diff options
author | Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com> | 2023-11-20 05:14:25 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org> | 2023-11-20 05:14:25 -0300 |
commit | 69741355e6dbcf64408b77dca6a2f863ccecdae9 (patch) | |
tree | c7a4674e03cb7ea4acd28fe572e67b7019f83f03 /gcc/machmode.h | |
parent | 2f8f7ee2db82a315f9faf8b306d6203ca7f7b002 (diff) | |
download | gcc-69741355e6dbcf64408b77dca6a2f863ccecdae9.zip gcc-69741355e6dbcf64408b77dca6a2f863ccecdae9.tar.gz gcc-69741355e6dbcf64408b77dca6a2f863ccecdae9.tar.bz2 |
testsuite: scev: expect fail on ilp32
I've recently patched scev-3.c and scev-5.c because it only passed by
accident on ia32. It also fails on some (but not all) arm-eabi
variants. It seems hard to characterize the conditions in which the
optimization is supposed to pass, but expecting them to fail on ilp32
targets, though probably a little excessive and possibly noisy, is not
quite as alarming as getting a fail in test reports, so I propose
changing the xfail marker from ia32 to ilp32.
I'm also proposing to add a similar marker to scev-4.c. Though it
doesn't appear to be failing for me, I've got reports that suggest it
still does for others, and it certainly did for us as well.
for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-3.c: xfail on all ilp32 targets,
though some of these do pass.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-4.c: Likewise.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-5.c: Likewise.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/machmode.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions