diff options
author | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> | 2025-01-13 13:57:18 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org> | 2025-01-13 13:57:18 +0100 |
commit | 41a5a97dba6873d928675fd789a2d884c6d20a8d (patch) | |
tree | 9a447d5826d283bfd4c1e8fd7d1b4eb233b879b9 /libiberty/simple-object-xcoff.c | |
parent | 539fc490690d825ab2d299a0f577c5e9d3fa33d0 (diff) | |
download | gcc-41a5a97dba6873d928675fd789a2d884c6d20a8d.zip gcc-41a5a97dba6873d928675fd789a2d884c6d20a8d.tar.gz gcc-41a5a97dba6873d928675fd789a2d884c6d20a8d.tar.bz2 |
expr: Fix up the divmod cost debugging note [PR115910]
Something I've noticed during working on the crc wrong-code fix.
My first version of the patch failed because of no longer matching some
expected strings in the assembly, so I had to add TDF_DETAILS debugging
into the -fdump-rtl-expand-details dump which the crc tests can use.
For PR115910 Andrew has added similar note for the division/modulo case
if it is positive and we can choose either unsigned or signed
division. The problem is that unlike most other TDF_DETAILS diagnostics,
this is not done before emitting the IL for the function, but during it.
Other messages there are prefixed with ;;, both details on what it is doing
and the GIMPLE IL for which it expands RTL, so the
;; Generating RTL for gimple basic block 4
;;
(code_label 13 12 14 2 (nil) [0 uses])
(note 14 13 0 NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
positive division: unsigned cost: 30; signed cost: 28
;; return _4;
message in between just looks weird and IMHO should be ;; prefixed.
2025-01-13 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/115910
* expr.cc (expand_expr_divmod): Prefix the TDF_DETAILS note with
";; " and add a space before (needed tie breaker). Formatting fixes.
Diffstat (limited to 'libiberty/simple-object-xcoff.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions