diff options
author | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2020-08-05 15:05:30 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2020-08-05 15:05:30 -0400 |
commit | d21252de6c81ed236d8981d47b9a57dc4f1c6d57 (patch) | |
tree | 0998a63ef34180ce3fc314ad61f148431bd120b9 /libiberty/strtol.c | |
parent | dd30d93f1a3ead7b814c1b179cf7197e4bf1e183 (diff) | |
download | gcc-d21252de6c81ed236d8981d47b9a57dc4f1c6d57.zip gcc-d21252de6c81ed236d8981d47b9a57dc4f1c6d57.tar.gz gcc-d21252de6c81ed236d8981d47b9a57dc4f1c6d57.tar.bz2 |
c++: cxx_eval_vec_init after zero-initialization [PR96282]
In the first testcase below, expand_aggr_init_1 sets up t's default
constructor such that the ctor first zero-initializes the entire base b,
followed by calling b's default constructor, the latter of which just
default-initializes the array member b::m via a VEC_INIT_EXPR.
So upon constexpr evaluation of this latter VEC_INIT_EXPR, ctx->ctor is
nonempty due to the prior zero-initialization, and we proceed in
cxx_eval_vec_init to append new constructor_elts to the end of ctx->ctor
without first checking if a matching constructor_elt already exists.
This leads to ctx->ctor having two matching constructor_elts for each
index.
This patch fixes this issue by truncating a zero-initialized array
CONSTRUCTOR in cxx_eval_vec_init_1 before we begin appending array
elements to it. We propagate its zeroed out state during evaluation by
clearing CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING on each new appended aggregate element.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/96282
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_vec_init_1): Truncate ctx->ctor and
then clear CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING on each appended element
initializer if we're initializing a previously zero-initialized
array object.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/96282
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array26.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-array27.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-init18.C: New test.
Co-authored-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'libiberty/strtol.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions