aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>2022-08-30 15:46:43 +0200
committerAldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>2022-08-30 17:43:37 +0200
commit75f59441cd63a1d07e86d70d59c518049f53904f (patch)
tree84f0d2e66b02beb667e5bdadaa0a22e5768aba82 /gcc
parentb73c49f6f88dd7f7569f9a72c8ceb04598d4c15c (diff)
downloadgcc-75f59441cd63a1d07e86d70d59c518049f53904f.zip
gcc-75f59441cd63a1d07e86d70d59c518049f53904f.tar.gz
gcc-75f59441cd63a1d07e86d70d59c518049f53904f.tar.bz2
Improve union of ranges containing NAN.
Previously [5,6] U NAN would just drop to VARYING. With this patch, the resulting range becomes [5,6] with the NAN bit set to unknown. [I still have yet to decide what to do with intersections. ISTM, the intersection of a known NAN with anything else should be a NAN, but it could also be undefined (the empty set). I'll have to run some tests and see. Currently, we drop to VARYING cause well... it's always safe to give up;-).] gcc/ChangeLog: * value-range.cc (early_nan_resolve): Change comment. (frange::union_): Handle union when one side is a NAN. (range_tests_nan): Add tests for NAN union.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc')
-rw-r--r--gcc/value-range.cc44
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/value-range.cc b/gcc/value-range.cc
index b6d6c62..473139c 100644
--- a/gcc/value-range.cc
+++ b/gcc/value-range.cc
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ early_nan_resolve (frange &r, const frange &other)
// There's nothing to do for both NANs.
if (r.get_nan ().yes_p () == other.get_nan ().yes_p ())
return false;
- // But only one NAN complicates things.
+ // ?? Perhaps the intersection of a NAN and anything is a NAN ??.
r.set_varying (r.type ());
return true;
}
@@ -420,10 +420,22 @@ frange::union_ (const vrange &v)
*this = r;
return true;
}
- // ?? We could do better here. [5,6] U NAN should be [5,6] with the
- // NAN maybe bits set. For now, this is conservatively correct.
- if (get_nan ().yes_p () || r.get_nan ().yes_p ())
- return early_nan_resolve (*this, r);
+
+ // If one side has a NAN, the union is just the other side plus the
+ // NAN bit.
+ if (get_nan ().yes_p ())
+ {
+ *this = r;
+ // NOP if NAN already set.
+ set_nan (fp_prop::VARYING);
+ return true;
+ }
+ if (r.get_nan ().yes_p ())
+ {
+ // NOP if NAN already set.
+ set_nan (fp_prop::VARYING);
+ return true;
+ }
bool changed = m_props.union_ (r.m_props);
@@ -3520,6 +3532,7 @@ static void
range_tests_nan ()
{
frange r0, r1;
+ REAL_VALUE_TYPE q, r;
// Equal ranges but with differing NAN bits are not equal.
r1 = frange_float ("10", "12");
@@ -3537,13 +3550,24 @@ range_tests_nan ()
ASSERT_FALSE (r0 == r0);
ASSERT_TRUE (r0 != r0);
- // Make sure that combining NAN and INF doesn't give any crazy results.
+ // [5,6] U NAN is [5,6] with an unknown NAN bit.
+ r0 = frange_float ("5", "6");
+ r0.set_nan (fp_prop::NO);
+ r1 = frange_nan (float_type_node);
+ r0.union_ (r1);
+ real_from_string (&q, "5");
+ real_from_string (&r, "6");
+ ASSERT_TRUE (real_identical (&q, &r0.lower_bound ()));
+ ASSERT_TRUE (real_identical (&r, &r0.upper_bound ()));
+ ASSERT_TRUE (r0.get_nan ().varying_p ());
+
+ // NAN U NAN = NAN
r0 = frange_nan (float_type_node);
- ASSERT_TRUE (r0.get_nan ().yes_p ());
- r1 = frange_float ("+Inf", "+Inf");
+ r1 = frange_nan (float_type_node);
r0.union_ (r1);
- // [INF, INF] U NAN = VARYING
- ASSERT_TRUE (r0.varying_p ());
+ ASSERT_TRUE (real_isnan (&r0.lower_bound ()));
+ ASSERT_TRUE (real_isnan (&r1.upper_bound ()));
+ ASSERT_TRUE (r0.get_nan ().yes_p ());
// [INF, INF] ^ NAN = VARYING
r0 = frange_nan (float_type_node);