aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/ada
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRobert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>2005-09-05 09:52:27 +0200
committerArnaud Charlet <charlet@gcc.gnu.org>2005-09-05 09:52:27 +0200
commit2ede092bd71ef3748866d32ae7267eb8ff8b15e2 (patch)
tree359619ed3ffb7e6470ef81008d5c53034cf88ca4 /gcc/ada
parent18605ccc2b1bdac4b7ef05c433ef6bff28d78d96 (diff)
downloadgcc-2ede092bd71ef3748866d32ae7267eb8ff8b15e2.zip
gcc-2ede092bd71ef3748866d32ae7267eb8ff8b15e2.tar.gz
gcc-2ede092bd71ef3748866d32ae7267eb8ff8b15e2.tar.bz2
checks.adb (Check_Needed): New procedure...
2005-09-01 Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com> * checks.adb (Check_Needed): New procedure, deals with removing checks based on analysis of short-circuited forms. Also generates warnings for improper use of non-short-circuited forms. Code clean ups. From-SVN: r103857
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/ada')
-rw-r--r--gcc/ada/checks.adb418
1 files changed, 228 insertions, 190 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/ada/checks.adb b/gcc/ada/checks.adb
index 68eb16e..8bb9171 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/checks.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/checks.adb
@@ -218,6 +218,30 @@ package body Checks is
-- routine. The Do_Static flag indicates that only a static check is
-- to be done.
+ type Check_Type is (Access_Check, Division_Check);
+ function Check_Needed (Nod : Node_Id; Check : Check_Type) return Boolean;
+ -- This function is used to see if an access or division by zero check is
+ -- needed. The check is to be applied to a single variable appearing in the
+ -- source, and N is the node for the reference. If N is not of this form,
+ -- True is returned with no further processing. If N is of the right form,
+ -- then further processing determines if the given Check is needed.
+ --
+ -- The particular circuit is to see if we have the case of a check that is
+ -- not needed because it appears in the right operand of a short circuited
+ -- conditional where the left operand guards the check. For example:
+ --
+ -- if Var = 0 or else Q / Var > 12 then
+ -- ...
+ -- end if;
+ --
+ -- In this example, the division check is not required. At the same time
+ -- we can issue warnings for suspicious use of non-short-circuited forms,
+ -- such as:
+ --
+ -- if Var = 0 or Q / Var > 12 then
+ -- ...
+ -- end if;
+
procedure Find_Check
(Expr : Node_Id;
Check_Type : Character;
@@ -254,10 +278,6 @@ package body Checks is
-- that the access value is non-null, since the checks do not
-- not apply to null access values.
- procedure Install_Null_Excluding_Check (N : Node_Id);
- -- Determines whether an access node requires a runtime access check and
- -- if so inserts the appropriate run-time check
-
procedure Install_Static_Check (R_Cno : Node_Id; Loc : Source_Ptr);
-- Called by Apply_{Length,Range}_Checks to rewrite the tree with the
-- Constraint_Error node.
@@ -380,13 +400,18 @@ package body Checks is
elsif Access_Checks_Suppressed (Etype (P)) then
return;
- -- We do not need checks if we are not generating code (i.e. the
- -- expander is not active). This is not just an optimization, there
- -- are cases (e.g. with pragma Debug) where generating the checks
- -- can cause real trouble).
+ -- We do not need checks if we are not generating code (i.e. the
+ -- expander is not active). This is not just an optimization, there
+ -- are cases (e.g. with pragma Debug) where generating the checks
+ -- can cause real trouble).
elsif not Expander_Active then
return;
+
+ -- We do not need checks if not needed because of short circuiting
+
+ elsif not Check_Needed (P, Access_Check) then
+ return;
end if;
-- Case where P is an entity name
@@ -1360,7 +1385,8 @@ package body Checks is
begin
if Expander_Active
- and not Backend_Divide_Checks_On_Target
+ and then not Backend_Divide_Checks_On_Target
+ and then Check_Needed (Right, Division_Check)
then
Determine_Range (Right, ROK, Rlo, Rhi);
@@ -1382,7 +1408,6 @@ package body Checks is
-- Test for extremely annoying case of xxx'First divided by -1
if Do_Overflow_Check (N) then
-
if Nkind (N) = N_Op_Divide
and then Is_Signed_Integer_Type (Typ)
then
@@ -2420,6 +2445,121 @@ package body Checks is
return Cond;
end Build_Discriminant_Checks;
+ ------------------
+ -- Check_Needed --
+ ------------------
+
+ function Check_Needed (Nod : Node_Id; Check : Check_Type) return Boolean is
+ N : Node_Id;
+ P : Node_Id;
+ K : Node_Kind;
+ L : Node_Id;
+ R : Node_Id;
+
+ begin
+ -- Always check if not simple entity
+
+ if Nkind (Nod) not in N_Has_Entity
+ or else not Comes_From_Source (Nod)
+ then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Look up tree for short circuit
+
+ N := Nod;
+ loop
+ P := Parent (N);
+ K := Nkind (P);
+
+ if K not in N_Subexpr then
+ return True;
+
+ -- Or/Or Else case, left operand must be equality test
+
+ elsif K = N_Op_Or or else K = N_Or_Else then
+ exit when N = Right_Opnd (P)
+ and then Nkind (Left_Opnd (P)) = N_Op_Eq;
+
+ -- And/And then case, left operand must be inequality test. Note that
+ -- at this stage, the expander will have changed a/=b to not (a=b).
+
+ elsif K = N_Op_And or else K = N_And_Then then
+ exit when N = Right_Opnd (P)
+ and then Nkind (Left_Opnd (P)) = N_Op_Not
+ and then Nkind (Right_Opnd (Left_Opnd (P))) = N_Op_Eq;
+ end if;
+
+ N := P;
+ end loop;
+
+ -- If we fall through the loop, then we have a conditional with an
+ -- appropriate test as its left operand. So test further.
+
+ L := Left_Opnd (P);
+
+ if Nkind (L) = N_Op_Not then
+ L := Right_Opnd (L);
+ end if;
+
+ R := Right_Opnd (L);
+ L := Left_Opnd (L);
+
+ -- Left operand of test must match original variable
+
+ if Nkind (L) not in N_Has_Entity
+ or else Entity (L) /= Entity (Nod)
+ then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ -- Right operand of test mus be key value (zero or null)
+
+ case Check is
+ when Access_Check =>
+ if Nkind (R) /= N_Null then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+
+ when Division_Check =>
+ if not Compile_Time_Known_Value (R)
+ or else Expr_Value (R) /= Uint_0
+ then
+ return True;
+ end if;
+ end case;
+
+ -- Here we have the optimizable case, warn if not short-circuited
+
+ if K = N_Op_And or else K = N_Op_Or then
+ case Check is
+ when Access_Check =>
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("Constraint_Error may be raised (access check)?",
+ Parent (Nod));
+ when Division_Check =>
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("Constraint_Error may be raised (zero divide)?",
+ Parent (Nod));
+ end case;
+
+ if K = N_Op_And then
+ Error_Msg_N ("use `AND THEN` instead of AND?", P);
+ else
+ Error_Msg_N ("use `OR ELSE` instead of OR?", P);
+ end if;
+
+ -- If not short-circuited, we need the ckeck
+
+ return True;
+
+ -- If short-circuited, we can omit the check
+
+ else
+ return False;
+ end if;
+ end Check_Needed;
+
-----------------------------------
-- Check_Valid_Lvalue_Subscripts --
-----------------------------------
@@ -2467,222 +2607,120 @@ package body Checks is
Related_Nod : Node_Id;
Has_Null_Exclusion : Boolean := False;
- type Msg_Kind is (Components, Formals, Objects);
- Msg_K : Msg_Kind := Objects;
- -- Used by local subprograms to generate precise error messages
+ begin
+ pragma Assert (K = N_Parameter_Specification
+ or else K = N_Object_Declaration
+ or else K = N_Discriminant_Specification
+ or else K = N_Component_Declaration);
- procedure Check_Must_Be_Access
- (Typ : Entity_Id;
- Has_Null_Exclusion : Boolean);
- -- ??? local subprograms must have comment on spec
+ Typ := Etype (Defining_Identifier (N));
- procedure Check_Already_Null_Excluding_Type
- (Typ : Entity_Id;
- Has_Null_Exclusion : Boolean;
- Related_Nod : Node_Id);
- -- ??? local subprograms must have comment on spec
+ pragma Assert (Is_Access_Type (Typ)
+ or else (K = N_Object_Declaration and then Is_Array_Type (Typ)));
- procedure Check_Must_Be_Initialized
- (N : Node_Id;
- Related_Nod : Node_Id);
- -- ??? local subprograms must have comment on spec
+ case K is
+ when N_Parameter_Specification =>
+ Related_Nod := Parameter_Type (N);
+ Has_Null_Exclusion := Null_Exclusion_Present (N);
- procedure Check_Null_Not_Allowed (N : Node_Id);
- -- ??? local subprograms must have comment on spec
+ when N_Object_Declaration =>
+ Related_Nod := Object_Definition (N);
+ Has_Null_Exclusion := Null_Exclusion_Present (N);
- -- ??? following bodies lack comments
+ when N_Discriminant_Specification =>
+ Related_Nod := Discriminant_Type (N);
+ Has_Null_Exclusion := Null_Exclusion_Present (N);
- --------------------------
