aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/testsuite/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>2023-03-06 18:00:47 +0100
committerHans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>2023-03-07 02:21:47 +0100
commit7dde02e9efc9d7ecd87814f4c8ee803ef005a7fd (patch)
treef04d98687ef2c6952cc5b43b371868e53ebe5915 /gcc/testsuite/lib
parent3dd4ada43704115b91e496de2dfbd925443450bc (diff)
downloadgcc-7dde02e9efc9d7ecd87814f4c8ee803ef005a7fd.zip
gcc-7dde02e9efc9d7ecd87814f4c8ee803ef005a7fd.tar.gz
gcc-7dde02e9efc9d7ecd87814f4c8ee803ef005a7fd.tar.bz2
testsuite: Add tail_call effective target
The RTL "expand" dump is the first RTL dump, and it also appears to be the earliest trace of the target having implemented sibcalls. Including the "," in the pattern searched for, to try and avoid possible false matches, but there doesn't appear to be any identifiers or target names nearby so this is just belts and suspenders. Using "tail_call" as a shorter and more commonly used term than a derivative of "sibling calls", and expecting only gcc folks to have heard of "sibcalls". * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_tail_call): New.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/lib')
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp9
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 4236c92..4bad4da 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -11680,6 +11680,15 @@ proc check_effective_target_frame_pointer_for_non_leaf { } {
return 0
}
+# Return 1 if the target can perform tail-call optimizations of the
+# most trivial type.
+proc check_effective_target_tail_call { } {
+ return [check_no_messages_and_pattern tail_call ",SIBCALL" rtl-expand {
+ __attribute__((__noipa__)) void foo (void) { }
+ __attribute__((__noipa__)) void bar (void) { foo(); }
+ } {-O2 -fdump-rtl-expand-all}] ;# The "SIBCALL" note requires a detailed dump.
+}
+
# Return 1 if the target's calling sequence or its ABI
# create implicit stack probes at or prior to function entry.
proc check_effective_target_caller_implicit_probes { } {