delete fixed bugs, describe one as appropriate news

From-SVN: r25547

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 61 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/f/bugs.texi b/gcc/f/bugs.texi
index 961b67b..5be1cb2 100644
--- a/gcc/f/bugs.texi
+++ b/gcc/f/bugs.texi
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 @c The text of this file appears in the file BUGS
 @c in the G77 distribution, as well as in the G77 manual.
 
-@c 1998-09-01
+@c 1999-03-03
 
 @ifclear BUGSONLY
 @node Actual Bugs
@@ -30,18 +30,8 @@ configure, port, build, and install @code{g77},
 
 @itemize @bullet
 @item
-@code{g77} sometimes crashes when compiling code
-containing the construct @samp{CMPLX(0.)} or similar.
-This is a @code{gcc} back-end bug.
-It can be worked around using @samp{-fno-emulate-complex},
-though that might trigger other, older bugs.
-Compiling without optimization is another work-around.
-
-Fixed in @code{egcs} 1.1.
-
-@item
 @c Tim Prince discovered this.
-Automatic arrays aren't working on HP-UX systems,
+Automatic arrays possibly aren't working on HP-UX systems,
 at least in HP-UX version 10.20.
 Writing into them apparently causes over-writing
 of statically declared data in the main program.
@@ -50,34 +40,6 @@ or pointers to them being improperly handled,
 e.g. not passed to other procedures as they should be.
 
 @item
-@c Toon Moene discovered these.
-Some Fortran code has been found to be miscompiled
-by @code{g77} built on @code{gcc} version 2.8.1
-on m68k-next-nextstep3 configurations
-when using the @samp{-O2} option.
-Even a C function is known to miscompile
-on that configuration
-when using the @samp{-O2 -funroll-loops} options.
-
-Fixed in @code{egcs}.
-
-@cindex DNRM2
-@cindex stack, 387 coprocessor
-@cindex ix86
-@cindex x86
-@cindex -O2
-@item
-A code-generation bug afflicts
-Intel x86 targets when @samp{-O2} is specified
-compiling, for example, an old version of
-the @samp{DNRM2} routine.
-The x87 coprocessor stack is being
-mismanaged in cases where assigned @code{GOTO}
-and @code{ASSIGN} are involved.
-
-Fixed in @code{egcs} version 1.1.
-
-@item
 @code{g77} fails to warn about
 use of a ``live'' iterative-DO variable
 as an implied-DO variable
@@ -85,14 +47,6 @@ in a @samp{WRITE} or @samp{PRINT} statement
 (although it does warn about this in a @samp{READ} statement).
 
 @item
-A compiler crash, or apparently infinite run time,
-can result when compiling complicated expressions
-involving @code{COMPLEX} arithmetic
-(especially multiplication).
-
-Fixed in @code{egcs} version 1.1.
-
-@item
 Something about @code{g77}'s straightforward handling of
 label references and definitions sometimes prevents the GBE
 from unrolling loops.
@@ -238,19 +192,6 @@ The new option @samp{-fno-emulate-complex} avoids the work-around,
 reverting to using the same ``broken'' mechanism as that used
 by versions of @code{g77} prior to 0.5.20.
 
-@cindex ELF support
-@cindex support, ELF
-@cindex -fPIC option
-@cindex options, -fPIC
-@item
-@code{g77} sometimes produces invalid assembler code
-when using the @samp{-fPIC} option (such as compiling for ELF targets)
-on the Intel x86 architecture target.
-The symptom is that the assembler complains about invalid opcodes.
-This bug is in the @code{gcc} back end.
-
-Fixed in @code{egcs} version 1.0.2.
-
 @cindex padding
 @cindex structures
 @cindex common blocks