aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/cp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPatrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>2023-05-11 16:31:33 -0400
committerPatrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>2023-05-11 16:31:33 -0400
commit02777f20be4f40160f1b4ed34fa59ba75245b5b7 (patch)
treefc0f1282937654022ebe9e38a712300ba541a0d1 /gcc/cp
parentbd02669579fed2617f1090c8640bdcdced1ab7a1 (diff)
downloadgcc-02777f20be4f40160f1b4ed34fa59ba75245b5b7.zip
gcc-02777f20be4f40160f1b4ed34fa59ba75245b5b7.tar.gz
gcc-02777f20be4f40160f1b4ed34fa59ba75245b5b7.tar.bz2
c++: 'mutable' subobject of constexpr variable [PR109745]
r13-2701-g7107ea6fb933f1 made us correctly accept during constexpr evaluation 'mutable' member accesses of objects constructed during that evaluation, while continuing to reject such accesses for constexpr objects constructed outside of that evaluation, by considering the CONSTRUCTOR_MUTABLE_POISON flag during cxx_eval_component_reference. However, this flag is set only for the outermost CONSTRUCTOR of a constexpr variable initializer, so if we're accessing a 'mutable' member of a nested CONSTRUCTOR, the flag won't be set and we won't reject the access. This can lead to us accepting invalid code, as in the first testcase, or even wrong code generation due to our speculative constexpr evaluation, as in the second and third testcase. This patch fixes this by setting CONSTRUCTOR_MUTABLE_POISON recursively rather than only on the outermost CONSTRUCTOR. PR c++/109745 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * typeck2.cc (poison_mutable_constructors): Define. (store_init_value): Use it instead of setting CONSTRUCTOR_MUTABLE_POISON directly. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-mutable4.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-mutable5.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-mutable2.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/cp')
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/typeck2.cc26
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc b/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc
index f5cc7c8..72b3831 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck2.cc
@@ -776,6 +776,27 @@ split_nonconstant_init (tree dest, tree init)
return code;
}
+/* T is the initializer of a constexpr variable. Set CONSTRUCTOR_MUTABLE_POISON
+ for any CONSTRUCTOR within T that contains (directly or indirectly) a mutable
+ member, thereby poisoning it so it can't be copied to another a constexpr
+ variable or read during constexpr evaluation. */
+
+static void
+poison_mutable_constructors (tree t)
+{
+ if (TREE_CODE (t) != CONSTRUCTOR)
+ return;
+
+ if (cp_has_mutable_p (TREE_TYPE (t)))
+ {
+ CONSTRUCTOR_MUTABLE_POISON (t) = true;
+
+ if (vec<constructor_elt, va_gc> *elts = CONSTRUCTOR_ELTS (t))
+ for (const constructor_elt &ce : *elts)
+ poison_mutable_constructors (ce.value);
+ }
+}
+
/* Perform appropriate conversions on the initial value of a variable,
store it in the declaration DECL,
and print any error messages that are appropriate.
@@ -886,10 +907,7 @@ store_init_value (tree decl, tree init, vec<tree, va_gc>** cleanups, int flags)
else
value = fold_non_dependent_init (value, tf_warning_or_error,
/*manifestly_const_eval=*/true, decl);
- if (TREE_CODE (value) == CONSTRUCTOR && cp_has_mutable_p (type))
- /* Poison this CONSTRUCTOR so it can't be copied to another
- constexpr variable. */
- CONSTRUCTOR_MUTABLE_POISON (value) = true;
+ poison_mutable_constructors (value);
const_init = (reduced_constant_expression_p (value)
|| error_operand_p (value));
DECL_INITIALIZED_BY_CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_P (decl) = const_init;