aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-1.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>2000-08-10 09:19:44 +0100
committerJoseph Myers <jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>2000-08-10 09:19:44 +0100
commit9052d3bebc0b9420a5f9cd8907f5b5c405e7cf7d (patch)
treed0cd0063959a5d0dc1fe4a1a374d8ccbb93bffcd /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-1.c
parentda40cbf67ae68725ec9bbdbccf0275597e51a9b3 (diff)
downloadgcc-9052d3bebc0b9420a5f9cd8907f5b5c405e7cf7d.zip
gcc-9052d3bebc0b9420a5f9cd8907f5b5c405e7cf7d.tar.gz
gcc-9052d3bebc0b9420a5f9cd8907f5b5c405e7cf7d.tar.bz2
c90-array-lval-1.c, [...]: New tests.
* gcc.dg/c90-array-lval-1.c, gcc.dg/c90-scope-1.c, gcc.dg/c99-array-lval-1.c, gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-1.c, gcc.dg/c99-func-1.c, gcc.dg/c99-func-2.c, gcc.dg/c99-scope-1.c: New tests. From-SVN: r35602
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-1.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-1.c16
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c3082ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* Test for constraints on constant expressions. In C90 it is clear that
+ certain constructs are not permitted in unevaluated parts of an
+ expression (except in sizeof); in C99 it might fall within implementation
+ latitude; and if the operands are suitable, diagnostics should not be
+ issued.
+*/
+/* Origin: Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>; inspired by
+ http://deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=524271595&fmt=text by Peter Seebach.
+*/
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1999 -pedantic-errors" } */
+
+/* The comma operator is in a subexpression that is not evaluated, so OK
+ by C99. In C90 a diagnostic is required since it is not in a sizeof.
+*/
+int i = (1 ? 0 : (2, 3));