testsuite: debug: fix dejagnu directive syntax

In this case, they were all harmless in reality (no diff in test logs).

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-array-1.c: Fix dg-do directive syntax.
	* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-union-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-struct-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-union-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-4.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-5.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-6.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-mode-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-used-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-3.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-4.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-3.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-4.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-file-scope-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-float-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-func-index-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-3.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-4.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-functions-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-int-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-objt-index-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-preamble-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-str-table-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-3.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-3.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-union-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-1.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-2.c: Ditto.
	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-3.c: Ditto.

55 files changed, 56 insertions, 55 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-array-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-array-1.c
index 967b1e8..51ec991 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-array-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-array-1.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
    a1 : cta_nelems = 2, 5
    buf : cta_nelems = 0.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x3000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*btt_info" 5 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-1.c
index 793b4c8..cc15833 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-1.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
      - (0x13 << 24) | 0x40 - note that this is aligned to 0x40.
      - (0x13 << 24) | 0x31 - in case structures are packed.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target int32plus } */
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-2.c
index 2ec00dc..1f52517 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-bitfields-2.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
    We expect a struct with 2 members to be generated. The size 0 bitfield
    should not have any entry in the member list.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
 
 /* Struct with bitfield members, and 2 members.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
index 15b7625..781f807 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-datasec-1.c
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+
 /* BTF generation of BTF_KIND_DATASEC records.
 
    We expect 3 DATASEC records: one for each of .data, .rodata and .bss.
@@ -9,7 +10,7 @@
    so we cannot check them.
  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-additional-options "-msdata=none" { target { { powerpc*-*-* } && ilp32 } } } */
 /* { dg-additional-options "-msmall-data-limit=0" { target { riscv*-*-* } } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-union-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-union-1.c
index e3a1902..9838dc2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-union-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/btf/btf-union-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* Test BTF generation for union type.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gbtf -dA" } */
 
 /* One union type with 4 members */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-struct-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-struct-1.c
index 93547d4..807e0a4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-struct-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-struct-1.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
    struct a : ctt_info = 0x1a000002 (2 fields)
    struct {} : ctt_info = 0x1a000001 (1 field)  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_name" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-union-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-union-1.c
index f45af9b..382ecbd 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-union-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-anonymous-union-1.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
    struct anon_union : ctt_info = 0x1a000001 (1 field)
    union {} : ctt_info = 0x1e000002 (2 fields)  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_name" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-1.c
index 006a758..d50da97 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-1.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
    a1 : cta_nelems = 2, 5
    buf : cta_nelems = 0.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 5 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-2.c
index 4721c4f..8bceb7a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-2.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
     
     In this testcase, two CTF array records each of type int [0] is expected.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 2 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-4.c
index 013a8ff..86c57dc 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-4.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
    Test CTF generation for single element arrays.  In this testcase, one CTF
    record for array is expected with cta_nelems = 1.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-5.c
index ec50441..f635a2c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-5.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-5.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 
 */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-6.c
index 5564cb8..211d9c6 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-6.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-array-6.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* CTF generation for multidimensional array.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]+0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*cta_nelems" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-mode-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-mode-1.c
index c4801a7..2cb77da 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-mode-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-mode-1.c
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
    variable refers to a specific CTF type, so this testcase merely asserts
    for existence of individual CTF records.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"B1.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-used-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-used-1.c
index 61f6b64..b40d92d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-used-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-attr-used-1.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
    This attribute, attached to a function, means that code must be emitted for
    the function even if it appears that the function is not referenced.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O2 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* These should be true for higher optimization levels.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-1.c
index 1deac90..f12adeb 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-1.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
    In this testcase, two slices are expected - one for enum and the other for
    int.  CTF slices are unnamed records.  */
    
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*cts_bits" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-2.c
index aea0921..0a911b4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-2.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
    across targets with different BIT_PER_WORD.  Is there a way to add
    cts_offset related checks in the testcase?  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x6\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*cts_type" 3 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-3.c
index 8fbcf12..411040d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-3.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* The bool bitfield type.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*cts_type" 2 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-4.c
index 012069a..c03ffb7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-bitfields-4.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
    In this testcase, two slices are expected.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x2\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*cts_type" 2 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c
index e6c3199..ff106fe 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
    
    This testcase has a mix of C constructs containing COMPLEX_TYPE.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target libc_has_complex_functions } */
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-1.c
index 0137e9d..919e5b3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-1.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
       10: void (*) (size_t, int *restrict, const int *restrict) (size 0x0)
     */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -gdwarf-4 -dA" { target { *-*-darwin* } } } */
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-2.c
index 4f328f3..5f1ca55 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-2.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
    two const qualifier CTF records are expected (const int and const struct
    s1).  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"int.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-3.c
index 97317a4..b18c43e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-3.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
    In this testcase, it is expected to have const and volatile CTF
    records.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"unsigned char.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-4.c
index c1633ee..a3984e0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-cvr-quals-4.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
    is 1 const qualifier. 1 more no-name CTF record corresponds to the CTF
    pointer record.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_name" 2 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-1.c
index 9693544..16abbed 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* CTF generation for enums.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"RED.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-2.c
index fd8aaec..b40bcaf 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-enum-2.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
    
    In this testcase, CTF for enumerator GFS_MONOTONIC will not be generated.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"GFS_MONOTONIC.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 0 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-file-scope-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-file-scope-1.c
index ddfb31d..e58fb54 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-file-scope-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-file-scope-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* CTF is not generated for entities not at file-scope.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"SFOO.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 0 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-float-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-float-1.c
index 9e24b45..ddf4230 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-float-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-float-1.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /* Tests for CTF float base types.
    - Verify that there is a single record for the base types.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"float.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"double.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-1.c
index fdec743..90f2015 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-1.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
    type.  The second assembler tag is due to a ref type in a CVR CTF record.
    TBD - perhaps a more robust string pattern is needed.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x26000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 2 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-2.c
index a3154f2..a10b75b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-forward-2.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
    For forward types, the compiler encodes the CTF kind in the ctt_type field.
    CTF_K_FORWARD is used as the CTF type as usual in the ctt_info.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x26000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-func-index-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-func-index-1.c
index 86ca795..aff41e3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-func-index-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-func-index-1.c
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
    In this testcase, 2 records in the function index section are expected.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "funcinfo_name" 2 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-1.c
index cc1a600a..fc53fd9 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* CTF generation of function pointers.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000001\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000002\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-2.c
index a4a1104..80b9c18 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-2.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
    In this testcase,  there is a single function type expected for two
    different function pointer types.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000001\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"rcu_callback_t.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-3.c
index fe35d6c..f9b0aef 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-3.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
    In this testcase,  there is a single function type expected.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000001\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"foo_init_callback.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-4.c
index b8a7417..02a7151 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-4.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-function-pointers-4.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
    In this testcase, Type de-duplication of function type is exercised.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000001\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"var_assign_func_t.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-functions-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-functions-1.c
index 0b086a5..b94dca5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-functions-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-functions-1.c
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
     */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x16000002\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-int-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-int-1.c
index 8c68b2e..e4ffcc2 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-int-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-int-1.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /* Tests for CTF integer base types.
    - Verify that there is a single record for the base types.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"int.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"short int.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-objt-index-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-objt-index-1.c
index ee3481a..f66c3de 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-objt-index-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-objt-index-1.c
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 
    In this testcase, 4 records in the object index section are expected.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "objtinfo_name" 4 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-1.c
index e1fccec..bb1067f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-1.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
      - struct foo_struct *
   */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"foo_struct.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-2.c
index e36e5ec..e6e1202 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-pointers-2.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
    
    In this testcase, one CTF pointer type record is expected.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0xe000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-preamble-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-preamble-1.c
index 28547fa..2df0c28 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-preamble-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-preamble-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* Verify the CTF preamble in the CTF section.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "0xdff2.*CTF preamble magic number" } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "0x4.*CTF preamble version" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-str-table-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-str-table-1.c
index 0a0f1f0..fc40dde 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-str-table-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-str-table-1.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
    single empty string.  Just an optimization by the compiler, it is not
    mandated by the CTF format.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \".0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-1.c
index 19711c0..4ad8ff5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-1.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
    struct b : ctt_into = 0x1a000002 (2 field members)
 */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x1a000004\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-2.c
index 09b4d2f..3a65013 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-2.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
    Further, the compiler is expected to generate a single CTF struct type for
    struct dmx_dtdef (due to Type de-duplication at CTF generation).  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"dmx_dtdef.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"dtd_name.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-1.c
index d6c6b6b..3bd302a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-1.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
 
    Deemed as acceptable for now.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ascii \"cmodel.0\"\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctf_string" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-2.c
index 37094b5d..17c0d94 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-struct-array-2.c
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
    the location.  CTF generation feeds off DWARF dies; this testcase tests
    that the location expr is handled.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA -gdwarf-2" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-1.c
index aa40ab0..8d5916c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-1.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
        unique (type of a, b, c will all point to int); hence, the check.
    */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x2a000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 7 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-2.c
index 8c9d3bb..fe8724e 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-2.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
    In this testcase, typedef of type void should be generated.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x2a000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-3.c
index 93d0845..c211e59 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-3.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
    In this testcase, a single CTF record for typedef is expected.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x2a000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-1.c
index 19e8f49..3800378 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-1.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 typedef struct my_int
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-2.c
index deeb85a..d49812d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-2.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* Test compilation of typedef composition in structs.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 typedef struct
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-3.c
index 6d6918b..f13822d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-typedef-struct-3.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
       4: const my_int_t (size 0x8) -> 3: my_int_t (size 0x8) -> 1: struct my_int (size 0x8)
 */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x4\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctv_typeidx" 1 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-union-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-union-1.c
index 929d532..8721318 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-union-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-union-1.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* CTF generation for union type.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\[\t \]0x1e000004\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 1 } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ctm_name" 4 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-1.c
index 8c3ab10..1f8de92 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-1.c
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
    In this testcase, 7 records in the variable info section are expected.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ctv_name" 7 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-2.c
index 75c3ed7..316f76c 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-2.c
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
    In this testcase, CTF record for bstatic is NOT expected.  CTF generation
    is only carried out for variables at file-scope or global-scope.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ctv_name" 0 } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-3.c
index 8aea1e8..5697db6 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-variables-3.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
    single CTF variable and a single entry in the CTF object info section
    are expected.  */
 
-/* { dg-do compile )  */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-O0 -gctf -dA" } */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "0x12000000\[\t \]+\[^\n\]*ctt_info" 2 } } */