() in +27.6.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.seeks"> [lib.ostream.seeks]</a>: </p> <blockquote> <p>In case of failure, the function calls <tt>setstate(failbit)</tt> (which may throw <tt>ios_base::failure</tt>). @@ -3748,7 +3750,7 @@ stream state in case of failure.</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Setting failbit is the usual error reporting mechanism for streams</p> <hr> -<a name="132"></a><h3><a name="132">132. list::resize description uses random access iterators</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.capacity"> [lib.list.capacity]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 6 Mar 1999</p> +<a name="132"><h3>132. list::resize description uses random access iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.capacity"> [lib.list.capacity]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 6 Mar 1999</p> <p>The description reads:</p> <p>-1- Effects:</p> @@ -3779,22 +3781,22 @@ stream state in case of failure.</p> with David Abrahams. They had a discussion and believe there is no issue of exception safety with the proposed resolution.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="133"><h3>133. map missing get_allocator()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 6 Mar 1999</p> +<a name="133"><h3>133. map missing get_allocator()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 6 Mar 1999</p> <p>The title says it all.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Insert in 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, paragraph 2, +<p>Insert in 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, paragraph 2, after operator= in the map declaration:</p> <pre> allocator_type get_allocator() const;</pre> <hr> -<a name="134"><h3>134. vector constructors over specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.cons"> [lib.vector.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 6 Mar 1999</p> +<a name="134"><h3>134. vector constructors over specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.cons"> [lib.vector.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 6 Mar 1999</p> <p>The complexity description says: "It does at most 2N calls to the copy constructor of T and logN reallocations if they are just input iterators ...".</p> <p>This appears to be overly restrictive, dictating the precise memory/performance tradeoff for the implementor.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 23.2.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.cons"> [lib.vector.cons]</a>, paragraph 1 to:</p> +<p>Change 23.2.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.cons"> [lib.vector.cons]</a>, paragraph 1 to:</p> <p>-1- Complexity: The constructor template <class InputIterator> vector(InputIterator first, InputIterator last) @@ -3809,7 +3811,7 @@ order logN reallocations if they are just input iterators. is greater than or equal to 2. </p> <hr> -<a name="136"><h3>136. seekp, seekg setting wrong streams?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 6 Mar 1999</p> +<a name="136"><h3>136. seekp, seekg setting wrong streams?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 6 Mar 1999</p> <p>I may be misunderstanding the intent, but should not seekg set only the input stream and seekp set only the output stream? The description seems to say that each should set both input and output streams. If @@ -3870,8 +3872,8 @@ This requirement is a bit weird. There's no similar requirement for basic_streambuf<>::seekpos, or for basic_filebuf<>::seekoff or basic_filebuf<>::seekpos.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="137"><h3>137. Do use_facet and has_facet look in the global locale?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 17 Mar 1999</p> -<p>Section 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> says:</p> +<a name="137"><h3>137. Do use_facet and has_facet look in the global locale?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 17 Mar 1999</p> +<p>Section 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> says:</p> <p>-4- In the call to use_facet<Facet>(loc), the type argument chooses a facet, making available all members of the named type. If @@ -3881,7 +3883,7 @@ check if a locale implements a particular facet with the template function has_facet<Facet>(). </p> <p>This contradicts the specification given in section -22.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.global.templates"> [lib.locale.global.templates]</a>: +22.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.global.templates"> [lib.locale.global.templates]</a>: <br><br> template <class Facet> const Facet& use_facet(const locale& loc); <br> @@ -3898,7 +3900,7 @@ from section 22.1.1. </p> <p>Needed for consistency with the way locales are handled elsewhere in the standard.</p> <hr> -<a name="139"><h3>139. Optional sequence operation table description unclear</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 30 Mar 1999</p> +<a name="139"><h3>139. Optional sequence operation table description unclear</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 30 Mar 1999</p> <p>The sentence introducing the Optional sequence operation table (23.1.1 paragraph 12) has two problems:</p> @@ -3921,7 +3923,7 @@ with:</p> amortized constant time.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="141"><h3>141. basic_string::find_last_of, find_last_not_of say pos instead of xpos</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::find.last.of"> [lib.string::find.last.of]</a>, 21.3.6.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::find.last.not.of"> [lib.string::find.last.not.of]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Arch Robison <b>Date:</b> 28 Apr 1999</p> +<a name="141"><h3>141. basic_string::find_last_of, find_last_not_of say pos instead of xpos</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::find.last.of"> [lib.string::find.last.of]</a>, 21.3.6.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::find.last.not.of"> [lib.string::find.last.not.of]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Arch Robison <b>Date:</b> 28 Apr 1999</p> <p>Sections 21.3.6.4 paragraph 1 and 21.3.6.6 paragraph 1 surely have misprints where they say:<br> <br> @@ -3940,7 +3942,7 @@ proposed resolution.]</i></p> <tt><br> </tt>— <tt>xpos <= pos</tt> and <tt>xpos < size();</tt></p> <hr> -<a name="142"><h3>142. lexicographical_compare complexity wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.lex.comparison"> [lib.alg.lex.comparison]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 20 Jun 1999</p> +<a name="142"><h3>142. lexicographical_compare complexity wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.lex.comparison"> [lib.alg.lex.comparison]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 20 Jun 1999</p> <p>The lexicographical_compare complexity is specified as:<br> <br> "At most min((last1 - first1), (last2 - first2)) @@ -3953,7 +3955,7 @@ equality you have to check both < and >? Yes, IMO you are right! (and Matt states this complexity in his book)</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 25.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.lex.comparison"> [lib.alg.lex.comparison]</a> complexity to:</p> +<p>Change 25.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.lex.comparison"> [lib.alg.lex.comparison]</a> complexity to:</p> <blockquote> At most <tt>2*min((last1 - first1), (last2 - first2))</tt> applications of the corresponding comparison. @@ -3973,7 +3975,7 @@ right! (and Matt states this complexity in his book)</p> --end example] </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="144"><h3>144. Deque constructor complexity wrong </h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.deque.cons"> [lib.deque.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Herb Sutter <b>Date:</b> 9 May 1999</p> +<a name="144"><h3>144. Deque constructor complexity wrong </h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.deque.cons"> [lib.deque.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Herb Sutter <b>Date:</b> 9 May 1999</p> <p>In 23.2.1.1 paragraph 6, the deque ctor that takes an iterator range appears to have complexity requirements which are incorrect, and which contradict the complexity requirements for insert(). I suspect that the text in question, @@ -4004,7 +4006,7 @@ typo):</p> <p>Complexity: Makes last - first calls to the copy constructor of T.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="146"><h3>146. complex<T> Inserter and Extractor need sentries</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.ops"> [lib.complex.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 12 May 1999</p> +<a name="146"><h3>146. complex<T> Inserter and Extractor need sentries</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.ops"> [lib.complex.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 12 May 1999</p> <p>The <u> extractor</u> for complex numbers is specified as: </p> <blockquote> @@ -4061,7 +4063,7 @@ consistency with the other inserters and extractors in the library. Regarding the issue of padding in the inserter, I don't know what the intent was. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>After 26.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.ops"> [lib.complex.ops]</a> paragraph 14 (operator>>), add a +<p>After 26.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.ops"> [lib.complex.ops]</a> paragraph 14 (operator>>), add a Notes clause:</p> <blockquote> @@ -4078,7 +4080,7 @@ follows an "all-or-none" rule.</p> <p>For inserters, the LWG believes there is no defect; the standard is correct as written.</p> <hr> -<a name="147"><h3>147. Library Intro refers to global functions that aren't global</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Lois Goldthwaite <b>Date:</b> 4 Jun 1999</p> +<a name="147"><h3>147. Library Intro refers to global functions that aren't global</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Lois Goldthwaite <b>Date:</b> 4 Jun 1999</p> <p>The library had many global functions until 17.4.1.1 [lib.contents] paragraph 2 was added: </p> @@ -4141,22 +4143,22 @@ Because operator new and delete are global, the proposed resolution was changed from "non-member" to "global or non-member. </p> <hr> -<a name="148"><h3>148. Functions in the example facet BoolNames should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Jeremy Siek <b>Date:</b> 3 Jun 1999</p> -<p>In 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 13, the do_truename() and +<a name="148"><h3>148. Functions in the example facet BoolNames should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Jeremy Siek <b>Date:</b> 3 Jun 1999</p> +<p>In 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 13, the do_truename() and do_falsename() functions in the example facet BoolNames should be const. The functions they are overriding in numpunct_byname<char> are const. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 13, insert "const" in +<p>In 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 13, insert "const" in two places:</p> <blockquote> <p><tt>string do_truename() const { return "Oui Oui!"; }<br> string do_falsename() const { return "Mais Non!"; }</tt></p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="150"><h3>150. Find_first_of says integer instead of iterator </h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find.first.of"> [lib.alg.find.first.of]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt McClure <b>Date:</b> 30 Jun 1999</p> +<a name="150"><h3>150. Find_first_of says integer instead of iterator </h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find.first.of"> [lib.alg.find.first.of]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt McClure <b>Date:</b> 30 Jun 1999</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 25.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find.first.of"> [lib.alg.find.first.of]</a> paragraph 2 from:</p> +<p>Change 25.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find.first.of"> [lib.alg.find.first.of]</a> paragraph 2 from:</p> <blockquote> <p>Returns: The first iterator i in the range [first1, last1) such @@ -4170,7 +4172,7 @@ that for some <u>integer</u> j in the range [first2, last2) ...</p> that for some iterator j in the range [first2, last2) ...</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="151"><h3>151. Can't currently clear() empty container</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ed Brey <b>Date:</b> 21 Jun 1999</p> +<a name="151"><h3>151. Can't currently clear() empty container</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ed Brey <b>Date:</b> 21 Jun 1999</p> <p>For both sequences and associative containers, a.clear() has the semantics of erase(a.begin(),a.end()), which is undefined for an empty container since erase(q1,q2) requires that q1 be dereferenceable @@ -4206,13 +4208,13 @@ iterators or certain kinds of iterators is unnecessary. <u>into a</u></p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="152"><h3>152. Typo in <tt>scan_is()</tt> semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +<a name="152"><h3>152. Typo in <tt>scan_is()</tt> semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>The semantics of <tt>scan_is()</tt> (paragraphs 4 and 6) is not exactly described because there is no function <tt>is()</tt> which only takes a character as argument. Also, in the effects clause (paragraph 3), the semantic is also kept vague.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> paragraphs 4 and 6, change the returns +<p>In 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> paragraphs 4 and 6, change the returns clause from:</p> <blockquote> <p>"... such that <tt>is(*p)</tt> @@ -4221,7 +4223,7 @@ would..."</p> <p>to: "... such that <tt>is(m, *p)</tt> would...."</p> <hr> -<a name="153"><h3>153. Typo in <tt>narrow()</tt> semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +<a name="153"><h3>153. Typo in <tt>narrow()</tt> semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>The description of the array version of <tt>narrow()</tt> (in paragraph 11) is flawed: There is no member <tt>do_narrow()</tt> which takes only three arguments because in addition to the range a default @@ -4232,7 +4234,7 @@ two signatures followed by a <b>Returns</b> clause that only addresses one of them.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change the returns clause in 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a> +<p>Change the returns clause in 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a> paragraph 10 from:</p> <p> Returns: do_widen(low, high, to).</p> @@ -4240,7 +4242,7 @@ paragraph 10 from:</p> <p> Returns: do_widen(c) or do_widen(low, high, to), respectively.</p> -<p>Change 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a> paragraph 10 and 11 from:</p> +<p>Change 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a> paragraph 10 and 11 from:</p> <pre> char narrow(char c, char /*dfault*/) const; const char* narrow(const char* low, const char* high, char /*dfault*/, char* to) const;</pre> @@ -4262,48 +4264,48 @@ version..." comment above. Perhaps it was a circuitous way of saying "dfault" needed to be uncommented?]</i></p> <p><i>[Post-Toronto: the issues list maintainer has merged in the -proposed resolution from issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#207">207</a>, which addresses the +proposed resolution from issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#207">207</a>, which addresses the same paragraphs.]</i></p> <hr> <a name="154"><h3>154. Missing <tt>double</tt> specifier for <tt>do_get()</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>The table in paragraph 7 for the length modifier does not list the length modifier <tt>l</tt> to be applied if the type is <tt>double</tt>. Thus, the standard asks the implementation to do undefined things when using <tt>scanf()</tt> (the missing length modifier for <tt>scanf()</tt> when scanning <tt>double</tt>s is actually a problem I found quite often in production code, too).</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 7, add a row in the Length +<p>In 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 7, add a row in the Length Modifier table to say that for <tt>double</tt> a length modifier <tt>l</tt> is to be used.</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The standard makes an embarrassing beginner's mistake.</p> <hr> <a name="155"><h3>155. Typo in naming the class defining the class <tt>Init</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>There are conflicting statements about where the class -<tt>Init</tt> is defined. According to 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> paragraph 2 -it is defined as <tt>basic_ios::Init</tt>, according to 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> it is defined as <tt>ios_base::Init</tt>.</p> +<tt>Init</tt> is defined. According to 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> paragraph 2 +it is defined as <tt>basic_ios::Init</tt>, according to 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> it is defined as <tt>ios_base::Init</tt>.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> paragraph 2 from +<p>Change 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> paragraph 2 from "<tt>basic_ios::Init"</tt> to "<tt>ios_base::Init"</tt>.</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Although not strictly wrong, the standard was misleading enough to warrant the change.</p> <hr> -<a name="156"><h3>156. Typo in <tt>imbue()</tt> description</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +<a name="156"><h3>156. Typo in <tt>imbue()</tt> description</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>There is a small discrepancy between the declarations of -<tt>imbue()</tt>: in 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> the argument is passed as -<tt>locale const&</tt> (correct), in 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> it +<tt>imbue()</tt>: in 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> the argument is passed as +<tt>locale const&</tt> (correct), in 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> it is passed as <tt>locale const</tt> (wrong).</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> change the <tt>imbue</tt> argument +<p>In 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> change the <tt>imbue</tt> argument from "<tt>locale const" to "locale const&".</tt></p> <hr> <a name="158"><h3>158. Underspecified semantics for <tt>setbuf()</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>The default behavior of <tt>setbuf()</tt> is described only for the situation that <tt>gptr() != 0 && gptr() != egptr()</tt>: namely to do nothing. What has to be done in other situations @@ -4315,11 +4317,11 @@ buffer management of derived classes unless these classes do it themselves, the default behavior of <tt>setbuf()</tt> should always be to do nothing.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 3, Default behavior, +<p>Change 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 3, Default behavior, to: "Default behavior: Does nothing. Returns this."</p> <hr> -<a name="159"></a><h3><a name="159">159. Strange use of <tt>underflow()</tt> -</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.get"> [lib.streambuf.virt.get]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +<a name="159"><h3>159. Strange use of <tt>underflow()</tt> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.get"> [lib.streambuf.virt.get]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>The description of the meaning of the result of <tt>showmanyc()</tt> seems to be rather strange: It uses calls to <tt>underflow()</tt>. Using <tt>underflow()</tt> is strange because @@ -4327,19 +4329,19 @@ this function only reads the current character but does not extract it, <tt>uflow()</tt> would extract the current character. This should be fixed to use <tt>sbumpc()</tt> instead.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 27.5.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.get"> [lib.streambuf.virt.get]</a> paragraph 1, +<p>Change 27.5.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.get"> [lib.streambuf.virt.get]</a> paragraph 1, <tt>showmanyc()</tt>returns clause, by replacing the word "supplied" with the words "extracted from the stream".</p> <hr> <a name="160"><h3>160. Typo: Use of non-existing function <tt>exception()</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>The paragraph 4 refers to the function <tt>exception()</tt> which is not defined. Probably, the referred function is <tt>basic_ios<>::exceptions()</tt>.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a>, 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, paragraph 1, -27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, paragraph 3, and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>, +<p>In 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a>, 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, paragraph 1, +27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, paragraph 3, and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>, paragraph 1, change "<tt>exception()" to "exceptions()"</tt>.</p> @@ -4347,12 +4349,12 @@ paragraph 1, change "<tt>exception()" to is the correct spelling.]</i></p> <hr> <a name="161"><h3>161. Typo: <tt>istream_iterator</tt> vs. <tt>istreambuf_iterator</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>The note in the second paragraph pretends that the first argument is an object of type <tt>istream_iterator</tt>. This is wrong: It is an object of type <tt>istreambuf_iterator</tt>.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> from:</p> +<p>Change 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> from:</p> <blockquote> <p>The first argument provides an object of the istream_iterator class...</p> </blockquote> @@ -4361,8 +4363,8 @@ an object of type <tt>istreambuf_iterator</tt>.</p> <p>The first argument provides an object of the istreambuf_iterator class...</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="164"><h3>164. do_put() has apparently unused fill argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> -<p>In 22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a> the do_put() function is specified +<a name="164"><h3>164. do_put() has apparently unused fill argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> +<p>In 22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a> the do_put() function is specified as taking a fill character as an argument, but the description of the function does not say whether the character is used at all and, if so, in which way. The same holds for any format control parameters that @@ -4372,7 +4374,7 @@ character in any way? In any case, the specification of time_put.do_put() looks inconsistent to me.<br> <br> Is the signature of do_put() wrong, or is the effects clause incomplete?</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add the following note after 22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a> +<p>Add the following note after 22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a> paragraph 2:</p> <blockquote> <p> [Note: the <tt>fill</tt> argument may be used in the implementation-defined formats, or by derivations. A space character is a reasonable default @@ -4383,7 +4385,7 @@ paragraph 2:</p> users need some guidance on what to pass for the <tt>fill</tt> argument since the standard doesn't say how it's used.</p> <hr> -<a name="165"><h3>165. <tt>xsputn()</tt>, <tt>pubsync()</tt> never called by <tt>basic_ostream</tt> members?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +<a name="165"><h3>165. <tt>xsputn()</tt>, <tt>pubsync()</tt> never called by <tt>basic_ostream</tt> members?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>Paragraph 2 explicitly states that none of the <tt>basic_ostream</tt> functions falling into one of the groups "formatted output functions" and "unformatted output functions" calls any stream buffer function @@ -4430,7 +4432,7 @@ called from what functions and eg to state specifically that flush() is allowed to call sync() while other functions are not.]</i></p> <hr> <a name="167"><h3>167. Improper use of <tt>traits_type::length()</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>Paragraph 4 states that the length is determined using <tt>traits::length(s)</tt>. Unfortunately, this function is not defined for example if the character type is <tt>wchar_t</tt> and the @@ -4439,7 +4441,7 @@ the character type is <tt>char</tt> and the type of <tt>s</tt> is either <tt>signed char const*</tt> or <tt>unsigned char const*</tt>.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> paragraph 4 from:</p> +<p>Change 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> paragraph 4 from:</p> <blockquote> <p>Effects: Behaves like an formatted inserter (as described in lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts) of out. After a sentry object is @@ -4494,12 +4496,12 @@ traits class for some arbitrary charT type, and we somehow have to deal with a const char*. There's nothing better to do but fall back to char_traits<char></p> <hr> -<a name="168"><h3>168. Typo: formatted vs. unformatted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +<a name="168"><h3>168. Typo: formatted vs. unformatted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>The first paragraph begins with a descriptions what has to be done in <i>formatted</i> output functions. Probably this is a typo and the paragraph really want to describe unformatted output functions...</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 1, the first and last +<p>In 27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 1, the first and last sentences, change the word "formatted" to "unformatted":</p> <blockquote> @@ -4508,18 +4510,18 @@ sentences, change the word "formatted" to function."</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="169"><h3>169. Bad efficiency of <tt>overflow()</tt> mandated</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +<a name="169"><h3>169. Bad efficiency of <tt>overflow()</tt> mandated</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> <p>Paragraph 8, Notes, of this section seems to mandate an extremely inefficient way of buffer handling for <tt>basic_stringbuf</tt>, especially in view of the restriction that <tt>basic_ostream</tt> -member functions are not allowed to use <tt>xsputn()</tt> (see 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>): For each character to be inserted, a new buffer +member functions are not allowed to use <tt>xsputn()</tt> (see 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>): For each character to be inserted, a new buffer is to be created.</p> <p>Of course, the resolution below requires some handling of simultaneous input and output since it is no longer possible to update <tt>egptr()</tt> whenever <tt>epptr()</tt> is changed. A possible solution is to handle this in <tt>underflow()</tt>.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 8, Notes, insert the words +<p>In 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 8, Notes, insert the words "at least" as in the following:</p> <blockquote> <p>To make a write position available, the function reallocates (or initially @@ -4529,23 +4531,23 @@ solution is to handle this in <tt>underflow()</tt>.</p> </blockquote> <hr> <a name="170"><h3>170. Inconsistent definition of <tt>traits_type</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> -<p>The classes <tt>basic_stringstream</tt> (27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a>), -<tt>basic_istringstream</tt> (27.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istringstream"> [lib.istringstream]</a>), and -<tt>basic_ostringstream</tt> (27.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostringstream"> [lib.ostringstream]</a>) are inconsistent +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +<p>The classes <tt>basic_stringstream</tt> (27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a>), +<tt>basic_istringstream</tt> (27.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istringstream"> [lib.istringstream]</a>), and +<tt>basic_ostringstream</tt> (27.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostringstream"> [lib.ostringstream]</a>) are inconsistent in their definition of the type <tt>traits_type</tt>: For <tt>istringstream</tt>, this type is defined, for the other two it is not. This should be consistent.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>To the declarations of -<tt>basic_ostringstream</tt> (27.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostringstream"> [lib.ostringstream]</a>) and -<tt>basic_stringstream</tt> (27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a>) add:</p> +<tt>basic_ostringstream</tt> (27.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostringstream"> [lib.ostringstream]</a>) and +<tt>basic_stringstream</tt> (27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a>) add:</p> <blockquote> <pre>typedef traits traits_type;</pre> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="171"><h3>171. Strange <tt>seekpos()</tt> semantics due to joint position</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> -<p>Overridden virtual functions, seekpos()</p> <p>In 27.8.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf"> [lib.filebuf]</a> paragraph 3, it is stated that a joint input and +<a name="171"><h3>171. Strange <tt>seekpos()</tt> semantics due to joint position</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Jul 1999</p> +<p>Overridden virtual functions, seekpos()</p> <p>In 27.8.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf"> [lib.filebuf]</a> paragraph 3, it is stated that a joint input and output position is maintained by <tt>basic_filebuf</tt>. Still, the description of <tt>seekpos()</tt> seems to talk about different file positions. In particular, it is unclear (at least to me) what is @@ -4597,17 +4599,17 @@ paragraph 14 from:</p> <p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Dietmar supplied the above wording.]</i></p> <hr> <a name="172"><h3>172. Inconsistent types for <tt>basic_istream::ignore()</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Greg Comeau, Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> -<p>In 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a> the function +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Greg Comeau, Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> +<p>In 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a> the function <tt>ignore()</tt> gets an object of type <tt>streamsize</tt> as first -argument. However, in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> +argument. However, in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 23 the first argument is of type <tt>int.</tt></p> <p>As far as I can see this is not really a contradiction because everything is consistent if <tt>streamsize</tt> is typedef to be <tt>int</tt>. However, this is almost certainly not what was intended. The same thing happened to <tt>basic_filebuf::setbuf()</tt>, -as described in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#173">173</a>.</p> +as described in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#173">173</a>.</p> <p>Darin Adler also submitted this issue, commenting: Either 27.6.1.1 should be modified @@ -4615,17 +4617,17 @@ to show a first parameter of type int, or 27.6.1.3 should be modified to show a first parameter of type streamsize and use numeric_limits<streamsize>::max.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 23 and 24, change both uses +<p>In 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 23 and 24, change both uses of <tt>int</tt> in the description of <tt>ignore()</tt> to <tt>streamsize</tt>.</p> <hr> <a name="173"><h3>173. Inconsistent types for <tt>basic_filebuf::setbuf()</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Greg Comeau, Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Greg Comeau, Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> <p> -In 27.8.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf"> [lib.filebuf]</a> the function <tt>setbuf()</tt> gets an +In 27.8.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf"> [lib.filebuf]</a> the function <tt>setbuf()</tt> gets an object of type <tt>streamsize</tt> as second argument. However, in -27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 9 the second argument is of type +27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 9 the second argument is of type <tt>int</tt>. </p> @@ -4634,25 +4636,25 @@ As far as I can see this is not really a contradiction because everything is consistent if <tt>streamsize</tt> is typedef to be <tt>int</tt>. However, this is almost certainly not what was intended. The same thing happened to <tt>basic_istream::ignore()</tt>, -as described in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#172">172</a>. +as described in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#172">172</a>. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 9, change all uses of +<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 9, change all uses of <tt>int</tt> in the description of <tt>setbuf()</tt> to <tt>streamsize</tt>.</p> <hr> <a name="174"><h3>174. Typo: <tt>OFF_T</tt> vs. <tt>POS_T</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> <p>According to paragraph 1 of this section, <tt>streampos</tt> is the type <tt>OFF_T</tt>, the same type as <tt>streamoff</tt>. However, in paragraph 6 the <tt>streampos</tt> gets the type <tt>POS_T</tt></p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 1 from "<tt>typedef +<p>Change D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 1 from "<tt>typedef OFF_T streampos;</tt>" to "<tt>typedef POS_T streampos;</tt>"</p> <hr> -<a name="175"><h3>175. Ambiguity for <tt>basic_streambuf::pubseekpos()</tt> and a few other functions.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> +<a name="175"><h3>175. Ambiguity for <tt>basic_streambuf::pubseekpos()</tt> and a few other functions.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> <p>According to paragraph 8 of this section, the methods <tt>basic_streambuf::pubseekpos()</tt>, <tt>basic_ifstream::open()</tt>, and <tt>basic_ofstream::open</tt> @@ -4665,23 +4667,23 @@ three cases. However, this generates an ambiguity with the overloaded version because now the arguments are absolutely identical if the last argument is not specified.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 8, remove the default arguments for +<p>In D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 8, remove the default arguments for <tt>basic_streambuf::pubseekpos()</tt>, <tt>basic_ifstream::open()</tt>, and <tt>basic_ofstream::open().</tt></p> <hr> -<a name="176"><h3>176. <tt>exceptions()</tt> in <tt>ios_base</tt>...?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> +<a name="176"><h3>176. <tt>exceptions()</tt> in <tt>ios_base</tt>...?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 1999</p> <p>The "overload" for the function <tt>exceptions()</tt> in paragraph 8 gives the impression that there is another function of this function defined in class <tt>ios_base</tt>. However, this is not the case. Thus, it is hard to tell how the semantics (paragraph 9) can be implemented: "Call the corresponding member function specified -in clause 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>."</p> +in clause 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>."</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 8, move the declaration of the +<p>In D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 8, move the declaration of the function <tt>exceptions()</tt>into class <tt>basic_ios</tt>.</p> <hr> -<a name="179"><h3>179. Comparison of const_iterators to iterators doesn't work</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 2 Jul 1998</p> +<a name="179"><h3>179. Comparison of const_iterators to iterators doesn't work</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 2 Jul 1998</p> <p>Currently the following will not compile on two well-known standard library implementations:</p> @@ -4754,7 +4756,7 @@ return i == ci; </p> </blockquote> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Insert this paragraph after 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 7:</p> +<p>Insert this paragraph after 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 7:</p> <blockquote> <p>In the expressions</p> <pre> i == j @@ -4785,10 +4787,10 @@ the nested types <tt>X::iterator</tt> and <tt>X::const_iterator</tt>, where <tt>X</tt> is a container. There is no requirement that <tt>X::reverse_iterator</tt> and <tt>X::const_reverse_iterator</tt> can be mixed. If mixing them is considered important, that's a -separate issue. (Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#280">280</a>.) +separate issue. (Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#280">280</a>.) </p> <hr> -<a name="181"><h3>181. make_pair() unintended behavior</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 3 Aug 1999</p> +<a name="181"><h3>181. make_pair() unintended behavior</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 3 Aug 1999</p> <p>The claim has surfaced in Usenet that expressions such as<br> <br> <tt>make_pair("abc", 3)</tt><br> @@ -4799,7 +4801,7 @@ parameter to <tt> const char (&)[4]</tt>, which type is uncopyable.<br> I doubt anyone intended that behavior... </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 20.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.utility"> [lib.utility]</a>, paragraph 1 change the following +<p>In 20.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.utility"> [lib.utility]</a>, paragraph 1 change the following declaration of make_pair():</p> <blockquote> <pre>template <class T1, class T2> pair<T1,T2> make_pair(const T1&, const T2&);</pre> @@ -4808,7 +4810,7 @@ declaration of make_pair():</p> <blockquote> <pre>template <class T1, class T2> pair<T1,T2> make_pair(T1, T2);</pre> </blockquote> -<p> In 20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a> paragraph 7 and the line before, change:</p> +<p> In 20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a> paragraph 7 and the line before, change:</p> <blockquote> <pre>template <class T1, class T2> pair<T1, T2> make_pair(const T1& x, const T2& y);</pre> @@ -4834,10 +4836,10 @@ suggestions, and any efficiency concerns were more than offset by the advantages of the solution. Two implementors reported that the proposed resolution passed their test suites.</p> <hr> -<a name="182"><h3>182. Ambiguous references to size_t</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Al Stevens <b>Date:</b> 15 Aug 1999</p> +<a name="182"><h3>182. Ambiguous references to size_t</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Al Stevens <b>Date:</b> 15 Aug 1999</p> <p>Many references to <tt> size_t</tt> throughout the document omit the <tt> std::</tt> namespace qualification.</p> <p>For -example, 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 2:</p> +example, 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 2:</p> <blockquote> <pre>— operator new(size_t) — operator new(size_t, const std::nothrow_t&) @@ -4845,7 +4847,7 @@ example, 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro — operator new[](size_t, const std::nothrow_t&)</pre> </blockquote> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p> In 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 2: replace:</p> +<p> In 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 2: replace:</p> <blockquote> <p><tt> - operator new(size_t)<br> - operator new(size_t, const std::nothrow_t&)<br> @@ -4920,7 +4922,7 @@ declaration of template <class charT> class ctype.<br> <p>The LWG believes correcting names like <tt>size_t</tt> and <tt>ptrdiff_t</tt> to <tt>std::size_t</tt> and <tt>std::ptrdiff_t</tt> to be essentially editorial. There there can't be another size_t or -ptrdiff_t meant anyway because, according to 17.4.3.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.extern.types"> [lib.extern.types]</a>,</p> +ptrdiff_t meant anyway because, according to 17.4.3.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.extern.types"> [lib.extern.types]</a>,</p> <blockquote> For each type T from the Standard C library, the types ::T and std::T @@ -4934,7 +4936,7 @@ Editor's authority to make this change.</p> <p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Nico Josuttis provided the above wording at the request of the LWG.]</i></p> -<p><i>[Toronto: This is tangentially related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>, but only tangentially: the intent of this issue is to +<p><i>[Toronto: This is tangentially related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>, but only tangentially: the intent of this issue is to address use of the name <tt>size_t</tt> in contexts outside of namespace std, such as in the description of <tt>::operator new</tt>. The proposed changes should be reviewed to make sure they are @@ -4944,8 +4946,8 @@ correct.]</i></p> them to be correct.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="183"><h3>183. I/O stream manipulators don't work for wide character streams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 7 Jul 1999</p> -<p>27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a> paragraph 3 says (clause numbering added for +<a name="183"><h3>183. I/O stream manipulators don't work for wide character streams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 7 Jul 1999</p> +<p>27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a> paragraph 3 says (clause numbering added for exposition):</p> <blockquote> <p>Returns: An object s of unspecified type such that if [1] out is an (instance @@ -4973,7 +4975,7 @@ ostreams.</p> that the value of the expression is "the same specialization of basic_ostream as out"&</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Replace section 27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a> except paragraph 1 with the +<p>Replace section 27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a> except paragraph 1 with the following:</p> <blockquote> <p>2- The type designated smanip in each of the following function @@ -5119,19 +5121,19 @@ in. <p><i>[Kona: Andy Sawyer and Beman Dawes will work to improve the wording of the proposed resolution.]</i></p> -<p><i>[Tokyo - The LWG noted that issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#216">216</a> involves +<p><i>[Tokyo - The LWG noted that issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#216">216</a> involves the same paragraphs.]</i></p> <p><i>[Post-Tokyo: The issues list maintainer combined the proposed -resolution of this issue with the proposed resolution for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#216">216</a> as they both involved the same paragraphs, and were so +resolution of this issue with the proposed resolution for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#216">216</a> as they both involved the same paragraphs, and were so intertwined that dealing with them separately appear fraught with error. The full text was supplied by Bill Plauger; it was cross checked against changes supplied by Andy Sawyer. It should be further checked by the LWG.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="184"><h3>184. numeric_limits<bool> wording problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.numeric.special"> [lib.numeric.special]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Gabriel Dos Reis <b>Date:</b> 21 Jul 1999</p> +<a name="184"><h3>184. numeric_limits<bool> wording problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.numeric.special"> [lib.numeric.special]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Gabriel Dos Reis <b>Date:</b> 21 Jul 1999</p> <p>bools are defined by the standard to be of integer types, as per -3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/basic.html#basic.fundamental"> [basic.fundamental]</a> paragraph 7. However "integer types" +3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/basic.html#basic.fundamental"> [basic.fundamental]</a> paragraph 7. However "integer types" seems to have a special meaning for the author of 18.2. The net effect is an unclear and confusing specification for numeric_limits<bool> as evidenced below.</p> @@ -5169,7 +5171,7 @@ types with base representation other than 2.</p> <p>Furthermore, numeric_limits<bool>::is_modulo and numeric_limits<bool>::is_signed have similar problems.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Append to the end of 18.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.numeric.special"> [lib.numeric.special]</a>:</p> +<p>Append to the end of 18.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.numeric.special"> [lib.numeric.special]</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>The specialization for bool shall be provided as follows:</p> <pre> namespace std { @@ -5221,8 +5223,8 @@ resolution.]</i></p> <p><i>[Post-Tokyo: At the request of the LWG in Tokyo, Nico Josuttis provided the above wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="185"><h3>185. Questionable use of term "inline"</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> UK Panel <b>Date:</b> 26 Jul 1999</p> -<p>Paragraph 4 of 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> says:</p> +<a name="185"><h3>185. Questionable use of term "inline"</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> UK Panel <b>Date:</b> 26 Jul 1999</p> +<p>Paragraph 4 of 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> says:</p> <blockquote> <p> [Example: To negate every element of a: transform(a.begin(), a.end(), a.begin(), negate<double>()); The corresponding functions will inline @@ -5247,17 +5249,17 @@ any "inlining" will take place in this case.</p> <p>Thus the example "mandates" behavior that is explicitly not required elsewhere.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 1, remove the sentence:</p> +<p>In 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 1, remove the sentence:</p> <blockquote> <p>They are important for the effective use of the library.</p> </blockquote> -<p>Remove 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 2, which reads:</p> +<p>Remove 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 2, which reads:</p> <blockquote> <p> Using function objects together with function templates increases the expressive power of the library as well as making the resulting code much more efficient.</p> </blockquote> -<p>In 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 4, remove the sentence:</p> +<p>In 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 4, remove the sentence:</p> <blockquote> <p>The corresponding functions will inline the addition and the negation.</p> @@ -5266,8 +5268,8 @@ not required elsewhere.</p> <p><i>[Kona: The LWG agreed there was a defect.]</i></p> <p><i>[Tokyo: The LWG crafted the proposed resolution.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="186"><h3>186. bitset::set() second parameter should be bool</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Darin Adler <b>Date:</b> 13 Aug 1999</p> -<p>In section 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>, paragraph 13 defines the +<a name="186"><h3>186. bitset::set() second parameter should be bool</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Darin Adler <b>Date:</b> 13 Aug 1999</p> +<p>In section 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>, paragraph 13 defines the bitset::set operation to take a second parameter of type int. The function tests whether this value is non-zero to determine whether to set the bit to true or false. The type of this second parameter should @@ -5277,7 +5279,7 @@ possible to slice an integer that's larger than an int. This can't happen with bool, since conversion to bool has the semantic of translating 0 to false and any non-zero value to true.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a> Para 1 Replace:</p> +<p>In 23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a> Para 1 Replace:</p> <blockquote> <pre>bitset<N>& set(size_t pos, int val = true ); </pre> </blockquote> @@ -5285,7 +5287,7 @@ translating 0 to false and any non-zero value to true.</p> <blockquote> <pre>bitset<N>& set(size_t pos, bool val = true );</pre> </blockquote> -<p>In 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> Para 12(.5) Replace:</p> +<p>In 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> Para 12(.5) Replace:</p> <blockquote> <pre>bitset<N>& set(size_t pos, int val = 1 );</pre> </blockquote> @@ -5304,7 +5306,7 @@ usually implemented as <tt>inline</tt>, and because it is already the case that users cannot rely on the type of a pointer to a nonvirtual member of a standard library class.</p> <hr> -<a name="187"><h3>187. iter_swap underspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 14 Aug 1999</p> +<a name="187"><h3>187. iter_swap underspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 14 Aug 1999</p> <p>The description of iter_swap in 25.2.2 paragraph 7,says that it ``exchanges the values'' of the objects to which two iterators refer.<br> <br> What it doesn't say is whether it does so using swap @@ -5360,7 +5362,7 @@ much more than exchanging the two iterators' values: it would change predecessor/successor relationships, possibly moving the iterator from one list to another. That would surely be inappropriate.</p> <hr> -<a name="189"><h3>189. setprecision() not specified correctly</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.state"> [lib.fmtflags.state]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 25 Aug 1999</p> +<a name="189"><h3>189. setprecision() not specified correctly</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.state"> [lib.fmtflags.state]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 25 Aug 1999</p> <p>27.4.2.2 paragraph 9 claims that setprecision() sets the precision, and includes a parenthetical note saying that it is the number of digits after the decimal point.<br> @@ -5373,10 +5375,10 @@ point.<br> I would like the committee to look at the definition carefully and correct the statement in 27.4.2.2</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Remove from 27.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.state"> [lib.fmtflags.state]</a>, paragraph 9, the text +<p>Remove from 27.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.state"> [lib.fmtflags.state]</a>, paragraph 9, the text "(number of digits after the decimal point)".</p> <hr> -<a name="193"><h3>193. Heap operations description incorrect</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.heap.operations"> [lib.alg.heap.operations]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Markus Mauhart <b>Date:</b> 24 Sep 1999</p> +<a name="193"><h3>193. Heap operations description incorrect</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.heap.operations"> [lib.alg.heap.operations]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Markus Mauhart <b>Date:</b> 24 Sep 1999</p> <p>25.3.6 [lib.alg.heap.operations] states two key properties of a heap [a,b), the first of them is<br> <br> @@ -5395,7 +5397,7 @@ could not be used for a priority queue as explained in 23.2.3.2.2 priority AND time).</p> </blockquote> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 25.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.heap.operations"> [lib.alg.heap.operations]</a> property (1) from:</p> +<p>Change 25.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.heap.operations"> [lib.alg.heap.operations]</a> property (1) from:</p> <blockquote> <p>(1) *a is the largest element</p> </blockquote> @@ -5404,16 +5406,16 @@ priority AND time).</p> <p>(1) There is no element greater than <tt>*a</tt></p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="195"><h3>195. Should <tt>basic_istream::sentry</tt>'s constructor ever set eofbit?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 13 Oct 1999</p> +<a name="195"></a><h3><a name="195">195. Should <tt>basic_istream::sentry</tt>'s constructor ever set eofbit?</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 13 Oct 1999</p> <p>Suppose that <tt>is.flags() & ios_base::skipws</tt> is nonzero. What should <tt>basic_istream<>::sentry</tt>'s constructor do if it reaches eof while skipping whitespace? 27.6.1.1.2/5 suggests it should set failbit. Should it set eofbit as well? The standard doesn't seem to answer that question.</p> -<p>On the one hand, nothing in 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> says that +<p>On the one hand, nothing in 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> says that <tt>basic_istream<>::sentry</tt> should ever set eofbit. On the -other hand, 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a> paragraph 4 says that if +other hand, 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a> paragraph 4 says that if extraction from a <tt>streambuf</tt> "returns <tt>traits::eof()</tt>, then the input function, except as explicitly noted otherwise, completes its actions and does @@ -5452,7 +5454,7 @@ returns <tt>traits::eof()</tt>, the function calls </p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="198"><h3>198. Validity of pointers and references unspecified after iterator destruction</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 3 Nov 1999</p> +<a name="198"><h3>198. Validity of pointers and references unspecified after iterator destruction</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 3 Nov 1999</p> <p> Is a pointer or reference obtained from an iterator still valid after destruction of the iterator? @@ -5499,14 +5501,14 @@ elements of containers.</p> <p>The standard itself assumes that pointers and references obtained from an iterator are still valid after iterator destruction or -change. The definition of reverse_iterator::operator*(), 24.4.1.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.op.star"> [lib.reverse.iter.op.star]</a>, which returns a reference, defines +change. The definition of reverse_iterator::operator*(), 24.4.1.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.op.star"> [lib.reverse.iter.op.star]</a>, which returns a reference, defines effects:</p> <blockquote> <pre>Iterator tmp = current; return *--tmp;</pre> </blockquote> -<p>The definition of reverse_iterator::operator->(), 24.4.1.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opref"> [lib.reverse.iter.opref]</a>, which returns a pointer, defines effects:</p> +<p>The definition of reverse_iterator::operator->(), 24.4.1.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opref"> [lib.reverse.iter.opref]</a>, which returns a pointer, defines effects:</p> <blockquote> <pre>return &(operator*());</pre> </blockquote> @@ -5517,13 +5519,13 @@ explicitly. This will also reduce the chance of user code breaking unexpectedly when porting to a different standard library implementation.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add a new paragraph to 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>:</p> +<p>Add a new paragraph to 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>:</p> <blockquote> Destruction of an iterator may invalidate pointers and references previously obtained from that iterator. </blockquote> -<p>Replace paragraph 1 of 24.4.1.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.op.star"> [lib.reverse.iter.op.star]</a> with:</p> +<p>Replace paragraph 1 of 24.4.1.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.op.star"> [lib.reverse.iter.op.star]</a> with:</p> <blockquote> <p><b>Effects:</b></p> @@ -5536,7 +5538,7 @@ previously obtained from that iterator. [<i>Note:</i> This operation must use an auxiliary member variable, rather than a temporary variable, to avoid returning a reference that persists beyond the lifetime of its associated iterator. (See -24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>.) The name of this member variable is shown for +24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>.) The name of this member variable is shown for exposition only. <i>--end note</i>] </p> </blockquote> @@ -5552,7 +5554,7 @@ reformulated yet again to reflect this reality.]</i></p> assumes its underlying iterator has persistent pointers and references. Andy Koenig pointed out that it is possible to rewrite reverse_iterator so that it no longer makes such an assupmption. -However, this issue is related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#299">299</a>. If we +However, this issue is related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#299">299</a>. If we decide it is intentional that <tt>p[n]</tt> may return by value instead of reference when <tt>p</tt> is a Random Access Iterator, other changes in reverse_iterator will be necessary.]</i></p> @@ -5575,7 +5577,7 @@ Clause 23 should be reviewed to make sure that guarantees for predefined iterators are as strong as users expect.</p> <hr> -<a name="199"><h3>199. What does <tt>allocate(0)</tt> return?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 19 Nov 1999</p> +<a name="199"><h3>199. What does <tt>allocate(0)</tt> return?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 19 Nov 1999</p> <p> Suppose that <tt>A</tt> is a class that conforms to the Allocator requirements of Table 32, and <tt>a</tt> is an @@ -5597,7 +5599,7 @@ representation. Since this already implies special case code, it would be over-specification to mandate the return value. </p> <hr> -<a name="200"><h3>200. Forward iterator requirements don't allow constant iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 19 Nov 1999</p> +<a name="200"><h3>200. Forward iterator requirements don't allow constant iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 19 Nov 1999</p> <p> In table 74, the return type of the expression <tt>*a</tt> is given as <tt>T&</tt>, where <tt>T</tt> is the iterator's value type. @@ -5619,7 +5621,7 @@ otherwise <tt>const U&</tt>". <p><i>[Tokyo: The LWG believes this is the tip of a larger iceberg; there are multiple const problems with the STL portion of the library and that these should be addressed as a single package. Note -that issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#180">180</a> has already been declared NAD Future for +that issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#180">180</a> has already been declared NAD Future for that very reason.]</i></p> <p><i>[Redmond: the LWG thinks this is separable from other constness @@ -5629,7 +5631,7 @@ modified: the original version only discussed *a. It was pointed out that we also need to worry about *r++ and a->m.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="202"><h3>202. unique() effects unclear when predicate not an equivalence relation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 13 Jan 2000</p> +<a name="202"><h3>202. unique() effects unclear when predicate not an equivalence relation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrew Koenig <b>Date:</b> 13 Jan 2000</p> <p> What should unique() do if you give it a predicate that is not an equivalence relation? There are at least two plausible answers: @@ -5696,7 +5698,7 @@ In fact, the SGI implementation of unique() does neither: It yields 1, 3, 7. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> paragraph 1 to:</p> +<p>Change 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> paragraph 1 to:</p> <blockquote> For a nonempty range, eliminates all but the first element from every consecutive group of equivalent elements referred to by the iterator @@ -5727,7 +5729,7 @@ require another round of review.]</i></p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The LWG also considered an alternative resolution: change -25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> paragraph 1 to:</p> +25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> paragraph 1 to:</p> <blockquote> For a nonempty range, eliminates all but the first element from every @@ -5750,7 +5752,7 @@ that the behavior of unique() for a non-equivalence relation is specified. Both resolutions are consistent with the behavior of existing implementations.</p> <hr> -<a name="208"><h3>208. Unnecessary restriction on past-the-end iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Stephen Cleary <b>Date:</b> 02 Feb 2000</p> +<a name="208"><h3>208. Unnecessary restriction on past-the-end iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Stephen Cleary <b>Date:</b> 02 Feb 2000</p> <p>In 24.1 paragraph 5, it is stated ". . . Dereferenceable and past-the-end values are always non-singular."</p> <p>This places an unnecessary restriction on past-the-end iterators for @@ -5762,7 +5764,7 @@ without a "footer" node.</p> <p>This would have an impact on existing code that expects past-the-end iterators obtained from different (generic) containers being not equal.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> paragraph 5, the last sentence, from:</p> +<p>Change 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> paragraph 5, the last sentence, from:</p> <blockquote> <p>Dereferenceable and past-the-end values are always non-singular.</p> </blockquote> @@ -5776,8 +5778,8 @@ zero-length vectors, null pointers are perfectly reasonable past-the-end iterators. Null pointers are singular. </p> <hr> -<a name="209"><h3>209. basic_string declarations inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Igor Stauder <b>Date:</b> 11 Feb 2000</p> -<p>In Section 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> the basic_string member function +<a name="209"></a><h3><a name="209">209. basic_string declarations inconsistent</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Igor Stauder <b>Date:</b> 11 Feb 2000</p> +<p>In Section 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> the basic_string member function declarations use a consistent style except for the following functions:</p> <blockquote> <pre>void push_back(const charT); @@ -5790,7 +5792,7 @@ not by reference - should be charT or const charT& )<br> - swap: redundant use of template parameters in argument basic_string<charT,traits,Allocator>&</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In Section 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> change the basic_string member +<p>In Section 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> change the basic_string member function declarations push_back, assign, and swap to:</p> <blockquote> <pre>void push_back(charT c); @@ -5805,8 +5807,8 @@ above. The LWG felt that this was sufficient reason to merit the change. </p> <hr> -<a name="210"><h3>210. distance first and last confused</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Lisa Lippincott <b>Date:</b> 15 Feb 2000</p> -<p>In paragraph 9 of section 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>, it is written:</p> +<a name="210"><h3>210. distance first and last confused</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Lisa Lippincott <b>Date:</b> 15 Feb 2000</p> +<p>In paragraph 9 of section 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>, it is written:</p> <blockquote> <p> In the description of the algorithms operators + and - are used for some of the iterator categories for which they do not have to @@ -5816,14 +5818,14 @@ change. <tt>return distance(a, b);</tt></p> </blockquote> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>On the last line of paragraph 9 of section 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> change +<p>On the last line of paragraph 9 of section 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> change <tt>"a-b"</tt> to <tt>"b-a".</tt></p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>There are two ways to fix the defect; change the description to b-a or change the return to distance(b,a). The LWG preferred the former for consistency.</p> <hr> -<a name="211"><h3>211. operator>>(istream&, string&) doesn't set failbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Scott Snyder <b>Date:</b> 4 Feb 2000</p> +<a name="211"><h3>211. operator>>(istream&, string&) doesn't set failbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Scott Snyder <b>Date:</b> 4 Feb 2000</p> <p>The description of the stream extraction operator for std::string (section 21.3.7.9 [lib.string.io]) does not contain a requirement that failbit be set in the case that the operator fails to extract any characters from the input @@ -5837,12 +5839,12 @@ while (is >> str) ... ;</pre> </blockquote> <p>(which tests failbit) is not required to terminate at EOF.</p> <p>Furthermore, this is inconsistent with other extraction operators, -which do include this requirement. (See sections 27.6.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted"> [lib.istream.formatted]</a> and 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), where this +which do include this requirement. (See sections 27.6.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted"> [lib.istream.formatted]</a> and 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), where this requirement is present, either explicitly or implicitly, for the extraction operators. It is also present explicitly in the description -of getline (istream&, string&, charT) in section 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 8.)</p> +of getline (istream&, string&, charT) in section 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 8.)</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Insert new paragraph after paragraph 2 in section 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>:</p> +<p>Insert new paragraph after paragraph 2 in section 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>If the function extracts no characters, it calls @@ -5850,13 +5852,13 @@ is.setstate(ios::failbit) which may throw ios_base::failure (27.4.4.3).</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="212"><h3>212. Empty range behavior unclear for several algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 26 Feb 2000</p> +<a name="212"><h3>212. Empty range behavior unclear for several algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nico Josuttis <b>Date:</b> 26 Feb 2000</p> <p>The standard doesn't specify what min_element() and max_element() shall return if the range is empty (first equals last). The usual implementations return last. This problem seems also apply to partition(), stable_partition(), next_permutation(), and prev_permutation().</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a> - Minimum and maximum, paragraphs 7 and +<p>In 25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a> - Minimum and maximum, paragraphs 7 and 9, append: Returns last if first==last.</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The LWG looked in some detail at all of the above mentioned @@ -5864,7 +5866,7 @@ algorithms, but believes that except for min_element() and max_element() it is already clear that last is returned if first == last.</p> <hr> -<a name="214"><h3>214. set::find() missing const overload</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a>, 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 28 Feb 2000</p> +<a name="214"><h3>214. set::find() missing const overload</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a>, 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 28 Feb 2000</p> <p>The specification for the associative container requirements in Table 69 state that the find member function should "return iterator; const_iterator for constant a". The map and multimap @@ -5875,7 +5877,7 @@ and multiset do not, all they have is:</p> </blockquote> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Change the prototypes for find(), lower_bound(), upper_bound(), and -equal_range() in section 23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a> and section 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a> to each have two overloads:</p> +equal_range() in section 23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a> and section 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a> to each have two overloads:</p> <blockquote> <pre>iterator find(const key_type & x); const_iterator find(const key_type & x) const;</pre> @@ -5891,7 +5893,7 @@ pair<const_iterator, const_iterator> equal_range(const key_type & x) c extending the proposed resolution to lower_bound, upper_bound, and equal_range.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="217"><h3>217. Facets example (Classifying Japanese characters) contains errors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 29 Feb 2000</p> +<a name="217"></a><h3><a name="217">217. Facets example (Classifying Japanese characters) contains errors</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 29 Feb 2000</p> <p>The example in 22.2.8, paragraph 11 contains the following errors:</p> <p>1) The member function `My::JCtype::is_kanji()' is non-const; the function must be const in order for it to be callable on a const object (a reference to @@ -5934,7 +5936,7 @@ declared above.</pre> return 0; }</pre> <hr> -<a name="220"><h3>220. ~ios_base() usage valid?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.cons"> [lib.ios.base.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Jonathan Schilling, Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 13 Mar 2000</p> +<a name="220"><h3>220. ~ios_base() usage valid?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.cons"> [lib.ios.base.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Jonathan Schilling, Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 13 Mar 2000</p> <p>The pre-conditions for the ios_base destructor are described in 27.4.2.7 paragraph 2:</p> <blockquote> @@ -5976,7 +5978,7 @@ basic_ios::init. If an ios_base object is destroyed before these initializations have taken place, the behavior is undefined.</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="221"><h3>221. num_get<>::do_get stage 2 processing broken</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 14 Mar 2000</p> +<a name="221"></a><h3><a name="221">221. num_get<>::do_get stage 2 processing broken</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 14 Mar 2000</p> <p>Stage 2 processing of numeric conversion is broken.</p> <p>Table 55 in 22.2.2.1.2 says that when basefield is 0 the integral @@ -6009,7 +6011,7 @@ This technique has the consequence that alternate representations of digits will not be recognized. This design decision was made deliberately, with full knowledge of that limitation.</p> <hr> -<a name="222"><h3>222. Are throw clauses necessary if a throw is already implied by the effects clause?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 17 Mar 2000</p> +<a name="222"><h3>222. Are throw clauses necessary if a throw is already implied by the effects clause?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 17 Mar 2000</p> <p>Section 21.3.6.8 describes the basic_string::compare function this way:</p> <blockquote> <pre>21.3.6.8 - basic_string::compare [lib.string::compare] @@ -6025,7 +6027,7 @@ int compare(size_type pos1, size_type n1, </blockquote> <p>and the constructor that's implicitly called by the above is defined to throw an out-of-range exception if pos > str.size(). See -section 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a> paragraph 4.</p> +section 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a> paragraph 4.</p> <p>On the other hand, the compare function descriptions themselves don't have "Throws: " clauses and according to 17.3.1.3, paragraph 3, elements @@ -6034,7 +6036,7 @@ that do not apply to a function are omitted.</p> "Effects" clauses correct, or are the "Throws" clauses missing?</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> paragraph 3, the footnote 148 attached to +<p>In 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> paragraph 3, the footnote 148 attached to the sentence "Descriptions of function semantics contain the following elements (as appropriate):", insert the word "further" so that the foot note reads:</p> @@ -6050,10 +6052,10 @@ throw. The inconsistent wording is in a footnote, and thus non-normative. The proposed resolution from the LWG clarifies the footnote.</p> <hr> -<a name="223"><h3>223. reverse algorithm should use iter_swap rather than swap</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.reverse"> [lib.alg.reverse]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 21 Mar 2000</p> +<a name="223"><h3>223. reverse algorithm should use iter_swap rather than swap</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.reverse"> [lib.alg.reverse]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 21 Mar 2000</p> <p>Shouldn't the effects say "applies iter_swap to all pairs..."?</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 25.2.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.reverse"> [lib.alg.reverse]</a>, replace:</p> +<p>In 25.2.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.reverse"> [lib.alg.reverse]</a>, replace:</p> <blockquote> Effects: For each non-negative integer i <= (last - first)/2, applies swap to all pairs of iterators first + i, (last - i) - 1. @@ -6064,7 +6066,7 @@ footnote.</p> applies iter_swap to all pairs of iterators first + i, (last - i) - 1. </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="224"><h3>224. clear() complexity for associative containers refers to undefined N</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ed Brey <b>Date:</b> 23 Mar 2000</p> +<a name="224"><h3>224. clear() complexity for associative containers refers to undefined N</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ed Brey <b>Date:</b> 23 Mar 2000</p> <p>In the associative container requirements table in 23.1.2 paragraph 7, a.clear() has complexity "log(size()) + N". However, the meaning of N is not defined.</p> @@ -6078,7 +6080,7 @@ error: there's no difference between <i>O(N)</i> and <i>O(N + log(N))</i>. The text in the standard is probably an incorrect cut-and-paste from the range version of <tt>erase</tt>.</p> <hr> -<a name="225"><h3>225. std:: algorithms use of other unqualified algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 01 Apr 2000</p> +<a name="225"><h3>225. std:: algorithms use of other unqualified algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 01 Apr 2000</p> <p>Are algorithms in std:: allowed to use other algorithms without qualification, so functions in user namespaces might be found through Koenig lookup?</p> <p>For example, a popular standard library implementation includes this @@ -6139,12 +6141,12 @@ leading "::" qualification is not required because any namespace qualification is sufficient to suppress Koenig lookup.]</i></p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Add a paragraph and a note at the end of -17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a>:</p> +17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Unless otherwise specified, no global or non-member function in the standard library shall use a function from another namespace which is -found through <i>argument-dependent name lookup</i> (3.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/basic.html#basic.lookup.koenig"> [basic.lookup.koenig]</a>).</p> +found through <i>argument-dependent name lookup</i> (3.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/basic.html#basic.lookup.koenig"> [basic.lookup.koenig]</a>).</p> <p>[Note: the phrase "unless otherwise specified" is intended to allow Koenig lookup in cases like that of ostream_iterators:<br> @@ -6163,9 +6165,9 @@ allow Koenig lookup in cases like that of ostream_iterators:<br> is as yet unsure if the proposed resolution is the best solution. Furthermore, the LWG believes that the same problem of unqualified library names applies to wording in the standard itself, -and has opened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> accordingly. Any resolution of -issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> should be coordinated with the resolution of -issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>.]</i></p> +and has opened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> accordingly. Any resolution of +issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> should be coordinated with the resolution of +issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>.]</i></p> <p><i>[Toronto: The LWG is not sure if this is a defect in the standard. Most LWG members believe that an implementation of @@ -6190,10 +6192,10 @@ resolution for this issue is in accordance with Howard's paper.]</i></p> other namespace. However, this is at worst a clarification. It is surely right that algorithsm shouldn't pick up random names, that user-defined names should have no effect unless otherwise specified. - Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> deals with the question of when it is + Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> deals with the question of when it is appropriate for the standard to explicitly specify otherwise.</p> <hr> -<a name="226"><h3>226. User supplied specializations or overloads of namespace std function templates</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 01 Apr 2000</p> +<a name="226"><h3>226. User supplied specializations or overloads of namespace std function templates</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 01 Apr 2000</p> <p>The issues are: </p> <p>1. How can a 3rd party library implementor (lib1) write a version of a standard algorithm which is specialized to work with his own class template? </p> @@ -6236,7 +6238,7 @@ eventually be used with lib2. This may seem innocuous at first when applied to names like swap, but consider more ambiguous names like unique_copy() instead. It is easy to imagine the user wanting to define these names differently in his own namespace. A definition with semantics incompatible with the standard -library could cause serious problems (see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>).</p> +library could cause serious problems (see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>).</p> <p>Why, you may ask, can't we just partially specialize std::swap()? It's because the language doesn't allow for partial specialization of function templates. If you write:</p> @@ -6359,10 +6361,10 @@ resolution is the one proposed by Howard.]</i></p> (such as iter_swap, swap_ranges, reverse, rotate, and sort) conform to that concept. The Swappable concept will make it clear that these algorithms use unqualified lookup for the calls - to <tt>swap</tt>. Also, in 26.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.transcend"> [lib.valarray.transcend]</a> paragraph 1, + to <tt>swap</tt>. Also, in 26.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.transcend"> [lib.valarray.transcend]</a> paragraph 1, state that the valarray transcendentals use unqualified lookup.</p> <hr> -<a name="227"></a><h3><a name="227">227. std::swap() should require CopyConstructible or DefaultConstructible arguments</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 09 Apr 2000</p> +<a name="227"><h3>227. std::swap() should require CopyConstructible or DefaultConstructible arguments</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 09 Apr 2000</p> <p>25.2.2 reads:</p> <blockquote> <p><tt> template<class T> void swap(T& a, T& b);</tt><br> @@ -6403,9 +6405,9 @@ resolution is the one proposed by Howard.]</i></p> <p> Requires: Type T is CopyConstructible (20.1.3) and Assignable (23.1)</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="228"><h3>228. Incorrect specification of "..._byname" facets</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.categories"> [lib.locale.categories]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Apr 2000</p> -<p>The sections 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a>, 22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a>, -22.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.byname"> [lib.locale.codecvt.byname]</a>, 22.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct.byname"> [lib.locale.numpunct.byname]</a>, 22.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.collate.byname"> [lib.locale.collate.byname]</a>, 22.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.byname"> [lib.locale.time.put.byname]</a>, 22.2.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.moneypunct.byname"> [lib.locale.moneypunct.byname]</a>, and 22.2.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.messages.byname"> [lib.locale.messages.byname]</a> overspecify the +<a name="228"><h3>228. Incorrect specification of "..._byname" facets</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.categories"> [lib.locale.categories]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 20 Apr 2000</p> +<p>The sections 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a>, 22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a>, +22.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.byname"> [lib.locale.codecvt.byname]</a>, 22.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct.byname"> [lib.locale.numpunct.byname]</a>, 22.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.collate.byname"> [lib.locale.collate.byname]</a>, 22.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.byname"> [lib.locale.time.put.byname]</a>, 22.2.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.moneypunct.byname"> [lib.locale.moneypunct.byname]</a>, and 22.2.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.messages.byname"> [lib.locale.messages.byname]</a> overspecify the definitions of the "..._byname" classes by listing a bunch of virtual functions. At the same time, no semantics of these functions are defined. Real implementations do not define these @@ -6524,18 +6526,18 @@ specialization it is not virtual.</p> ~messages_byname(); // virtual }; }</pre> -<p>Remove section 22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a> completely (because in +<p>Remove section 22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a> completely (because in this case only those members are defined to be virtual which are defined to be virtual in 'ctype<cT>'.)</p> <p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Dietmar Kühl submitted this issue at the request of -the LWG to solve the underlying problems raised by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>.]</i></p> +the LWG to solve the underlying problems raised by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>.]</i></p> <p><i>[Copenhagen: proposed resolution was revised slightly, to remove three last virtual functions from <tt>messages_byname</tt>.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="229"><h3>229. Unqualified references of other library entities</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.contents"> [lib.contents]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 19 Apr 2000</p> +<a name="229"><h3>229. Unqualified references of other library entities</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.contents"> [lib.contents]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 19 Apr 2000</p> <p>Throughout the library chapters, the descriptions of library entities refer to other library entities without necessarily qualifying the names.</p> @@ -6549,7 +6551,7 @@ override any ::std::swap function when Koenig lookup applies.</p> "::std::" throughout, too many lines in the standard would have to be adjusted to make that change in a Technical Corrigendum.</p> -<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a>, which addresses qualification of +<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a>, which addresses qualification of <tt>size_t</tt>, is a special case of this. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> @@ -6563,7 +6565,7 @@ adjusted to make that change in a Technical Corrigendum.</p> <p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Steve Clamage submitted this issue at the request of the LWG to solve a problem in the standard itself similar to the -problem within implementations of library identified by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>. Any resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> should be +problem within implementations of library identified by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>. Any resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> should be coordinated with the resolution of this issue.]</i></p> <p><i>[post-Toronto: Howard is undecided about whether it is @@ -6586,8 +6588,8 @@ issues 225 and 226. In light of that resolution, the proposed resolution for the current issue makes sense.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="230"><h3>230. Assignable specified without also specifying CopyConstructible</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 26 Apr 2000</p> -<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> identified an instance (std::swap) where +<a name="230"><h3>230. Assignable specified without also specifying CopyConstructible</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 26 Apr 2000</p> +<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> identified an instance (std::swap) where Assignable was specified without also specifying CopyConstructible. The LWG asked that the standard be searched to determine if the same defect existed elsewhere.</p> @@ -6595,19 +6597,19 @@ determine if the same defect existed elsewhere.</p> <p>There are a number of places (see proposed resolution below) where Assignable is specified without also specifying CopyConstructible. There are also several cases where both are -specified. For example, 26.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.accumulate"> [lib.accumulate]</a>.</p> +specified. For example, 26.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.accumulate"> [lib.accumulate]</a>.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> table 65 for value_type: +<p>In 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> table 65 for value_type: change "T is Assignable" to "T is CopyConstructible and Assignable" </p> -<p>In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> table 69 X::key_type; change +<p>In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> table 69 X::key_type; change "Key is Assignable" to "Key is CopyConstructible and Assignable"<br> </p> -<p>In 24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a> paragraph 1, change: +<p>In 24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a> paragraph 1, change: </p> <blockquote> <p> A class or a built-in type X satisfies the requirements of an @@ -6626,12 +6628,12 @@ Table 73: </blockquote> <p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Beman Dawes submitted this issue at the request of -the LWG. He asks that the 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> and 25.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.fill"> [lib.alg.fill]</a> changes be studied carefully, as it is not clear that +the LWG. He asks that the 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> and 25.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.fill"> [lib.alg.fill]</a> changes be studied carefully, as it is not clear that CopyConstructible is really a requirement and may be overspecification.]</i></p> <p><i>[Portions of the resolution for issue 230 have been superceded by -the resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#276">276</a>.]</i></p> +the resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#276">276</a>.]</i></p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The original proposed resolution also included changes to input @@ -6641,7 +6643,7 @@ Assignable type was also required to be Copy Constructible, but decided against this because fill and replace really don't require the Copy Constructible property.</p> <hr> -<a name="231"><h3>231. Precision in iostream?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> James Kanze, Stephen Clamage <b>Date:</b> 25 Apr 2000</p> +<a name="231"><h3>231. Precision in iostream?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> James Kanze, Stephen Clamage <b>Date:</b> 25 Apr 2000</p> <p>What is the following program supposed to output?</p> <pre>#include <iostream> @@ -6682,7 +6684,7 @@ etc. Plus, of course, if precision == 0 and flags & floatfield == of the anomalies of printf:-).</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -Replace 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 11, with the following +Replace 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 11, with the following sentence: </p> <blockquote> @@ -6709,7 +6711,7 @@ case.</p> where precision is 0 and mode is %g.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="232"><h3>232. "depends" poorly defined in 17.4.3.1</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Peter Dimov <b>Date:</b> 18 Apr 2000</p> +<a name="232"><h3>232. "depends" poorly defined in 17.4.3.1</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Peter Dimov <b>Date:</b> 18 Apr 2000</p> <p>17.4.3.1/1 uses the term "depends" to limit the set of allowed specializations of standard templates to those that "depend on a user-defined name of external linkage."</p> @@ -6741,24 +6743,24 @@ possible way for a user to come up with a specialization for bitset, for example, that might not have already been specialized by the implementor?</p> -<p><i>[Toronto: this may be related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a>.]</i></p> +<p><i>[Toronto: this may be related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a>.]</i></p> <p><i>[post-Toronto: Judy provided the above proposed resolution and rationale.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="234"><h3>234. Typos in allocator definition</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 24 Apr 2000</p> +<a name="234"><h3>234. Typos in allocator definition</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 24 Apr 2000</p> <p>In paragraphs 12 and 13 the effects of <tt>construct()</tt> and <tt>destruct()</tt> are described as returns but the functions actually return <tt>void</tt>.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Substitute "Returns" by "Effect".</p> <hr> -<a name="235"><h3>235. No specification of default ctor for reverse_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterator"> [lib.reverse.iterator]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 24 Apr 2000</p> +<a name="235"><h3>235. No specification of default ctor for reverse_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterator"> [lib.reverse.iterator]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 24 Apr 2000</p> <p>The declaration of <tt>reverse_iterator</tt> lists a default constructor. However, no specification is given what this constructor should do.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> - <p>In section 24.4.1.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.cons"> [lib.reverse.iter.cons]</a> add the following + <p>In section 24.4.1.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.cons"> [lib.reverse.iter.cons]</a> add the following paragraph:</p> <blockquote> <p><tt>reverse_iterator()</tt></p> @@ -6771,7 +6773,7 @@ should do.</p> <p><i>[pre-Copenhagen: Dietmar provide wording for proposed resolution.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="237"><h3>237. Undefined expression in complexity specification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.cons"> [lib.list.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 24 Apr 2000</p> +<a name="237"><h3>237. Undefined expression in complexity specification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.cons"> [lib.list.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 24 Apr 2000</p> <p>The complexity specification in paragraph 6 says that the complexity is linear in <tt>first - last</tt>. Even if <tt>operator-()</tt> is defined on iterators this term is in general undefined because it @@ -6782,7 +6784,7 @@ would have to be <tt>last - first</tt>.</p> <p>to become</p> <blockquote>Linear in <i>distance(first, last)</i>.</blockquote> <hr> -<a name="238"><h3>238. Contradictory results of stringbuf initialization.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.cons"> [lib.stringbuf.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 11 May 2000</p> +<a name="238"><h3>238. Contradictory results of stringbuf initialization.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.cons"> [lib.stringbuf.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dietmar Kühl <b>Date:</b> 11 May 2000</p> <p>In 27.7.1.1 paragraph 4 the results of calling the constructor of 'basic_stringbuf' are said to be <tt>str() == str</tt>. This is fine that far but consider this code:</p> @@ -6807,7 +6809,7 @@ defined to be <tt>basic_string<cT>()</tt>.</p> we fixed it, it would say just the same thing as text that's already in the standard.</p> <hr> -<a name="239"><h3>239. Complexity of unique() and/or unique_copy incorrect</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> May 15 2000</p> +<a name="239"><h3>239. Complexity of unique() and/or unique_copy incorrect</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> May 15 2000</p> <p>The complexity of unique and unique_copy are inconsistent with each other and inconsistent with the implementations. The standard specifies:</p> @@ -6834,13 +6836,13 @@ applying the predicate last-first times, especially since it is not specified to which pair in the sequence the predicate is applied twice.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change both complexity sections in 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> to:</p> +<p>Change both complexity sections in 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> to:</p> <blockquote>Complexity: For nonempty ranges, exactly last - first - 1 applications of the corresponding predicate.</blockquote> <hr> -<a name="240"><h3>240. Complexity of adjacent_find() is meaningless</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.adjacent.find"> [lib.alg.adjacent.find]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> May 15 2000</p> +<a name="240"><h3>240. Complexity of adjacent_find() is meaningless</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.adjacent.find"> [lib.alg.adjacent.find]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> May 15 2000</p> <p>The complexity section of adjacent_find is defective:</p> <blockquote> @@ -6875,7 +6877,7 @@ not required of predicates because they can have non-const data members. For this reason, a specification using a binder could only be an "as-if" specification.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change the complexity section in 25.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.adjacent.find"> [lib.alg.adjacent.find]</a> to:</p> +<p>Change the complexity section in 25.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.adjacent.find"> [lib.alg.adjacent.find]</a> to:</p> <blockquote> For a nonempty range, exactly <tt>min((<i>i</i> - <i>first</i>) + 1, (<i>last</i> - <i>first</i>) - 1)</tt> applications of the @@ -6887,7 +6889,7 @@ return value. bound. The LWG preferred an exact count.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="241"><h3>241. Does unique_copy() require CopyConstructible and Assignable?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> May 15 2000</p> +<a name="241"><h3>241. Does unique_copy() require CopyConstructible and Assignable?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> May 15 2000</p> <p>Some popular implementations of unique_copy() create temporary copies of values in the input sequence, at least if the input iterator @@ -6898,7 +6900,7 @@ the value type is CopyConstructible and Assignable.</p> specify any additional requirements that they impose on any of the types used by the algorithm. An example of an algorithm that creates temporary copies and correctly specifies the additional requirements -is accumulate(), 26.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.accumulate"> [lib.accumulate]</a>.</p> +is accumulate(), 26.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.accumulate"> [lib.accumulate]</a>.</p> <p>Since the specifications of unique() and unique_copy() do not require CopyConstructible and Assignable of the InputIterator's value @@ -6941,12 +6943,12 @@ minor as not to require re-review. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="242"><h3>242. Side effects of function objects</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.transform"> [lib.alg.transform]</a>, 26.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.numeric.ops"> [lib.numeric.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> May 15 2000</p> +<a name="242"></a><h3><a name="242">242. Side effects of function objects</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.transform"> [lib.alg.transform]</a>, 26.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.numeric.ops"> [lib.numeric.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Angelika Langer <b>Date:</b> May 15 2000</p> <p>The algorithms transform(), accumulate(), inner_product(), partial_sum(), and adjacent_difference() require that the function object supplied to them shall not have any side effects.</p> -<p>The standard defines a side effect in 1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/intro.html#intro.execution"> [intro.execution]</a> as:</p> +<p>The standard defines a side effect in 1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/intro.html#intro.execution"> [intro.execution]</a> as:</p> <blockquote>-7- Accessing an object designated by a volatile lvalue (basic.lval), modifying an object, calling a library I/O function, or calling a function that does any of those operations are all side effects, which are changes @@ -7119,7 +7121,7 @@ added footnotes pointing out that the use of closed ranges was intentional.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="243"><h3>243. <tt>get</tt> and <tt>getline</tt> when sentry reports failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> May 15 2000</p> +<a name="243"><h3>243. <tt>get</tt> and <tt>getline</tt> when sentry reports failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> May 15 2000</p> <p>basic_istream<>::get(), and basic_istream<>::getline(), are unclear with respect to the behavior and side-effects of the named functions in case of an error.</p> @@ -7166,7 +7168,7 @@ had language that made this an unambiguous requirement; those words were moved to a place where their context made them less clear. See Jerry Schwarz's message c++std-lib-7618.</p> <hr> -<a name="248"><h3>248. time_get fails to set eofbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.category.time"> [lib.category.time]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 22 June 2000</p> +<a name="248"><h3>248. time_get fails to set eofbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.category.time"> [lib.category.time]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 22 June 2000</p> <p>There is no requirement that any of time_get member functions set ios::eofbit when they reach the end iterator while parsing their input. Since members of both the num_get and money_get facets are required to @@ -7184,7 +7186,7 @@ member functions, the member sets ios_base::eofbit in err. because it was more consistent with the way eof is described for other input facets.</p> <hr> -<a name="250"></a><h3><a name="250">250. splicing invalidates iterators</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Brian Parker <b>Date:</b> 14 Jul 2000</p> +<a name="250"><h3>250. splicing invalidates iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Brian Parker <b>Date:</b> 14 Jul 2000</p> <p> Section 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops] states that </p> @@ -7201,14 +7203,14 @@ after <tt>splice</tt>. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add a footnote to 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, paragraph 1:</p> +<p>Add a footnote to 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, paragraph 1:</p> <blockquote> -[<i>Footnote:</i> As specified in 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, paragraphs +[<i>Footnote:</i> As specified in 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, paragraphs 4-5, the semantics described in this clause applies only to the case where allocators compare equal. --end footnote] </blockquote> -<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 4 with:</p> +<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 4 with:</p> <blockquote> Effects: Inserts the contents of x before position and x becomes empty. Pointers and references to the moved elements of x now refer to @@ -7217,7 +7219,7 @@ moved elements will continue to refer to their elements, but they now behave as iterators into *this, not into x. </blockquote> -<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 7 with:</p> +<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 7 with:</p> <blockquote> Effects: Inserts an element pointed to by i from list x before position and removes the element from x. The result is unchanged if @@ -7227,7 +7229,7 @@ to refer to this same element but as a member of *this. Iterators to *i behave as iterators into *this, not into x. </blockquote> -<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 12 with:</p> +<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 12 with:</p> <blockquote> Requires: [first, last) is a valid range in x. The result is undefined if position is an iterator in the range [first, last). @@ -7242,10 +7244,10 @@ iterators into *this, not into x. <p>The original proposed resolution said that iterators and references would remain "valid". The new proposed resolution clarifies what that means. Note that this only applies to the case of equal allocators. ->From 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> paragraph 4, the behavior of list when +From 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> paragraph 4, the behavior of list when allocators compare nonequal is outside the scope of the standard.</p> <hr> -<a name="251"><h3>251. basic_stringbuf missing allocator_type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf"> [lib.stringbuf]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jul 2000</p> +<a name="251"><h3>251. basic_stringbuf missing allocator_type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf"> [lib.stringbuf]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jul 2000</p> <p>The synopsis for the template class <tt>basic_stringbuf</tt> doesn't list a typedef for the template parameter <tt>Allocator</tt>. This makes it impossible to determine the type of @@ -7259,7 +7261,7 @@ basic_stringstream (27.7.4) the typedef:</p> <pre> typedef Allocator allocator_type; </pre> <hr> -<a name="252"><h3>252. missing casts/C-style casts used in iostreams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.string.streams"> [lib.string.streams]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jul 2000</p> +<a name="252"><h3>252. missing casts/C-style casts used in iostreams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.string.streams"> [lib.string.streams]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 28 Jul 2000</p> <p>27.7.2.2, p1 uses a C-style cast rather than the more appropriate const_cast<> in the Returns clause for basic_istringstream<>::rdbuf(). The same C-style cast is being used in 27.7.3.2, p1, D.7.2.2, p1, and @@ -7294,7 +7296,7 @@ issue is stylistic rather than a matter of correctness.</p> <p>with</p> <pre> -2- Returns: const_cast<strstreambuf*>(&sb).</pre> <hr> -<a name="253"><h3>253. valarray helper functions are almost entirely useless</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.cons"> [lib.valarray.cons]</a>, 26.3.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.assign"> [lib.valarray.assign]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Robert Klarer <b>Date:</b> 31 Jul 2000</p> +<a name="253"><h3>253. valarray helper functions are almost entirely useless</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.cons"> [lib.valarray.cons]</a>, 26.3.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.assign"> [lib.valarray.assign]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Robert Klarer <b>Date:</b> 31 Jul 2000</p> <p>This discussion is adapted from message c++std-lib-7056 posted November 11, 1999. I don't think that anyone can reasonably claim that the problem described below is NAD.</p> @@ -7369,66 +7371,66 @@ classes are almost entirely useless.</p> <p>slice_array:</p> <ul> <li> Make the copy constructor and copy-assignment operator declarations - public in the slice_array class template definition in 26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> </li> -<li> remove paragraph 3 of 26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> + public in the slice_array class template definition in 26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> </li> +<li> remove paragraph 3 of 26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> </li> -<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.cons.slice.arr"> [lib.cons.slice.arr]</a> +<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.cons.slice.arr"> [lib.cons.slice.arr]</a> </li> -<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.cons.slice.arr"> [lib.cons.slice.arr]</a> to read "This constructor is declared +<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.cons.slice.arr"> [lib.cons.slice.arr]</a> to read "This constructor is declared to be private. This constructor need not be defined."</li> -<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a> +<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a> </li> <li> Change the first three words of the second sentence of paragraph 1 of - 26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li> + 26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li> </ul> <p>gslice_array:</p> <ul> <li> Make the copy constructor and copy-assignment operator declarations - public in the gslice_array class template definition in 26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> </li> -<li> remove the note in paragraph 3 of 26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> + public in the gslice_array class template definition in 26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> </li> +<li> remove the note in paragraph 3 of 26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> </li> -<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.cons"> [lib.gslice.array.cons]</a> +<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.cons"> [lib.gslice.array.cons]</a> </li> -<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.cons"> [lib.gslice.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is declared +<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.cons"> [lib.gslice.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is declared to be private. This constructor need not be defined."</li> -<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.assign"> [lib.gslice.array.assign]</a> +<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.assign"> [lib.gslice.array.assign]</a> </li> <li> Change the first three words of the second sentence of paragraph 1 of - 26.3.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.assign"> [lib.gslice.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li> + 26.3.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.assign"> [lib.gslice.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li> </ul> <p>mask_array:</p> <ul> <li> Make the copy constructor and copy-assignment operator declarations - public in the mask_array class template definition in 26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> </li> -<li> remove the note in paragraph 2 of 26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> + public in the mask_array class template definition in 26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> </li> +<li> remove the note in paragraph 2 of 26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> </li> -<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.cons"> [lib.mask.array.cons]</a> +<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.cons"> [lib.mask.array.cons]</a> </li> -<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.cons"> [lib.mask.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is declared +<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.cons"> [lib.mask.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is declared to be private. This constructor need not be defined."</li> -<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.assign"> [lib.mask.array.assign]</a> +<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.assign"> [lib.mask.array.assign]</a> </li> <li> Change the first three words of the second sentence of paragraph 1 of - 26.3.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.assign"> [lib.mask.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li> + 26.3.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.assign"> [lib.mask.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li> </ul> <p>indirect_array:</p> <ul> <li>Make the copy constructor and copy-assignment operator declarations - public in the indirect_array class definition in 26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a> + public in the indirect_array class definition in 26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a> </li> -<li> remove the note in paragraph 2 of 26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a> +<li> remove the note in paragraph 2 of 26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a> </li> -<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.cons"> [lib.indirect.array.cons]</a> +<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.cons"> [lib.indirect.array.cons]</a> </li> -<li> change the descriptive text in 26.3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.cons"> [lib.indirect.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is +<li> change the descriptive text in 26.3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.cons"> [lib.indirect.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is declared to be private. This constructor need not be defined."</li> -<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.9.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.assign"> [lib.indirect.array.assign]</a> +<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.9.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.assign"> [lib.indirect.array.assign]</a> </li> <li> Change the first three words of the second sentence of paragraph 1 of - 26.3.9.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.assign"> [lib.indirect.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li> + 26.3.9.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.assign"> [lib.indirect.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li> </ul> <p><i>[Proposed resolution was modified in Santa Cruz: explicitly make copy constructor and copy assignment operators public, instead of @@ -7445,7 +7447,7 @@ believed we should make the assignment operators public, in addition to the copy constructors, for reasons of symmetry and user expectation.</p> <hr> -<a name="256"><h3>256. typo in 27.4.4.2, p17: copy_event does not exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 21 Aug 2000</p> +<a name="256"><h3>256. typo in 27.4.4.2, p17: copy_event does not exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 21 Aug 2000</p> <p> 27.4.4.2, p17 says </p> @@ -7464,7 +7466,7 @@ copyfmt_event. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Replace copy_event with copyfmt_event in the named paragraph.</p> <hr> -<a name="259"><h3>259. <tt>basic_string::operator[]</tt> and const correctness</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.access"> [lib.string.access]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Chris Newton <b>Date:</b> 27 Aug 2000</p> +<a name="259"><h3>259. <tt>basic_string::operator[]</tt> and const correctness</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.access"> [lib.string.access]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Chris Newton <b>Date:</b> 27 Aug 2000</p> <p> <i>Paraphrased from a message that Chris Newton posted to comp.std.c++:</i> </p> @@ -7488,7 +7490,7 @@ In section 21.3.4, paragraph 1, change </p> <hr> <a name="260"><h3>260. Inconsistent return type of <tt>istream_iterator::operator++(int)</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istream.iterator.ops"> [lib.istream.iterator.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 27 Aug 2000</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istream.iterator.ops"> [lib.istream.iterator.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 27 Aug 2000</p> <p>The synopsis of istream_iterator::operator++(int) in 24.5.1 shows it as returning the iterator by value. 24.5.1.2, p5 shows the same operator as returning the iterator by reference. That's incorrect @@ -7504,7 +7506,7 @@ given the Effects clause below (since a temporary is returned). The <p>(that is, remove the `&').</p> <hr> <a name="261"><h3>261. Missing description of <tt>istream_iterator::operator!=</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istream.iterator.ops"> [lib.istream.iterator.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 27 Aug 2000</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istream.iterator.ops"> [lib.istream.iterator.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 27 Aug 2000</p> <p> 24.5.1, p3 lists the synopsis for </p> @@ -7530,7 +7532,7 @@ Add paragraph 7 to the end of section 24.5.1.2 with the following text: <p>-7- Returns: !(x == y).</p> <hr> -<a name="262"><h3>262. Bitmask operator ~ specified incorrectly</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 03 Sep 2000</p> +<a name="262"><h3>262. Bitmask operator ~ specified incorrectly</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 03 Sep 2000</p> <p> The ~ operation should be applied after the cast to int_type. </p> @@ -7551,7 +7553,7 @@ to: { return static_cast< bitmask>(~static_cast<int_type>(X)); } </pre> <hr> -<a name="263"><h3>263. Severe restriction on <tt>basic_string</tt> reference counting</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Kevlin Henney <b>Date:</b> 04 Sep 2000</p> +<a name="263"><h3>263. Severe restriction on <tt>basic_string</tt> reference counting</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Kevlin Henney <b>Date:</b> 04 Sep 2000</p> <p> The note in paragraph 6 suggests that the invalidation rules for references, pointers, and iterators in paragraph 5 permit a reference- @@ -7621,14 +7623,14 @@ Change the following sentence in 21.3 paragraph 5 from or rend(). </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="264"><h3>264. Associative container <tt>insert(i, j)</tt> complexity requirements are not feasible.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> John Potter <b>Date:</b> 07 Sep 2000</p> +<a name="264"><h3>264. Associative container <tt>insert(i, j)</tt> complexity requirements are not feasible.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> John Potter <b>Date:</b> 07 Sep 2000</p> <p> Table 69 requires linear time if [i, j) is sorted. Sorted is necessary but not sufficient. Consider inserting a sorted range of even integers into a set<int> containing the odd integers in the same range. </p> -<p><i>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#102">102</a></i></p> +<p><i>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#102">102</a></i></p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> In Table 69, in section 23.1.2, change the complexity clause for @@ -7660,7 +7662,7 @@ inserted is sorted, it's more trouble than it's worth to say that it's linear in some special cases. </p> <hr> -<a name="265"><h3>265. std::pair::pair() effects overly restrictive</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 11 Sep 2000</p> +<a name="265"><h3>265. std::pair::pair() effects overly restrictive</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 11 Sep 2000</p> <p> I don't see any requirements on the types of the elements of the std::pair container in 20.2.2. From the descriptions of the member @@ -7697,7 +7699,7 @@ default constructor was written the obvious way. This has been clarified by core issue 178, and there is no longer any doubt that the straightforward implementation is correct.</p> <hr> -<a name="266"><h3>266. bad_exception::~bad_exception() missing Effects clause</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.bad.exception"> [lib.bad.exception]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 24 Sep 2000</p> +<a name="266"><h3>266. bad_exception::~bad_exception() missing Effects clause</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.bad.exception"> [lib.bad.exception]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 24 Sep 2000</p> <p> The synopsis for std::bad_exception lists the function ~bad_exception() but there is no description of what the function does (the Effects @@ -7706,10 +7708,10 @@ clause is missing). <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> Remove the destructor from the class synopses of -<tt>bad_alloc</tt> (18.4.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.bad.alloc"> [lib.bad.alloc]</a>), -<tt>bad_cast</tt> (18.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.bad.cast"> [lib.bad.cast]</a>), -<tt>bad_typeid</tt> (18.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.bad.typeid"> [lib.bad.typeid]</a>), -and <tt>bad_exception</tt> (18.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.bad.exception"> [lib.bad.exception]</a>). +<tt>bad_alloc</tt> (18.4.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.bad.alloc"> [lib.bad.alloc]</a>), +<tt>bad_cast</tt> (18.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.bad.cast"> [lib.bad.cast]</a>), +<tt>bad_typeid</tt> (18.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.bad.typeid"> [lib.bad.typeid]</a>), +and <tt>bad_exception</tt> (18.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.bad.exception"> [lib.bad.exception]</a>). </p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p> @@ -7720,7 +7722,7 @@ removing them is more consistent with how exception classes are described in clause 19. </p> <hr> -<a name="268"><h3>268. Typo in locale synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 5 Oct 2000</p> +<a name="268"><h3>268. Typo in locale synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 5 Oct 2000</p> <p>The synopsis of the class std::locale in 22.1.1 contains two typos: the semicolons after the declarations of the default ctor locale::locale() and the copy ctor locale::locale(const locale&) @@ -7740,7 +7742,7 @@ are missing.</p> locale(const locale& other) throw(); </pre> <hr> -<a name="270"><h3>270. Binary search requirements overly strict</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.binary.search"> [lib.alg.binary.search]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 18 Oct 2000</p> +<a name="270"><h3>270. Binary search requirements overly strict</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.binary.search"> [lib.alg.binary.search]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 18 Oct 2000</p> <p> Each of the four binary search algorithms (lower_bound, upper_bound, equal_range, binary_search) has a form that allows the user to pass a @@ -7990,7 +7992,7 @@ that the upper bound is no earlier than the lower bound, that the pair returned by equal_range is a valid range, and that the first part of that pair is the lower bound.</p> <hr> -<a name="271"><h3>271. basic_iostream missing typedefs</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreamclass"> [lib.iostreamclass]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Nov 2000</p> +<a name="271"><h3>271. basic_iostream missing typedefs</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreamclass"> [lib.iostreamclass]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Nov 2000</p> <p> Class template basic_iostream has no typedefs. The typedefs it inherits from its base classes can't be used, since (for example) @@ -7999,7 +8001,7 @@ basic_iostream<T>::traits_type is ambiguous. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Add the following to basic_iostream's class synopsis in -27.6.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreamclass"> [lib.iostreamclass]</a>, immediately after <tt>public</tt>:</p> +27.6.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreamclass"> [lib.iostreamclass]</a>, immediately after <tt>public</tt>:</p> <pre> // types: typedef charT char_type; @@ -8009,7 +8011,7 @@ basic_iostream<T>::traits_type is ambiguous. typedef traits traits_type; </pre> <hr> -<a name="272"><h3>272. Missing parentheses around subexpression</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Nov 2000</p> +<a name="272"><h3>272. Missing parentheses around subexpression</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Nov 2000</p> <p> 27.4.4.3, p4 says about the postcondition of the function: If rdbuf()!=0 then state == rdstate(); otherwise @@ -8026,7 +8028,7 @@ anything but non-zero. Add parentheses like so: rdstate()==(state|ios_base::badbit). </p> <hr> -<a name="273"></a><h3><a name="273">273. Missing ios_base qualification on members of a dependent class</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Nov 2000</p> +<a name="273"><h3>273. Missing ios_base qualification on members of a dependent class</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Nov 2000</p> <p>27.5.2.4.2, p4, and 27.8.1.6, p2, 27.8.1.7, p3, 27.8.1.9, p2, 27.8.1.10, p3 refer to in and/or out w/o ios_base:: qualification. That's incorrect since the names are members of a dependent base @@ -8035,7 +8037,7 @@ class (14.6.2 [temp.dep]) and thus not visible.</p> <p>Qualify the names with the name of the class of which they are members, i.e., ios_base.</p> <hr> -<a name="274"><h3>274. a missing/impossible allocator requirement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Nov 2000</p> +<a name="274"><h3>274. a missing/impossible allocator requirement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Nov 2000</p> <p> I see that table 31 in 20.1.5, p3 allows T in std::allocator<T> to be of any type. But the synopsis in 20.4.1 calls for allocator<>::address() to @@ -8090,7 +8092,7 @@ also forbids volatile types and reference types. excluded from the PR.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="275"></a><h3><a name="275">275. Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 02 Nov 2000</p> +<a name="275"><h3>275. Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 02 Nov 2000</p> <p> In 22.2.2.1.1, we have a list of overloads for num_get<>::get(). There are eight overloads, all of which are identical except for the @@ -8129,7 +8131,7 @@ These two lists are not identical. They should be, since the arguments it was given. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>, change</p> +<p>In 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>, change</p> <pre> iter_type get(iter_type in, iter_type end, ios_base& str, ios_base::iostate& err, short& val) const; </pre> @@ -8138,10 +8140,10 @@ the arguments it was given. ios_base::iostate& err, float& val) const; </pre> <hr> -<a name="276"><h3>276. Assignable requirement for container value type overly strict</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Peter Dimov <b>Date:</b> 07 Nov 2000</p> +<a name="276"><h3>276. Assignable requirement for container value type overly strict</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Peter Dimov <b>Date:</b> 07 Nov 2000</p> <p> 23.1/3 states that the objects stored in a container must be -Assignable. 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, paragraph 2, +Assignable. 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, paragraph 2, states that map satisfies all requirements for a container, while in the same time defining value_type as pair<const Key, T> - a type that is not Assignable. @@ -8165,14 +8167,14 @@ general. <p> For example, the proposed resolution of active library issue -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> is to make set::iterator a constant iterator; this +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> is to make set::iterator a constant iterator; this means that no set operations can exploit the fact that the stored objects are Assignable. </p> <p> This is related to, but slightly broader than, closed issue -<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a>. +<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a>. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>23.1/3: Strike the trailing part of the sentence:</p> @@ -8268,7 +8270,7 @@ to forbid such implementations.</p> <p>Note that the type stored in a standard container must still satisfy the requirements of the container's allocator; this rules out, for -example, such types as "const int". See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#274">274</a> +example, such types as "const int". See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#274">274</a> for more details. </p> @@ -8280,7 +8282,7 @@ implement <tt>vector::push_back</tt> in terms of <tt>vector::insert</tt>.</p> <hr> -<a name="278"><h3>278. What does iterator validity mean?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> P.J. Plauger <b>Date:</b> 27 Nov 2000</p> +<a name="278"><h3>278. What does iterator validity mean?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> P.J. Plauger <b>Date:</b> 27 Nov 2000</p> <p> Section 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops] states that </p> @@ -8299,7 +8301,7 @@ validity. </p> <p> -If we accept the proposed resolution to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>, +If we accept the proposed resolution to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>, then we'd better clarify that a "valid" iterator need no longer designate an element within the same container as it once did. We then have to clarify what we mean by invalidating a past-the-end @@ -8308,7 +8310,7 @@ such an iterator has a different kind of validity. Perhaps we should introduce separate terms for the two kinds of "validity." </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add the following text to the end of section 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>, +<p>Add the following text to the end of section 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>, after paragraph 5:</p> <blockquote> An <i>invalid</i> iterator is an iterator that may be @@ -8334,10 +8336,10 @@ the wording. Dave provided new wording.]</i></p> all iterators pointing into the vector. That doesn't necessarily mean they all become singular.</p> <hr> -<a name="281"><h3>281. std::min() and max() requirements overly restrictive</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Dec 2000</p> +<a name="281"><h3>281. std::min() and max() requirements overly restrictive</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Dec 2000</p> <p>The requirements in 25.3.7, p1 and 4 call for T to satisfy the -requirements of <tt>LessThanComparable</tt> (20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>) -and <tt>CopyConstructible</tt> (20.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.copyconstructible"> [lib.copyconstructible]</a>). +requirements of <tt>LessThanComparable</tt> (20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>) +and <tt>CopyConstructible</tt> (20.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.copyconstructible"> [lib.copyconstructible]</a>). Since the functions take and return their arguments and result by const reference, I believe the <tt>CopyConstructible</tt> requirement is unnecessary. @@ -8346,14 +8348,14 @@ is unnecessary. <p>Remove the <tt>CopyConstructible</tt> requirement. Specifically, replace 25.3.7, p1 with</p> <p><b>-1- Requires:</b> Type T is <tt>LessThanComparable</tt> -(20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>). +(20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>). </p> <p>and replace 25.3.7, p4 with</p> <p><b>-4- Requires:</b> Type T is <tt>LessThanComparable</tt> -(20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>). +(20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>). </p> <hr> -<a name="282"><h3>282. What types does numpunct grouping refer to?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 5 Dec 2000</p> +<a name="282"><h3>282. What types does numpunct grouping refer to?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 5 Dec 2000</p> <p> Paragraph 16 mistakenly singles out integral types for inserting thousands_sep() characters. This conflicts with the syntax for floating @@ -8365,7 +8367,7 @@ point numbers described under 22.2.3.1/2. <blockquote> For integral types, punct.thousands_sep() characters are inserted into the sequence as determined by the value returned by punct.do_grouping() -using the method described in 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>. +using the method described in 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>. </blockquote> <p>To:</p> @@ -8373,7 +8375,7 @@ using the method described in 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/s <blockquote> For arithmetic types, punct.thousands_sep() characters are inserted into the sequence as determined by the value returned by punct.do_grouping() -using the method described in 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>. +using the method described in 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>. </blockquote> <p><i>[ @@ -8397,7 +8399,7 @@ standard. Howard, Bill, Pete, Benjamin, Nathan, Dietmar, Boris, and Martin.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="283"><h3>283. std::replace() requirement incorrect/insufficient</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 2000</p> +<a name="283"><h3>283. std::replace() requirement incorrect/insufficient</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 15 Dec 2000</p> <p> (revision of the further discussion) There are a number of problems with the requires clauses for the @@ -8544,18 +8546,18 @@ imposing a greater restriction that what the standard currently says (which is convertible to bool). </p> <hr> -<a name="284"><h3>284. unportable example in 20.3.7, p6</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 26 Dec 2000</p> -<p>The example in 20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a>, p6 shows how to use the C +<a name="284"><h3>284. unportable example in 20.3.7, p6</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 26 Dec 2000</p> +<p>The example in 20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a>, p6 shows how to use the C library function <tt>strcmp()</tt> with the function pointer adapter <tt>ptr_fun()</tt>. But since it's unspecified whether the C library functions have <tt>extern "C"</tt> or <tt>extern -"C++"</tt> linkage [17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a>], and since +"C++"</tt> linkage [17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a>], and since function pointers with different the language linkage specifications -(7.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/dcl.html#dcl.link"> [dcl.link]</a>) are incompatible, whether this example is +(7.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/dcl.html#dcl.link"> [dcl.link]</a>) are incompatible, whether this example is well-formed is unspecified. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a> paragraph 6 from:</p> +<p>Change 20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a> paragraph 6 from:</p> <blockquote> <p>[<i>Example:</i></p> <pre> replace_if(v.begin(), v.end(), not1(bind2nd(ptr_fun(strcmp), "C")), "C++"); @@ -8587,9 +8589,9 @@ aren't normative), and changed the sentence after the footnote so that it corresponds to the new code fragment.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="285"><h3>285. minor editorial errors in fstream ctors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.cons"> [lib.ifstream.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 31 Dec 2000</p> -<p>27.8.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.cons"> [lib.ifstream.cons]</a>, p2, 27.8.1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.cons"> [lib.ofstream.cons]</a>, p2, and -27.8.1.12 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.cons"> [lib.fstream.cons]</a>, p2 say about the effects of each constructor: +<a name="285"><h3>285. minor editorial errors in fstream ctors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.cons"> [lib.ifstream.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 31 Dec 2000</p> +<p>27.8.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.cons"> [lib.ifstream.cons]</a>, p2, 27.8.1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.cons"> [lib.ofstream.cons]</a>, p2, and +27.8.1.12 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.cons"> [lib.fstream.cons]</a>, p2 say about the effects of each constructor: </p> <p>... If that function returns a null pointer, calls @@ -8597,7 +8599,7 @@ it corresponds to the new code fragment.]</i></p> </p> <p>The parenthetical note doesn't apply since the ctors cannot throw an -exception due to the requirement in 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>, p3 +exception due to the requirement in 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>, p3 that <tt>exceptions()</tt> be initialized to <tt>ios_base::goodbit</tt>. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> @@ -8606,7 +8608,7 @@ Strike the parenthetical note from the Effects clause in each of the paragraphs mentioned above. </p> <hr> -<a name="286"><h3>286. <cstdlib> requirements missing size_t typedef</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 30 Dec 2000</p> +<a name="286"><h3>286. <cstdlib> requirements missing size_t typedef</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 30 Dec 2000</p> <p> The <cstdlib> header file contains prototypes for bsearch and qsort (C++ Standard section 25.4 paragraphs 3 and 4) and other @@ -8622,7 +8624,7 @@ the type size_t <cstdlib> to Table 97 (section C.2). <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Since size_t is in <stdlib.h>, it must also be in <cstdlib>.</p> <hr> -<a name="288"><h3>288. <cerrno> requirements missing macro EILSEQ</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 19.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.errno"> [lib.errno]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 30 Dec 2000</p> +<a name="288"><h3>288. <cerrno> requirements missing macro EILSEQ</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 19.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.errno"> [lib.errno]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Judy Ward <b>Date:</b> 30 Dec 2000</p> <p> ISO/IEC 9899:1990/Amendment1:1994 Section 4.3 States: "The list of macros defined in <errno.h> is adjusted to include a new @@ -8640,7 +8642,7 @@ Update Table 26 (section 19.3) "Header <cerrno> synopsis" and Table 95 (section C.2) "Standard Macros" to include EILSEQ. </p> <hr> -<a name="291"><h3>291. Underspecification of set algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 03 Jan 2001</p> +<a name="291"><h3>291. Underspecification of set algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 03 Jan 2001</p> <p> The standard library contains four algorithms that compute set operations on sorted ranges: <tt>set_union</tt>, <tt>set_intersection</tt>, @@ -8691,7 +8693,7 @@ same way. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add the following to the end of 25.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.union"> [lib.set.union]</a> paragraph 5:</p> +<p>Add the following to the end of 25.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.union"> [lib.set.union]</a> paragraph 5:</p> <blockquote> If [first1, last1) contains <i>m</i> elements that are equivalent to each other and [first2, last2) contains <i>n</i> elements that are @@ -8701,7 +8703,7 @@ from [first1, last1), and the last max(<i>n-m</i>, 0) of them from [first2, last2), in that order. </blockquote> -<p>Add the following to the end of 25.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.intersection"> [lib.set.intersection]</a> paragraph 5:</p> +<p>Add the following to the end of 25.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.intersection"> [lib.set.intersection]</a> paragraph 5:</p> <blockquote> If [first1, last1) contains <i>m</i> elements that are equivalent to each other and [first2, last2) contains <i>n</i> elements that are @@ -8709,7 +8711,7 @@ equivalent to them, the first min(<i>m</i>, <i>n</i>) of those elements from [first1, last1) are copied to the output range. </blockquote> -<p>Add a new paragraph, <b>Notes</b>, after 25.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.difference"> [lib.set.difference]</a> +<p>Add a new paragraph, <b>Notes</b>, after 25.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.difference"> [lib.set.difference]</a> paragraph 4:</p> <blockquote> If [first1, last1) contains <i>m</i> elements that are equivalent to each @@ -8718,7 +8720,7 @@ equivalent to them, the last max(<i>m-n</i>, 0) elements from [first1, last1) are copied to the output range. </blockquote> -<p>Add a new paragraph, <b>Notes</b>, after 25.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.symmetric.difference"> [lib.set.symmetric.difference]</a> +<p>Add a new paragraph, <b>Notes</b>, after 25.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.symmetric.difference"> [lib.set.symmetric.difference]</a> paragraph 4:</p> <blockquote> If [first1, last1) contains <i>m</i> elements that are equivalent to @@ -8741,7 +8743,7 @@ m</i> of these elements from [first2, last2) if <i>m</i> < <i>n</i>. already in the Standard. For more complicated cases, they describe the behavior of existing implementations.</p> <hr> -<a name="292"><h3>292. effects of a.copyfmt (a)</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 05 Jan 2001</p> +<a name="292"><h3>292. effects of a.copyfmt (a)</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 05 Jan 2001</p> <p>The Effects clause of the member function <tt>copyfmt()</tt> in 27.4.4.2, p15 doesn't consider the case where the left-hand side argument is identical to the argument on the right-hand side, that is @@ -8769,7 +8771,7 @@ assigns to the member objects of <tt>*this</tt> the corresponding member objects of <tt>rhs</tt>, except that... </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="295"><h3>295. Is abs defined in <cmath>?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Jens Maurer <b>Date:</b> 12 Jan 2001</p> +<a name="295"><h3>295. Is abs defined in <cmath>?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Jens Maurer <b>Date:</b> 12 Jan 2001</p> <p> Table 80 lists the contents of the <cmath> header. It does not list <tt>abs()</tt>. However, 26.5, paragraph 6, which lists added @@ -8779,7 +8781,7 @@ of <tt>abs()</tt> should be defined in <cmath>. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> Add <tt>abs</tt> to Table 80. Also, remove the parenthetical list -of functions "(abs(), div(), rand(), srand())" from 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>, +of functions "(abs(), div(), rand(), srand())" from 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>, paragraph 1. </p> @@ -8790,9 +8792,9 @@ rid of that vestigial list of functions in paragraph 1.]</i></p> <p>All this DR does is fix a typo; it's uncontroversial. A separate question is whether we're doing the right thing in putting some overloads in <cmath> that we aren't also -putting in <cstdlib>. That's issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>.</p> +putting in <cstdlib>. That's issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>.</p> <hr> -<a name="297"><h3>297. const_mem_fun_t<>::argument_type should be const T*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.member.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.member.pointer.adaptors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 6 Jan 2001</p> +<a name="297"><h3>297. const_mem_fun_t<>::argument_type should be const T*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.member.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.member.pointer.adaptors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 6 Jan 2001</p> <p>The class templates <tt>const_mem_fun_t</tt> in 20.3.8, p8 and <tt>const_mem_fun1_t</tt> in 20.3.8, p9 derive from <tt>unary_function<T*, S></tt>, and @@ -8862,7 +8864,7 @@ binary_function<<b>const</b> T*, A, S> {</tt> <p>This is simply a contradiction: the <tt>argument_type</tt> typedef, and the argument type itself, are not the same.</p> <hr> -<a name="298"><h3>298. ::operator delete[] requirement incorrect/insufficient</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> John A. Pedretti <b>Date:</b> 10 Jan 2001</p> +<a name="298"><h3>298. ::operator delete[] requirement incorrect/insufficient</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> John A. Pedretti <b>Date:</b> 10 Jan 2001</p> <p> The default behavior of <tt>operator delete[]</tt> described in 18.4.1.2, p12 - namely that for non-null value of <i>ptr</i>, the operator reclaims storage @@ -8885,7 +8887,7 @@ For a null value of <i><tt>ptr</tt></i> , does nothing. Any other value of <i><tt>ptr</tt></i> shall be a value returned earlier by a call to the default <tt>operator new[](std::size_t)</tt>. [Footnote: The value must not have been invalidated by an intervening -call to <tt>operator delete[](void*)</tt> (17.4.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.arguments"> [lib.res.on.arguments]</a>). +call to <tt>operator delete[](void*)</tt> (17.4.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.arguments"> [lib.res.on.arguments]</a>). --- end footnote] For such a non-null value of <i><tt>ptr</tt></i> , reclaims storage allocated by the earlier call to the default <tt>operator new[]</tt>. @@ -8902,7 +8904,7 @@ or <tt>operator delete(<i>ptr</i>, std::nothrow)</tt> respectively. </blockquote> <p>and expunge paragraph 13.</p> <hr> -<a name="300"><h3>300. list::merge() specification incomplete</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> John Pedretti <b>Date:</b> 23 Jan 2001</p> +<a name="300"><h3>300. list::merge() specification incomplete</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> John Pedretti <b>Date:</b> 23 Jan 2001</p> <p> The "Effects" clause for list::merge() (23.2.2.4, p23) appears to be incomplete: it doesn't cover the case where the argument @@ -8911,7 +8913,7 @@ note in p24 (below) is that x be empty after the merge which is surely unintended in this case. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraps 23-25 with:</p> +<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraps 23-25 with:</p> <blockquote> <p> 23 Effects: if (&x == this) does nothing; otherwise, merges the two @@ -8940,7 +8942,7 @@ effects. </blockquote> <p><i>[Copenhagen: The original proposed resolution did not fix all of -the problems in 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, p22-25. Three different +the problems in 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, p22-25. Three different paragraphs (23, 24, 25) describe the effects of <tt>merge</tt>. Changing p23, without changing the other two, appears to introduce contradictions. Additionally, "merges the argument list into the @@ -8949,7 +8951,7 @@ list" is excessively vague.]</i></p> <p><i>[Post-Curaçao: Robert Klarer provided new wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="301"><h3>301. basic_string template ctor effects clause omits allocator argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 27 Jan 2001</p> +<a name="301"><h3>301. basic_string template ctor effects clause omits allocator argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 27 Jan 2001</p> <p> The effects clause for the basic_string template ctor in 21.3.1, p15 leaves out the third argument of type Allocator. I believe this to be @@ -8976,7 +8978,7 @@ a mistake. static_cast<value_type>(end), <b>a</b>)</tt></blockquote> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="303"><h3>303. Bitset input operator underspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.operators"> [lib.bitset.operators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 5 Feb 2001</p> +<a name="303"><h3>303. Bitset input operator underspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.operators"> [lib.bitset.operators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 5 Feb 2001</p> <p> In 23.3.5.3, we are told that <tt>bitset</tt>'s input operator "Extracts up to <i>N</i> (single-byte) characters from @@ -9081,7 +9083,7 @@ input. Using <tt>widen</tt> does mean that alternative digit representations will not be recognized, but this was a known consequence of the design choice.</p> <hr> -<a name="305"><h3>305. Default behavior of codecvt<wchar_t, char, mbstate_t>::length()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 24 Jan 2001</p> +<a name="305"><h3>305. Default behavior of codecvt<wchar_t, char, mbstate_t>::length()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 24 Jan 2001</p> <p>22.2.1.5/3 introduces codecvt in part with:</p> <blockquote> @@ -9193,7 +9195,7 @@ example, and it would rule out a fixed-width encoding of UCS-4.</p> "shift-JIS" changed to "JIS".]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="306"><h3>306. offsetof macro and non-POD types</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.types"> [lib.support.types]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 21 Feb 2001</p> +<a name="306"><h3>306. offsetof macro and non-POD types</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.types"> [lib.support.types]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 21 Feb 2001</p> <p>Spliced together from reflector messages c++std-lib-8294 and -8295:</p> <p>18.1, paragraph 5, reads: "The macro <tt>offsetof</tt> @@ -9204,7 +9206,7 @@ that is a static data member or a function member is undefined."</p> <p>For the POD requirement, it doesn't say "no diagnostic -required" or "undefined behavior". I read 1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/intro.html#intro.compliance"> [intro.compliance]</a>, paragraph 1, to mean that a diagnostic is required. +required" or "undefined behavior". I read 1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/intro.html#intro.compliance"> [intro.compliance]</a>, paragraph 1, to mean that a diagnostic is required. It's not clear whether this requirement was intended. While it's possible to provide such a diagnostic, the extra complication doesn't seem to add any value. @@ -9219,13 +9221,13 @@ members thought that diagnostics should be required whenever possible.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="307"><h3>307. Lack of reference typedefs in container adaptors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.adaptors"> [lib.container.adaptors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 13 Mar 2001</p> +<a name="307"><h3>307. Lack of reference typedefs in container adaptors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.adaptors"> [lib.container.adaptors]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 13 Mar 2001</p> <p>From reflector message c++std-lib-8330. See also lib-8317.</p> <p> -The standard is currently inconsistent in 23.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.priority.queue"> [lib.priority.queue]</a> -paragraph 1 and 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a> paragraph 1. +The standard is currently inconsistent in 23.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.priority.queue"> [lib.priority.queue]</a> +paragraph 1 and 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a> paragraph 1. 23.2.3.3/1, for example, says: </p> @@ -9251,7 +9253,7 @@ container's reference type.</p> <p> I propose 3. This does not preclude option 2 if we choose to do it -later (see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#96">96</a>); the issues are independent. Option +later (see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#96">96</a>); the issues are independent. Option 3 offers a small step towards support for proxied containers. This small step fixes a current contradiction, is easy for vendors to implement, is already implemented in at least one popular lib, and @@ -9480,14 +9482,14 @@ and it was deliberately not adopted. Nevertheless, the LWG believes (straw poll: 10-2) that it is a genuine defect.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="308"><h3>308. Table 82 mentions unrelated headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 15 Mar 2001</p> +<a name="308"><h3>308. Table 82 mentions unrelated headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 15 Mar 2001</p> <p> Table 82 in section 27 mentions the header <cstdlib> for String -streams (27.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.string.streams"> [lib.string.streams]</a>) and the headers <cstdio> and -<cwchar> for File streams (27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>). It's not clear +streams (27.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.string.streams"> [lib.string.streams]</a>) and the headers <cstdio> and +<cwchar> for File streams (27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>). It's not clear why these headers are mentioned in this context since they do not define any of the library entities described by the -subclauses. According to 17.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.contents"> [lib.contents]</a>, only such headers +subclauses. According to 17.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.contents"> [lib.contents]</a>, only such headers are to be listed in the summary. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> @@ -9497,10 +9499,10 @@ Table 82.</p> <p><i>[Copenhagen: changed the proposed resolution slightly. The original proposed resolution also said to remove <cstdio> from Table 82. However, <cstdio> is mentioned several times within -section 27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>, including 27.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.c.files"> [lib.c.files]</a>.]</i></p> +section 27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>, including 27.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.c.files"> [lib.c.files]</a>.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="310"><h3>310. Is errno a macro?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>, 19.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.errno"> [lib.errno]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 21 Mar 2001</p> +<a name="310"><h3>310. Is errno a macro?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>, 19.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.errno"> [lib.errno]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Steve Clamage <b>Date:</b> 21 Mar 2001</p> <p> Exactly how should errno be declared in a conforming C++ header? </p> @@ -9587,9 +9589,9 @@ to be a macro.</p> <p><i>[Curaçao: additional rationale added.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="311"><h3>311. Incorrect wording in basic_ostream class synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 21 Mar 2001</p> +<a name="311"><h3>311. Incorrect wording in basic_ostream class synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 21 Mar 2001</p> -<p>In 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, the synopsis of class basic_ostream says:</p> +<p>In 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, the synopsis of class basic_ostream says:</p> <pre> // partial specializationss template<class traits> @@ -9604,29 +9606,29 @@ to be a macro.</p> </ul> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In the synopsis in 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, remove the +<p>In the synopsis in 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, remove the <i>// partial specializationss</i> comment. Also remove the same comment (correctly spelled, but still incorrect) from the synopsis in -27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a>. +27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a>. </p> <p><i>[ -Pre-Redmond: added 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> because of Martin's +Pre-Redmond: added 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> because of Martin's comment in c++std-lib-8939. ]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="312"><h3>312. Table 27 is missing headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.utilities"> [lib.utilities]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 29 Mar 2001</p> +<a name="312"><h3>312. Table 27 is missing headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.utilities"> [lib.utilities]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 29 Mar 2001</p> <p>Table 27 in section 20 lists the header <memory> (only) for Memory (lib.memory) but neglects to mention the headers -<cstdlib> and <cstring> that are discussed in 20.4.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.c.malloc"> [lib.c.malloc]</a>.</p> +<cstdlib> and <cstring> that are discussed in 20.4.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.c.malloc"> [lib.c.malloc]</a>.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Add <cstdlib> and <cstring> to Table 27, in the same row as <memory>.</p> <hr> -<a name="315"><h3>315. Bad "range" in list::unique complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 1 May 2001</p> +<a name="315"><h3>315. Bad "range" in list::unique complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 1 May 2001</p> <p> -23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, Para 21 describes the complexity of +23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, Para 21 describes the complexity of list::unique as: "If the range (last - first) is not empty, exactly (last - first) -1 applications of the corresponding predicate, otherwise no applications of the predicate)". @@ -9640,7 +9642,7 @@ otherwise no applications of the predicate)". Change the "range" from (last - first) to [first, last). </p> <hr> -<a name="316"><h3>316. Vague text in Table 69</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 4 May 2001</p> +<a name="316"><h3>316. Vague text in Table 69</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 4 May 2001</p> <p>Table 69 says this about a_uniq.insert(t):</p> <blockquote> @@ -9660,7 +9662,7 @@ indicates whether the insertion takes place.</p> takes place... </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="317"><h3>317. Instantiation vs. specialization of facets</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.localization"> [lib.localization]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 4 May 2001</p> +<a name="317"><h3>317. Instantiation vs. specialization of facets</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.localization"> [lib.localization]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 4 May 2001</p> <p> The localization section of the standard refers to specializations of the facet templates as instantiations even though the required facets @@ -9709,7 +9711,7 @@ describe templates was clarified during the standardization process, but the wording in clause 22 was never updated to reflect that change.</p> <hr> -<a name="318"><h3>318. Misleading comment in definition of numpunct_byname</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct.byname"> [lib.locale.numpunct.byname]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 12 May 2001</p> +<a name="318"><h3>318. Misleading comment in definition of numpunct_byname</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct.byname"> [lib.locale.numpunct.byname]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 12 May 2001</p> <p>The definition of the numpunct_byname template contains the following comment:</p> @@ -9725,14 +9727,14 @@ conceivable that an implementation will not explicitly specialize the template at all, but simply provide the primary template.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Remove the comment from the text in 22.2.3.2 and from the proposed -resolution of library issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a>.</p> +resolution of library issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a>.</p> <hr> -<a name="319"><h3>319. Storage allocation wording confuses "Required behavior", "Requires"</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a>, 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 15 May 2001</p> -<p>The standard specifies 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> that "Required +<a name="319"><h3>319. Storage allocation wording confuses "Required behavior", "Requires"</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a>, 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 15 May 2001</p> +<p>The standard specifies 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> that "Required behavior" elements describe "the semantics of a function definition provided by either the implementation or a C++ program."</p> -<p>The standard specifies 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> that "Requires" +<p>The standard specifies 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> that "Requires" elements describe "the preconditions for calling the function."</p> <p>In the sections noted below, the current wording specifies @@ -9741,7 +9743,7 @@ should be specified as "Requires".</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a> Para 12 Change:</p> +<p>In 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a> Para 12 Change:</p> <blockquote> <p>Required behavior: accept a value of ptr that is null or that was returned by an earlier call ...</p> @@ -9752,7 +9754,7 @@ should be specified as "Requires".</p> earlier call ...</p> </blockquote> -<p>In 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a> Para 11 Change:</p> +<p>In 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a> Para 11 Change:</p> <blockquote> <p>Required behavior: accept a value of ptr that is null or that was returned by an earlier call ...</p> @@ -9764,7 +9766,7 @@ should be specified as "Requires".</p> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="320"><h3>320. list::assign overspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.cons"> [lib.list.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 17 May 2001</p> +<a name="320"><h3>320. list::assign overspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.cons"> [lib.list.cons]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Howard Hinnant <b>Date:</b> 17 May 2001</p> <p> Section 23.2.2.1, paragraphs 6-8 specify that list assign (both forms) have the "effects" of a call to erase followed by a call to insert. @@ -9806,7 +9808,7 @@ Metrowerks and SGI recycle nodes, Dinkumware and Rogue Wave don't. <p>Effects: Replaces the contents of the list with the range [first, last).</p> </blockquote> -<p>In 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>, in Table 67 (sequence requirements), +<p>In 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>, in Table 67 (sequence requirements), add two new rows:</p> <pre> a.assign(i,j) void pre: i,j are not iterators into a. Replaces elements in a with a copy @@ -9847,7 +9849,7 @@ with "Replaces the elements of a with a copy of [i, j)." Changes not deemed serious enough to requre rereview.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="321"><h3>321. Typo in num_get</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Kevin Djang <b>Date:</b> 17 May 2001</p> +<a name="321"><h3>321. Typo in num_get</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Kevin Djang <b>Date:</b> 17 May 2001</p> <p> Section 22.2.2.1.2 at p7 states that "A length specifier is added to the conversion function, if needed, as indicated in Table 56." @@ -9862,7 +9864,7 @@ to be "A length modifier is added ..." <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>C uses the term "length modifier". We should be consistent.</p> <hr> -<a name="322"><h3>322. iterator and const_iterator should have the same value type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 17 May 2001</p> +<a name="322"><h3>322. iterator and const_iterator should have the same value type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 17 May 2001</p> <p> It's widely assumed that, if X is a container, iterator_traits<X::iterator>::value_type and @@ -9874,7 +9876,7 @@ iterator_traits<X::const_iterator>::value_type should be "const X::value_type". </p> -<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a>.</p> +<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a>.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>In Table 65 ("Container Requirements"), change the return type for X::iterator to "iterator type whose value type is T". Change the @@ -9894,7 +9896,7 @@ the way that const pointers are handled: the standard already requires that iterator_traits<const int*>::value_type is int. </p> <hr> -<a name="324"><h3>324. Do output iterators have value types?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 7 June 2001</p> +<a name="324"><h3>324. Do output iterators have value types?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 7 June 2001</p> <p>Table 73 suggests that output iterators have value types. It requires the expression "*a = t". Additionally, although Table 73 @@ -10012,7 +10014,7 @@ and any language suggesting otherwise is simply a mistake.</p> <p>A future revision of the standard may wish to revisit this design decision.</p> <hr> -<a name="325"><h3>325. Misleading text in moneypunct<>::do_grouping</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.6.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.moneypunct.virtuals"> [lib.locale.moneypunct.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Jul 2001</p> +<a name="325"><h3>325. Misleading text in moneypunct<>::do_grouping</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.6.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.moneypunct.virtuals"> [lib.locale.moneypunct.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 02 Jul 2001</p> <p>The Returns clause in 22.2.6.3.2, p3 says about moneypunct<charT>::do_grouping() </p> @@ -10064,7 +10066,7 @@ locale. It is just a reminder that the values are interpreted as small integers, not ASCII characters. </p> <hr> -<a name="327"><h3>327. Typo in time_get facet in table 52</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Tiki Wan <b>Date:</b> 06 Jul 2001</p> +<a name="327"><h3>327. Typo in time_get facet in table 52</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Tiki Wan <b>Date:</b> 06 Jul 2001</p> <p>The <tt>wchar_t</tt> versions of <tt>time_get</tt> and <tt>time_get_byname</tt> are listed incorrectly in table 52, required instantiations. In both cases the second template @@ -10073,7 +10075,7 @@ InputIterator, since these are input facets.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> In table 52, required instantiations, in -22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, change</p> +22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, change</p> <pre> time_get<wchar_t, OutputIterator> time_get_byname<wchar_t, OutputIterator> </pre> @@ -10086,7 +10088,7 @@ In table 52, required instantiations, in a typo, wchart instead of wchar_t.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="328"><h3>328. Bad sprintf format modifier in money_put<>::do_put()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.6.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.money.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.money.put.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 07 Jul 2001</p> +<a name="328"><h3>328. Bad sprintf format modifier in money_put<>::do_put()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.6.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.money.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.money.put.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 07 Jul 2001</p> <p>The sprintf format string , "%.01f" (that's the digit one), in the description of the do_put() member functions of the money_put facet in 22.2.6.2.2, p1 is incorrect. First, the f format specifier is wrong @@ -10099,11 +10101,11 @@ modifier.</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Fixes an obvious typo</p> <hr> -<a name="329"><h3>329. vector capacity, reserve and reallocation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a>, 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Anthony Williams <b>Date:</b> 13 Jul 2001</p> +<a name="329"><h3>329. vector capacity, reserve and reallocation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a>, 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Anthony Williams <b>Date:</b> 13 Jul 2001</p> <p> There is an apparent contradiction about which circumstances can cause -a reallocation of a vector in Section 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> and -section 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>. +a reallocation of a vector in Section 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> and +section 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>. </p> <p>23.2.4.2p5 says:</p> @@ -10155,7 +10157,7 @@ than the old capacity, I think the intent is clear. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change the wording of 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> paragraph 5 to:</p> +<p>Change the wording of 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> paragraph 5 to:</p> <blockquote> Notes: Reallocation invalidates all the references, pointers, and @@ -10179,12 +10181,12 @@ the argument to the first, the intent was for the second invocation to have no effect. Wording implying that such cases have an effect on reallocation guarantees was inadvertant.</p> <hr> -<a name="331"><h3>331. bad declaration of destructor for ios_base::failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> PremAnand M. Rao <b>Date:</b> 23 Aug 2001</p> +<a name="331"><h3>331. bad declaration of destructor for ios_base::failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> PremAnand M. Rao <b>Date:</b> 23 Aug 2001</p> <p> -With the change in 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> to state +With the change in 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> to state "An implementation may strengthen the exception-specification for a non-virtual function by removing listed exceptions." -(issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#119">119</a>) +(issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#119">119</a>) and the following declaration of ~failure() in ios_base::failure </p> <pre> namespace std { @@ -10196,7 +10198,7 @@ and the following declaration of ~failure() in ios_base::failure }; } </pre> -<p>the class failure cannot be implemented since in 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> the destructor of class exception has an empty +<p>the class failure cannot be implemented since in 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> the destructor of class exception has an empty exception specification:</p> <pre> namespace std { class exception { @@ -10213,8 +10215,8 @@ exception specification:</p> <p>The proposed resolution is consistent with the way that destructors of other classes derived from <tt>exception</tt> are handled.</p> <hr> -<a name="333"><h3>333. does endl imply synchronization with the device?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> PremAnand M. Rao <b>Date:</b> 27 Aug 2001</p> -<p>A footnote in 27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a> states:</p> +<a name="333"></a><h3><a name="333">333. does endl imply synchronization with the device?</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> PremAnand M. Rao <b>Date:</b> 27 Aug 2001</p> +<p>A footnote in 27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a> states:</p> <blockquote> [Footnote: The effect of executing cout << endl is to insert a newline character in the output sequence controlled by cout, then @@ -10239,7 +10241,7 @@ I could not find any other statement that explicitly defined the behavior one way or the other. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Remove footnote 300 from section 27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a>.</p> +<p>Remove footnote 300 from section 27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a>.</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>We already have normative text saying what <tt>endl</tt> does: it inserts a newline character and calls <tt>flush</tt>. This footnote @@ -10247,7 +10249,7 @@ is at best redundant, at worst (as this issue says) misleading, because it appears to make promises about what <tt>flush</tt> does.</p> <hr> -<a name="334"><h3>334. map::operator[] specification forces inefficient implementation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrea Griffini <b>Date:</b> 02 Sep 2001</p> +<a name="334"><h3>334. map::operator[] specification forces inefficient implementation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andrea Griffini <b>Date:</b> 02 Sep 2001</p> <p> The current standard describes map::operator[] using a code example. That code example is however quite @@ -10324,7 +10326,7 @@ non-conforming. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -Replace 23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a> paragraph 1 with +Replace 23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a> paragraph 1 with </p> <blockquote> <p> @@ -10343,7 +10345,7 @@ value_type(x, T()) into the map. wording. We may also wish to have a blanket statement somewhere in clause 17 saying that we do not intend the semantics of sample code fragments to be interpreted as specifing exactly how many copies are -made. See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#98">98</a> for a similar problem.]</i></p> +made. See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#98">98</a> for a similar problem.]</i></p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p> @@ -10355,9 +10357,9 @@ consistent with existing practice. we are no longer defining <tt>operator[]</tt> in terms of <tt>insert</tt>.</p> <hr> -<a name="335"><h3>335. minor issue with char_traits, table 37</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 06 Sep 2001</p> +<a name="335"><h3>335. minor issue with char_traits, table 37</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 06 Sep 2001</p> <p> -Table 37, in 21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a>, descibes char_traits::assign +Table 37, in 21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a>, descibes char_traits::assign as: </p> <pre> X::assign(c,d) assigns c = d. @@ -10394,10 +10396,10 @@ and char_traits<wchar_t> in 21.1.3.2...) <pre> X::assign(r,d) assigns r = d </pre> <hr> -<a name="336"><h3>336. Clause 17 lack of references to deprecated headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Detlef Vollmann <b>Date:</b> 05 Sep 2001</p> +<a name="336"></a><h3><a name="336">336. Clause 17 lack of references to deprecated headers</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Detlef Vollmann <b>Date:</b> 05 Sep 2001</p> <p>From c++std-edit-873:</p> -<p>17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>, Table 11. In this table, the header +<p>17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>, Table 11. In this table, the header <strstream> is missing.</p> <p>This shows a general problem: The whole clause 17 refers quite @@ -10406,47 +10408,47 @@ library (though a deprecated one).</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>To 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> Table 11, C++ Library Headers, add +<p>To 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> Table 11, C++ Library Headers, add "<strstream>".</p> <p>In the following places, change "clauses 17 through 27" to "clauses 17 through 27 and Annex D":</p> <ul> -<li>1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/intro.html#intro.refs"> [intro.refs]</a> Normative references/1/footnote 1</li> -<li>1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/intro.html#intro.defs"> [intro.defs]</a> Definitions/1</li> -<li>7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/dcl.html#dcl.dcl"> [dcl.dcl]</a> Library introduction/9</li> -<li>17.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.description"> [lib.description]</a> Method of description (Informative)/1</li> -<li>17.3.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.character.seq"> [lib.character.seq]</a> Character sequences/1/bullet 2</li> -<li>17.3.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.functions.within.classes"> [lib.functions.within.classes]</a> Functions within classes/1</li> -<li>17.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.objects.within.classes"> [lib.objects.within.classes]</a> Private members/1/(2 places)</li> -<li>17.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.requirements"> [lib.requirements]</a> Library-wide requirements/1</li> -<li>17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> Headers/4</li> -<li>17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> Replacement functions/1</li> -<li>17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a> Global or non-member functions/2</li> -<li>17.4.4.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.protection.within.classes"> [lib.protection.within.classes]</a> Protection within classes/1</li> +<li>1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/intro.html#intro.refs"> [intro.refs]</a> Normative references/1/footnote 1</li> +<li>1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/intro.html#intro.defs"> [intro.defs]</a> Definitions/1</li> +<li>7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/dcl.html#dcl.dcl"> [dcl.dcl]</a> Library introduction/9</li> +<li>17.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.description"> [lib.description]</a> Method of description (Informative)/1</li> +<li>17.3.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.character.seq"> [lib.character.seq]</a> Character sequences/1/bullet 2</li> +<li>17.3.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.functions.within.classes"> [lib.functions.within.classes]</a> Functions within classes/1</li> +<li>17.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.objects.within.classes"> [lib.objects.within.classes]</a> Private members/1/(2 places)</li> +<li>17.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.requirements"> [lib.requirements]</a> Library-wide requirements/1</li> +<li>17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> Headers/4</li> +<li>17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> Replacement functions/1</li> +<li>17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a> Global or non-member functions/2</li> +<li>17.4.4.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.protection.within.classes"> [lib.protection.within.classes]</a> Protection within classes/1</li> </ul> <hr> -<a name="337"><h3>337. replace_copy_if's template parameter should be InputIterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Detlef Vollmann <b>Date:</b> 07 Sep 2001</p> +<a name="337"><h3>337. replace_copy_if's template parameter should be InputIterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Detlef Vollmann <b>Date:</b> 07 Sep 2001</p> <p>From c++std-edit-876:</p> <p> -In section 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> before p4: The name of the first +In section 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> before p4: The name of the first parameter of template replace_copy_if should be "InputIterator" -instead of "Iterator". According to 17.3.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.type.descriptions"> [lib.type.descriptions]</a> p1 the +instead of "Iterator". According to 17.3.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.type.descriptions"> [lib.type.descriptions]</a> p1 the parameter name conveys real normative meaning. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Change <tt>Iterator</tt> to <tt>InputIterator</tt>.</p> <hr> -<a name="338"><h3>338. is whitespace allowed between `-' and a digit?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.categories"> [lib.locale.categories]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 17 Sep 2001</p> +<a name="338"><h3>338. is whitespace allowed between `-' and a digit?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.categories"> [lib.locale.categories]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 17 Sep 2001</p> <p> ->From Stage 2 processing in 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, p8 and 9 (the +From Stage 2 processing in 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, p8 and 9 (the original text or the text corrected by the proposed resolution of -issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a>) it seems clear that no whitespace is allowed -within a number, but 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a>, p2, which gives the +issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a>) it seems clear that no whitespace is allowed +within a number, but 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a>, p2, which gives the format for integer and floating point values, says that whitespace is optional between a plusminus and a sign. </p> @@ -10456,10 +10458,10 @@ The text needs to be clarified to either consistently allow or disallow whitespace between a plusminus and a sign. It might be worthwhile to consider the fact that the C library stdio facility does not permit whitespace embedded in numbers and neither does the C or -C++ core language (the syntax of integer-literals is given in 2.13.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lex.html#lex.icon"> [lex.icon]</a>, that of floating-point-literals in 2.13.