diff options
| author | Dave Love <fx@gcc.gnu.org> | 1998-11-19 10:41:20 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dave Love <fx@gcc.gnu.org> | 1998-11-19 10:41:20 +0000 |
| commit | 10a51b218ffe05c48d43143bd676830191a72efa (patch) | |
| tree | 2c41adf087bb1115db5a88dbe3a98386d1c9dbce /gcc/f | |
| parent | e9831ca0d0ca81e4fdbae886e046a232c2e92d36 (diff) | |
| download | gcc-10a51b218ffe05c48d43143bd676830191a72efa.zip gcc-10a51b218ffe05c48d43143bd676830191a72efa.tar.gz gcc-10a51b218ffe05c48d43143bd676830191a72efa.tar.bz2 | |
Formatting changes from Craig.
From-SVN: r23713
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/f')
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/f/bugs.texi | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/f/bugs.texi b/gcc/f/bugs.texi index af18d80c..b591cfc 100644 --- a/gcc/f/bugs.texi +++ b/gcc/f/bugs.texi @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ Version 0.6 should solve most or all remaining problems @cindex COMPLEX support @cindex support, COMPLEX @item -Maintainers of gcc report that the back end definitely has ``broken'' +Maintainers of @code{gcc} report that the back end definitely has ``broken'' support for @code{COMPLEX} types. Based on their input, it seems many of the problems affect only the more-general facilities for gcc's @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ by versions of @code{g77} prior to 0.5.20. when using the @samp{-fPIC} option (such as compiling for ELF targets) on the Intel x86 architecture target. The symptom is that the assembler complains about invalid opcodes. -This bug is in the gcc back end. +This bug is in the @code{gcc} back end. Fixed in @code{egcs} version 1.0.2. |