diff options
| author | Egas Ribeiro <egas.g.ribeiro@tecnico.ulisboa.pt> | 2025-12-07 23:35:00 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2025-12-08 12:11:44 -0500 |
| commit | bae0ed69e1862add152f1b0618148f931611a9ca (patch) | |
| tree | 3c4aefc06ca413ef7b9e647de146909d553beb0c /libjava/classpath/java/sql/package.html | |
| parent | a7b8c5faa6ff3d9bcc15457113e611ec377c6f5f (diff) | |
| download | gcc-bae0ed69e1862add152f1b0618148f931611a9ca.zip gcc-bae0ed69e1862add152f1b0618148f931611a9ca.tar.gz gcc-bae0ed69e1862add152f1b0618148f931611a9ca.tar.bz2 | |
c++: Fix SFINAE for deleted explicit specializations [PR119343]
When checking a deleted explicit specialization in a SFINAE context,
we were incorrectly selecting a partial specialization because
resolve_nondeduced_context was calling mark_used. But resolving an
overload to a single function (per DR 115) does not constitute ODR-use,
so mark_used shouldn't be called there. Instead callers should call
mark_used or mark_single_function on the result to uniformly handle all
resolvable overloads (even non-template-id ones).
This turns out to fix the below testcase because it causes convert_to_void
for void(X::template g<0>) to properly propagate ODR-use failure (due to
deleted g<0>) and return error_mark_node instead of returning void_node.
PR c++/119343
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (resolve_nondeduced_context): Remove mark_used call.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/template/sfinae-deleted-pr119343.C: New test.
Signed-off-by: Egas Ribeiro <egas.g.ribeiro@tecnico.ulisboa.pt>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'libjava/classpath/java/sql/package.html')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
