diff options
author | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2022-01-11 13:00:48 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2022-01-11 13:00:48 -0500 |
commit | 0378f563b0321c44c4a9c98cf46d2a22b9160f76 (patch) | |
tree | 19cbe16081528335a8b3402da691793765ae4636 /gcc/objc | |
parent | 46de918f9892e637845bd97b4ca95011d46d3733 (diff) | |
download | gcc-0378f563b0321c44c4a9c98cf46d2a22b9160f76.zip gcc-0378f563b0321c44c4a9c98cf46d2a22b9160f76.tar.gz gcc-0378f563b0321c44c4a9c98cf46d2a22b9160f76.tar.bz2 |
c++: dependent bases and 'this' availability [PR103831]
Here during satisfaction of B's constraints we're failing to reject the
object-less call to the non-static member function A::size ultimately
because satisfaction is performed in the (access) context of the class
template B, which has a dependent base, and so the any_dependent_bases_p
check within build_new_method_call causes us to not reject the call.
(Subsequent constexpr evaluation of the call succeeds since the function
is effectively static.)
This patch fixes this by refining the any_dependent_bases_p check within
build_new_method_call: if we're in a context where 'this' is unavailable,
then we cannot resolve the implicit object regardless of the presence of
a dependent base. So let's also check current_class_ptr alongside a_d_b_p.
PR c++/103831
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* call.c (build_new_method_call): Consider dependent bases only
if 'this' is available.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-class3.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/non-dependent18.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/objc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions