diff options
| author | Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org> | 2017-09-21 11:00:43 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Richard Sandiford <rsandifo@gcc.gnu.org> | 2017-09-21 11:00:43 +0000 |
| commit | 4a77e8874709d7848e4216c59089ccce756f228e (patch) | |
| tree | 2f833fb43ecc1fb9ecb9c46f20119900d30c2630 /MAINTAINERS | |
| parent | dd72b5f95275ca75dc54b8b51a14ff2025ed1a3a (diff) | |
| download | gcc-4a77e8874709d7848e4216c59089ccce756f228e.zip gcc-4a77e8874709d7848e4216c59089ccce756f228e.tar.gz gcc-4a77e8874709d7848e4216c59089ccce756f228e.tar.bz2 | |
Tighten tree-ssa-ccp.c:get_value_for_expr condition
bit_value_unop and bit_value_binop require constant values
to be INTEGER_CSTs:
gcc_assert ((rval.lattice_val == CONSTANT
&& TREE_CODE (rval.value) == INTEGER_CST)
|| wi::sext (rval.mask, TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (rhs))) == -1);
However, when deciding whether to record a constant value,
the for_bits_p handling in get_value_for_expr used a negative
test for ADDR_EXPR:
else if (is_gimple_min_invariant (expr)
&& (!for_bits_p || TREE_CODE (expr) != ADDR_EXPR))
This patch uses a positive test for INTEGER_CST instead.
Existing tests showed the need for this once polynomial constants
are added.
2017-09-21 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org>
Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>
David Sherwood <david.sherwood@arm.com>
gcc/
* tree-ssa-ccp.c (get_value_for_expr): Use a positive test for
INTEGER_CST rather than a negative test for ADDR_EXPR.
Co-Authored-By: Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>
Co-Authored-By: David Sherwood <david.sherwood@arm.com>
From-SVN: r253056
Diffstat (limited to 'MAINTAINERS')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions