lra: Handle SUBREG in lra_rtx_hash [PR119307]

The following testcase ICEs starting with r15-3213 in
decompose_normal_address and starting with r15-3288 ICEs
in lra_rtx_hash, which since r8-5466 can't handle SUBREG
(previously SUBREG was "ei" and lra_rtx_hash can handle
that through
val += lra_rtx_hash (XEXP (x, i));
for e and
val += XINT (x, i);
for i, now it is "ep" where p stands for poly_uint16).

The following patch fixes it by handling SUBREG directly, a variant
could be instead add
        case 'p':
          for (int i = 0; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; ++i)
            val += SUBREG_BYTE (x).coeffs[i];
          break;
if you prefer that more (p is used solely for SUBREG and e.g. rtx_equal_p
has
        case 'p':
          if (maybe_ne (SUBREG_BYTE (x), SUBREG_BYTE (y)))
            return false;
          break;
).  Given the above rtx_equal_p snippet and that lra_rtx_hash
is solely used in invariant_hash (and recursion) and invariant_eq_p
uses rtx_equal_p we'll never consider different SUBREGs of the same thing
as the same invariant.

2025-03-18  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR rtl-optimization/119307
	* lra.cc (lra_rtx_hash): Handle SUBREG.

	* gcc.target/i386/pr119307.c: New test.

2 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/lra.cc b/gcc/lra.cc
index 8f30284..8c69917 100644
--- a/gcc/lra.cc
+++ b/gcc/lra.cc
@@ -1730,6 +1730,12 @@ lra_rtx_hash (rtx x)
     case CONST_INT:
       return val + UINTVAL (x);
 
+    case SUBREG:
+      val += lra_rtx_hash (SUBREG_REG (x));
+      for (int i = 0; i < NUM_POLY_INT_COEFFS; ++i)
+	val += SUBREG_BYTE (x).coeffs[i];
+      return val;
+
     default:
       break;
     }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr119307.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr119307.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6b56f6b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr119307.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* PR rtl-optimization/119307 */
+/* { dg-do compile { target x32 } } */
+/* { dg-require-profiling "-fprofile-generate" } */
+/* { dg-options "-Os -maddress-mode=long -fprofile-generate -ftrapv" } */
+
+_Complex int x;
+__int128 y;
+long n;
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+  x *= *(__int128 *) __builtin_memmove (&y, &x, n);
+}