aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJuzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>2023-11-23 18:55:03 +0800
committerPan Li <pan2.li@intel.com>2023-11-23 19:25:25 +0800
commit97ddebb6b4f6b132b0a8072b26d030077b418963 (patch)
tree861c87af9bed0a3147d4f494942be1da3e0f566c
parent256d64b3460807f33ff2f70e676801bdcf908c1c (diff)
downloadgcc-97ddebb6b4f6b132b0a8072b26d030077b418963.zip
gcc-97ddebb6b4f6b132b0a8072b26d030077b418963.tar.gz
gcc-97ddebb6b4f6b132b0a8072b26d030077b418963.tar.bz2
RISC-V: Refine some codes of riscv-v.cc[NFC]
This patch is NFC patch to refine unreasonable codes I notice. Tested on zvl128b/zvl256b/zvl512b/zvl1024b no regression. Committed. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv-v.cc (emit_vlmax_gather_insn): Refine codes. (emit_vlmax_masked_gather_mu_insn): Ditto. (modulo_sel_indices): Ditto. (expand_vec_perm): Ditto. (shuffle_generic_patterns): Ditto.
-rw-r--r--gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc54
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 36 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
index 7d3e803..24b09c0 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
@@ -294,8 +294,6 @@ public:
"vsetvl zero, rs1/imm". */
poly_uint64 nunits = GET_MODE_NUNITS (vtype_mode);
len = gen_int_mode (nunits, Pmode);
- if (!satisfies_constraint_K (len))
- len = force_reg (Pmode, len);
vls_p = true;
}
else if (can_create_pseudo_p ())
@@ -846,24 +844,6 @@ emit_vlmax_gather_insn (rtx target, rtx op, rtx sel)
}
else if (maybe_ne (GET_MODE_SIZE (data_mode), GET_MODE_SIZE (sel_mode)))
icode = code_for_pred_gatherei16 (data_mode);
- else if (CONST_VECTOR_P (sel)
- && GET_MODE_BITSIZE (GET_MODE_INNER (sel_mode)) > 16
- && riscv_get_v_regno_alignment (data_mode) > 1)
- {
- /* If the inner mode of data is not QI or HI and data_lmul > 1,
- emitting vrgatherei16.vv instruction will lower register
- pressure.
- data_mode sel_mode ei16
- RVVM1QI RVVM1QI RVVM2HI not needed
- RVVM2QI RVVM2QI RVVM4HI not needed
- RVVM2HI RVVM2HI RVVM2HI not needed
- RVVM2SI RVVM2SI RVVM1HI need
- RVVM4SI RVVM4SI RVVM2HI need
- RVVM8DI RVVM8DI RVVM2HI need */
- PUT_MODE (sel, get_vector_mode (HImode,
- GET_MODE_NUNITS (data_mode)).require ());
- icode = code_for_pred_gatherei16 (data_mode);
- }
else
icode = code_for_pred_gather (data_mode);
rtx ops[] = {target, op, sel};
@@ -877,13 +857,13 @@ emit_vlmax_masked_gather_mu_insn (rtx target, rtx op, rtx sel, rtx mask)
insn_code icode;
machine_mode data_mode = GET_MODE (target);
machine_mode sel_mode = GET_MODE (sel);
- if (maybe_ne (GET_MODE_SIZE (data_mode), GET_MODE_SIZE (sel_mode)))
- icode = code_for_pred_gatherei16 (data_mode);
- else if (const_vec_duplicate_p (sel, &elt))
+ if (const_vec_duplicate_p (sel, &elt))
{
icode = code_for_pred_gather_scalar (data_mode);
sel = elt;
}
+ else if (maybe_ne (GET_MODE_SIZE (data_mode), GET_MODE_SIZE (sel_mode)))
+ icode = code_for_pred_gatherei16 (data_mode);
else
icode = code_for_pred_gather (data_mode);
rtx ops[] = {target, mask, target, op, sel};
@@ -2703,15 +2683,21 @@ expand_vec_cmp_float (rtx target, rtx_code code, rtx op0, rtx op1,
return false;
}
-/* Modulo all SEL indices to ensure they are all in range if [0, MAX_SEL]. */
+/* Modulo all SEL indices to ensure they are all in range if [0, MAX_SEL].
+ MAX_SEL is nunits - 1 if rtx_equal_p (op0, op1). Otherwise, it is
+ 2 * nunits - 1. */
static rtx
-modulo_sel_indices (rtx sel, poly_uint64 max_sel)
+modulo_sel_indices (rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx sel)
{
rtx sel_mod;
machine_mode sel_mode = GET_MODE (sel);
poly_uint64 nunits = GET_MODE_NUNITS (sel_mode);
- /* If SEL is variable-length CONST_VECTOR, we don't need to modulo it. */
- if (!nunits.is_constant () && CONST_VECTOR_P (sel))
+ poly_uint64 max_sel = rtx_equal_p (op0, op1) ? nunits - 1 : 2 * nunits - 1;
+ /* If SEL is variable-length CONST_VECTOR, we don't need to modulo it.
+ Or if SEL is constant-length within [0, MAX_SEL], no need to modulo the
+ indice. */
+ if (CONST_VECTOR_P (sel)
+ && (!nunits.is_constant () || const_vec_all_in_range_p (sel, 0, max_sel)))
sel_mod = sel;
else
{
@@ -2761,9 +2747,7 @@ expand_vec_perm (rtx target, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx sel)
out-of-range indices, so we need to modulo all the vec_perm indices
to ensure they are all in range of [0, nunits - 1] when op0 == op1
or all in range of [0, 2 * nunits - 1] when op0 != op1. */
- rtx sel_mod
- = modulo_sel_indices (sel,
- rtx_equal_p (op0, op1) ? nunits - 1 : 2 * nunits - 1);
+ rtx sel_mod = modulo_sel_indices (op0, op1, sel);
/* Check if the two values vectors are the same. */
if (rtx_equal_p (op0, op1))
@@ -2772,15 +2756,13 @@ expand_vec_perm (rtx target, rtx op0, rtx op1, rtx sel)
return;
}
- rtx max_sel = gen_const_vector_dup (sel_mode, 2 * nunits - 1);
-
/* This following sequence is handling the case that:
__builtin_shufflevector (vec1, vec2, index...), the index can be any
value in range of [0, 2 * nunits - 1]. */
machine_mode mask_mode;
mask_mode = get_mask_mode (data_mode);
rtx mask = gen_reg_rtx (mask_mode);
- max_sel = gen_const_vector_dup (sel_mode, nunits);
+ rtx max_sel = gen_const_vector_dup (sel_mode, nunits);
/* Step 1: generate a mask that should select everything >= nunits into the
* mask. */
@@ -3282,15 +3264,15 @@ shuffle_generic_patterns (struct expand_vec_perm_d *d)
return false;
}
}
+ else if (riscv_get_v_regno_alignment (sel_mode) > 1
+ && GET_MODE_INNER (sel_mode) != HImode)
+ sel_mode = get_vector_mode (HImode, nunits).require ();
/* Success! */
if (d->testing_p)
return true;
rtx sel = vec_perm_indices_to_rtx (sel_mode, d->perm);
- /* 'mov<mode>' generte interleave vector. */
- if (!nunits.is_constant ())
- sel = force_reg (sel_mode, sel);
/* Some FIXED-VLMAX/VLS vector permutation situations call targethook
instead of expand vec_perm<mode>, we handle it directly. */
expand_vec_perm (d->target, d->op0, d->op1, sel);