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lex.html#lex.fcon"> [lex.fcon]</a> of the C++ standard). +C++ core language (the syntax of integer-literals is given in 2.13.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lex.html#lex.icon"> [lex.icon]</a>, that of floating-point-literals in 2.13.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lex.html#lex.fcon"> [lex.fcon]</a> of the C++ standard). </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change the first part of 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a> paragraph 2 from:</p> +<p>Change the first part of 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a> paragraph 2 from:</p> <blockquote> <p> The syntax for number formats is as follows, where <tt>digit</tt> @@ -10494,16 +10496,16 @@ Integer values have the format: </pre> </blockquote> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> -<p>It's not clear whether the format described in 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a> paragraph 2 has any normative weight: nothing in the +<p>It's not clear whether the format described in 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a> paragraph 2 has any normative weight: nothing in the standard says how, or whether, it's used. However, there's no reason for it to differ gratuitously from the very specific description of -numeric processing in 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>. The proposed +numeric processing in 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>. The proposed resolution removes all mention of "whitespace" from that format.</p> <hr> -<a name="339"><h3>339. definition of bitmask type restricted to clause 27</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a>, 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 17 September 2001</p> +<a name="339"><h3>339. definition of bitmask type restricted to clause 27</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a>, 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 17 September 2001</p> <p> -The ctype_category::mask type is declared to be an enum in 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a> with p1 then stating that it is a bitmask type, most -likely referring to the definition of bitmask type in 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>, p1. However, the said definition only applies to +The ctype_category::mask type is declared to be an enum in 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a> with p1 then stating that it is a bitmask type, most +likely referring to the definition of bitmask type in 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>, p1. However, the said definition only applies to clause 27, making the reference in 22.2.1 somewhat dubious. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> @@ -10511,7 +10513,7 @@ clause 27, making the reference in 22.2.1 somewhat dubious. <blockquote> Several types defined in clause 27 are bitmask types. Each bitmask type can be implemented as an enumerated type that overloads certain operators, - as an integer type, or as a bitset (23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a>). + as an integer type, or as a bitset (23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a>). </blockquote> <p>to read</p> <blockquote> @@ -10551,7 +10553,7 @@ following (note, in particluar, the cross-reference to 17.3.2.1.2 in } </pre> -<p>The type <tt>mask</tt> is a bitmask type (17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>).</p> +<p>The type <tt>mask</tt> is a bitmask type (17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>).</p> </blockquote> <p><i>[Curaçao: The LWG notes that T above should be bold-italics to be @@ -10559,7 +10561,7 @@ consistent with the rest of the standard.]</i></p> <hr> <a name="340"><h3>340. interpretation of <tt>has_facet<Facet>(loc)</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2001</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2001</p> <p> It's unclear whether 22.1.1.1.1, p3 says that <tt>has_facet<Facet>(loc)</tt> returns true for any <tt>Facet</tt> @@ -10606,7 +10608,7 @@ to hold only for specializations of <tt>Facet</tt> from Table 52 on }. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, paragraph 3, change +<p>In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, paragraph 3, change "that is a member of a standard category" to "shown in Table 51".</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The facets in Table 52 are an unbounded set. Locales should not be @@ -10616,7 +10618,7 @@ required to contain an infinite number of facets.</p> OutputIterator must be supported. Table 51 already contains a complete list of the ones we need.</p> <hr> -<a name="341"><h3>341. Vector reallocation and swap</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Anthony Williams <b>Date:</b> 27 Sep 2001</p> +<a name="341"><h3>341. Vector reallocation and swap</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Anthony Williams <b>Date:</b> 27 Sep 2001</p> <p>It is a common idiom to reduce the capacity of a vector by swapping it with an empty one:</p> <pre> std::vector<SomeType> vec; @@ -10625,16 +10627,16 @@ an empty one:</p> // vec is now empty, with minimal capacity </pre> -<p>However, the wording of 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a>paragraph 5 prevents +<p>However, the wording of 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a>paragraph 5 prevents the capacity of a vector being reduced, following a call to reserve(). This invalidates the idiom, as swap() is thus prevented -from reducing the capacity. The proposed wording for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#329">329</a> does not affect this. Consequently, the example above +from reducing the capacity. The proposed wording for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#329">329</a> does not affect this. Consequently, the example above requires the temporary to be expanded to cater for the contents of vec, and the contents be copied across. This is a linear-time operation.</p> <p>However, the container requirements state that swap must have constant -complexity (23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> note to table 65).</p> +complexity (23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> note to table 65).</p> <p>This is an important issue, as reallocation affects the validity of references and iterators.</p> @@ -10656,7 +10658,7 @@ pointing to the same element. Consequently iterators and references that referred to one vector now refer to the other, and vice-versa.</li> </ol> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add a new paragraph after 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> paragraph 5:</p> +<p>Add a new paragraph after 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> paragraph 5:</p> <blockquote> <pre> void swap(vector<T,Allocator>& x); </pre> @@ -10676,16 +10678,16 @@ do pointer twiddling, and that it should exchange all properties of the two vectors, including their reallocation guarantees. </p> <hr> -<a name="345"><h3>345. type tm in <cwchar></h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Clark Nelson <b>Date:</b> 19 Oct 2001</p> +<a name="345"><h3>345. type tm in <cwchar></h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Clark Nelson <b>Date:</b> 19 Oct 2001</p> <p> C99, and presumably amendment 1 to C90, specify that <wchar.h> -declares struct tm as an incomplete type. However, table 48 in 21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a> does not mention the type tm as being declared in +declares struct tm as an incomplete type. However, table 48 in 21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a> does not mention the type tm as being declared in <cwchar>. Is this omission intentional or accidental? </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In section 21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a>, add "tm" to table 48.</p> +<p>In section 21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a>, add "tm" to table 48.</p> <hr> -<a name="346"><h3>346. Some iterator member functions should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Jeremy Siek <b>Date:</b> 20 Oct 2001</p> +<a name="346"><h3>346. Some iterator member functions should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Jeremy Siek <b>Date:</b> 20 Oct 2001</p> <p>Iterator member functions and operators that do not change the state of the iterator should be defined as const member functions or as functions that take iterators either by const reference or by @@ -10697,7 +10699,7 @@ are suggested to make this explicit.</p> for non-const and a,b for const iterators. The following changes make this more explicit and also fix a couple problems.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> Change the first section of p9 from +<p>In 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> Change the first section of p9 from "In the following sections, a and b denote values of X..." to "In the following sections, a and b denote values of type const X...".</p> @@ -10725,11 +10727,11 @@ make this more explicit and also fix a couple problems.</p> the same problem appears there.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="347"><h3>347. locale::category and bitmask requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> P.J. Plauger, Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 23 Oct 2001</p> +<a name="347"></a><h3><a name="347">347. locale::category and bitmask requirements</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> P.J. Plauger, Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 23 Oct 2001</p> <p> -In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> paragraph 1, the category members +In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> paragraph 1, the category members are described as bitmask elements. In fact, the bitmask requirements -in 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a> don't seem quite right: <tt>none</tt> +in 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a> don't seem quite right: <tt>none</tt> and <tt>all</tt> are bitmask constants, not bitmask elements.</p> <p>In particular, the requirements for <tt>none</tt> interact poorly @@ -10748,7 +10750,7 @@ re-expresses the status quo more clearly, without introducing any changes beyond resolving the DR.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Replace the first two paragraphs of 22.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.types"> [lib.locale.types]</a> with:</p> +<p>Replace the first two paragraphs of 22.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.types"> [lib.locale.types]</a> with:</p> <blockquote> <pre> typedef int category; </pre> @@ -10792,7 +10794,7 @@ shown in Table 51: <blockquote> <p><b>Option 2:</b> <br> -Replace the first paragraph of 22.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.types"> [lib.locale.types]</a> with:</p> +Replace the first paragraph of 22.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.types"> [lib.locale.types]</a> with:</p> <blockquote> <p> Valid category values include the enumerated values. In addition, the @@ -10813,7 +10815,7 @@ of the other enumerated values; implementations may add extra categories.] </blockquote> </blockquote> <hr> -<a name="349"><h3>349. Minor typographical error in ostream_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostream.iterator"> [lib.ostream.iterator]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 24 Oct 2001</p> +<a name="349"><h3>349. Minor typographical error in ostream_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostream.iterator"> [lib.ostream.iterator]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Andy Sawyer <b>Date:</b> 24 Oct 2001</p> <p>24.5.2 [lib.ostream.iterator] states:</p> <pre> [...] @@ -10826,11 +10828,11 @@ of the other enumerated values; implementations may add extra categories.] should be of type 'const charT*'.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -In 24.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostream.iterator"> [lib.ostream.iterator]</a>, replace <tt>const char* delim</tt> with +In 24.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostream.iterator"> [lib.ostream.iterator]</a>, replace <tt>const char* delim</tt> with <tt>const charT* delim</tt>. </p> <hr> -<a name="352"><h3>352. missing fpos requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.typedefs"> [lib.char.traits.typedefs]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 2 Dec 2001</p> +<a name="352"><h3>352. missing fpos requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.typedefs"> [lib.char.traits.typedefs]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 2 Dec 2001</p> <p> <i>(1)</i> There are no requirements on the <tt>stateT</tt> template parameter of @@ -10873,7 +10875,7 @@ template fpos is used only in a very few places, all of which know the state type already. Unless motivation is provided, the second should be considered NAD.</p> <hr> -<a name="354"><h3>354. Associative container lower/upper bound requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Hans Aberg <b>Date:</b> 17 Dec 2001</p> +<a name="354"><h3>354. Associative container lower/upper bound requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Hans Aberg <b>Date:</b> 17 Dec 2001</p> <p> Discussions in the thread "Associative container lower/upper bound requirements" on comp.std.c++ suggests that there is a defect in the @@ -10907,7 +10909,7 @@ the intention (and not possible with the "const" versions). </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change Table 69 of section 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> indicated entries +<p>Change Table 69 of section 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> indicated entries to:</p> <blockquote> @@ -10925,7 +10927,7 @@ key greater than k, or a.end() if such an element is not found. <p><i>[Curaçao: LWG reviewed PR.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="355"><h3>355. Operational semantics for a.back()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Yaroslav Mironov <b>Date:</b> 23 Jan 2002</p> +<a name="355"><h3>355. Operational semantics for a.back()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Yaroslav Mironov <b>Date:</b> 23 Jan 2002</p> <p>Table 68 "Optional Sequence Operations" in 23.1.1/12 specifies operational semantics for "a.back()" as @@ -10995,7 +10997,7 @@ LWG would like a new issue opened.]</i></p> <hr> <a name="358"><h3>358. interpreting <tt>thousands_sep</tt> after a <tt>decimal_point</tt> -</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 12 Mar 2002</p> +</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 12 Mar 2002</p> <p> I don't think <tt>thousands_sep</tt> is being treated correctly after decimal_point has been seen. Since grouping applies only to the @@ -11041,7 +11043,7 @@ Change the first sentence of 22.2.2.1.2, p9 from support for such conventions, we need to do so explicitly.</p> <hr> -<a name="359"><h3>359. num_put<>::do_put (..., bool) undocumented</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.members"> [lib.facet.num.put.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 12 Mar 2002</p> +<a name="359"><h3>359. num_put<>::do_put (..., bool) undocumented</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.members"> [lib.facet.num.put.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 12 Mar 2002</p> <p>22.2.2.2.1, p1:</p> <pre> iter_type put (iter_type out, ios_base& str, char_type fill, @@ -11087,11 +11089,11 @@ I think the least invasive change to fix it would be something like the following: </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, just above paragraph 1, remove +<p>In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, just above paragraph 1, remove the <tt>bool</tt> overload.</p> <p> -In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, p23, make the following changes +In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, p23, make the following changes </p> <blockquote> @@ -11126,7 +11128,7 @@ This fixes a couple of obvious typos, and also fixes what appears to be a requirement of gratuitous inefficiency. </p> <hr> -<a name="360"><h3>360. locale mandates inefficient implementation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 12 Mar 2002</p> +<a name="360"><h3>360. locale mandates inefficient implementation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 12 Mar 2002</p> <p> 22.1.1, p7 (copied below) allows iostream formatters and extractors to make assumptions about the values returned from facet members. @@ -11162,7 +11164,7 @@ prevents locale from being implemented efficiently. <p>This change is reasonable becuase it clarifies the intent of this part of the standard.</p> <hr> -<a name="363"><h3>363. Missing exception specification in 27.4.2.1.1</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Walter Brown and Marc Paterno <b>Date:</b> 20 May 2002</p> +<a name="363"></a><h3><a name="363">363. Missing exception specification in 27.4.2.1.1</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Walter Brown and Marc Paterno <b>Date:</b> 20 May 2002</p> <p> The destructor of ios_base::failure should have an empty throw specification, because the destructor of its base class, exception, is @@ -11175,9 +11177,9 @@ declared in this way. <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Fixes an obvious glitch. This is almost editorial.</p> <hr> -<a name="364"><h3>364. Inconsistent wording in 27.5.2.4.2</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Walter Brown, Marc Paterno <b>Date:</b> 10 May 2002</p> +<a name="364"><h3>364. Inconsistent wording in 27.5.2.4.2</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Walter Brown, Marc Paterno <b>Date:</b> 10 May 2002</p> <p> -27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a> paragraph 1 is inconsistent with the Effects +27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a> paragraph 1 is inconsistent with the Effects clause for seekoff. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> @@ -11207,7 +11209,7 @@ for each class derived from basic_streambuf in this clause the existing wording and what's in the proposed resolution, but the change may make the intent clearer.</p> <hr> -<a name="365"><h3>365. Lack of const-qualification in clause 27</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Walter Brown, Marc Paterno <b>Date:</b> 10 May 2002</p> +<a name="365"><h3>365. Lack of const-qualification in clause 27</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Walter Brown, Marc Paterno <b>Date:</b> 10 May 2002</p> <p> Some stream and streambuf member functions are declared non-const, even thought they appear only to report information rather than to @@ -11218,7 +11220,7 @@ document N1360 for details and rationale. <p>The list of member functions under discussion: <tt>in_avail</tt>, <tt>showmanyc</tt>, <tt>tellg</tt>, <tt>tellp</tt>, <tt>is_open</tt>.</p> -<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a></p> +<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a></p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>In 27.8.1.5, 27.8.1.7, 27.8.1.8, 27.8.1.10, 27.8.1.11, and 27.8.1.13</p> @@ -11231,7 +11233,7 @@ document N1360 for details and rationale. <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Of the changes proposed in N1360, the only one that is safe is changing the filestreams' is_open to const. The LWG believed that -this was NAD the first time it considered this issue (issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a>), but now thinks otherwise. The corresponding streambuf +this was NAD the first time it considered this issue (issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a>), but now thinks otherwise. The corresponding streambuf member function, after all,is already const.</p> <p>The other proposed changes are less safe, because some streambuf @@ -11246,8 +11248,8 @@ state exposed by the public interface is unchanged.</p> way by providing both overloads; this would be a conforming extension.</p> <hr> -<a name="370"><h3>370. Minor error in basic_istream::get</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ray Lischner <b>Date:</b> 15 Jul 2002</p> -<p>Defect report for description of basic_istream::get (section 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), paragraph 15. The description for the get function +<a name="370"><h3>370. Minor error in basic_istream::get</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ray Lischner <b>Date:</b> 15 Jul 2002</p> +<p>Defect report for description of basic_istream::get (section 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), paragraph 15. The description for the get function with the following signature:</p> <pre> basic_istream<charT,traits>& get(basic_streambuf<char_type,traits>& @@ -11277,26 +11279,26 @@ with the following signature:</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Fixes an obvious typo.</p> <hr> -<a name="373"><h3>373. Are basic_istream and basic_ostream to use (exceptions()&badbit) != 0 ?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>, 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Keith Baker <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 2002</p> +<a name="373"><h3>373. Are basic_istream and basic_ostream to use (exceptions()&badbit) != 0 ?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>, 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Keith Baker <b>Date:</b> 23 Jul 2002</p> <p> -In 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a> and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a> +In 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a> and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a> (exception()&badbit) != 0 is used in testing for rethrow, yet -exception() is the constructor to class std::exception in 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> that has no return type. Should member function -exceptions() found in 27.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios"> [lib.ios]</a> be used instead? +exception() is the constructor to class std::exception in 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> that has no return type. Should member function +exceptions() found in 27.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios"> [lib.ios]</a> be used instead? </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -In 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a> and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>, change +In 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a> and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>, change "(exception()&badbit) != 0" to "(exceptions()&badbit) != 0". </p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Fixes an obvious typo.</p> <hr> -<a name="375"><h3>375. basic_ios should be ios_base in 27.7.1.3</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ray Lischner <b>Date:</b> 14 Aug 2002</p> +<a name="375"><h3>375. basic_ios should be ios_base in 27.7.1.3</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ray Lischner <b>Date:</b> 14 Aug 2002</p> <p> -In Section 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>: Table 90, Table 91, and paragraph +In Section 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>: Table 90, Table 91, and paragraph 14 all contain references to "basic_ios::" which should be "ios_base::". </p> @@ -11308,7 +11310,7 @@ paragraph 14 to "ios_base". <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Fixes an obvious typo.</p> <hr> -<a name="379"><h3>379. nonsensical ctype::do_widen() requirement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 6 Sep 2002</p> +<a name="379"><h3>379. nonsensical ctype::do_widen() requirement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 6 Sep 2002</p> <p> The last sentence in 22.2.1.1.2, p11 below doesn't seem to make sense. </p> @@ -11336,7 +11338,7 @@ footnote 224.) </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -Replace the last sentence of 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>, p11 with the +Replace the last sentence of 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>, p11 with the following text: </p> <pre> For any named ctype category with a ctype<char> facet ctc @@ -11349,9 +11351,9 @@ following text: <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The LWG believes this is just a typo, and that this is the correct fix.</p> <hr> -<a name="380"><h3>380. typos in codecvt tables 53 and 54</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 6 Sep 2002</p> +<a name="380"><h3>380. typos in codecvt tables 53 and 54</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 6 Sep 2002</p> <p> -Tables 53 and 54 in 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> are both titled "convert +Tables 53 and 54 in 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> are both titled "convert result values," when surely "do_in/do_out result values" must have been intended for Table 53 and "do_unshift result values" for Table 54. @@ -11376,7 +11378,7 @@ heading Meaning, to "space for more than (to_limit - to) destination elements was needed to terminate a sequence given the value of state." </p> <hr> -<a name="381"><h3>381. detection of invalid mbstate_t in codecvt</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 6 Sep 2002</p> +<a name="381"><h3>381. detection of invalid mbstate_t in codecvt</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 6 Sep 2002</p> <p> All but one codecvt member functions that take a state_type argument list as one of their preconditions that the state_type argument have @@ -11426,7 +11428,7 @@ behavior. Implementations that do choose to detect invalid state values, or that choose to detect any other kind of error, may return <b>error</b> as an indication.</p> <hr> -<a name="383"><h3>383. Bidirectional iterator assertion typo</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> ysapir (submitted via comp.std.c++) <b>Date:</b> 17 Oct 2002</p> +<a name="383"><h3>383. Bidirectional iterator assertion typo</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> ysapir (submitted via comp.std.c++) <b>Date:</b> 17 Oct 2002</p> <p> Following a discussion on the boost list regarding end iterators and the possibility of performing operator--() on them, it seems to me @@ -11438,8 +11440,8 @@ with that discussion. I have checked this newsgroup, as well as attempted a search of the Active/Defect/Closed Issues List on the site for the words "s is derefer" so I believe this has not been proposed before. Furthermore, -the "Lists by Index" mentions only DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#299">299</a> on section -24.1.4, and DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#299">299</a> is not related to this issue. +the "Lists by Index" mentions only DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#299">299</a> on section +24.1.4, and DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#299">299</a> is not related to this issue. </p> <p> @@ -11483,7 +11485,7 @@ Change the guarantee to "postcondition: r is dereferenceable." <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Fixes an obvious typo</p> <hr> -<a name="389"><h3>389. Const overload of valarray::operator[] returns by value</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Gabriel Dos Reis <b>Date:</b> 8 Nov 2002</p> +<a name="389"><h3>389. Const overload of valarray::operator[] returns by value</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Gabriel Dos Reis <b>Date:</b> 8 Nov 2002</p> <p>Consider the following program:</p> <pre> #include <iostream> #include <ostream> @@ -11523,8 +11525,8 @@ integration within programs written in C++. There is no reason why subscripting an expression of type valarray<T> that is const-qualified should not return a const T&.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In the class synopsis in 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a>, and in -26.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.access"> [lib.valarray.access]</a> just above paragraph 1, change</p> +<p>In the class synopsis in 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a>, and in +26.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.access"> [lib.valarray.access]</a> just above paragraph 1, change</p> <pre> T operator[](size_t const); </pre> <p>to</p> @@ -11541,28 +11543,28 @@ integrated with libraries in other languages, and return by value defeats that purpose. It is believed that this change will have no impact on allowable optimizations.</p> <hr> -<a name="391"><h3>391. non-member functions specified as const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.conversions"> [lib.conversions]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> James Kanze <b>Date:</b> 10 Dec 2002</p> +<a name="391"><h3>391. non-member functions specified as const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.conversions"> [lib.conversions]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> James Kanze <b>Date:</b> 10 Dec 2002</p> <p> The specifications of toupper and tolower both specify the functions as const, althought they are not member functions, and are not specified as -const in the header file synopsis in section 22.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locales"> [lib.locales]</a>. +const in the header file synopsis in section 22.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locales"> [lib.locales]</a>. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In 22.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.conversions"> [lib.conversions]</a>, remove <tt>const</tt> from the function +<p>In 22.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.conversions"> [lib.conversions]</a>, remove <tt>const</tt> from the function declarations of std::toupper and std::tolower</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Fixes an obvious typo</p> <hr> -<a name="395"><h3>395. inconsistencies in the definitions of rand() and random_shuffle()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> James Kanze <b>Date:</b> 3 Jan 2003</p> +<a name="395"><h3>395. inconsistencies in the definitions of rand() and random_shuffle()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> James Kanze <b>Date:</b> 3 Jan 2003</p> <p> -In 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>, the C++ standard refers to the C standard for the +In 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>, the C++ standard refers to the C standard for the definition of rand(); in the C standard, it is written that "The implementation shall behave as if no library function calls the rand function." </p> <p> -In 25.2.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.random.shuffle"> [lib.alg.random.shuffle]</a>, there is no specification as to +In 25.2.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.random.shuffle"> [lib.alg.random.shuffle]</a>, there is no specification as to how the two parameter version of the function generates its random value. I believe that all current implementations in fact call rand() (in contradiction with the requirement avove); if an implementation does @@ -11593,9 +11595,9 @@ implementation is permitted to use <tt>rand</tt>.] problem if the number of elements in the sequence is greater than RAND_MAX.</p> <hr> -<a name="400"><h3>400. redundant type cast in lib.allocator.members</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Markus Mauhart <b>Date:</b> 27 Feb 2003</p> +<a name="400"><h3>400. redundant type cast in lib.allocator.members</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Markus Mauhart <b>Date:</b> 27 Feb 2003</p> <p> -20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> allocator members, contains +20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> allocator members, contains the following 3 lines: </p> @@ -11615,16 +11617,16 @@ Replace "((T*) p)" with "p". <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>Just a typo, this is really editorial.</p> <hr> -<a name="402"><h3>402. wrong new expression in [some_]allocator::construct</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a>, <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Markus Mauhart <b>Date:</b> 27 Feb 2003</p> +<a name="402"><h3>402. wrong new expression in [some_]allocator::construct</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a>, <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Markus Mauhart <b>Date:</b> 27 Feb 2003</p> <p> This applies to the new expression that is contained in both par12 of -20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> and in par2 (table 32) of 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>. +20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> and in par2 (table 32) of 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>. I think this new expression is wrong, involving unintended side effects. </p> -<p>20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> contains the following 3 lines:</p> +<p>20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> contains the following 3 lines:</p> <pre> 11 Returns: the largest value N for which the call allocate(N,0) might succeed. void construct(pointer p, const_reference val); @@ -11632,7 +11634,7 @@ effects. </pre> -<p>20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> in table 32 has the following line:</p> +<p>20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> in table 32 has the following line:</p> <pre> a.construct(p,t) Effect: new((void*)p) T(t) </pre> @@ -11667,34 +11669,34 @@ probably must think about it. Replace "new" with "::new" in both cases. </p> <hr> -<a name="403"><h3>403. basic_string::swap should not throw exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.5.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::swap"> [lib.string::swap]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 25 Mar 2003</p> +<a name="403"><h3>403. basic_string::swap should not throw exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.5.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::swap"> [lib.string::swap]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Beman Dawes <b>Date:</b> 25 Mar 2003</p> <p> -std::basic_string, 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 2 says that +std::basic_string, 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 2 says that basic_string "conforms to the requirements of a Sequence, as specified in (23.1.1)." The sequence requirements specified in (23.1.1) to not include any prohibition on swap members throwing exceptions. </p> <p> -Section 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 does limit conditions under +Section 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 does limit conditions under which exceptions may be thrown, but applies only to "all container types defined in this clause" and so excludes basic_string::swap because it is defined elsewhere. </p> <p> -Eric Niebler points out that 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 5 explicitly +Eric Niebler points out that 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 5 explicitly permits basic_string::swap to invalidates iterators, which is -disallowed by 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10. Thus the standard would +disallowed by 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10. Thus the standard would be contradictory if it were read or extended to read as having -basic_string meet 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 requirements. +basic_string meet 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 requirements. </p> <p> Yet several LWG members have expressed the belief that the original intent was that basic_string::swap should not throw exceptions as -specified by 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10, and that the standard is +specified by 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10, and that the standard is unclear on this issue. The complexity of basic_string::swap is specified as "constant time", indicating the intent was to avoid copying (which could cause a bad_alloc or other exception). An @@ -11704,7 +11706,7 @@ exception-safe code. <p> Note: There remains long standing concern over whether or not it is -possible to reasonably meet the 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 swap +possible to reasonably meet the 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 swap requirements when allocators are unequal. The specification of basic_string::swap exception requirements is in no way intended to address, prejudice, or otherwise impact that concern. @@ -11716,14 +11718,14 @@ address, prejudice, or otherwise impact that concern. <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -In 21.3.5.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::swap"> [lib.string::swap]</a>, add a throws clause: +In 21.3.5.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::swap"> [lib.string::swap]</a>, add a throws clause: </p> <p> Throws: Shall not throw exceptions. </p> <hr> -<a name="404"><h3>404. May a replacement allocation function be declared inline?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a>, 18.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete"> [lib.new.delete]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 24 Apr 2003</p> +<a name="404"><h3>404. May a replacement allocation function be declared inline?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a>, 18.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete"> [lib.new.delete]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 24 Apr 2003</p> <p> The eight basic dynamic memory allocation functions (single-object and array versions of ::operator new and ::operator delete, in the @@ -11734,15 +11736,15 @@ in preference to the implementation's definition. <p> Three different parts of the standard mention requirements on -replacement functions: 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a>, 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a> -and 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a>, and 3.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/basic.html#basic.stc.dynamic"> [basic.stc.dynamic]</a>. +replacement functions: 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a>, 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a> +and 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a>, and 3.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/basic.html#basic.stc.dynamic"> [basic.stc.dynamic]</a>. </p> <p>None of these three places say whether a replacement function may - be declared inline. 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a> paragraph 2 specifies a + be declared inline. 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a> paragraph 2 specifies a signature for the replacement function, but that's not enough: the <tt>inline</tt> specifier is not part of a function's signature. - One might also reason from 7.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/dcl.html#dcl.fct.spec"> [dcl.fct.spec]</a> paragraph 2, which + One might also reason from 7.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/dcl.html#dcl.fct.spec"> [dcl.fct.spec]</a> paragraph 2, which requires that "an inline function shall be defined in every translation unit in which it is used," but this may not be quite specific enough either. We should either explicitly allow or @@ -11750,7 +11752,7 @@ and 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.ht functions.</p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -Add a new sentence to the end of 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 3: +Add a new sentence to the end of 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 3: "The program's definitions shall not be specified as <tt>inline</tt>. No diagnostic is required." </p> @@ -11766,16 +11768,16 @@ Providing this functionality would be difficult in some cases, and is believed to be of limited value. </p> <hr> -<a name="405"><h3>405. qsort and POD</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ray Lischner <b>Date:</b> 08 Apr 2003</p> +<a name="405"><h3>405. qsort and POD</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Ray Lischner <b>Date:</b> 08 Apr 2003</p> <p> -Section 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> describes bsearch and qsort, from the C +Section 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> describes bsearch and qsort, from the C standard library. Paragraph 4 does not list any restrictions on qsort, but it should limit the base parameter to point to POD. Presumably, qsort sorts the array by copying bytes, which requires POD. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -In 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> paragraph 4, just after the declarations and +In 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> paragraph 4, just after the declarations and before the nonnormative note, add these words: "both of which have the same behavior as the original declaration. The behavior is undefined unless the objects in the array pointed to by <i>base</i> are of POD @@ -11785,9 +11787,9 @@ type." <p><i>[Something along these lines is clearly necessary. Matt provided wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="407"><h3>407. Can singular iterators be destroyed?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 3 June 2003</p> +<a name="407"><h3>407. Can singular iterators be destroyed?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Nathan Myers <b>Date:</b> 3 June 2003</p> <p> -Clause 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>, paragraph 5, says that the only expression +Clause 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>, paragraph 5, says that the only expression that is defined for a singular iterator is "an assignment of a non-singular value to an iterator that holds a singular value". This means that destroying a singular iterator (e.g. letting an automatic @@ -11801,16 +11803,16 @@ destroying an iterator that holds a singular value, or the assignment of a non-singular value to an iterator that holds a singular value." </p> <hr> -<a name="410"><h3>410. Missing semantics for stack and queue comparison operators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a>, 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Hans Bos <b>Date:</b> 7 Jun 2003</p> +<a name="410"><h3>410. Missing semantics for stack and queue comparison operators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a>, 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Hans Bos <b>Date:</b> 7 Jun 2003</p> <p> -Sections 23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> and 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a> list +Sections 23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> and 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a> list comparison operators (==, !=, <, <=, >, =>) for queue and -stack. Only the semantics for queue::operator== (23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> par2) and queue::operator< (23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> +stack. Only the semantics for queue::operator== (23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> par2) and queue::operator< (23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> par3) are defined. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Add the following new paragraphs after 23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> +<p>Add the following new paragraphs after 23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> paragraph 3:</p> <blockquote> @@ -11833,7 +11835,7 @@ par3) are defined. </blockquote> -<p>Add the following paragraphs at the end of 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a>:</p> +<p>Add the following paragraphs at the end of 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a>:</p> <blockquote> @@ -11870,9 +11872,9 @@ par3) are defined. There isn't any real doubt about what these operators are supposed to do, but we ought to spell it out. <hr> -<a name="411"><h3>411. Wrong names of set member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Daniel Frey <b>Date:</b> 9 Jul 2003</p> +<a name="411"><h3>411. Wrong names of set member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Daniel Frey <b>Date:</b> 9 Jul 2003</p> <p> -25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a> paragraph 1 reads: +25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a> paragraph 1 reads: "The semantics of the set operations are generalized to multisets in a standard way by defining union() to contain the maximum number of occurrences of every element, intersection() to contain the minimum, and @@ -11886,9 +11888,9 @@ set_intersection(), not union() and intersection(). <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>Change that sentence to use the correct names.</p> <hr> -<a name="412"><h3>412. Typo in 27.4.4.3</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 10 Jul 2003</p> +<a name="412"><h3>412. Typo in 27.4.4.3</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 10 Jul 2003</p> <p> -The Effects clause in 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> paragraph 5 says that the +The Effects clause in 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> paragraph 5 says that the function only throws if the respective bits are already set prior to the function call. That's obviously not the intent. The typo ought to be corrected and the text reworded as: "If (<i>state</i> & @@ -11896,7 +11898,7 @@ exceptions()) == 0, returns. ..." </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -In 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> paragraph 5, replace "If (rdstate() & +In 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> paragraph 5, replace "If (rdstate() & exceptions()) == 0" with "If ((state | (rdbuf() ? goodbit : badbit)) & exceptions()) == 0". </p> @@ -11908,7 +11910,7 @@ exceptions()) == 0" with "If ((state | (rdbuf() ? goodbit : badbit)) latter, of course. Post-Kona: Martin provided wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="414"><h3>414. Which iterators are invalidated by v.erase()?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 19 Aug 2003</p> +<a name="414"><h3>414. Which iterators are invalidated by v.erase()?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Matt Austern <b>Date:</b> 19 Aug 2003</p> <p> Consider the following code fragment: </p> @@ -11957,7 +11959,7 @@ techniques.) </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -In 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> paragraph 3, change "Invalidates all the +In 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> paragraph 3, change "Invalidates all the iterators and references after the point of the erase" to "Invalidates iterators and references at or after the point of the erase". @@ -11969,7 +11971,7 @@ erase". and references in parallel, and it would seem counterintuitive to say that a reference to an erased value remains valid.</p> <hr> -<a name="415"><h3>415. behavior of std::ws</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.manip"> [lib.istream.manip]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="415"><h3>415. behavior of std::ws</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.manip"> [lib.istream.manip]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> According to 27.6.1.4, the ws() manipulator is not required to construct the sentry object. The manipulator is also not a member function so the @@ -11982,7 +11984,7 @@ doesn't affect the stream's gcount). </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -Add to 27.6.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.manip"> [lib.istream.manip]</a>, immediately before the first sentence +Add to 27.6.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.manip"> [lib.istream.manip]</a>, immediately before the first sentence of paragraph 1, the following text: </p> @@ -11997,7 +11999,7 @@ of paragraph 1, the following text: <p><i>[Post-Kona: Martin provided wording]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="420"><h3>420. is std::FILE a complete type?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="420"><h3>420. is std::FILE a complete type?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> 7.19.1, p2, of C99 requires that the FILE type only be declared in <stdio.h>. None of the (implementation-defined) members of the @@ -12010,14 +12012,14 @@ it really the intent that FILE be a complete type or is an implementation allowed to just declare it without providing a full definition? </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>In the first sentence of 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> paragraph 2, change +<p>In the first sentence of 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> paragraph 2, change "defined" to "declared".</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>We don't want to impose any restrictions beyond what the C standard already says. We don't want to make anything implementation defined, because that imposes new requirements in implementations.</p> <hr> -<a name="425"><h3>425. return value of std::get_temporary_buffer</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.temporary.buffer"> [lib.temporary.buffer]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="425"><h3>425. return value of std::get_temporary_buffer</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 20.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.temporary.buffer"> [lib.temporary.buffer]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> The standard is not clear about the requirements on the value returned from a call to get_temporary_buffer(0). In particular, it fails to specify whether @@ -12027,12 +12029,12 @@ malloc). The standard also fails to mention what the required behavior is when the argument is less than 0. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Change 20.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.temporary.buffer"> [lib.temporary.buffer]</a> paragraph 2 from "...or a pair of 0 +<p>Change 20.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.temporary.buffer"> [lib.temporary.buffer]</a> paragraph 2 from "...or a pair of 0 values if no storage can be obtained" to "...or a pair of 0 values if no storage can be obtained or if <i>n</i> <= 0."</p> <p><i>[Kona: Matt provided wording]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="426"><h3>426. search_n(), fill_n(), and generate_n() with negative n</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.search"> [lib.alg.search]</a>, 25.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.fill"> [lib.alg.fill]</a>, 25.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.generate"> [lib.alg.generate]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="426"><h3>426. search_n(), fill_n(), and generate_n() with negative n</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 25.1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.search"> [lib.alg.search]</a>, 25.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.fill"> [lib.alg.fill]</a>, 25.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.generate"> [lib.alg.generate]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> The complexity requirements for these function templates are incorrect (or don't even make sense) for negative n:</p> @@ -12099,7 +12101,7 @@ or 0 otherwise) assignments. so). The LWG considered and rejected the alternative of saying that negative numbers are undefined behavior.</p> <hr> -<a name="428"><h3>428. string::erase(iterator) validity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="428"><h3>428. string::erase(iterator) validity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 18 Sep 2003</p> <p> 23.1.1, p3 along with Table 67 specify as a prerequisite for a.erase(q) that q must be a valid dereferenceable iterator into the sequence a. @@ -12115,7 +12117,7 @@ This may be interepreted as a relaxation of the general requirement, which is most likely not the intent. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> -<p>Remove 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a> paragraph 5.</p> +<p>Remove 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a> paragraph 5.</p> <p><b>Rationale:</b></p> <p>The LWG considered two options: changing the string requirements to match the general container requirements, or just removing the @@ -12123,7 +12125,7 @@ which is most likely not the intent. option, on the grounds that duplicating text always risks the possibility that it might be duplicated incorrectly.</p> <hr> -<a name="432"><h3>432. stringbuf::overflow() makes only one write position available</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Christian W Brock <b>Date:</b> 24 Sep 2003</p> +<a name="432"><h3>432. stringbuf::overflow() makes only one write position available</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Christian W Brock <b>Date:</b> 24 Sep 2003</p> <p>27.7.1.3 par 8 says:</p> <blockquote> Notes: The function can make a write position available only if @@ -12338,7 +12340,7 @@ newoff + off to the next pointer xnext . <blockquote> <p> -12- _ If (newoff + off) < 0, or if (newoff + off) refers to an -uninitialized character (as defined in 27.7.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.members"> [lib.stringbuf.members]</a> +uninitialized character (as defined in 27.7.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.members"> [lib.stringbuf.members]</a> paragraph 1), the positioning operation fails. Otherwise, the function assigns xbeg + newoff + off to the next pointer xnext . </p> @@ -12394,7 +12396,7 @@ longer allowable since [pbase(), epptr()) may now contain uninitialized characters. Positioning is only allowable over the initialized range.</p> <hr> -<a name="435"><h3>435. bug in DR 25</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 15 Oct 2003</p> +<a name="435"><h3>435. bug in DR 25</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 15 Oct 2003</p> <p> It has been pointed out that the proposed resolution in DR 25 may not be @@ -12444,7 +12446,7 @@ iostreams where the operator does truncate). Benjamin provided wording.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="436"><h3>436. are cv-qualified facet types valid facets?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.facet"> [lib.locale.facet]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 15 Oct 2003</p> +<a name="436"><h3>436. are cv-qualified facet types valid facets?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 22.1.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.facet"> [lib.locale.facet]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Martin Sebor <b>Date:</b> 15 Oct 2003</p> <p> Is "const std::ctype<char>" a valid template argument to has_facet, use_facet, and the locale template ctor? And if so, does it designate the same Facet as @@ -12467,33 +12469,33 @@ template parameter.</p> text.]</i></p> <hr> -<a name="441"><h3>441. Is fpos::state const?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos"> [lib.fpos]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Vincent Leloup <b>Date:</b> 17 Nov 2003</p> +<a name="441"><h3>441. Is fpos::state const?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos"> [lib.fpos]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Vincent Leloup <b>Date:</b> 17 Nov 2003</p> <p> -In section 27.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.members"> [lib.fpos.members]</a> fpos<stateT>::state() is declared -non const, but in section 27.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos"> [lib.fpos]</a> it is declared const. +In section 27.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.members"> [lib.fpos.members]</a> fpos<stateT>::state() is declared +non const, but in section 27.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos"> [lib.fpos]</a> it is declared const. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -In section 27.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.members"> [lib.fpos.members]</a>, change the declaration of +In section 27.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.members"> [lib.fpos.members]</a>, change the declaration of <tt>fpos<stateT>::state()</tt> to const. </p> <hr> -<a name="442"><h3>442. sentry::operator bool() inconsistent signature</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Vincent Leloup <b>Date:</b> 18 Nov 2003</p> +<a name="442"><h3>442. sentry::operator bool() inconsistent signature</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Vincent Leloup <b>Date:</b> 18 Nov 2003</p> <p> -In section 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> paragraph 4, in description part +In section 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> paragraph 4, in description part basic_ostream<charT, traits>::sentry::operator bool() is declared as non const, but in section 27.6.2.3, in synopsis it is declared const. </p> <p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p> -In section 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> paragraph 4, change the declaration +In section 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> paragraph 4, change the declaration of <tt>sentry::operator bool()</tt> to const. </p> <hr> -<a name="443"><h3>443. filebuf::close() inconsistent use of EOF</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Vincent Leloup <b>Date:</b> 20 Nov 2003</p> +<a name="443"><h3>443. filebuf::close() inconsistent use of EOF</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Vincent Leloup <b>Date:</b> 20 Nov 2003</p> <p> -In section 27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a> par6, in effects description of +In section 27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a> par6, in effects description of basic_filebuf<charT, traits>::close(), overflow(EOF) is used twice; should be overflow(traits::eof()). </p> @@ -12502,7 +12504,7 @@ should be overflow(traits::eof()). Change overflow(EOF) to overflow(traits::eof()). </p> <hr> -<a name="448"><h3>448. Random Access Iterators over abstract classes</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 7 Jan 2004</p> +<a name="448"><h3>448. Random Access Iterators over abstract classes</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Date:</b> 7 Jan 2004</p> <p> Table 76, the random access iterator requirement table, says that the return type of a[n] must be "convertible to T". When an iterator's @@ -12514,7 +12516,7 @@ Surely this isn't an intended restriction? Change the return type to "convertible to T const&". </p> <hr> -<a name="449"><h3>449. Library Issue 306 Goes Too Far</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.types"> [lib.support.types]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Pete Becker <b>Date:</b> 15 Jan 2004</p> +<a name="449"><h3>449. Library Issue 306 Goes Too Far</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b> 18.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.types"> [lib.support.types]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a> <b>Submitter:</b> Pete Becker <b>Date:</b> 15 Jan 2004</p> <p>Original text:</p> <blockquote> The macro offsetof accepts a restricted set of type arguments in this |