diff options
author | Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> | 2006-11-16 21:25:16 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org> | 2006-11-16 21:25:16 +0000 |
commit | a9e64c639ef604bfc2d734b3973dfc0953875877 (patch) | |
tree | 3474f1e6d8e5a0484dd9285fb4f30365e230b1df /gcc/doc/implement-c.texi | |
parent | c8cf9f0f27b4bc784419f60976390c6e4111ccae (diff) | |
download | gcc-a9e64c639ef604bfc2d734b3973dfc0953875877.zip gcc-a9e64c639ef604bfc2d734b3973dfc0953875877.tar.gz gcc-a9e64c639ef604bfc2d734b3973dfc0953875877.tar.bz2 |
re PR middle-end/26306 (ICE on volatile array with non-constant bounds)
PR middle-end/26306
* gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Only force a load for references to
non-BLKmode volatile values.
* doc/implement-c.texi (Qualifiers implementation): Document the
interpretation of what a volatile access is.
* doc/extend.texi (C++ Extensions): Rework same documentation.
From-SVN: r118900
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/doc/implement-c.texi')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/doc/implement-c.texi | 37 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/doc/implement-c.texi b/gcc/doc/implement-c.texi index 9631233..dc99610 100644 --- a/gcc/doc/implement-c.texi +++ b/gcc/doc/implement-c.texi @@ -503,7 +503,42 @@ determined by the ABI@. @cite{What constitutes an access to an object that has volatile-qualified type (C90 6.5.3, C99 6.7.3).} -@xref{Volatiles, , When is a Volatile Object Accessed?}. +Such an object is normally accessed by pointers and used for accessing +hardware. In most expressions, it is intuitively obvious what is a read +and what is a write. For example + +@smallexample +volatile int *dst = @var{somevalue}; +volatile int *src = @var{someothervalue}; +*dst = *src; +@end smallexample + +@noindent +will cause a read of the volatile object pointed to by @var{src} and store the +value into the volatile object pointed to by @var{dst}. There is no +guarantee that these reads and writes are atomic, especially for objects +larger than @code{int}. + +However, if the volatile storage is not being modified, and the value of +the volatile storage is not used, then the situation is less obvious. +For example + +@smallexample +volatile int *src = @var{somevalue}; +*src; +@end smallexample + +According to the C standard, such an expression is an rvalue whose type +is the unqualified version of its original type, i.e. @code{int}. Whether +GCC interprets this as a read of the volatile object being pointed to or +only as a request to evaluate the expression for its side-effects depends +on this type. + +If it is a scalar type, or on most targets an aggregate type whose only +member object is of a scalar type, or a union type whose member objects +are of scalar types, the expression is interpreted by GCC as a read of +the volatile object; in the other cases, the expression is only evaluated +for its side-effects. @end itemize |