- -- Check_Must_Be_Access --
- --------------------------
+ when N_Component_Declaration =>
+ if Present (Access_Definition (Component_Definition (N))) then
+ Related_Nod := Component_Definition (N);
+ Has_Null_Exclusion :=
+ Null_Exclusion_Present
+ (Access_Definition (Component_Definition (N)));
+ else
+ Related_Nod :=
+ Subtype_Indication (Component_Definition (N));
+ Has_Null_Exclusion :=
+ Null_Exclusion_Present (Component_Definition (N));
+ end if;
- procedure Check_Must_Be_Access
- (Typ : Entity_Id;
- Has_Null_Exclusion : Boolean)
- is
- begin
- if Has_Null_Exclusion
- and then not Is_Access_Type (Typ)
- then
- Error_Msg_N ("(Ada 2005) must be an access type", Related_Nod);
- end if;
- end Check_Must_Be_Access;
+ when others =>
+ raise Program_Error;
+ end case;
- ---------------------------------------
- -- Check_Already_Null_Excluding_Type --
- ---------------------------------------
+ -- Enforce legality rule 3.10 (14/1): A null_exclusion is only allowed
+ -- of the access subtype does not exclude null.
- procedure Check_Already_Null_Excluding_Type
- (Typ : Entity_Id;
- Has_Null_Exclusion : Boolean;
- Related_Nod : Node_Id)
- is
- begin
- if Has_Null_Exclusion
- and then Can_Never_Be_Null (Typ)
- then
- Error_Msg_N
- ("(Ada 2005) already a null-excluding type", Related_Nod);
- end if;
- end Check_Already_Null_Excluding_Type;
+ if Has_Null_Exclusion
+ and then Can_Never_Be_Null (Typ)
- -------------------------------
- -- Check_Must_Be_Initialized --
- -------------------------------
+ -- No need to check itypes that have the null-excluding attribute
+ -- because they were checked at their point of creation
- procedure Check_Must_Be_Initialized
- (N : Node_Id;
- Related_Nod : Node_Id)
- is
- Expr : constant Node_Id := Expression (N);
+ and then not Is_Itype (Typ)
+ then
+ Error_Msg_N
+ ("(Ada 2005) already a null-excluding type", Related_Nod);
+ end if;
- begin
- pragma Assert (Nkind (N) = N_Component_Declaration
- or else Nkind (N) = N_Object_Declaration);
-
- if not Present (Expr) then
- case Msg_K is
- when Components =>
- Error_Msg_N
- ("(Ada 2005) null-excluding components must be " &
- "initialized", Related_Nod);
-
- when Formals =>
- Error_Msg_N
- ("(Ada 2005) null-excluding formals must be initialized",
- Related_Nod);
-
- when Objects =>
- Error_Msg_N
- ("(Ada 2005) null-excluding objects must be initialized",
- Related_Nod);
- end case;
- end if;
- end Check_Must_Be_Initialized;
+ -- Check that null-excluding objects are always initialized
+
+ if K = N_Object_Declaration
+ and then not Present (Expression (N))
+ then
+ -- Add a an expression that assignates null. This node is needed
+ -- by Apply_Compile_Time_Constraint_Error, that will replace this
+ -- node by a Constraint_Error node.
+
+ Set_Expression (N, Make_Null (Sloc (N)));
+ Set_Etype (Expression (N), Etype (Defining_Identifier (N)));
- ----------------------------
- -- Check_Null_Not_Allowed --
- ----------------------------
+ Apply_Compile_Time_Constraint_Error
+ (N => Expression (N),
+ Msg => "(Ada 2005) null-excluding objects must be initialized?",
+ Reason => CE_Null_Not_Allowed);
+ end if;
- procedure Check_Null_Not_Allowed (N : Node_Id) is
+ -- Check that the null value is not used as a single expression to
+ -- assignate a value to a null-excluding component, formal or object;
+ -- otherwise generate a warning message at the sloc of Related_Nod and
+ -- replace Expression (N) by an N_Contraint_Error node.
+
+ declare
Expr : constant Node_Id := Expression (N);
begin
if Present (Expr)
and then Nkind (Expr) = N_Null
then
- case Msg_K is
- when Components =>
+ case K is
+ when N_Discriminant_Specification |
+ N_Component_Declaration =>
Apply_Compile_Time_Constraint_Error
(N => Expr,
Msg => "(Ada 2005) NULL not allowed in"
& " null-excluding components?",
- Reason => CE_Null_Not_Allowed,
- Rep => False);
+ Reason => CE_Null_Not_Allowed);
- when Formals =>
+ when N_Parameter_Specification =>
Apply_Compile_Time_Constraint_Error
(N => Expr,
Msg => "(Ada 2005) NULL not allowed in"
& " null-excluding formals?",
- Reason => CE_Null_Not_Allowed,
- Rep => False);
+ Reason => CE_Null_Not_Allowed);
- when Objects =>
+ when N_Object_Declaration =>
Apply_Compile_Time_Constraint_Error
(N => Expr,
Msg => "(Ada 2005) NULL not allowed in"
& " null-excluding objects?",
- Reason => CE_Null_Not_Allowed,
- Rep => False);
+ Reason => CE_Null_Not_Allowed);
+
+ when others =>
+ null;
end case;
end if;
- end Check_Null_Not_Allowed;
-
- -- Start of processing for Null_Exclusion_Static_Checks
-
- begin
- pragma Assert (K = N_Component_Declaration
- or else K = N_Parameter_Specification
- or else K = N_Object_Declaration
- or else K = N_Discriminant_Specification
- or else K = N_Allocator);
-
- case K is
- when N_Component_Declaration =>
- Msg_K := Components;
-
- if not Present (Access_Definition (Component_Definition (N))) then
- Has_Null_Exclusion := Null_Exclusion_Present
- (Component_Definition (N));
- Typ := Etype (Subtype_Indication (Component_Definition (N)));
- Related_Nod := Subtype_Indication (Component_Definition (N));
- Check_Must_Be_Access (Typ, Has_Null_Exclusion);
- Check_Already_Null_Excluding_Type
- (Typ, Has_Null_Exclusion, Related_Nod);
- Check_Must_Be_Initialized (N, Related_Nod);
- end if;
-
- Check_Null_Not_Allowed (N);
-
- when N_Parameter_Specification =>
- Msg_K := Formals;
- Has_Null_Exclusion := Null_Exclusion_Present (N);
- Typ := Entity (Parameter_Type (N));
- Related_Nod := Parameter_Type (N);
- Check_Must_Be_Access (Typ, Has_Null_Exclusion);
- Check_Already_Null_Excluding_Type
- (Typ, Has_Null_Exclusion, Related_Nod);
- Check_Null_Not_Allowed (N);
-
- when N_Object_Declaration =>
- Msg_K := Objects;
-
- if Nkind (Object_Definition (N)) /= N_Access_Definition then
- Has_Null_Exclusion := Null_Exclusion_Present (N);
- Typ := Entity (Object_Definition (N));
- Related_Nod := Object_Definition (N);
- Check_Must_Be_Access (Typ, Has_Null_Exclusion);
- Check_Already_Null_Excluding_Type
- (Typ, Has_Null_Exclusion, Related_Nod);
- Check_Must_Be_Initialized (N, Related_Nod);
- end if;
-
- Check_Null_Not_Allowed (N);
-
- when N_Discriminant_Specification =>
- Msg_K := Components;
-
- if Nkind (Discriminant_Type (N)) /= N_Access_Definition then
- Has_Null_Exclusion := Null_Exclusion_Present (N);
- Typ := Etype (Defining_Identifier (N));
- Related_Nod := Discriminant_Type (N);
- Check_Must_Be_Access (Typ, Has_Null_Exclusion);
- Check_Already_Null_Excluding_Type
- (Typ, Has_Null_Exclusion, Related_Nod);
- end if;
-
- Check_Null_Not_Allowed (N);
-
- when N_Allocator =>
- Msg_K := Objects;
- Has_Null_Exclusion := Null_Exclusion_Present (N);
- Typ := Etype (Expression (N));
-
- if Nkind (Expression (N)) = N_Qualified_Expression then
- Related_Nod := Subtype_Mark (Expression (N));
- else
- Related_Nod := Expression (N);
- end if;
-
- Check_Must_Be_Access (Typ, Has_Null_Exclusion);
- Check_Already_Null_Excluding_Type
- (Typ, Has_Null_Exclusion, Related_Nod);
- Check_Null_Not_Allowed (N);
-
- when others =>
- raise Program_Error;
- end case;
+ end;
end Null_Exclusion_Static_Checks;
----------------------------------