diff options
author | Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana@gcc.gnu.org> | 2015-10-09 10:58:06 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana@gcc.gnu.org> | 2015-10-09 10:58:06 +0000 |
commit | f869c12f4c930a233b02e31843d7a255d50ce5d1 (patch) | |
tree | 28e427e367439d44f5e2009524bd7c9f75a8d3b0 /gcc/gimple-fold.c | |
parent | a46b23e136f56e1bb44065d260b49c24b656bd8b (diff) | |
download | gcc-f869c12f4c930a233b02e31843d7a255d50ce5d1.zip gcc-f869c12f4c930a233b02e31843d7a255d50ce5d1.tar.gz gcc-f869c12f4c930a233b02e31843d7a255d50ce5d1.tar.bz2 |
[PATCH PR target/67366 2/2] [gimple-fold.c] Support movmisalign optabs in gimple-fold.c
This patch by Richard allows for movmisalign optabs to be supported
in gimple-fold.c. This caused a bit of pain in the testsuite with strlenopt-8.c
in conjunction with the ARM support for movmisalign_optabs as the test
was coded up to do different things depending on whether the target
supported misaligned access or not. However now with unaligned access
being allowed for different levels of the architecture in the arm backend,
the concept of the helper function non_strict_align mapping identically
to the definition of STRICT_ALIGNMENT disappears.
Adjusted thusly for ARM. The testsuite/lib changes were tested with an
arm-none-eabi multilib that included architecture variants that did not
support unaligned access and architecture variants that did.
The testing matrix for this patch was:
1. x86_64 bootstrap and regression test - no regressions.
2. armhf bootstrap and regression test - no regressions.
3. arm-none-eabi cross build and regression test for
{-marm/-march=armv7-a/-mfpu=vfpv3-d16/-mfloat-abi=softfp}
{-mthumb/-march=armv8-a/-mfpu=crypto-neon-fp-armv8/-mfloat-abi=hard}
{-marm/-mcpu=arm7tdmi/-mfloat-abi=soft}
{-mthumb/-mcpu=arm7tdmi/-mfloat-abi=soft}
with no regressions.
Ok to apply ?
2015-10-09 Richard Biener <rguenth@suse.de>
PR target/67366
* gimple-fold.c (optabs-query.h): Include
(gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op): Allow unaligned stores
when movmisalign_optabs are available.
2015-10-09 Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>
PR target/67366
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_non_strict_align):
Adjust for arm*-*-*.
* gcc.target/arm/pr67366.c: New test.
From-SVN: r228644
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/gimple-fold.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/gimple-fold.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-fold.c b/gcc/gimple-fold.c index ee2a320..17a23d6 100644 --- a/gcc/gimple-fold.c +++ b/gcc/gimple-fold.c @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see #include "tree-eh.h" #include "gimple-match.h" #include "gomp-constants.h" +#include "optabs-query.h" + /* Return true when DECL can be referenced from current unit. FROM_DECL (if non-null) specify constructor of variable DECL was taken from. @@ -709,7 +711,9 @@ gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, /* If the destination pointer is not aligned we must be able to emit an unaligned store. */ && (dest_align >= GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (TYPE_MODE (type)) - || !SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS (TYPE_MODE (type), dest_align))) + || !SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS (TYPE_MODE (type), dest_align) + || (optab_handler (movmisalign_optab, TYPE_MODE (type)) + != CODE_FOR_nothing))) { tree srctype = type; tree desttype = type; @@ -721,7 +725,10 @@ gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi, srcmem = tem; else if (src_align < GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (TYPE_MODE (type)) && SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS (TYPE_MODE (type), - src_align)) + src_align) + && (optab_handler (movmisalign_optab, + TYPE_MODE (type)) + == CODE_FOR_nothing)) srcmem = NULL_TREE; if (srcmem) { |