RISC-V: Fix vsetvl compatibility predicate [PR118154].HEADtrunkmaster

In PR118154 we emit strided stores but the first of those does not
always have the proper VTYPE.  That's because we erroneously delete
a necessary vsetvl.

In order to determine whether to elide

(1)
      Expr[7]: VALID (insn 116, bb 17)
        Demand fields: demand_ratio_and_ge_sew demand_avl
        SEW=8, VLMUL=mf2, RATIO=16, MAX_SEW=64
        TAIL_POLICY=agnostic, MASK_POLICY=agnostic
        AVL=(reg:DI 0 zero)

when e.g.

(2)
      Expr[3]: VALID (insn 360, bb 15)
        Demand fields: demand_sew_lmul demand_avl
        SEW=64, VLMUL=m1, RATIO=64, MAX_SEW=64
        TAIL_POLICY=agnostic, MASK_POLICY=agnostic
        AVL=(reg:DI 0 zero)
        VL=(reg:DI 13 a3 [345])

is already available, we use
sew_ge_and_prev_sew_le_next_max_sew_and_next_ratio_valid_for_prev_sew_p.

(1) requires RATIO = SEW/LMUL = 16 and an SEW >= 8.  (2) has ratio = 64,
though, so we cannot directly elide (1).

This patch uses ratio_eq_p instead of next_ratio_valid_for_prev_sew_p.

	PR target/118154

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (MAX_LMUL): New define.
	(pre_vsetvl::earliest_fuse_vsetvl_info): Use.
	(pre_vsetvl::pre_global_vsetvl_info): New predicate with equal
	ratio.
	* config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.def: Use.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr118154-1.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/pr118154-2.c: New test.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions